Tailoring electron-electron coupling network for DNP at high magnetic field and fast MAS
26th April, 2022
Asif Equbal
Northwestern University, Chicago
University of California, Santa Barbara�
Solid Effect ?
Overhauser Effect?
Cross Effect ?
Thermal Mixing ?
?
2
Solid Effect (SE)
Overhauser Effect (OE)
Cross Effect (CE)
ω𝜇w = ωe ± ω0n
ω𝜇w = ωe
ω0n = |ωe1 – ωe2|
DNP Mechanisms
Key Parameters: T1e (Temperature, Concentration, Solvent) 2) MW power & frequency 3) e-e coupling network
Thermal Mixing (TM)
ω0n = |ωe1 – ωe2|
flip-flop
flip-flop-flip
ZQ or DQ
microwave Saturation
ZQ or DQ
cross relaxation
Intrinsic Hamiltonian
Inhomogeneous vs. homogeneous broadening
3
What is the most optimum polarization transfer pathway?
How to tune local and global spin concentration to maximize DNP?
0 vs. 6
2 vs. 6
6 vs. 6
15 vs. 6
CE/TM
vs.
SE/OE
Coupled electron spin system is a better choice
4
ω𝜇w
Simulated EPR Spectrum of Nitroxide Radical at ~7 T
Basic: Cross-Effect Mechanism
Enhancement ∝ ∆P(e)
𝛚n = 𝛚e1 - 𝛚e2
193.4
193.6
193.8
194
194.2
194.4
Frequency (GHz)
Thurber et al. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 084508, 2012
Mentink-Vigier et al. J. Magn. Reso. 224, 13-21
5
Relaxation
g-tensor
orientation
e-e coupling
D and J
CE -DNP
Optimum Polarizing Agent
2006
TOTAPOL
Chemically tethered
2013
TEKPOL
Bulky
Slow Relaxation
2018
ASYMPOL
Asymmetric
Strong J coupling
2020
TINYPOL
Strong D coupling
2013
AMUPOL
Rigid
Slow Relaxation
2015
TEMTRIPOL
Tethered Mixed Radical
2018
HYTEK
Mixed Radical
Highest DNP
TOTAPOL
TEKPOL
AMUPOL
TINYPOL
ASYMPOL
Evolution of DNP Polarizing Agent
Lund et al. Chemical science 11, 10, 2810, 2020
Mentik-Vigier et al. JACS, 140, 35, 11013–11019, 2018
Song et al JACS, 128, 35, 11385, 2006
Sauvée et al. Angew, 125(41), 11058, 2013
Zagdoun et al, JACS, 135, 34, 12790, 2013
6
2020- TINYPOL
10.5 A
Dipolar coupling= 50 MHz
Lund et al. Chemical science 11, 10, 2810, 2020
2013- AMUPOL
11.5 A
Dipolar coupling= 35 MHz
AMPUPOL
TINYPOL
CE rate=
Enhancement
400
800
900
Optimal electron-electron coupling in a biradical
7
MD simulation
J-coupling distribution
Non-optimum J-coupling
Lund et al. Chemical science 11, 10, 2810, 2020
Why ?
Analysis of TINYPOL
Non-optimum
Adiabaticity of e-e crossing is critical to maintain large ΔPe
Equbal et al. PNMRS 2021, 126, 1
optimum
Non-optimum
Equbal et al PCCP 2020,22, 13569
Tailor e-e coupling to Magnetic Field
@1000 MHz
@800 MHz
@400 MHz
Recommendation
+ Conformational Rigidity, Molecular Stability, Solubility
Caution! Too large e-e coupling is deleterious.
10
Intermolecular e-e coupling in glassy matrix
Interplay: Microwave Power vs. Spectral Diffusion vs. T1e Relaxation
Intermolecular Coupling ?
11
SE
ω𝜇w = ωe ± ωn
ω0H
ε+
ω0H
ε-
5 mM, diluted e spin system
DNP using Trityl-OX063
12
Conc. | SE-DNP | TM-DNP |
10mM | 10 | 1.6 |
20mM | 20 | 5.2 |
40mM | 14 | 30 |
100mM | 2 | 110 |
SE
TM
SE
High Conc.
Exploring TM 1H-DNP in Trityl at High Field
Equbal et al, JPCL, 11, 9, 3718, 2020
Low Cost Synthesizers
13
BDPA: Overhauser DNP
Can et al. JCP, 141, 6, 064202, 2014
BDPA Centre
Gurinov et al. Angew, 60(28), 15371-15375, 2021
electron
hoping
ZQ Cross-relaxation
Delage-Laurin, Palani et al. JACS, 143(48), 20281, 2021
Fully Protonated
Selectively Deuterated
DQ Cross-relaxation
14
OE: Why? vs. Why Not ?
DNP profiles observed in BDPA (OE) are common in CE mechanism
Equbal et al, JPCL 2018
BDPA Centre
Equbal et al, JPCL 2019
Vs.
15
OE: Why? vs. Why Not ?
Han & coworkers, JPCL 2020
Fully Protonated
Selectively Deuterated
Vs.
Delage-Laurin, Palani et al. JACS, 143(48), 20281, 2021
Kuzhelev et al. JACS, 144, 3, 1164–1168, 2022
Li et al, JPCL, 11, 21, 9195, 2020
Experiment @ 9T
Prisner & coworkers , JACS 2021
Experiment
@ ~9T
EPR Signature of TM: �Asymmetric EPR-line & Hyperpolarization of Electrons in Pump-probe ELDOR
16
Equbal et al, JPCL, 11, 9, 3718, 2020
17
μw Pump Frequency
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
-0.5
-0
0.5
Low
High
1
-1
(C)
(D)
(A)
(B)
Energy
<S1z+S2z>
Zeeman Order
<S1zS2z>
Dipolar Order
Dipolar Order: Source of Electron Hyperpolarization in ELDOR
Dipolar order detection by EPR confirms cluster states of BDPA and trityl at 20-80 mM concentration.
18
X
Z
Y
Mixing of Zeeman and Dipolar Order Under MW Irradiation
Equbal et al. Unpublished
EPR Signature of Dipolar Order in BDPA => Clustering
19
Pump-probe ELDOR
𝜏
𝜏saturation
𝜏p
ν𝜇w-probe
ν𝜇w-pump
𝜏delay
𝜏
𝜏p
echo
Recycle
delay
BDPA
Equbal et al. Unpublished
Signature of
Dipolar Order
DNP
20
Tailored Polarizing Agent
There is so much left to learn…. and that is very fascinating
BDPA & Trityl (20-80 mM)
We confirm presence of TM DNP
but DONOT rule out the OE hypothesis
Balance J and D coupling
Conclusion
21
Acknowledgement
Prof. Songi Han (UCSB)
Dr. Miranda Li
Kan Tagami
Dr. Sheetal Jain
Dr. Ilia Kaminker
Celeste Tobar
Questions ?
Dr. Mikhail Veshtort (SpinEv)
ISMAR sponsored
Tutorial Lectures
Dr. Alisa Leavesly