1 of 18

2 of 18

Project Overview

Sponsor: PISCES LAB within UCSD’s Center for Energy Research (CER)

Problem Definition

  • Current TDS system is brought to atmospheric pressure to exchange samples
    • Limited number of samples tested per day

Project Objective:

  • Design a sample loading system
    • Test at least 5 samples per day

(Saul)

1

Current Testing Chamber

Heater

Quartz Tube

3 of 18

Final Design

(Brayden)

2

Quartz Tube

Port Aligner

Sample Transporter

Storage Actuator

Door

Gate Valve

Bellows

Thermocouple Actuator

Sample Testing Chamber

Connection to TDS System

Sample Loading Chamber

4 of 18

Sample Movement Process

(Jamie)

3

Sample Retrieval from Elevator

Delivering Sample

5 of 18

Key Design: Sample Holder

(Ethan)

4

  • Material: Quartz
  • 38.1 mm x 38.1 mm x 6.35 mm
  • Holds samples on the lip in a loose fit hole
    • Unpolished quartz is cut out
  • Sample face remains untouched
  • Can be manufactured for different sample sizes
    • Adjust hole size/shape

Sample Holder CAD

Acrylic Sample Holder

6 of 18

Key Design: Grabber

(Brayden)

5

  • Material: 304 Stainless Steel
  • Attaches to 2DOF horizontal actuator
    • Linear movement
    • Twisting of inner shaft opens and closes grabber
  • Outsourced to ProtoLabs

Grabber CAD

3D Printed Grabber

Grabber Animations

7 of 18

Key Design: Sample Pedestal

(Jamie)

6

  • Material: Quartz
  • Holds sample plate during TDS testing
  • Quartz rod at the end to attach pedestal to system
    • Keeps pedestal in the same place at all times

Pedestal CAD

Pedestal

Quartz Rod

Shaft Collars

Stainless Steel Rods

8 of 18

Key Design: Storage Elevator

(Leo)

7

  • Material: SS 304
  • Attaches to storage actuator
  • 8 sample slots
  • Modular Design

Elevator CAD

Final Elevator Assembly

Elevator Modular Pieces

9 of 18

Key Design: Thermocouple Manipulation

  • Thermocouple wire held with two 304 Stainless Holders

  • Allows for simple movement of thermocouple wire

(Ved)

8

Thermocouple Movement

Thermocouple Attachment

10 of 18

Testing Conditions

  • Validating sample loading capabilities
    • No heating or vacuum pressures
  • Unable to get all finalized parts due to long lead times:
    • Sample Transporter
      • Used actuator with same DOF, but with linear travel of 610 mm (24 in.) instead of 1 m
    • Quartz Tube
      • Used an acrylic tube in its place
    • Sample Holders
      • Used an acrylic sample holder

(Jamie)

9

Acrylic Sample Holder

Acrylic Testing Chamber

11 of 18

Hardware Demonstration: System Assembly

(Saul)

10

12 of 18

Hardware Performance: Grabber

  • Originally, aluminum rods (for the grabber prototype) were used to keep the entire grabber from rotating
    • Switched from aluminum to steel rods
  • Imperfect manufacturing from ProtoLabs

3D Printed Grabber Closing

Sample Transporter DOF

3D Printed Grabber Extending

(Brayden)

11

13 of 18

Hardware Performance: Thermocouple

  • Thermocouple wobbles slightly
  • 3D printed model bends too much, stainless attachment will not have this issue

(Ved)

12

Stainless Attachment

3D Printed Attachment

14 of 18

Hardware Performance

  • Still work to go with the grabber
    • Stainless grabber needs to be adjusted and implemented into the system
  • Need to practice more with the manual sample exchange
  • Limited visibility when retrieving samples from the elevator

(Ethan)

13

15 of 18

Remaining Questions and Concerns

Ease of Use

  • Manual use is somewhat difficult

Grabber

  • Grabber was designed for finalized sample transporter
  • Cannot test grabber on finalized sample transporter, will not be able to refine grabber

Thermocouple

  • Thermocouple tends to wobble, might not touch down in the same place each time it is lowered

(Saul)

14

16 of 18

Recommendations for the Future

  • Automate the sample loading system
  • Add method to stop rotation of the elevator
  • Mark locations on the storage actuator locations to stop
    • Ensure grabber slides easily into sample holder slot
  • Add quartz rod to add rigidity to the thermocouple wire

(Leo)

15

17 of 18

Thank you!

Any Questions?

18 of 18

Budget

  • Spent: $20,087.16
    • IdealVac: $4,337.17
    • Kurt J. Lesker: $3,530.09
    • Ferrovac: $7,197.00
    • ProtoLabs: $2,379.80
    • Technical Glass: $705.14
    • McMaster-Carr: $85.15
    • Table Components: $2,643.00
  • To Be Ordered:
    • Main Actuator: $5,965.00
    • Quartz Tube: $2,610.75
    • Quartz Pedestal: $640.00

  • Projected Spending: $29,507.88