Supply Chain Analysis for Plastic and Styrofoam To-Go Boxes
Melissa Greiman | Maddison Beckman
Agenda
Product-Driven Approach*
| Functional | Innovative | To-go boxes |
Product Life Cycle | More than 2 years | 3 months - 1 year | > 2 years |
Contribution Margin | 5 - 20% | 20 - 60% | <1% |
Avg. Margin of Error | 10% | 40 - 100% | <10% |
Avg. Stockout Rate | 1 - 2% | 10 - 40% | Do not stockout much |
Avg. Forced end-of-season markdown | 0% | 10 - 25% | 0% |
Lead time required for made-to-order products | 6 months - 1 year | 1 day - 2 weeks | <1 month lead time |
Product Variety | Low 10 - 20 variants | High offers millions of variants | Low |
*Adapted from “What in the RIght Supply Chain for a Product.” HBR 1993
So, Functional or Innovative?
Functional
Innovative
Market-Driven Approach
| Physically Efficient | Market-Responsive | To-go containers |
Primary Purpose | Supply predictable demand efficiently at the lower possible cost | Respond quickly to unpredictable demand in order to minimize stockouts, forced markdowns, and obsolete inventory | Demand can be predicted |
Manufacturing Focus | Maintain high average utilization rate | Deploy Excess buffer capacity | Can hold a great amount of containers at a low cost |
Inventory Strategy | Generate high turns and minimize inventory throughout the chain | Deploy significant buffer stocks of parts or finished goods | Buy a mass amount of containers at once |
Market-Driven Approach (con’t)
| Physically Efficient | Market-Responsive | To-go containers |
Lead-Time Focus | Shorten lead time as long as it doesn’t increase cost | Invest aggressively in ways to reduce lead time | Try not to increase costs greater |
Approach to Choosing Supplies | Select primarily for cost and quality | Select primarily for speed, flexibility, and quality | Cost and Quality |
Product Design Strategy | Maximize performance and minimize cost | Use modular design in order to postpone product differentiation for as long as possible | Cost effective and efficient |
So, Physically Efficient or Market Responsive?
Physically Efficient
Market Responsive
Supply Market Analysis for Biodegradable To-go Boxes
Side-by-Side Analysis for Styrofoam & Biodegradable To-go Boxes
Costs
Fazoli’s use on average 83,200 entrée to-go boxes a year
Ordering Costs
Ordering Costs (Styrofoam to-go boxes)
Cost per Case | $14.9911 |
# of Boxes in each Case | 20011 |
83,200 boxes
200 boxes per case
= 416 cases
416 cases X $14.99 per case = $6,235.84
Ordering Costs (Biodegradable to-go boxes)
Cost per Case | $33.99 |
# of Boxes in each Case | 200 |
83,200 boxes
200 boxes per case
= 416 cases
416 cases X $33.99 per case = $14,139.84
Triple Bottom Line Pyramid
Health Effects
Per Person Treatment Costs
Leukemia (AML)3 | $104,386 |
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
U.S. Population as of 2016 | 322,672,0186 |
Terre Haute Population as of 2016 | 60,7855 |
# of People Contracting AML Each Year | 60,1407 |
# of Restaurants in Terre Haute | 100 |
# of People in Terre Haute Contracting AML
= (# contracting/US Population)*TH Population
= (60,140/322,672,018)*(60,785)
≈ 11 people
Average Cost of AML per Person | $104,386 |
Cost of Treatment for 11 people
= Cost of AML per Person*11 people
= $104,386*11
≈ $1,148,286
Restaurant Contribution
= $1,148,286/# of Restaurants
= $1,148,286/100
≈ $11,482.46
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) - con’t
# of People in Terre Haute Contracting AML
= (# contracting/US Population)*TH Population
= (60,140/322,672,018)*(60,785)
≈ 11 people *
# of People Contracting AML from Benzene
= (# People in TH contracting AML * % of Benzene contribution to AML
11 people * 0.3613
≈ 4 people
Restaurant Contribution
= $417,544/# of Restaurants
= $417,544/100
≈ $4,175.44
Cost of Treatment for 4 people
= Cost of AML per Person*4 people
= $104,386*4
≈ $417,544
Triple Bottom Line Pyramid
Environmental Impacts of Styrofoam and Plastic
Environmental Costs Breakdown
Statewide disposal costs: $72 million per year for disposable cups and bags. 520,000 tons of material landfilled (50 tons recycled) multiplied by statewide average collection and disposal cost of $140 per ton.10
Fazoli’s Contribution to Disposal Costs = (# of to-go boxes*average weight)*Disposal Cost per Ton
= (83,200*0.000368*$140
= $4,286.46
.006% of Indiana landfills are filled with one year of Fazoli's to-go boxes.
30.6176(# of to-go boxes*average weight)/520,000(Total tons of material landfilled statewide)=0.00589%
Avg. Weight of Styrofoam To-go Box15 | 0.000368 |
# of Fazoli’s To-go Boxes | 83,200 |
Disposal Cost per Ton | $140 |
Costs
Fazoli’s use on average 83,200 entrée to-go boxes a year
Ordering Costs | $6,300 |
Health Costs | $4,200 |
Environmental and Cleanup Costs | $4,300 |
Total | 14,800 |
Disposal Costs for Biodegradable To-go Boxes
Statewide disposal costs: $72 million per year for disposable cups and bags. 520,000 tons of material landfilled (50 tons recycled) multiplied by statewide average collection and disposal cost of $140 per ton.10
Fazoli’s Contribution to Disposal Costs = (# of to-go boxes*average weight)*Disposal Cost per Ton
= (83,200*0.00084)*$98
= $6,849
People that Recycle (35%)16 =$6,849 * .65
=$4452
Avg. Weight of biodegradable To-go Box14 | 0.00084 tons |
# of Fazoli’s To-go Boxes | 83,200 |
Disposal Cost per Ton | $98* |
*140*.7=9817
Cost Savings from Biodegradable To-go Containers
Savings (Triple Bottom Line Considerations)*
Bottom Line (NPV) | (31,558.38) |
Triple Bottom Line (NPV) | (22,942.12) |
Payback Period | |
* Consistent with ISO 9000 (product quality), ISO 14000 (environmental aspects), and ISO 21000 (social regulations) quality standards
Environmental Benefits
Every ton of 100% Post-consumer waste recycled paper products you buy saves:
12 trees
1,087 pounds of solid waste
1,560 kilowatts of energy
1,196 gallons of water
1,976 lbs. of greenhouse gases
3 cubic yards of landfill space
390 gallons of oil12
Works Cited
[2] http://sustainability.wustl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Impacts-of-Styrofoam.pdf
[3] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11276372
[4] http://www.pdf.org/en/science_news/release/pr_1363095060
[5] https://suburbanstats.org/population/indiana/how-many-people-live-in-terre-haute
[7] http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/leuks.html
[8] http://www.pdf.org/en/parkinson_statistics
[10] http://www.earthresource.org/campaigns/capp/capp-economics.html
[12] http://www.earthresource.org/campaigns/capp/capp-styrofoam.html
[13] http://www.jstor.org/stable/40964683
[14] https://www.goodstartpackaging.com/9-x-9-x-3-single-compartment/
[15] http://www.genpak.com/product/hinged-carryout-containers/
[16] http://recycleacrossamerica.org/recycling-facts
Interesting Link:
Health Effects
Per Person Treatment Costs
Leukemia (AML)3 | $104,386 |
Parkinson’s4 | $22,800 |
Parkinson’s Disease
U.S. Population as of 2016 | 322,672,018 |
Terre Haute Population as of 2016 | 60,785 |
# of People Contracting Parkinson’s per Year | 60,0008 |
# of Restaurants in Terre Haute | 100 |
# of People in Terre Haute Contracting Parkinson’s
= (# contracting/US Population)*TH Population
= (60,000/322,672,018)*(60,785)
≈ 11 people
Average Cost of Parkinson’s per Person | $22,800 |
Cost of Treatment for 11 people
= Cost of Parkinson’s per Person*11 people
= $22,800*11
≈ $250,800
Restaurant Contribution
= $250,800/# of Restaurants
= $250,800/100
≈ $2,508