1 of 22

Alternative Grading Methods

An Introduction

2 of 22

Plan for Today

  1. Introductions
  2. Community agreement 
  3. The Benefits of Alternative Grading Methods and Why I use Them
  4. Overview of 3 Alternative Grading Methods
  5. Break
  6. Work with the grading methods in stations (Stationenlernen)
  7. Final discussion

3 of 22

Let me introduce myself . . .

  • Originally from Germany  (Pegnitz in Oberfranken)

  • In the German Studies department at Lawrence University since Fall 2023
  • Research interests: 19th-century literature by women and disability in Higher Education

Petra Watzke (and Ivy)

4 of 22

Introductions

Please share:

  • your name
  • where you teach
  • one mundane/everyday fact about yourself

5 of 22

Activity: Community Agreement

Questions to consider

  • What do you need from others (peers, presenter) for this to be an inclusive and productive learning environment?
  • What do you need from others to succeed during collaborative/group work?
  • What do you need from others to succeed during discussion?
  • How will you contribute to make this workshop an inclusive and productive experience?

  1. Answer the questions for yourself (5 min; taking notes is encouraged)
  2. Discuss the questions at your table and come to an agreement. Write  your agreement on a piece of paper. (5 min.)
  3. A spokesperson for each group briefly presents their agreement
  4. (With a secretary): brief  discussion to determine community agreement for our workshop, write community agreement on board.

6 of 22

Background: Why Alternative Grading Methods?

Experience of Ableism* beginning in graduate school

Ableism in Textbooks and Teaching Materials

Normative expectations about what students look like and what they can do.

Tokenization of Disability

"Laufen Sie!"

Total Physical

Response (TPR)

*A set of beliefs or practices that devalue and discriminate against people with physical, intellectual, or psychiatric disabilities. (Center for Disability Rights)

7 of 22

The Basis of my Alternative Grading Methods is�Universal Design for Learning

  • increase access to learning for as many students as possible by offering multiple access points at key stages of the learning process.
  • minimize barriers for diverse students and learning styles by centering the design process on the needs of disabled learners
  • Goes beyond providing accommodations 

Goals of my alternative grading methods

  • Focus on progress, not outcome

  • Lessen hierarchy in the classroom

  • Lessen performance/test anxieties

  • Encourage risk taking

  • Support intrinsic motivation and curiosity

8 of 22

The Benefits of Alternative Grading Methods

Facts about grades:

  • Letter (or number) grades were not commonly used until the late 19th century?*
  • Grades can decrease motivation and the willingness to take risks.
  • Grades are always subjective.
  • Grades condition students to rely on extrinsic motivation (i.e., the grade).

Alternative Grading Methods can . . .

  • increase motivation by offering choice and tapping into students' interests
  • decrease anxiety about classroom performance and testing
  • strengthen classroom community by offering frequent opportunities to work together and exchange ideas
  • envision students as partners in the learning process

*Susan Blum, "Why Grade? Why Ungrade?" Ungrading, West Virginia UP, 2020, p.6-7.

9 of 22

Alternative Grading Methods I use

  • Project-Based Learning
  • Contract Grading
  • Co-Grading

10 of 22

Project-Based Learning

  • Projects replace exams to demonstrate comprehension and progress
  • Multi-step process with opportunities for revision
  • Mitigates testing anxiety
  • Activates students' intrinsic motivation
  • Students learn by actively constructing their own understanding of material
  • 4 phases : project prompt, discovery/planning, development (which includes critique and revision), and presentation*

Example 1: Chapter Project "Esskultur" (GER 101)

Example 2: Create a wheelmap of the college (GER 418: German-Speaking Countries from the Margins). Related Course Topic: Behinderte Aktivisten in Deutschland.

*adapted from JohnLarmer, John Mergendoller, and Suzie Boss, Setting the Standard for Project-Based Learning, ASCD, 2015, p. 104f.

11 of 22

Contract Grading

  • All requirements for specific grades are described in grading contract
  • Opportunity for input and revision of contract at beginning of term
  • Transparency and control over grade
  • Students can determine their workload based on the grade they want to achieve
  • Students as partners in the learning process
  • Example 1: Fairy Tales �Curse Contract (this was my first attempt at contract grading and is way too detailed.

  • Overview: Contract Grading

12 of 22

Ungrading

  • Students get feedback (self, peers, instructor) on all assignments instead of grades
  • Revision as important step of learning process
  • Individual meetings with instructor throughout term to determine goals and progress

13 of 22

The 3 Meetings

  • Meeting 1: we get to know each other, discuss expectations anxieties, and individual goals
  • Meeting 2: (Mid-Term Meeting). General check-in. We discuss progress toward learning goals and concerns about the course (this is in addition to anonymous midterm feedback)
  • Meeting 3: Students submit course portfolio (example) at least 24 hours before meeting. In meeting we discuss overall progress in class, look back at portfolio (student-guided) and negotiate final grade, based on the records that the instructor and the student kept  (portfolio instructions)

14 of 22

Potential Concerns with Alternative Grading

  • Students do not take it seriously
  • Submitting work that does not meet the standard laid out in the syllabus  will result in a bad grade, just like in any other class

  • "I did my best, therefore I deserve an A"
  • Did you complete all the work described in the syllabus?
  • Did you reach the goals that you set for yourself?

  • Keeping detailed records will prevent these issues

  • "It is too much work for instructors"  
  •  Valid concern. No less work than teaching any other class work is merely structured differently
  • All methods I presented can be adapted for different class sizes and instructor goals (more on next slide)

  • The three methods I presented offer an increasing amount of freedom and demand an increasing amount of responsibility
  • I use PBL in the Elementary German Sequence
  • I use contract grading in courses, where students are likely to only encounter me once
  • I use ungrading in the Advanced German sequence, where students take ca. 2-3 courses with me

15 of 22

Resources

Resources:

  • Overview: Ungrading

16 of 22

Smaller Steps

17 of 22

18 of 22

Station Learning 1: Reflection

Sit at a table with a new group and discuss the following question. Designate one person in your group as note taker.

  • Why are you interested in alternative grading methods?
  • What experience do you already have with alternative grading methods?
  • How do alternative grading methods fit in with your pedagogy goals?
  • How does your educational setting (students, classes, school, mandated curriculum) influence the opportunity to use alternative grading methods?

19 of 22

Station Learning 2: Planning for alternative grading

  • Individually, consider which alternative grading methods (big or small steps) you could envision using in your own teaching.
  • For what class?
  • What would be the goals?
  • What would you change/adapt to fit your specific situation?

20 of 22

Abschlussdiskussion

21 of 22

Book Recommendations

Addy, Tracie, Derek Dube, Khadijah Mitchell, and Mallory SoRelle. What Inclusive Instructors Do. Routledge, 2023.

Blum, Susan, ed. Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead). Virginia UP, 2020.

Davidson, Cathy. The New College Classroom. Harvard UP, 2022.

Fritzgerald, Andratesha. Antiracism and Universal Design for Learning. CAST, 2020.

22 of 22

Get the presentation

  • Or email me: petra.watzke@lawrence.edu