1 of 20

Mock CórdobaGalaxy formation for gravity and cosmology

Discussion session 1: Cosmology� 08.04.2019

2 of 20

The future of observational cosmology

  • What will be a standard cosmological analysis in 10 or 15 years? �
  • Multiple probes available:�- Clustering (BAO & RSD)�- Weak lensing (cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing)�- Galaxy Clusters�- Radio galaxies (Halpha and more)�- direct velocities catalogues�- GW sirens

Image credit: Max Tegmark

3 of 20

Mock catalogues requirements

  • What do we need mock catalogues for?�- Covariance matrices.�- Test cosmological/galaxy formation models with clustering measurements, environment, sat/central, etc�- Covariance of results inferred from different methods.�- Survey design & optimisation.
  • What types of mocks are required for the analysis of current and future surveys?�- Optical common but HI soon to arrive
  • Control against systematics effect, biases and degeneracies� �

4 of 20

Mock catalogues for multi-probe analyses

  • Joint clustering-lensing studies will require new mock catalogues�- (Galaxy) Halo + Density Field �
  • Can we use existing codes to generate these mocks? �
  • What else would we need?
  • GW/Kilonova host galaxies
  • velocity/radio surveys host (difficult selecyon functions)�

5 of 20

Mock CórdobaGalaxy formation for gravity and cosmology

Discussion session 2: Hydro-Galaxy Formation� 08.04.2019

6 of 20

Mocks from Hydro simulations

Galaxy clusters:

  • Masses of BCGs? Mismatch between observations and both semianalytic models and hydro simulations?
  • Dust? Modelling dust in simulations?

Small-scale structure:

  • Cosmological issues coming from small-scale structure: cores vs. cusps.
  • Dwarf galaxies in semianalytic models vs. dwarfs in hydro simulations.
  • Cosmological probes from low-mass galaxies.

Machine Learning:

  • Give up on physical insight in favor of Machine Learning?

7 of 20

Modified gravity

  • Breaking the degeneracy between baryonic physics and MG. What are the further steps?�
  • What are the key tests that we should focus on to rule out LCDM and /or a particular MG model?

  • Can we always parametrize deviations from GR into a single factor to be constrained with cosmological tests? (e.g. G factor in Cai’s talk)�
  • Can/should we include MG for approximate methods (COLA, scaling,...)?

  • Include lensing for f(R) simulations�
  • Many MG theories out there, not enough computational power. What should we simulate?

8 of 20

Mock CórdobaGalaxy formation for gravity and cosmology

Discussion session 3: Modified Gravity

09.04.2019

9 of 20

Mock CórdobaGalaxy formation for gravity and cosmology

Discussion session 4: Hydro-Galaxy Formation II� 09.04.2019

10 of 20

Topics for discussion

Neutrino masses: Current upper limits from Lyman-alpha forest + CMB are close to the lower bounds from ground experiments. But this result depends on our good understanding of hydro-simulations. What are the requirements and tests to validate such simulations?

HI-studies: What are the possible ways to use 21cm measurements to constrain cosmology, besides intensity mapping? Cross-correlations with other tracers? Learn about gas content of different tracers? f(R) or wDM simulations to check assembly bias effect? Illustris vs EAGLE

Galaxy colors in simulations: How well they reproduce observations?

11 of 20

Mock CórdobaGalaxy formation for gravity and cosmology

Discussion session 5: Mocks/Assembly Bias� 10.04.2019

12 of 20

Topics for discussion

  • How to improve SAMs to reproduce colours?
  • Update on MD-Galacticus sSFR vs Mstar plot
  • Multiple ways towards the same clustering, which one is right?
  • Assembly Bias: Fake News? Do we care for cosmology (HOD good enough?) ? How do we detect this in the real world? Halo mass estimates? Central vs satellite? Real-redshift space?
  • Approximate methods are fine (Martha et al.) for covariance for Euclid, do we stop worrying about running simulations?
  • Gender Bias in Science?!
  • The need to retune models when changing the N-body simulation. How do we improve the gender balance and diversity?
  • Easter egg hunt

13 of 20

14 of 20

Mock CórdobaGalaxy formation for gravity and cosmology

Discussion session 6: Voids, ELGs and lenses� 10.04.2019

15 of 20

Voids, ELGs and lenses

  • Should we introduce the effect that baryons have over haloes when populating DM only simulations with galaxies?
  • For cosmological studies, do we care about the physical details of nebular emission?
  • Imagine that in some years we have characterised the DE, then what?
  • Which new cosmological probes could be promising?
  • Is there anything more to do with voids aside probes based on galaxy cross correlation or abundance studies?
  • How much of the models that we want to test can be used in the treatment of systematics on cosmological probes?
  • Void interior properties, pristine structure ?
  • Feedback in void regions ?
  • Any chance to probe magnetogenesis models?
  • How extended are dark matter halos of small galaxy systems?
  • Is the search/characterisation of voids too optical-centric?
  • Anyone in favour of finish talks with the summary/conclusions?

16 of 20

Discussion Session - Cosmology

  • Competition/exchange lab experiments (e.g. testing gravity on small scales, quantum gravity, inhomogeneous DE)
  • Galaxies without DM
  • Combine cosmological probes -> galaxy clustering + lensing, intermediate scales, intrinsic alignments, systematic errors
  • Goals of future simulations, mocks for multiprobe analysis, parametrization of small scale physics
  • Do we have a small-scale problem?
  • Which new probes are most promising e.g. void abundance problematic, void lensing profile
  • Higher order statistics, BAO, Lyman-alpha gas physics, MG

17 of 20

Discussion Session - Cosmology

  • “Out of the box” statistics, VPF, shape distribution of voids, Minkowski functionals, machine learning
  • Machine learning applications, exchange with computer scientists

18 of 20

Galaxy Formation Group Session

19 of 20

Discussion Session: Galaxy Formation

Road map: HI-region / Angular momuntum / Bar formation / Environmental quenching / SAM improvement regarding HI / Bar formation in SAMs:

Conclusion question:

How to bar structures influence the starformation and the AGN feedback in HI-rich galaxies?

20 of 20

Problem:

  • Absence in HI in the center! HI-holes! Bars feed AGN or transport gas in the outskirts.
  • Morphology quenching: real or fake?
  • Bias in choosing galaxies! Blind survey!
  • What are the issues which make the starformation efficent or inefficient?

How should SAMs be improved?

bar formation, angular momentum, HI region (circular velocity profles to construct rotations curves)��Idea: include bars in SAMs!

What to do: Push SAM into a more complex direction regarding to HI modelling. ��Others: How to relate magnetic fields with bars?