Traumatic Brain Injury Data Assessment Tool
Austin Dunn // Michaela Gobron // Lydia Lui // Jin Matsumoto // Mandeep Sandhu
Background
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) - What is it?
Image from: http://epilepsyu.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/TBI.jpg
Motivation
Image from : http://pediatric-house-calls.djmed.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/concussion-head-wrap.jpg
Current Practice
Current Practice
Continuous monitoring to ensure parameters remain within desired ranges
There is no current treatment for TBI patients.
The best option is MONITORING these critical variables to improve the quality of care.
Problem Statement
Standard bedside monitors do NOT have a system that displays data in a format that allows healthcare professionals to quickly analyze fluctuations of critical variables between ideal, marginal, and critical ranges.
.
Current Standards
Thus...
In order to more effectively monitor tbi patients, our client has requested a new user interface that better displays the data from his traumatic brain injury patients.
Objective
The proposed device must graph critical Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) variables utilizing a graphical user interface (GUI) with a green-yellow-red color scheme to display every change-of-state from the ideal, marginal, and severe regions so healthcare providers can easily access if and for how long the variables deviate from their prescribed ranges.
Device Goals
Features to assist in data interpretation
Design Concept
Data Input: USB Drive
Hardware: Raspberry Pi 2
Software: Processing Program
Display:
9 inch Touchscreen
Touch Screen Module
USB Drive: Data In
9” Touch
Screen Display
Power
HDMI Cable
Data Acquisition
Data Input: USB Drive
Hospital Monitor: IntelliVue MP70
Third Party Application: MediCollector
Design Solution
Design for Manufacturing
Verification
Design Goal Assessment
Metric | Marginal Goal | Ideal Goal | Verification Method | Output |
Weight | <15 | < 12 Pounds | Measurement verified on scale | 6.8 Pounds |
Volume | < 2304 in3 (16” x 16” x 9”) | < 1536 in3 (16” x 16” x 6”) | Measurement calculated through dimension of case | 358 in3 |
Memory Size | 4 GB | 4 GB | Observational | 8 GB |
Start up/ Calibration time | < 180 Seconds | < 60 Seconds | Timing the process from turning on device to start of program | 39 Seconds |
Cost | ~2000 US Dollars | < 2000 US Dollars | Observational | 684.36 US Dollars |
Font Size | 25 Points | 72 Points | Observational | 30 Points |
External Power Consumption | 300 Watts | < 300 Watts | Calculated by using the known voltage and current input (P=VI) | 29.5 Watts |
GUI Features
Validation
Validation: Survey Results
Survey dispersed to numerous healthcare professionals, including our client. From the survey responses, we changed the design output.
“Looks Awesome!”
Simple
Intuitive
Validation Continued
“Extremely helpful feature! Normalizing the variables to each patient is a feature the current monitors lack. Very impressive.”
Value Added - Impact on Patient Treatment
Future Improvements
Future Works: Real Time Data
Future Improvements Continued
Continuous Monitoring beside the MP70 for real time treatment methods
There is no current treatment for TBI patients
Therefore, the best option is MONITORING them to improve their quality of care
Questions?
Appendix
Motivation/Background
Problem
Objective/Design Solution
Features
How Design Works
Assessment of Solutions
Surveys
Assembly of Device
Value Added
Big Reveal
REAL TIME DATA - TEMP SENSOR
Future Works
Material Properties
Material | Tensile Strength, psi | Rockwell Hardness | Impact Strength, ft.-lbs./in. | Coefficient of Friction | Dielectric Strength, volts/0.001 | Water Absorption, % | Density lbs./in.3 | Thermal Expansion, in./in./° F |
Delrin® Acetal Resin | 9,000- 11,000 | M89-M94 | 1-2.4 | 0.2 | 435-500 | 0.2-0.4 | 0.051 | 4.7 to 12.2^10–5 |