1 of 53

Language Documentation and Revitalizing Indigenous Languages 2

Technology for language documentation and revitalization

Clemens J. Mayer 02/16/2022

2 of 53

Overview

  • Metadata
  • Video/Audio editing
  • Storage, distribution, archiving
  • ELAN & FLEx

3 of 53

Previous experiences?

  • What software have you used in the past?
  • What worked? What didn’t?

4 of 53

Metadata

5 of 53

Metadata:

  • Generally only simple software required
  • Some software not compatible for multiple researchers
  • Excel, Google Sheets, Iameta, SayMore

6 of 53

Metadata: Discussion

  • Why is keeping good metadata important?
  • What should (not) be kept in metadata?
  • (How) can technology help/hinder metadata keeping?

7 of 53

Metadata: Excel & co.

  • Useful layout
  • Will suit most people‘s needs
  • Excel/LibreOffice no online function (but can be easily uploaded/shared)

8 of 53

Metadata: Excel & co.

  • Useful layout
  • Will suit most people‘s needs
  • Excel/LibreOffice no online function (but can be easily uploaded/shared)

9 of 53

Metadata: Excel & co.

10 of 53

Metadata: Lameta

  • Intuitive GUI – easy to use
  • Useful for large projects
  • No online capability (but project export)

11 of 53

Metadata: Lameta

12 of 53

Metadata: SayMore

  • Same GUI as Lameta
  • Has additional features such as file import, annotation, file conversion, progress tracking

13 of 53

Metadata: SayMore

14 of 53

Metadata: Personal Recommendations

  • Sheet (Excel etc.) will suit most people‘s needs
  • Sharing through client-side cloud services

15 of 53

Video/Audio Editing

16 of 53

Video/Audio Editing:

  • What do you (minimally) need from video/audio editors?

17 of 53

Video/Audio Editing:

  • Proprietary vs. Open-Source software
  • Proprietary: Most options, often expensive
  • Open-Source: Sometimes restricted, not always updated, free

18 of 53

Audio:

  • Audacity: Standard, has telemetrics in update
  • Praat: Specifically for phonological analysis

19 of 53

Audio: Audacity

  • Basic audio editing: Trimming, making clips, etc.
  • Easy to use, intuitive GUI, open-source
  • Telemetrics in new update – use fork instead

20 of 53

Audio: Audacity

21 of 53

Audio: Praat

  • Spectrographic analysis
  • Many options for scripts/automatization
  • May not be useful for your project
  • Some learning curve

22 of 53

Audio: Praat

23 of 53

Video:

  • Adobe Premiere
  • DaVinci Resolve
  • Other options: Windows Movie Maker, Apple iMovie, etc.

24 of 53

Video: Adobe Premiere

  • UH Department standard
  • Many functions, can be used for complicated projects
  • High price-point
  • High learning curve

25 of 53

Video: Adobe Premiere

(videomaker.com)

26 of 53

Video: DaVinci Resolve

  • Comparable functionality to Premiere
  • Should suffice for your needs
  • Free, open-source
  • High learning curve

27 of 53

Video: DaVinci Resolve

28 of 53

Video: OS Software

  • Low functionality
  • Basic trimming only – no audio track options
  • Useful for quickly importing video files
  • Free Low learning curve

29 of 53

Video: OS Software

30 of 53

Audio/Video: Personal Recommendations

  • Basic needs: Audacity & OS Software
  • Phonetic analysis: Audacity & Praat
  • Video editing: DaVinci Resolve

31 of 53

Audio/Video: Discussion

  • Which audio/video editing software is relevant at which stage of documentation?
  • Is it wise/efficient to choose at the outset for potential goals?
    • E.g. Song collections, videos for general public, etc.

32 of 53

Storage & Distribution:

33 of 53

Storage & Distribution

  • What data should be stored where, accessible how and by whom?

34 of 53

Storage & Distribution

  • Archives: Digital, long-term, relatively inaccessible
  • Local: community-managed, accessible, requires infrastructure

35 of 53

Storage & Distribution

  • Example option: Raspberry Pi mini-archive
    • Inexpensive, DIY, requires some know-how for set-up and upkeep
    • Requires little infrastructure
    • No dedicated software/package
    • Principally local access only

36 of 53

37 of 53

ELAN & FLEx:

38 of 53

ELAN & FLEx:

  • Industry standard
  • Powerful tools for transcription, translation, and analysis
  • Cross-compatible!

39 of 53

ELAN:

  • Open-Source
  • Developed by/for linguists at MPI Nijmegen
  • Time-aligned transcriptions for audio/video files
  • Windows & Mac
  • Export capabilities
  • Medium learning curve

40 of 53

ELAN:

  • Best way to go from audio file -> transcribed & translated text

41 of 53

ELAN:

42 of 53

ELAN:

43 of 53

FLEx:

  • Database software
  • Developed by SIL
  • Features: Lexical entries, glossing, dictionary making
  • Many sub-features, perhaps too many

44 of 53

FLEx:

45 of 53

FLEx:

46 of 53

ELAN & FLEx:

  • Ability to export ELAN-FLEx-ELAN
  • Useful for interlinear (glossed) texts
  • Requires correct template & database setup

47 of 53

ELAN:

  • Breakout Activities:
  • Set up a template for your ELAN transcription
  • Segment, transcribe (& translate) audio file
  • Further instructions Here

48 of 53

Activity reflection

  • What was unexpected about the transcription process? Any elements you didn‘t think about before?
  • What are some issues/difficulties you encountered?
  • Does this software support your documentation goals? If so, how? If not, what is missing?

49 of 53

Mahalo nui!

Hartelijk Dank!

Thank you very much!

50 of 53

Links

51 of 53

Links

52 of 53

Links

53 of 53

Links