1 of 23

OPTIMIZATION OF PIPE CONNECTION IN THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

Prepared by: Ademi Islyam

      Lunara Kublasheva

      Daulet Zhumat 

Supervisor: Batyr K. Naurushev

Almaty, 2024

2 of 23

2

AGENDA

  1.   Purpose and objectives of the study
  2. Problem statement
  3. Literature review:

3.1 tubing type selection

4. Proposed solution

  1. Hyposisys
  2. Design of the tubing
  3. Methodology

7.1 fusion 3d modeling of the tubing

7.2 ansys flow simulation

8. Results:

8.1 Simulation results

8.2 Manual calculations results

8.3 Validation of manual results

9. Economical calculations

10. Comparison of the proposed tubing and basic design

  1. Conclusion

3 of 23

3

Purpose of the study: to find the type of pipe connection for 

which optimization is most necessary in modern reality.

Objectives:

  • Conduct review and analysis of data sources on the study topic
  • Analyze pipe connections
  • Identify the problem
  • Determine a solution
  • Build 3D model of threaded pipe connection 
  • Complete tests on the pipe
    • Pressure and stress reaction tests
    • Gas flow and leakage tests
  • Make calculations and compare with automatic results
  • Calculate economical profit
  • Make a conclusion

4 of 23

4

 After analyzing pipe connections, tubing was found to be the most in need of optimization due to reasons mentioned below in the Table 1.

Pipeline 

Casing column

Tubing pipe

  • Existing kilometers of pipelines would have to be dug out
  • The cost of optimization exceeds the benefit
  • Current design works fine
  • Optimization will not bring significant improvements  or economic benefits
  • Optimization can require significant time and effort
  • Minimize energy losses and ensure more efficient operation of pumps and compressors
  • Recently, leakage cases have become more frequent
  • Articles over the recent years

Table 1 – Pipe connection optimization reasoning

5 of 23

5

TUBING TYPES

Tubing with coupling connections

Tubing with integral connections

With external upset end

With a non-upset end 

Integral joint 

Description

Long tubing with a joint installed in a wellbore to facilitate the extraction of oil and gas.

Refers to the pipe end without the extra thick and straight thread and collar.

These tubing have a male and female connection obtained from the upset of the ends.

Table 2 – comparison evaluation

6 of 23

6

Causes

Consequences

  • High wear of equipment
  • Active corrosion processes
  • Mechanical damage
  • Decrease in resource production
  • Stagnation of production
  • Harm to the environment
  • Harmful effects on human health

Gas leakage is one of the significant problems for tubing connections as show the accidents over the recent years.

 Accidents on field:

  • TOO “Buzachi Neft”: Methane release at the Karaturun field. Natural gas fire at well No. 303 (2023)
  • NCOC: Gas leakage at Kashagan field (2013 and 2022)

 As international crude oil prices continued to go down over the past two years and the exploitation difficulty of remaining oil and gas blocks continues to increase, oil companies urgently need to reduce the cost of casing. Seal ledge is usually adopted for sealing, so the cost cannot be significantly reduced.

API round thread is currently the thread type with the lowest relative cost. Therefore, great economic benefit will be made if a kind of low-cost gas-tight thread can be developed to replace the existing premium thread. It will also be a revolutionary innovation.

CONSIDERED PROBLEM

Table 3 - Causes and consequences of gas leakage

7 of 23

7

Diameter

73,02 mm

Thickness

5,51 mm

Material

Alloy steel

Thread 

API Spec 5B standard round thread 

Strength group

J55

Gap

0,0125 mm

Because of the structural design, after the API tubing thread is engaged, there is a spiral leakage channel between the tooth crest and the tooth bottom, which connects the inner space and the outer space of the casing. Due to the existence of the leakage channel, the API round thread theoretically does not have fluid sealing capability, so it is generally not used as gas-tight thread.

Great economic benefit will be made if a kind of low-cost gas-tight thread can be developed on the basis of API round thread with a relatively lowest cost to replace the existing premium thread

Table 4 –Tubing properties

THE PROPOSED SOLUTION

8 of 23

8

Fig.1 - Initial drawing of a pipe connection

By incorporating an elastic sealing ring within the collar, the seal is achieved through the precise fit between the sealing ring and the casing thread.

Fig.2 - Seal connection and detailed view

DESIGN OF THE TUBING WITH API THREAD AND ELASTIC RING

9 of 23

9

USED SOFTWARE PROGRAM

Autodesk Fusion software developed by Autodesk and includes computer-aided design (CAD), computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), computer-aided engineering (CAE) and printed circuit board (PCB) design systems.  

Was used for designing and modeling the pipe and collar.

Tests conducted in Fusion:

  • Internal pressure test
  • Hydrostatic pressure test

ANSYS

Finite element analysis software 

developed by "Ansys inc" which provides an information of how given product will work or not work in real conditions.

Was used to make simulation of gas flow in the tubing.

       

10 of 23

10

Fig. 3 – Internal pressure test 

TESTS AND ANALYSES

 Using the Fusion 360 program, a test was performed to determine the safety factor of tubing by the action of internal flow pressure. This allowed us to determine whether the pipe will withstand the load. Our pipe can withstand a load of 50 MPa, which corresponds to the required result

Fig. 4 – Hydrostatic pressure test 

11 of 23

11

TESTS AND ANALYSES​

Fig. 6 – Gas flow simulation in the tubing without a sealing ring

12 of 23

12

Fig. 5 – Gas flow simulation in the tubing with a sealing ring

 To simulate gas flow and check for the risk of gas release Ansys software was used. In the test, the gas sealing performance of the tubing thread connector under the conditions of tension, compression and temperature was mainly evaluated, the load condition of the downhole tubing was simulated.

TESTS AND ANALYSES​

13 of 23

13

TESTS AND ANALYSES​

Fig. 7 – Location of tubing in Ansys coordinates  

14 of 23

14

TESTS AND ANALYSES​

Fig. 8 - Velocity of flow in tubing without sealing ring

 The x-axis shows the coordinates that were mentioned earlier. To build a graph, you need to draw a line inside the pipe indicating the coordinates. Interval of x-line values is very low, hence the pipe graph with a curved ring. If the interval of the x-axis were significant, then the graph would be smooth. Therefore, in the fig.10 the line deviates very strongly, which means a leakage.

Fig. 9 Velocity of flow in tubing with sealing ring

15 of 23

15

TESTS AND ANALYSES​

Fig. 10 - Gas loss in tubing without sealing ring

Fig. 11 - Velocity of flow in tubing with sealing ring

16 of 23

16

TESTS AND ANALYSES​

Fig. 12 - Mass flow calculation in Ansys

17 of 23

17

CALCULATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

(Eq.1)

(Eq.2)

(Eq.3)

(Eq.4)

 

(Eq.5)

 

(Eq.6)

 

(Eq.8)

 

 

 

 

For hydrostatic pressure test:

For internal pressure test:

(Eq.7)

(Eq.9)

(Eq.11)

(Eq.10)

18 of 23

18

CALCULATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 6 – Well Data

(Eq.12)

(Eq.13)

(Eq.15)

(Eq.16)

(Eq.17)

Well Data

Total Depth

1965,96

m

Monthly Gas Production

2275

mcf

Reservoir Pressure

19286067,6

Pa

Gas Temperature

126

F

Tubing set at

1752,6

m

P at tubing depth

17045788

Pa

Length of 1 tubing

6

m

Compressibility factor, z

0,85977601

𝜸g

0,55229548

Ppc

677,174314

Tpc

340,235701

Ppr

4,13039884

Tpr

1,72136551

D

1,01765412

C

0,05652061

B

1,60204373

A

0,5246228

𝛖

23,8936502

Qmax

0,31698511

S

0,0132665

Gas leakage data

k

1,26

𝛖 comp

14,1616745

T comp

52,1601311

𝝆 comp

627,339967

М comp

0,07667898

𝝻

0,62920148

Qm

3,7186189

R

519

P

16982788

Table 5 – Calculation results

 

(Eq.14)

(Eq.18)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Eq.19)

(Eq.20)

(Eq.21)

(Eq.22)

(Eq.24)

(Eq.23)

(Eq.25)

(Eq.26)

(Eq.27)

(Eq.28)

19 of 23

19

ECONOMICAL PART

Date

Monthly gas production, mcf

Gas production in m3/h

Price of the gas/m3

The money lost

Total

2014.01

2275

89,4733694

67,229

109997,459

1661749,5

2014.02

2167

85,2258425

103144,091

2014.03

3052

120,031966

159303,633

2014.04

2242

88,175514

107903,374

2014.05

2366

93,0523042

115772,056

2014.06

2194

86,2877242

104857,433

2014.07

2527

99,3842657

125988,65

2014.08

2736

107,604017

139251,186

2014.09

2763

108,665899

140964,528

2014.10

2855

112,284163

146802,582

2014.11

3268

128,52702

173010,368

2014.12

4241

166,794092

234754,136

2015.01

2950

116,020413

43,3993

98659,191

835508,263

2015.02

2257

88,7654483

70270,8775

2015.03

2581

101,508029

83543,3358

2015.04

2871

112,913426

95423,0052

2015.05

1496

58,8361146

39096,9863

2015.06

4032

158,574341

142982,647

2015.07

3404

133,875758

117257,018

2015.08

1498

58,9147725

39178,9151

2015.09

1096

43,1045331

22711,2354

2015.10

1124

44,2057438

23858,238

2015.11

1180

46,4081652

26152,2431

2015.12

2406

94,6254624

76374,5697

2016.01

3031

119,206058

59,7753

140456,736

1398407,73

2016.02

2334

91,7937777

101130,881

2016.03

2309

90,8105539

99720,341

2016.04

2093

82,3154999

87533,2754

2016.05

2115

83,1807369

88774,5506

2016.06

2203

86,6416848

93739,6514

2016.07

2149

84,5179213

90692,885

2016.08

3029

119,1274

140343,893

2016.09

2164

85,1078556

91539,209

2016.10

3255

128,015744

153095,175

2016.11

3263

128,330376

153546,547

2016.12

3339

131,319376

157834,589

2017.01

3224

126,796546

58,66175

148526,689

1090742,4

2017.02

2935

115,430479

132524,607

2017.03

1989

78,2252887

80144,0893

2017.04

2240

88,0968561

94042,0913

2017.05

3307

130,06085

153122,442

2017.06

2659

104,575688

117242,342

2017.07

2285

89,866659

96533,765

2017.08

2025

79,641131

82137,4283

2017.09

1888

74,2530644

74551,6662

2017.10

775

30,479939

12924,2709

2017.11

1790

70,3988269

69125,3547

2017.12

1081

42,5145988

29867,6518

2018.01

1311

51,5602582

24,5

17793,0318

148325,809

2018.02

1121

44,087757

13399,2011

2018.03

852

33,5082685

7178,46186

2018.04

807

31,7384656

6137,81775

2018.05

1267

49,8297842

16775,5131

2018.06

944

37,1265322

9306,00093

2018.07

1145

45,0316519

13954,2113

2018.08

1049

41,2560723

11734,1705

2018.09

849

33,3902816

7109,08558

2018.10

1754

68,9829846

28037,595

2018.11

972

38,2277429

9953,51282

2018.12

842

33,1149789

6947,20761

Table 7 – Total money loss

20 of 23

20

ECONOMICAL PART

Price of non-upset tubing

Price of polymer material

The work of the employee, tenge/min

Total

1233057

29200

12

1265737

Table 8 – Total for tubing with sealing ring

 During the entire time of gas production, there was a gas leak with a flow rate of 21.3 cubic meters per hour. More than 5 million tenge was lost, to be more precise 5 134 738 tenge. 

Using a polymer sealing ring, it would be possible to avoid gas leakage and save more than 5 million tenge.

 In the table below you can see the price for tubing, a sealing ring and for the work of an employee at the field. This tubing with a sealing ring will be cheaper than other tubing connections. For example, the most common tubing with an integral joint costs 463,422 tenge more.

21 of 23

21

CONCLUSION

 The cost of the gas-tight thread developed on the basis of the API round thread is about 1.3 times that of the API round thread. Therefore, at least 27% of the casing cost can be saved and considerable economic benefits can be made if this gas-tight thread is used to replace the current widely-used premium thread.

 The analysis shows that the thread structure has a good sealing performance and stability. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in CO2 storage and flooding projects at home and abroad, where cost is a key issue restricting such projects. The proposed thread structure can effectively prevent the leakage of the wellbore in the CO2 storage and flooding projects and can reduce the casing cost. If high-grade steel pipes are used, the sealing capacity of such thread sealing structure will be further improved to meet higher-pressure working conditions.

 Great economic benefit will be made if a kind of low-cost gas-tight thread can be developed on the basis of API round thread with a relatively lowest cost to replace the existing premium thread.

22 of 23

22

  1. J. Van Wittenberghe , P. De Baets , W. De Waele , T. Galle , T.T. Bui and G. De Roeck. Design characteristics that improve the fatigue life of threaded pipe connections, 2011.
  2. T. Galle, W. De Waele, P. De Baets, J. Van Wittenberghe. Influence of design features on the structural integrity of threaded pipe connections, 2011.
  3. Guo Jianchun, Gou Bo, Wang Kunjie, Ren Jichuan, Zeng Ji. An optimal design of network-fracture acidification for ultra-deep gas wells in the Lower Permian strata of the western Sichuan basin, 2017.
  4. Xie Zengye, Wei Guoqi, Zhang Jian, Yang Wei, Zhang Lu, Wang Zhihong, Zhao Jie. Characteristics of source rocks of the Datangpo Fm, Nanhua System, at the southeastern margin of Sichuan Basin and their significance to oil and gas exploration, 2017.
  5. Zhang Yongqiang, Liu Li, Lu Jinfu, Yin Zhifu, Wang Ke, Liu Jie, Ta Chuan. Development of gas-tight threads based on API round threads and its evaluation, 2017.
  6. Fan Shuanshi, Wang Xi, Lang Xuemei, Wang Yanhong. Energy efficiency simulation of the process of gas hydrate exploitation from flue gas in an electric power plant, 2017.
  7. Liang Jie, Zhang Penghui, Chen Jianwen, Gong Jianming, Yuan Yong. Hydrocarbon preservation conditions in MesozoicePaleozoic marine strata in the South Yellow Sea Basin, 2017.
  8. Zheng Lihui, Wei Panfeng, Zhang Zheng, Nie Shuaishuai, Lou Xuanqing, Cui Kexin, Fu Yuwei. Joint exploration and development: A self-salvation road to sustainable development of unconventional oil and gas resources, 2017.
  9. Khlebnikov V.N., Antonov S.V., Mishin A.S., Liang Meng, Khamidullina I.V., Zobov P.M., Likhacheva N.V., Gushchin P.A. Major factors influencing the generation of natural gas hydrate in porous media, 2017.
  10. Zhang Yongping, Yang Yanhui, Shao Guoliang, Chen Longwei, Wei Ning, Zhang Liwen. Problems in the development of high-rank CBM horizontal wells in the FanzhuangeZhengzhuang Block in the Qinshui Basin and countermeasures, 2017.
  11. You Lijun, Kang Yili, Chen Qiang, Fang Chaohe, Yang Pengfei. Prospect of shale gas recovery enhancement by oxidation-induced rock burst, 2017.
  12. Yin Yiyong, Su Yinao, Wang Zhaohui. Vibration characteristics of casing string under the exciting force of an electric vibrator, 2017.

References

23 of 23

23

  1. Fatigue investigation of threaded pipe connections, Labo Soete, Ghen University, 2010.
  2. DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS THAT IMPROVE THE FATIGUE LIFE OF THREADED PIPE CONNECTIONS, 2011.
  3. Rebecca A.Gailun, Charlotte J.Wright, Linda M.Nichols, John W.Stevenson, Fundamentals of oil and gas accounting fourth edition, 2001.
  4. Influence of design features on the structural integrity of threaded pipe connections, 2011.
  5. Petroleum Production Systems, Second Edition, Michael J.Economides, A.Daniel Hill, Christine Ehlig-Economides, Ding Zhu, 2015.
  6. Loosening Monitoring of the Threaded Pipe Connection Using Time Reversal Technique and Piezoceramic Transducers, Yabin Liang, Qian Feng, Dogsheng Li, 2018 .
  7. Pipeline Engineering, Henry Liu, 2003.
  8. Lurie M.V., Musailov I.T., Lysenko N.O. The Effective Method of Calculating Gas Leaks Through Holes in the Walls of Gas Pipelines and High-Pressure Vessels. Territorija “NEFTEGAS” [Oil and Gas Territory]. 2020;(3–4):110–116.
  9. Piping and pipeline engineering – Mechanical engineering, L.L.Faulkner, Columbus division, Battelle Memorial Institute and Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  10. Threaded Pipe Connections, Jeroen Van Wittenberghe, Ghent, 2011.
  11. V.I.Ryazanov, A.V.Pakharev. Complications during drilling wells, 2016.
  12. Correlations for evaluating oil and gas properties.
  13. Melnichenko, U. G. Calculation of the duration of the process of emptying gas pipeline sections with an crossed route profile / U. G. Melnichenko // Oil and Gas Energy. – 2008. – No. 2(7). – pp. 20–23.
  14. V.A. Zhyla, E.B. Solovyova. Вetermination of volumes of gas emissions and algorithm for solving the problem in case of damage to low-pressure gas pipelines.
  15. D.S. Zhovtikhanov et al. Threaded lock conic connection of drill pipes and method to increase its carrying ability and resource of work, 2021.
  16. Yabin Liang, Qian Feng, Dongsheng Li. Loosening Monitoring of the Threaded Pipe Connection Using Time Reversal Technique and Piezoceramic Transducers, 2018.