1 of 18

MCBK Trust and Policy WG��Co-Chairs:�Josh Richardson, PhD, MS, MLIS, FAMIA�Tony Solomonides, PhD, MSc, FAMIA��February 29, 2024

2 of 18

Trust and Policy Working Group Charter

  • Understand the current CBK landscape as it relates to trust, governance of CBK, and policies for CBK.
  • Identify roles and opportunities for the MCBK community in promoting transparency and trust.
  • Define attributes of and potentially develop prototypes for CBK “product information labels” that would promote transparency of trust.
  • Develop model governance structures.
  • Make recommendations for measuring and evaluating trust and transparency of CBK artifacts, implementation, and evaluation.�

2

3 of 18

2023 MCBK T&P WG Activities

3

4 of 18

Considerations when Representing Trust in CBK

Jamie McCusker

Director of Data Operations at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and co-chair of the MCBK Technical Standards and Infrastructure Workgroup

Josh Richardson

Research Scientist at RTI International and co-chair of the MCBK Trust and Policy Workgroup

February 15, 2023

5 of 18

Purpose

  • To present the outcomes of MCBK Technical Standards & Infrastructure discussions and articulate the principles necessary to support a technical infrastructure for applying CBK at scale, and with it, the larger learning cycle infrastructure.
  • To identify infrastructure characteristics that can lead to the dissemination of trustworthy, open knowledge objects within an LHS.
  • To present the FAIR + T(rust) O(penness) framework

6 of 18

Questions We Discussed

  • What are any CBK-MM governance needs that the T&P should tackle?
    • Charter
    • SOP
    • RACI
  • What would help the CBK-MM effort achieve its goals while also not being (too) interruptive?
  • What specifically from W3 governance should CBK-MM reference or mirror?
  • What’s feasible given the volunteer basis of the T&P?
  • Other?

7 of 18

Presented AMIA 2023 Poster

  • Concept maps of an ontology to arrive at an interchange language for CBK metadata
  • Minimum information to structure, describe, and access CBK resources
  • Targeted key constituencies from knowledge creators to knowledge publishers and managers, to knowledge end users

8 of 18

How do CBK, CDS, and GenAI relate?

8

CBK

GenAI

CDS

create

apply

monitor

  • The evidence-based medicine (EBM) movement was a reaction to the weaknesses of “expert opinion”.

        • It’s more important to see what the data point to than to sift through mutually contradictory expert assertions.

  • Did we lose anything in this shift in focus?

  • Why is trust such a major issue in AI?

9 of 18

Why develop a CBK “nutrition label”

  • Increase transparency of how knowledge is/was created and maintained
  • Promote trust among multiple stakeholders: developers, implementers, end users, etc.
  • Enable effective regulation of knowledge
  • Better protect intellectual property

10 of 18

Forthcoming mandate for a “nutrition label”?

11 of 18

Previous Work on Dataset “Nutrition Label”

12 of 18

Sendak et al.’s “Model Facts Label” for AI/ML

13 of 18

Dr. Robert Reid Webinar Presentation

14 of 18

15 of 18

16 of 18

Met with MCBK T&P UK (December 2023)

Events:

  • Launch meeting October 2019
  • Participation in MCBK sessions at MIE May 2023, MedInfo July 2023, MCBK NA events & UK national meetings, bimonthly NHSE-NICE “Maximising use of evidence and knowledge” discussions
  • First ever global knowledge collaborathon (“hackday”) with Health Data Research UK, 2021
  • Two computable guideline hackdays with NICE, 2022 & 2023
  • Workshop on regulation of knowledge objects, London, February 2023
  • Annual conference 2023
  • Workshop on eForms and GP templates at FCI conference, Manchester Nov ‘23

Publications:

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1pl-C6WEU0dbXGnuLoZsNkvvORCo6ezAduH_RYX3aceU/edit?usp=sharing

17 of 18

Accomplishments

  • Understand the current CBK landscape as it relates to trust, governance of CBK, and policies for CBK.
    • Reid presentation
  • Identify roles and opportunities for the MCBK community in promoting transparency and trust.
    • Partnering with the CBK-MM initiative
  • Define attributes of and potentially develop prototypes for CBK “product information labels” that would promote transparency of trust.
    • Discussed characteristics of CBK label design
  • Develop model governance structures.
    • Partnering with the CBK-MM initiative
  • Make recommendations for measuring and evaluating trust and transparency of CBK artifacts, implementation, and evaluation.
    • TBD

18 of 18

MCBK Trust & Policy WG Meetings

  • All are welcome to join!
  • Meets 1-hour monthly
    • 3rd Wednesday of each month
    • 12-1pm EST
  • We value ideas around discussion, presentation, and joint efforts
  • Co-chairs
    • Josh Richardson: jrichardson@rti.org
    • Tony Solomonides: tony.solomonides@gmail.com

18