Why aquatic plants are important to a healthy lake and what we can do to manage (or try and live with) invasive aquatic plants
Jesse Vermaire
Environmental Science
& Geography and Environmental Studies, Carleton University
URLA 2023
Nearshore environment
Littoral zone
Macrophyte Growth Forms
Macrophytes have 3 distinct growth forms
1) Emergent
2) Submerged
3) Floating
wetlandinfo.ehp.qld.gov.au
Potamogeton spp. (Pondweeds)
Myriophyllum spp. (Milfoil)
Vallisneria spp. (Tape grass)
Ceratophyllum spp. (Coontail)
Elodea spp. (Common water weed)
Controls on Submerged Macrophyte Growth
(biomass is greatest at slopes <5% and plants cannot grow at slopes ~>15-20%)
Kalff 2002
Ecological Importance
Simple model of ecological interactions in lakes
Aquatic plants
Turbidity
Algae
Nutrients
Zooplank
Allelopathic
Waves
Fish
Water
Depth
Resusp.
Sed.
Scheffer et al 1993 TREE
Regime Shifts in Shallow Lakes
Scheffer 1993
Turbid lake
Clear lake
Ecological
Transition
Interest in:
Regime Shifts:
Too much of a good thing
What can cause excessive macrophyte growth?
Hydrological or water level changes
Macrophyte removal permits in Rideau Canal
Figure 4. Expected climate change responses of key lake ecosystem processes. Shown are the level of additional risk to ...
BioScience, biac052, https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac052
The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.
Global warming
Longer growing season and warmer water temperatures can increase the likelihood of algae blooms.��What about aquatic plants?
Orchard Lake, Wisconsin
2011
2012
2013
2014
4-year Average
Plant Biovolume over 4 years
Earlier ice-off can lead to more macrophyte growth
Brownification of lakes
Meyer-Jacob, C., et al. Sci Rep 9, 16676 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52912-0
�
Invasive aquatic plant management
Eurasian watermilfoil
Invasive aquatic plant management
Zooplankton communities change where aquatic plants are removed
Can native aquatic plants re-establish?
Biodegradable benthic barriers (Gatineau Park with NCC)
3000m2 of coverage in Fall 2022
Good side
Bad side
RVCA
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
2002
2011
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
0
20
40
60
80
100
1999
2011
0
1
2
3
4
Fish Index of Biotic Integrity
0
1
2
3
4
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
2
4
6
8
10
Years
Poor
Excellent
Bird Index of Biotic Integrity
Ecological
health
Water Quality Index
Ecological
health
Poor
Excellent
Benthic Invertebrate Index
1999
2011
Years
2000
2011
Years
Upper watershed
Middle watershed
Lower watershed
Credit Valley Conservation
Conservation efforts work
Evidence for improving ecosystem health at the subwatershed scale
Thank you