1 of 23

2 of 23

Using GDP/ GNI to measure economic well-being

A higher real GDP/ GNI per capita value usually corresponds to a higher standard of living, as the average person will be able to purchase more goods and services. However, there are several reasons why these values may not accurately measure economic well-being.

“The gross national product does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education, or the joy of their play.”

– Robert F. Kennedy

3 of 23

Why might increases in GDP not equate to a higher standard of living?

4 of 23

Real world example

Source: GDP per capita vs. economic inequality

Using examples from the source, discuss why real GDP per capita statistics may not accurately reflect the differences in standards of living between countries.

5 of 23

Real GDP per capita indicates the average level of national income received by each person in an economy. However, this value does not accurately reflect the economic well-being of individuals as income is not distributed equally amongst individuals in an economy, and different countries have differing levels of income inequality.

See Gini coefficient (later).

The real GDP per capita of South Africa and Ukraine are similar, which may suggest the living standards are comparable. However, Ukraine has the lowest Gini coefficient (low income inequality) while South Africa has the highest Gini coefficient (high income inequality).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_inequality-adjusted_income

Note how low USA is.

6 of 23

Using GDP/ GNI to measure economic well-being

Leisure time

Source: Annual working hours vs. GDP per capita

Take Hong Kong and Switzerland for example. The GDP per capita in these two countries are similar, which may suggest the living standards are comparable. However, the average person in Hong Kong works 596 hours more than the average worker in Switzerland in a year.

Working hours

(hours per person)

GDP per capita

(int.-$)

Hong Kong

2,186

56,055

Switzerland

1,590

57,410

Therefore, real GDP/ GNI values do not accurately measure economic well-being as important factors such as leisure time are unaccounted for.

7 of 23

GDP does not take into account Quality of Output

Output figures also tell us little about the quality of goods and services produced. This is best illustrated by the fact that a £1000 computer is more powerful than a £2000 computer that you purchased 5 years ago but statistics do not take this into account (improvements in goods and services- P 264)

8 of 23

Productive v unproductive output? GDP doesn’t differentiate between these

9 of 23

10 of 23

Using GDP/ GNI to measure economic well-being

Negative externalities

GDP and GNI statistics do not account for the negative externalities which arise with increased production in the economy. As a result, economic well-being may be overstated as environmental costs are not considered.

Green GDP is a measure of economic activity which

accounts for environmental degradation and the depletion

of natural resources.

Green GDP = GDP - environmental costs of production

11 of 23

12 of 23

Using GDP/ GNI to measure economic well-being- non class activity

Informal activities

GDP/ GNI statistics may be understated as they do not account for informal activities involving non-marketed goods and those in the hidden/ underground economy.

13 of 23

Answers may include:

  • Activities in the underground economy are very significant to a country’s GDP as it is one of the largest and most influential markets in the world.

The sale of goods and services in the underground economy are hard to track, but ‘reputable sources peg it up well into the trillions of dollars per year’. This is ‘bigger than the market for fast food, movies, fashion, and smartphones, combined many times over’. Therefore, GDP/ GNI figures may be understated as they do not account for transactions in the underground economy.

Black market=illegal

Informal can be legal but just not declared

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDzZD_YF_Wk

14 of 23

Self Provided Goods- why they mean that GDP figures may be unreliable

15 of 23

Real world example – case study (HW)

Podcast: What Does GDP Not Tell Us? (15 mins ted talk)

  1. When was the GDP statistical tool created?
  2. What does GDP measure?
  3. What has GDP become the defining measure of? Why is this a problem?
  4. What are the three factors which make a ‘good society’ in the Social Progress Index?

16 of 23

Answers:

  • 1930s

  • GDP measures the total value of production in an economy per year.

  • GDP ‘has since become the only defining measure of economic progress’.

This is a problem because GDP does not tell us anything about the environment or fairness.

It is also a tool which measures the value of production in the economy, where a higher level of goods and services produced is seen as ‘progress’. In this case, money spent on reconstruction after a natural disaster, something which is detrimental to well-being, is considered ‘progress’.

Additionally, GDP makes no judgment about the productivity of economic activity. For example, expenditure on prisons, bombs, and tear gas have a market price and are a part of the domestic production. Because of this, the GDP considers the value of these goods as a positive step forward.

  • Basic human needs for survival, foundations of well-being (education, information, health and sustainable environment), and opportunities to pursue goals, dreams, and ambitions free from obstacles.

https://www.npr.org/2018/08/17/639250769/michael-green-what-does-gdp-not-tell-us

https://pixabay.com/photos/earthquake-rubble-collapse-disaster-1665878/

17 of 23

Alternative Measures of well being (P266-8)

There are lots of alternative measures and I have mentioned some already, but the ones mentioned in the syllabus are:

  • OECD Better Life Index
  • Happiness index
  • Happy Planet Index

Read Tragakes P 266-268 and make notes on these- which do you think is the best and why?

18 of 23

Alternative measures of well-being- RWE-student task

Task: Using the links above

  1. List the variables which are considered in each of the three indices.
  2. How is the Happy Planet Index calculated?
  3. List the top 5 countries for each of the three indices.
  4. List the bottom 5 countries for each of the three indices.

19 of 23

  • OECD looks at 11 key variables:

material living conditions (housing, income, jobs)

quality of life (community, education, environment, governance, health, life satisfaction, safety and work-life balance).

The happiness index looks at 6 key variables:

income, freedom, trust in government/corruption, healthy life expectancy, social support from family and friends, and generosity.

The happy planet index looks at 4 key variables:

well-being, life expectancy, inequality of outcomes, and ecological footprint.

2. HPI = "Wellbeing x Life expectancy x Inequality of outcomes" /"Ecological footprint"

3. OECD Better Life Index 2020

  • Norway
  • Australia
  • Iceland
  • Canada
  • Denmark

36) Greece

37) Turkey

38) Colombia

39) Mexico

40) South Africa

*The BTI only includes 40 countries; most of the countries included are members of the OECD and are developed countries.

https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/#/11111111111

Note it is unlikely you’ll ever be asked any of these details!

20 of 23

Happiness Index 2020

1) Finland

2) Iceland

3) Denmark

4) Switzerland

5) Netherlands

91) Cambodia

92) India

93) Jordan

94) Tanzania

95) Zimbabwe

https://happiness-report.s3.amazonaws.com/2021/WHR+21.pdf

Happy Planet Index 2016

1) Costa Rica

2) Mexico

3) Colombia

4) Vanuatu

5) Vietnam

136) Mongolia

137) Benin

138) Togo

139) Luxembourg

140) Chad

http://happyplanetindex.org/s/hpi-data-2016.xlsx

21 of 23

Real world example – data analysis- Independent extension task- HW

Data Analysis Questions

  1. What do you notice from the data?
  2. What questions do you wonder about the data?
  3. Research information that may help you answer your questions from Q3.
  4. What conclusions can you make from Q1, Q2, and Q3?

22 of 23

Link to student notes and activities

https://docs.google.com/document/d/10MuQJs3PN6P1pF0YO-K1HQREdGFDmob_Fk2nw_SbeEA/edit

Conclusion: GDP is flawed and narrow as a measure of quality of life- other broader measures could be and are used such as UN HDI. However GDP/GNI is often included in these measures- just that on its own it is too limited

23 of 23