1 of 14

Introductory remarks

Iain Butterworth

2 of 14

Healthy City Model

3 of 14

Low density housing in new areas on the fringe

Reduced access to amenity, community services and public transport

Overweight and obesity

Chronic disease (CVD, Diabetes, Cancer)

Affordability of housing

Affordability of living on fringe

Drug and alcohol dependence

Stress, social isolation

Family violence

Lack of local employment opportunities

Increased VMT

High unemployment

Chronic disease (Mental health, CVD)

Car dependency – increased VMT

Inactivity

Sedentariness

Youth violence

Family violence

Reduced use of community services

Preliminary potential pathways of social determinants of health

Slide source: Prof Billie Giles-Corti (2012)

4 of 14

Slide source: Prof Billie Giles-Corti

5 of 14

EMPLOYMENT

FOOD

HOUSING

PUBLIC OPEN SPACE

SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE

TRANSPORT

WALKABILITY

DOMAINS OF LIVEABILITY

6 of 14

NEIGHBOURHOOD ATTRIBUTES

BEHAVIOURS

INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES

LONG-TERM OUTCOMES

ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRANSPORT

Distance to, density, and frequency of public transport by type

ACCESS TO CYCLE INFRA- STRUCTURE

Distance to, and density of cycle lanes

CAR USE / RELIANCE

SOCIAL INEQUITIES

Car reliance, household expenditure stress

TRAFFIC EXPOSURE

TRANSPORT COMMUTE TIME

WALKABILITY

PUBLIC TRANSPORT USE

CYCLING FOR TRANSPORT

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELLED

WALKING FOR TRANSPORT

WEIGHT STATUS

PHYSICAL ACTIVITY ACCUMULATION

CHRONIC CONDITIONS

TRANSPORT PLANNING AND POLICIES

MENTAL HEALTH

UPSTREAM

DOWNSTREAM

Prof Hannah Badland

7 of 14

8 of 14

Urban & transport planning & design interventions

Transport mode & �daily living outcomes

Risk �exposures

Intermediary �outcomes

Injury & �disease outcomes

Destination accessibility

Distribution of employment

Demand management

Design

Density

Distance to transit

Diversity

Desirability

Regional Planning

Local urban design

Private motor vehicle

Public transport

Cycling

Transport mode outcomes

Walking / Cycling

Attitudes & preferences

Social & cultural norms

Mobility needs

Demand

Traffic

Air pollution

Noise

Social isolation

Personal safety

Physical inactivity

Prolonged sitting

Unhealthy diet

Traffic incidents

Greenhouse �gas & particulate �matter emissions, climate change

Obesity & overweight, cardio-metabolic �risk factors

Road trauma

Respiratory disease

Heat stress

Infectious disease

Mental illness

Major chronic �diseases: CVD, T2 diabetes, cancer

Employment & education access

Food & health �service access

Social & �recreational access

Daily living outcomes

Age

Demographics

Gender

Health, wellbeing and liveability

Socioeconomic position & area-level disadvantage

Urban system�policies

Transport

Social & �health services

Education

Employment

& economic development

Land use �& urban design

Housing

Public open space �& recreation

Public safety

Slide source: Prof Billie Giles-Corti et al

9 of 14

Overwhelming evidence: Frumkin et al (2017)

10 of 14

Shanahan, D. F. et al. (2016). Health Benefits from Nature Experiences Depend on Dose. Sci. Rep. 6, 28551

11 of 14

People & Parks Foundation: ‘Live Nature Wise’

12 of 14

Public open space (POS) domain

Villanueva et al, 2015, Applied Geography

NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in

Healthy Liveable Communities

Funded by:

13 of 14

Plan Melbourne: https://www.planmelbourne.vic.gov.au/

14 of 14