1 of 21

Tailoring electron-electron coupling network for DNP at high magnetic field and fast MAS

26th April, 2022

Asif Equbal

Northwestern University, Chicago

University of California, Santa Barbara

  • Solid Effect
  • No e-e coupling
  • Trityl
  • Cross Effect
  • Moderate intramolecular e-e
  • AMUPOL (~10 mM)

Solid Effect ?

Overhauser Effect?

Cross Effect ?

Thermal Mixing ?

?

2 of 21

2

Solid Effect (SE)

Overhauser Effect (OE)

Cross Effect (CE)

ω𝜇w = ωe ± ω0n

ω𝜇w = ωe

ω0n = |ωe1 – ωe2|

DNP Mechanisms

Key Parameters: T1e (Temperature, Concentration, Solvent) 2) MW power & frequency 3) e-e coupling network

Thermal Mixing (TM)

ω0n = |ωe1 – ωe2|

flip-flop

flip-flop-flip

ZQ or DQ

microwave Saturation

ZQ or DQ

cross relaxation

Intrinsic Hamiltonian

Inhomogeneous vs. homogeneous broadening

3 of 21

3

What is the most optimum polarization transfer pathway?

How to tune local and global spin concentration to maximize DNP?

0 vs. 6

2 vs. 6

6 vs. 6

15 vs. 6

  • OE/CE/TM: Low power requirement
  • OE: Requires e-n cross-relaxation (unclear)
  • CE/TM: Intrinsic Hamiltonian; e-e helps (designable)
  • Trade-off: efficiency vs. number of resonances

CE/TM

vs.

SE/OE

Coupled electron spin system is a better choice

4 of 21

4

ω𝜇w

Simulated EPR Spectrum of Nitroxide Radical at ~7 T

Basic: Cross-Effect Mechanism

Enhancement ∆P(e)

𝛚n = 𝛚e1 - 𝛚e2

193.4

193.6

193.8

194

194.2

194.4

Frequency (GHz)

Thurber et al. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 084508, 2012

Mentink-Vigier et al. J. Magn. Reso. 224, 13-21 

5 of 21

5

Relaxation

g-tensor

orientation

e-e coupling

D and J

CE -DNP

Optimum Polarizing Agent

2006

TOTAPOL

Chemically tethered

2013

TEKPOL

Bulky

Slow Relaxation

2018

ASYMPOL

Asymmetric

Strong J coupling

2020

TINYPOL

Strong D coupling

2013

AMUPOL

Rigid

Slow Relaxation

2015

TEMTRIPOL

Tethered Mixed Radical

2018

HYTEK

Mixed Radical

Highest DNP

TOTAPOL

TEKPOL

AMUPOL

TINYPOL

ASYMPOL

Evolution of DNP Polarizing Agent

Lund et al. Chemical science 11, 10, 2810, 2020

Mentik-Vigier et al. JACS, 140, 35, 11013–11019, 2018

Song et al JACS, 128, 35, 11385, 2006

Sauvée et al. Angew, 125(41), 11058, 2013

Zagdoun et al, JACS, 135, 34, 12790, 2013

6 of 21

6

  • TINYPOL is better at high magnetic field�but far below theoretical maximum, ~660.

2020- TINYPOL

10.5 A

Dipolar coupling= 50 MHz

Lund et al. Chemical science 11, 10, 2810, 2020

2013- AMUPOL

11.5 A

Dipolar coupling= 35 MHz

  • Other Factor?

AMPUPOL

TINYPOL

 

CE rate=

Enhancement

400

800

900

 

Optimal electron-electron coupling in a biradical

7 of 21

7

MD simulation

J-coupling distribution

Non-optimum J-coupling

Lund et al. Chemical science 11, 10, 2810, 2020

Why ?

Analysis of TINYPOL

 

 

Non-optimum

8 of 21

Adiabaticity of e-e crossing is critical to maintain large ΔPe

Equbal et al. PNMRS 2021, 126, 1

optimum

Non-optimum

Equbal et al PCCP 2020,22, 13569

9 of 21

Tailor e-e coupling to Magnetic Field

@1000 MHz

@800 MHz

@400 MHz

Recommendation

+ Conformational Rigidity, Molecular Stability, Solubility

Caution! Too large e-e coupling is deleterious.

 

 

10 of 21

10

Intermolecular e-e coupling in glassy matrix

Interplay: Microwave Power vs. Spectral Diffusion vs. T1e Relaxation

  • Intramolecular Coupling

Intermolecular Coupling ?

11 of 21

11

SE

ω𝜇w = ωe ± ωn

ω0H

ε+

ω0H

ε-

5 mM, diluted e spin system

DNP using Trityl-OX063

12 of 21

12

Conc.

SE-DNP

TM-DNP

10mM

10

1.6

20mM

20

5.2

40mM

14

30

100mM

2

110

SE

TM

SE

High Conc.

  • Signatures of TM DNP can be identified using EPR detection

Exploring TM 1H-DNP in Trityl at High Field

  • DNP Enhancement Table

Equbal et al, JPCL, 11, 9, 3718, 2020

  • Experimental

Low Cost Synthesizers

13 of 21

13

  • DNP Filed/Frequency Profile
  • Central positive peak

BDPA: Overhauser DNP

Can et al. JCP, 141, 6, 064202, 2014

BDPA Centre

  • DNP Power Profile
  • Low MW power

Gurinov et al. Angew60(28), 15371-15375, 2021

electron

hoping

  • Deuteration Effect

ZQ Cross-relaxation

Delage-Laurin, Palani et al. JACS, 143(48), 20281, 2021

Fully Protonated

Selectively Deuterated

DQ Cross-relaxation

  • Change in DNP profile

14 of 21

14

OE: Why? vs. Why Not ?

  • Similar DNP Frequency(Field) and MW power profiles.
  • Central positive peak

DNP profiles observed in BDPA (OE) are common in CE mechanism

  • Truncated Cross Effect

Equbal et al, JPCL 2018

BDPA Centre

  • Low MW Power
  • Oversaturation Effect

Equbal et al, JPCL 2019

Vs.

15 of 21

15

OE: Why? vs. Why Not ?

  • Deuteration Effect
  • Deuteration changes T1e => Electron Spin Polarization => DNP Profile
  • Bulk T1n also changes => possibly via Triple-flip mechanism
  • Numerical
  • Numerical

Han & coworkers, JPCL 2020

Fully Protonated

Selectively Deuterated

  • Numerical

Vs.

Delage-Laurin, Palani et al. JACS, 143(48), 20281, 2021

Kuzhelev et al. JACS, 144, 3, 1164–1168, 2022

Li et al, JPCL, 11, 21, 9195, 2020

  • Dispersive DNP Profile of BDPA in lipid

Experiment @ 9T

Prisner & coworkers , JACS 2021

Experiment

@ ~9T

16 of 21

EPR Signature of TM: �Asymmetric EPR-line & Hyperpolarization of Electrons in Pump-probe ELDOR

16

Equbal et al, JPCL, 11, 9, 3718, 2020

17 of 21

17

μw Pump Frequency

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

-0.5

-0

0.5

Low

High

1

-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

(C)

(D)

(A)

(B)

 

 

 

 

 

Energy

<S1z+S2z>

Zeeman Order

<S1zS2z>

Dipolar Order

Dipolar Order: Source of Electron Hyperpolarization in ELDOR

 

18 of 21

Dipolar order detection by EPR confirms cluster states of BDPA and trityl at 20-80 mM concentration.

18

X

Z

Y

Mixing of Zeeman and Dipolar Order Under MW Irradiation

Equbal et al. Unpublished

19 of 21

EPR Signature of Dipolar Order in BDPA => Clustering

19

Pump-probe ELDOR

𝜏

𝜏saturation

𝜏p

ν𝜇w-probe

ν𝜇w-pump

𝜏delay

𝜏

𝜏p

echo

Recycle

delay

BDPA

Equbal et al. Unpublished

Signature of

Dipolar Order

DNP

20 of 21

20

  • Cross Effect

Tailored Polarizing Agent

There is so much left to learn…. and that is very fascinating

  • Thermal Mixing DNP

BDPA & Trityl (20-80 mM)

We confirm presence of TM DNP

but DONOT rule out the OE hypothesis

Balance J and D coupling

Conclusion

  • Future Direction
  • Optimize TM DNP Under MAS
  • Microwave gated irradiation
  • Scaffold to control spin Parameter ?

21 of 21

21

Acknowledgement

Prof. Songi Han (UCSB)

Dr. Miranda Li

Kan Tagami

Dr. Sheetal Jain

Dr. Ilia Kaminker

Celeste Tobar

Questions ?

Happening soon!

Global NMR Twitter Conference- 2022

For students and postdocs

www.globalnmr.org

Dr. Mikhail Veshtort (SpinEv)

ISMAR sponsored

Tutorial Lectures

Dr. Alisa Leavesly