8th International Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics in Heavy-ion Reactions
The effect of the entrance channels on the dynamics of the competition of processes of the nuclear reactions in heavy-ion collisions.
А.К. Nasirov1,2, B. M. Kayumov 2,3, G. A. Yuldasheva2, E.D. Khusanov2,4
1Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, JINR, Dubna, Russia
2Institute of Nuclear Physics, Academy of Science of Uzbekistan
3New Uzbekistan University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
4National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent
August 21-25, 2026, Shanxi, China
Content
2
3
History: International School-Seminar on Heavy Ion Physics in Dubna, Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions, JINR, September 1993.
Vadim Volkov, Gurgen Adamian, Nikolai Antonenko,
and Avazbek Nasirov
Avazbek Nasirov, Gurgen Adamian, Wolf Udo Schroeder, Evgeni Cherepanov, and Nikolai Antonenko,
The authors of the dinuclear system model: N.V. Antonenko, E.A. Cherepanov, A.K. Nasirov, V.P. Permjakov, V.V. Volkov
Reasons causing a hindrance to formation of the evaporation residues in synthesis of the superheavy elements complete fusion.
Competition between quasifission and formation of the compound nucleus is the other reason causing decreasing of the probability of synthesis of superheavy elements. The quasifission is dominant in cold fusion processes.
4
N.V. Antonenko, V.V. Volkov, E.A. Cherepanov, A.K. Nasirov, V.P. Permyakov
Phys.Lett. B 319 (1993) p.425; Phys.Rev.C 51, (1995) p.2635. For first time
Fusion
Quasifission
PCN=1
Two different mechanisms of the complete fusion.
Multinucleon transfer mechanism of the complete fusion
6
[Phys. Scripta 24, 113 (1981); Nucl. Phys. A 376, 275 (1982)] and
extra-extra push model [J. Błocki, H. Feldmeier, W.J. Świątecki, Nucl. Phys. A 459 (1986) 145.] was suggested to describe the experimental values of the fusion cross sections in the reactions with the massive nuclei.
2. The models in this direction have been developed later to include the dynamical effects at calculation of the nucleus-nucleus potential:
Washiyama K. and Lacroix D. Phys. Rev. C 78 024610 (2008)
Washiyama K., Lacroix D. and Ayik S. Phys. Rev. C 79 024609 (2009)
Long Zhu et al., Nucl. Phys. A 915, 90–105 (2013).
3. ….
The hindrance to complete fusion in the nuclear reactions of the heavy ion
collisions is seen from the calculations of the fusion cross sections which
depend on the nucleus-nucleus interaction potential.
7
Synthesis of Superheavy element | ||
Atomic number, Symbol | Country of synthesis | Year of synthesis |
Z=108, Hs, Hassnium | Germany | 1982 |
Z=109, Mt, Meitnerium | Germany | 1984 |
Z=110, Ds, Darmstadtium | Germany | 1995 |
Z=111, Rg, Roentgenium | Germany | 1995 |
Z=112, Cn, Copernicium | Germany | 1996 |
Z=113, Nh, Nihonium | Japan | 2004 |
Z=114, Fl, Flerovium | Russia | 2000 |
Z=115, Mc, Moscovium | Russia | 2003 |
Z=116, Lv, Livermorium | Russia | 2004 |
Z=117, Ts, Tessnium | Russia | 2010 |
Z=118, Og, Oganesson | Russia | 2006 |
Appearance of the hindrance to complete fusion (PCN< 1) in the nuclear reactions of the heavy ion collisions.
8
Incomplete fusion (ICN)
F1
F2
LICN
E*ICN
Potential energy surface of for two colliding nuclei
9
Main reaction channels of the heavy ion collisions
9
Incomplete fusion (ICN)
F1
F2
LICN
E*ICN
Mass-energetic distribution �of the binary products
Deep inelastic collisions
Quasifission
Fusion-fission
The dinuclear system concept assumes that nucleon transfer between two nuclei is main mechanism of the nuclear reactions in heavy-ion collisions at the around Coulomb barrier energies.
Superheavy elements
Sketch of the reaction mechanisms:
dinuclear system, mononucleus and compound nucleus are always
have alternative ways for their evolution.
Beam
Detectors
11
Meenu Thakur et al. Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 133 (2017)
About mixing of the reaction products in different reaction channels
“Competing asymmetric fusion-fission and quasifission in neutron-deficient sub-lead nuclei”, S. Gupta, ..., A.K. Nasirov, G.A. Yuldasheva, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135297 (2020).
12
12
Classical equations of the radial and tangential motions with the friction coefficients which are calculated microscopically.
13
E*DNS
Theoretical framework for the charge and mass distributions
Master equation:
A.K.Nasirov, B.M.Kayumov, O.K.Ganiev, G.A.Yuldasheva, Phys. Lett. B, 842, 137976, 2023
The proton number in
the light fragment
The proton number
in the heavy fragment
Calculation of the yields of the quasifission products at breakup of the dinuclear system
16
Nasirov A.K. et al. Eur. Phys. Jour. A 34, 325 (2007)
γ = 8 · 10 − 22 MeV sec − 1
A.K. Nasirov INP
Role of quasifission in fission fragment mass distributions for �the 28Si + 197Au reaction.
17
The role of the quasifission contribution in the dependence of the width of the mass distribution of fission-like products on the collision energy.
18
19
20
P
21
b
18O
18O
4He
4He
165Ho
165Ho
179Ta
E*DNS
E*’DNS
Incomplete fusion
E*’’DNS
Calculation of the incomplete fusion cross section
А.К.Nasirov, et. al. Phys. Lett. B 942 (2023) 137976
A.K. Nasirov INP
The role of the orbital angular momentum
22
A,Z
AC, ZC
Conjugate
nucleus
Application of the dinuclear system model for the interpretation of the experimental data measured at the Inter-University Accelerator Centre (IUAC), New Delhi by the group of �Prof. Indranil Mazumdar from Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India.
23
A.K. Nasirov INP
The appearance of the hindrance to complete fusion in reactions with the light nuclei due to centrifugal forces in collisions with the large impact parameters.
24
16O+130Te
L=40 h
R=Rm(Z)
Z,A
Ztot-Z
R
(A.K. Nasirov et al. Physics Letters B 842: 137976 (2023))
25
26
Solutions of the transport master equations for the evolution and decay dinuclear system formed in reaction 18O+165Ho.
(A.K. Nasirov et al. Physics Letters B 842: 137976 (2023))
Comparison of the results by dinuclear system model and PACE4 code used in Ref. Avinash Agarwal, et al. Phys.Rev.C103-034602 (2021).
27
Fig.6. from Avinash Agarwal, et al. Phys.Rev.C103, 034602 (2021).
Comparison of theoretical result (curve) of this work with experimental data (squares).
A.K. Nasirov INP
28
Differences in the cross sections of the evaporation residues of the same superheavy elements, obtained
for cold and hot fusion reactions, shows the dependence of the fission barrier on neutron numbers.
Fission barrier of the superheavy elements
as a function of their neutron numbers.
48Ca+232Th
Nc=170
64Ni+208Pb,
Nc=162
64Ni+209Bi, Nc=160
48Ca+237Np
Nc=172
Ncomp=170
Ncomp=160
PHYSICAL REVIEW C 110, 014618 (2024)
A.K.N., A. R. Yusupov, and B. M. Kayumov. Small cross section of
the synthesis of darmstadtium in the 48Ca+232Th reaction.
M. Kowal, et al. Phys.Rev.C 82, 014303 (2010).
Conclusion
29
1. Experience of the synthesis of superheavy elements shows that there is
a huge hindrance for complete fusion of the colliding nuclei as a function of
the mass asymmetry of the entrance channel.
2. The hindrance to fusion increases by the increase of the angular momentum
of collision.
3. Incomplete fusion occurs as the hindrance to complete fusion in collisions with
the angular momentum of collision.
4. Complete fusion occurs by multinucleon transfer through the neck connecting
two fragments of dinuclear system.
A.K. Nasirov INP
Thank you for your attention !
30
Calculation of the competition between complete fusion and quasifission: Pcn(EDNS,L).�Influence of the nuclear shell effects are in intrinsic barrier B*fus and in YZ charge (mass) distributions.
31
Kayumov B.M., Ganiev O.K., A.K. N, G.A. Yuldasheva
Phys. Rev. C 105, 014618 (2022)
Nasirov A.K. et al. Nuclear Physics A 759 (2005) 342.
Fazio G. et al, Modern Phys. Lett. A 20 (2005) p.391
E*DNS(Z)=Ec.m.-Vmin+(BP+BT) -(BZ+Bztot-z)
BP,BT, BZ, Bztot-z are binding energies of the colliding nuclei
and fragments of the dinuclear system.
Shell structure data of nuclei are included
into calculation of potential energy surface due
to these quantities.