Promising Approaches in Gender Transformative Education
Gaps between girls & boys in education are narrowing
Yet gender gaps later in life are still pronounced
Gender gaps in education may no longer be linked to gender gaps in income
Source: United Nations Development Programme, 2023 Gender Social Norms Index Report
Gender Transformative Education (GTE) can help
Gender Transformative Education challenges and overturns harmful gender norms and inequalities. A gender-transformative approach activates all parts of an education system to ensure that learners have access to inclusive, gender equal, and safe schools, while transforming harmful gendered stereotypes, attitudes, norms and practices. It addresses the root causes of inequality and the systems of oppression that hold back learners in all their diversity, in particular girls, minorities and the most vulnerable.
Source: United Nations Girls' Education Initiative (UNGEI). Definition based on Gender transformative education: reimagining education for a more just and inclusive world, Plan International, UNGEI, UNICEF, Transform Education
Promoting positive gender norms and preventing violence against children in schools in Uganda: Lessons from practice
Devin Faris, Violence Against Children Prevention Director
Promoting positive gender norms & preventing violence against children in schools in Uganda: Lessons from practice
Intervention: The Good School Toolkit, a whole school intervention to prevent violence against children and adolescents (GST-S) - Uganda
Purpose: Reduce student chances of experiencing violence at school, promote healthy relationships, improve student voice/leadership. �
Data & Methods (post GST RCT): GST-S systematic adaptation: formative study (4 schools); Pilot RCT (8 schools); practice-based insights from scale
3. Measure 3: Practice-based learning/L&A (RRP study forthcoming)
Uganda
Promoting positive gender norms & preventing violence against children in schools in Uganda: Lessons from practice
Key Findings (Adaptation Process):
Emerging Lessons from Practice:
What works to end gender stereotypes through schools? Emerging evidence from global majority countries
Antara Ganguli, UN Girls’ Education Initiative (UNGEI) Director
“The thought of equality is there at our home, but it has to go outside the home. This is what this programme has triggered for our school and community (parent from India).”
"As a girl, I heard I did not need to focus on studying; marriage and household chores were my path. This project showed me girls can be independent and have equal rights. I've learned to pursue my dreams and goals." (grade 8 student from Bangladesh)
Intervention: i) demonstrate how play, reflection and activity-based curricula on gender stereotypes shifts students’ and teachers’ attitudes and beliefs around restrictive gender norms in Bangladesh, India and Niger; ii) build evidence and momentum to institutionalize such curricula and pedagogy; iii) drive research and learning agenda through a coalition of partners.
Purpose: To drive momentum around ending gender stereotypes in schools, ultimately contributing to gender equality in and through education.
Data & Methods: Comparative baseline and endline surveys applied over ca. 6 months:
•9714 students (45% girls) of grade 3 to 10 from 60 schools in India, Bangladesh and Niger; and
•423 trained teachers (36% women) on play/reflection-based curricula reached.
Bangladesh
India
Niger
Key Findings:
Key lessons from 10 case studies from 11 countries from Asia and Africa developed together with global Partner Coalition to End Gender Stereotypes (30 members). |
Integrating gender transformative approaches into comprehensive sexuality education in the US: Preliminary findings from an RCT in Washington D.C.
Rachel Katz, Program Associate
Intervention: Sex ed curriculum (16-hours), all genders, 15-19 years, English and Spanish, grounded in critical thinking, gender role deconstruction, and interpersonal power dynamics; digital component
Topics: gender and identity, emotions, power and relationships, sexuality in the media, STI prevention, contraception, and accessing health services
Purpose: Increase positive sexual and reproductive health (SRH) behaviors and gender equitable relationships, avoiding fear, shame, and stigma
Outcomes: consistent use of condoms and contraceptives; use of SRH services; sexual agency (communication and consent)
Data & Methods: RCT; 700 youth; control job readiness curriculum; in Latin American Youth Center, charter & public schools
Integrating GTE into comprehensive sexuality education in the US: Preliminary findings from an RCT in Washington DC
Washington, DC, USA
Integrating GTE into comprehensive sexuality education in the US: Preliminary findings from an RCT in Washington DC
Program H Key Findings:
Many Ways of Being Preliminary Findings:
159 youth
“We would use posters…for what people expect from men and women. And also for nonbinary people…Like on the men’s side, a stereotype would be how they’re not supposed to show their feelings and they’re supposed to be powerful and dominant in public. And this could be hurtful…or lead to depression.” - MWB participant
Gender Transformative Education Systems: Pathway to a gender-equitable world
Sunita Menon, Senior Director
Intervention:
ØDirect implementation of gender transformative education system in 2 states of Punjab & Odisha
Ø Capacities of 66,000 teachers; state and district officials built to bring gender equitable behaviour in the classroom
Ø Impact 4 million adolescents from class VI to X with a gender equity curriculum by 2028.
ØBuild an environment where girls can thrive across 35,000 schools through parental engagement and School Management Committees
ØAdvocate for a gender transformative education system nationwide
Gender Transformative Education Systems: Pathway to a gender-equitable world
Purpose:
Data & Methods:
by JPAL & BT
Agenda set Gender and Education with central and state govt and larger civil society.
Gender Transformative Education Systems: Pathway to a gender-equitable world
What are the promises of GTE?
in the short-term? In the long-term? In regards to evidence?
What are the potential pitfalls / risks of GTE to guard against?
Where do we go from here — how do we further the GTE agenda?