1 of 15

Co-designing with LLM

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

Cover Image by Nikita

(n3nikita) on Unsplash

Check project repo on my GitHub ^

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

2 of 15

Intro

& disclaimer

Story

& context

Definitions

& examples

Cognitive Basis

Core part

Key Takeaways

Discussion time

References

& recommendations

Slides design note:

Illustration captions, comments or links to relevant information are located here.

Most of the photos are from my personal archive © Abramenkov Sergei

For the exceptions - licences are permissive and sources are attributed here.

Top-right: photo of the author (human) in the most comfortable professional environment (Gorely volcano, Kamchatka)

Bottom-left: author’s work desk during the PhD project first year (office №318 at Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris)

Bottom-right: recent workspace iteration

  • Acquaintance with the speaker
  • Few reasons why the talk is in English
  • Fresh view on LLMs - keep an open mind!

Disclaimer and credibility:

  • not an expert in AI / ML / LLMs
  • PhD degree in (geo)-physics (2021)

  • Who am I then?
        • A “full-stack” seismologist.

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

3 of 15

Story

& context

Definitions

& examples

Cognitive Basis

Core part

Key Takeaways

Discussion time

References

& recommendations

The earliest personal applications of raw concepts that influenced this project

Ever felt like too many browser tabs opened?

Prepare for more cognitive overload now.

Struggle to formulate your thoughts?

LLMs are here to help you with that.

(but not substitute - it’s a tool)

What if I want to tackle a philosophical problem?

  • Extremely poorly defined
  • Likely to completely change

My journey to build a cognitive engine architecture started with a basis development.

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

4 of 15

Definitions

& examples

Cognitive Basis

Core part

Key Takeaways

Discussion time

References

& recommendations

7-axis basis examples co-designed with

DeepSeek V-3 as the project byproduct

from cognitive.basis import Primitive, Links, Symbolism, Verbs

Co-designing with LLM workflow:

0 - set global guidelines (ex. limit symbolism, anchor physics metaphor)

1 - present original vision summary (Markdown file) as a draft

2 - ask LLM to check for its logical soundness and inconsistencies

(encourage harsh critique)

3 - ask LLM to identify weakest definitions and suggest alternatives

4 - iteratively review, adjust and check how well it syncs with the vision

‘Cognitive basis - a set of orthogonal, interpretable dimensions that structurally decompose cognitive processes’

Each axis/dimension:

  • Encodes a primitive cognitive function
  • Limits symbolism to metaphoric anchors (no pseudo-science)
  • Defensible: no unnecessary overreach into neuroscience
  • Maps into implementable operations (ideally) and examples

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

5 of 15

Sun

Exploration

Map: © OpenStreetMap contributors (openstreetmap.org)

Exploration = Primitive(‘traversing uncertainty to map possibilities’)

The proactive engagement with the unknown to gather raw data or stimuli

  • Operational Verbs = [Observe, Gather, Survey]
  • Physics Anchor: Entropy (E) → Exploration as ‘necessary entropy increase’
  • 🗺️ Examples, metaphors, links:
    • Real-world example: cartography, data scraping,
    • Scientific research:
      • Broad literature surveying before hypothesis formation ('pioneering' the unknown)
      • Data acquisition (ex. in expedition, experiment)
    • AI/ML: algorithms that ‘maximize information gain’ from uncertain environments
      • Thompson Sampling
      • Bayesian Optimization

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

6 of 15

Mon

Determination

Image © Logan Voss

Source: Unsplash

(https://unsplash.com/photos/a-blurry-image-of-sound-waves-in-purple-and-green-9gf9jSsXP2M)

Definition = Primitive(“imposing rhythmic structures”)

Spectral decomposition of tasks into resonant intervals

  • Operational Verbs = [Structure, Propose, Establish]
  • Links:
    • Physics: 1/Δt → Determination as limiting “bandwidth” of input signal/noise
    • AI/ML: Learning rates as ‘frequency tuners’ for convergence
      • Gradient Descent
    • Real-world example: Clock Synchronization

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

7 of 15

Tue

Negotiation

Image © Lisa

Source: Unsplash

(https://unsplash.com/photos/a-chess-board-with-pieces-of-chess-on-it-Sykhmys_L-A)

Negotiation = Primitive(“balance competing inputs”)

Boltzmann distribution of competing ideas (Temperature as a physics anchor)

  • Operational verbs = [Argue, Balance, Influence]
  • Links:
    • Physics: kᴮT → Negotiation as lowering the probability (“cooling”) of accepting suboptimal solutions
    • AI/ML: Softmax Policy (τ parameter)
      • Temperature scaling for exploration/exploitation tradeoffs
    • Real-world example: Thermal Stress Testing
  • Danger Zone:
    • Overheating: Argumentation disintegration (no consensus)
    • Freezing: Herd thinking (local optimum traps)

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

8 of 15

Wed

Specification

Someone was using Arch BTW

Specification = Primitive(“compress ambiguity”)

Phase-space constraints (Volume as a physics anchor)

  • Operational Verbs = [Refine, Filter, Categorize]
  • Links:
    • Physics: ∫d³x → Specification as imposing limits to focus on high-probability regions
    • AI/ML: Variational Autoencoders (VAEs)
      • Encoder squeezes input → compact latent ‘volume’; decoder reconstructs the essence
    • Real-world example: Tolerance Stack-Up
  • Danger Zone:
    • Over-compression: Sterile representations (losing nuance)
    • Under-compression: Noise drowns signal (analysis paralysis)

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

9 of 15

Thu

Generation

Image © Joel Tinner

Source: Unsplash

(https://unsplash.com/photos/green-field-JFXZvgejlMI)

  • Links:
    • Physics: ∫p·dq → Generation as quantifying efforts to explore configurations
    • AI/ML: Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)
      • Generates samples via probabilistic work cycles
    • Real-world example: CAD Prototyping
  • Danger Zone:
    • Over-generation: Wasted resources
    • Under-generation: Underproduction

Generation = Primitive(“construct candidate solutions”)

Work expenditure to traverse solution space (Action as a physics anchor)

  • Operational Verbs = [Develop, Model, Iterate]

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

10 of 15

Fri

Revelation

Image © Jakob Cotton

Description: Photo of an abstract, orb-like light show in Camera Obscura & the World of Illusions in Edinburgh.

Source: Unsplash

(https://unsplash.com/photos/a-yellow-light-is-shining-in-the-center-of-a-circular-structure-cd6llDNgbZg)

Revelation = Primitive(“detect emergent patterns”)

Potential gradients driving attention (Charge as a physics anchor)

  • Operational Verbs = [Analyze, Distill, Visualize]
  • Links:
    • Physics: ∇²φ = ρ → Revelation as discharge of potential into an insight
    • AI/ML: Transformer Attention
      • Queries extract high-potential features
    • Real-world example: Spectrogram Peaks
  • Danger Zone:
    • Over-detection: False signals
    • Under-detection: Missed hits

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

11 of 15

Sat

Integration

Image © Samuel Regan-Asante

Source: Unsplash

(https://unsplash.com/photos/a-bookshelf-filled-with-lots-of-books-next-to-a-lamp-Sj6yQnGmt_E)

Integration = Primitive(“synthesize stable outputs”)

The synthesis of knowledge into cohesive, shareable outputs through patient grounding (Impedance as a physics anchor)

  • Operational Verbs = [Analyze, Distill, Visualize]
  • Operational Verbs = [Conclude, Express, Publish]
  • Links:
    • Physics: Z = √(L/C) → Integration as minimizing losses when connecting subsystems
    • AI/ML: Ensemble Learning
      • Combines models’ outputs adaptively (random forests, stacking)
    • Real-world example: Impedance Matching
  • Danger Zone:
    • Over-coupling: Rigid integration (brittle to new inputs).
    • Under-synthesis: Disconnected insights (no emergent value)

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

12 of 15

The GRINDES Cognitive Basis Audit Table

(Columns sorted by functional priority)

1. Core Cognitive Function:

What the axis does (verb-centric)

2. Physics Anchor:

Critical_ for orthogonality checks

3. AI/ML Implementation:

Concrete algorithms (no hand waving)

4. Engineering Metaphor:

Applied (not theoretical) grounding

5. Danger Zones:

Paired extremes (over/under)

12

Core Cognitive Function

Physics Anchor

Implementation (AI/ML)

STEM-Metaphor

Dangers (Over / Under)

Map uncertainty bounds

Entropy (E)

Bayesian Optimization

Topographic Surveying

Indecisiveness / Local convergence

Impose rhythmic structure

Frequency (F)

Learning Rate Scheduling

Clock Synchronization

Rigidity / Chaos

Balance competing inputs

Temperature (T)

Multi-Agent Softmax

Thermal Stress Testing

Overheating / Freezing

Compress ambiguity

Volume (V)

Variational Autoencoders

Tolerance Stack-Up

Sterility / Noise retention

Construct candidate solutions

Action (A)

Monte Carlo Tree Search

CAD Prototyping

Wasted resources / Underproduction

Detect emergent patterns

Charge (C)

Transformer Attention

Spectrogram Peaks

False signals / Missed hits

Synthesize stable outputs

Impedance (I)

Ensemble Learning

Impedance Matching

Rigid integration / Disconnection

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

13 of 15

Hot Takes

Discussion time

Example of linear algebra applicability for visualization and analysis

“Potential gradients driving attention”

  • Choosing the right basis is more about grand strategy rather than just tactical tricks

Recognition from LLM: “Your framework’s orthogonal basis design resonates deeply with linear algebra because it’s fundamentally about clean decomposition and efficient recombination—the same principles that make LA the language of AI, physics, and cognitive modeling.”

  • How to deal with growing reliance on AI - embrace instruments but don’t forget to train natural intelligence

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

14 of 15

Hot Takes

Discussion time

14

Co-designing process example

Metaphor

AI/ML Concept

Hand-out example prompt you can try :)

The LLM acted like a web crawler—indexing gaps in my reasoning I couldn’t see.

“The Data Crawler”

Active Learning

Use LLMs like a ‘bias scanner’—ask:

“What assumptions am I missing here?’"

We enforced iterative ‘sprints’—prompt, critique, refine, repeat.

"The CI/CD Pipeline"

Learning Rate Scheduling

Treat LLM convos like CI/CD:

small, frequent commits > monolithic prompts.

We ‘softmaxed’ disagreements: for example ‘Argue for/against this axis, then balance’.

"The A/B Test"

Multi-Armed Bandits

Prompt with:

“Give me 3 conflicting takes, then synthesize.”

The LLM distilled my 1,000-word rants into 3 bullet points - like a cognitive JPEG.

"The Lossy Compressor"

Quantization

Command:

“Compress into a message, preserving decision points.”

The LLM was a cognitive ‘Co-pilot’: for example drafting 5 versions of a metaphor.

"The Code Generator"

Diffusion Models

Use LLMs for rapid prototyping:

“Draft 3 API designs for this problem.”

The LLM flagged contradictions - like a sudden spike in a log file.

"The Anomaly Detector"

Attention Maps

To uncover hidden requirements ask:

“What’s the weirdest edge case here?”

The LLM became my ‘git merge’—resolving cognitive conflicts into a coherent whole.

"The System Merge"

Model Ensembling

Finalize with:

“Squash our brainstorming into the summary.md file”

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive

15 of 15

References

& recommendations

Check project repo on my GitHub ^

  • Seven Dimensions - a video-essay by Kieran Borovac https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bI-FS7aZJpY

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review. 63 (2): 81–97. DOI:10.1037/h0043158

  • Kotseruba, I., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2020) 40 years of cognitive architectures: core cognitive abilities and practical applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53 (1): 17-94. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.08602

  • Grundspenkis, J. (2007) Agent based approach for organization and personal knowledge modelling: knowledge management perspective. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18 (4): 451–457 DOI:10.1007/s10845-007-0052-6

Sat

Integration

Co-designing with LLM:

a personalized cognitive engine architecture basis

© Sergei Abramenkov, PhD

Data Fest 2025 (Spring)

Novosibirsk, Korona.tech

May 25, 12:30-13:00 (UTC+7)

Sun

Exploration

Mon

Determination

Tue

Negotiation

Wed

Specification

Thu

Generation

Fri

Revelation

Day

Primitive