Pipeline design (Dense flow versus two-phase flow)
Supervisor:�Dr.Rola Afifi�
BY:
Youssef Ezzat
Abdelrahman Yehia
Youssef Ahmed
Muhammed Ahmed
Karim Yasser
INTRODUCTION
Pipeline design and construction basics�
Engineering, economic and scientific principles.
Route, design and construct a pipeline that can work safely
Minimal effect on the environment.
Optimal efficiency.
The major factors influencing the pipeline design and construction
Volume flow rate.
Length if the pipeline.
Nature of the fluid being transported.
Terrain and medium.
Climate conditions.
Materials
Construction operation and maintenance.
Codes, standards, and regulations.
TYPES OF PIPELINES.
Gathering Lines.
Transmission Pipelines.
Distribution Pipelines.
Pipeline Routing affecting Factors:
Geophysical Factors.
Land Use and Community Acceptance Factors.
Engineering and Cost Factors
Socio Economic Factors.
Two phase types
Two-phase flow types:
Flow regimes:
Gas-Liquid flow�
Bubbly flow
Slug flow
Churn flow
Annular flow
Mist flow
Horizontal pipelines
Solid-Liquid Flows�
Flow behavior | Rheological behavior | Concentration by volume | Rynolds number, Re |
Homogenous | Newtonian | <25% | ≤ 0.1 |
Pseudo homogenous flow | Newtonian | <25% | 0.1 < Re < 2 |
heterogeneous | Newtonian | <25% | > 2 |
Liquid-Liquid flow
Gas-Solid flow �
Slug flow
Packed bed
Dune flow
Homogenous flow
PARAMETERS OF TWO-PHASE FLOW
Pressure drops
1
Heat transfer coefficient
2
Mass transfer coefficient
3
Mean phase content
4
Flux limitation
5
TWO-PHASE FLOWS MODELLING APPROACHES�
Description of the Dense phase�
Thermodynamic behavior
critical temperature
Cricondentherm
Cricondenbar
critical temperature
Hydraulic benefits
Dense Phase Conveying�
Dense phase transfer generally occurs in one of two basic forms:
Difference between dense phase types�
Dense phase properties | Full Pipeline | Slug Flow | Bed Flow |
Difference in pressure | High | Medium-high | Medium |
Material velocities | The lowest | low | Medium-high |
Figures | | | |
Applications of two-phase flow
Gas-Liquid flow :
- pipeline systems for the transport of oil-gas mixtures
- industrial applications
Solid-Liquid flow:
- Hydraulic conveying of solid materials
- crystallization systems.
Applications of two-phase flow
Liquid-liquid flow :
- pipelines like in the petroleum industries
- liquid-liquid solvent extraction mass transfer systems.
Gas-Solid flow :
- Widely exists in chemical engineering
- power engineering , metallurgical engineering
- slurry pipelines transportation.
METHODS USED FOR TWO-PHASE FLOW CALCULATIONS
Unsteadiness of Discharged Mixture
Phase Discharge
METHODS USED FOR TWO-PHASE FLOW CALCULATIONS
Laser Doppler methods in fluid mechanic
Two-Phase Flow Map
Dense flow applications
HIGH-PRESSURE DELIVERY CAPABILITY
Many chemical reactors and fluidized bed combustor systems operate at high pressure and require materials to be fed into a high-pressure operating system.
MULTIPLE-DISTANCE CONVEYING
ProMax
Introduction to ProMax
Used Components
Equations
Equations
Equations
Cases
Two phase case
Dense phase case
Liquid holdup and Viscosity results
Pressure and Velocity results
LOW PRESSURE VERSUS HIGH PRESSURE DENSE PHASE NATURAL GAS PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION
Case A (Dense phase)
Case B (Intermediate Pressure)
Case C (low pressure)
compressor stations power
Case | Station/power, HP | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Total | |
A | 194,084 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 194,084 |
B | 142,930 | 142,930 | 142,930 | 0 | 0 | 428,790 |
C | 113,289 | 103,433 | 103,433 | 103,433 | 103,433 | 527,021 |
pipeline inlet pressure for the three cases
Case | Segment number/Inlet pressure, psia | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
A | 3215 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
B | 1961 | 1961 | 1961 | 0 | 0 |
C | 1595 | 1595 | 1595 | 1595 | 1595 |
Pressure in the pipeline
Temperature in the pipeline
Gas density in the pipeline
Gas velocity in the pipeline
Gas viscosity in the pipeline
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
The capital costs (CAPEX)
7. Meter stations
8. Telecommunication systems
9. Environmental and permitting
10. Right of way (ROW)
11. Engineering and construction management
12.Contingency and other costs
Pipeline cost
Pipeline coatings, labor and installation cost
Mainline valve stations and Meter stations
Right of way (ROW)
Engineering and construction, and Contingency and other costs
The operating costs (OPEX)
Compressor station electrical energy cost
CASE A, B AND C ECONOMICAL COMPARISON
To simplify some calculations, we will put some assumptions that will be constant in all three cases:
Equity cost and loan amortization cost
Description | Cost in million USD | ||
Case A | Case B | Case C | |
Pipeline cost | 1,256.772 | 802.040 | 653.170 |
Pipeline coatings (15%) | 188.515 | 120.306 | 97.975 |
Labor and installation cost | 3,613.217 | 2,305.865 | 1,877.86 |
Compressor stations cost | 73.751 | 162 | 200.267 |
Compressor stations installation | 332.271 | 734.088 | 902.259 |
Mainline valve station | 14.655 | 14.655 | 14.655 |
Meter stations | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Subtotal | 5,491.181 | 4,150.648 | 3,758.186 |
Telecommunication systems (4%) | 219.647 | 166.025 | 150.327 |
Environmental and permitting (12%) | 658.941 | 498.077 | 450.982 |
Right of way (ROW) (8%) | 439.294 | 332.051 | 300.654 |
Engineering and construction management (12%) | 658.941 | 498.077 | 450.982 |
Contingency and other costs (10%)
| 549.118 | 415.064 | 375.818 |
Total | 8,017.122 | 6,059.942 | 5,486.949 |
Description | Cost in million USD | ||
Case A | Case B | Case C | |
compressor station electrical energy | 300.010 | 750.255 | 893.996 |
Fuel consumption | 104.446 | 139.262 | 174,077 |
Compressor station maintenance (5%) | 3.687 | 8.147 | 10,013 |
Pipeline maintenance cost (3%) | 37.703 | 24.061 | 19,595 |
Rental and recurring ROW costs | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Salaries | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Payroll overhead (20%) | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Other operating and management costs (70%) | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.05 |
Total | 451.698 | 929.187 | 1,103.532 |
Pipeline tariffs
Net present value
Net present value for case A, B, and C
Description | Cost in million USD | ||
Case A | Case B | Case C | |
Cost of service | 1,905.175 | 881.397 | 750.569 |
Net present value | 1,747.422 | -$6,646.962 | -$8,952,391 |
Tariff | Cost in USD per MCF | ||
0.722 | 0.487 | 0.415 | |
NORD 2 STREAM – TWO-PHASE VERSUS DENSE PHASE NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION
Two phase case�
Dense phase cycles�
Compressors Differences Table�
| Two- Phase Cycle | Dense Phase Cycle 1 | Dense Phase Cycle 2 | ||||||
Compressor No. | Efficiency | Energy Rate | Pressure Difference | Efficiency | Energy Rate | Pressure Difference | Efficiency | Energy Rate | Pressure Difference |
| % | hp | Psia | % | hp | psia | % | hp | psia |
1 | 90 | 490814 | 1573 | 75 | 140245 | 1740 | 75 | 140245 | 1740 |
2 | 72 | 490814 | 1710 | 75 | 34538 | 718 | 75 | 21106 | 502 |
3 |
|
| 1710 | 75 | 57850 | 1367 | 75 | 4443 | 1108 |
Two Phase Pipeline Specifications Table �
Segment | Segment Type | Pipe Length | Ambient Temp | Overall heat Transfer coefficient | Pressure Change | Outside Diameter
| Thickness | Inside Diameter |
|
| Mile | Fahrenheit | Btu/hr-ft2-˚F | psia | inch | inch | Inch |
1 | Pipe | 186.4 | 41 | 1.004 | 1073.7 | 52 | 1.18 | 49.6 |
2 | Pipe | 310.6 | 41 | 1.003 | 1441.7 | 49.5 | 1.378 | 46.7 |
3 | Pipe | 263.5 | 41 | 1.003 | 1357.3 | 47.5 | 1.055 | 45.4 |
Total |
| 760.5 |
| |||||
Dense Phase cycle 1 Pipeline specifications Table �
Segment | Segment Type | Pipe Length | Ambient Temperature | Overall heat Transfer coefficient | Pressure Change | Outside Diameter
| Thickness | Inside Diameter |
|
| mile | Fahrenheit | Btu/hr-ft2-˚F | Psia | inch | inch | inch |
1 | Pipe | 186.4 | 41 | 1.004 | 423.09 | 45 | 1.18 | 42.6 |
2 | Pipe | 310.6 | 41 | 1.003 | 709.95 | 45 | 1.378 | 42.2 |
3 | Pipe | 263.5 | 41 | 1.003 | 1269.85 | 40 | 1.055 | 37.9 |
Total |
| 760.5 |
| |||||
Dense Phase cycle 2 Pipeline specifications Table �
Segment | Segment Type | Pipe Length | Ambient Temperature | Overall heat Transfer coefficient | Pressure Change (ΔP) | Outside Diameter
| Thickness | Inside Diameter |
|
| mile | Fahrenheit | Btu/hr-ft2-˚F | Psia | inch | inch | inch |
1 | Pipe | 186.4 | 41 | 1.004 | 207.66 | 52 | 1.57 | 48.85 |
2 | Pipe | 310.6 | 41 | 1.003 | 450.6 | 45 | 1.77 | 45.96 |
3 | Pipe | 263.5 | 41 | 1.003 | 511.03 | 40 | 1.45 | 44.6 |
Total |
| 760.5 |
| |||||
Temperature results�
Pressure results�
Liquid hold up results�
Liquid hold up results�
Gas Velocity results�
Gas Viscosity results�
NORD 2 STREAM – Economical analysis
Gas Viscosity results�
Description | Cost in million USD | ||
Two-phase | Dense- | Dense-2 | |
Pipeline cost | 748.255 | 649.963 | 907.170 |
Pipeline coatings (15%) | 112.238 | 97.494 | 136.075 |
Labor and installation cost | 2,151.233 | 1,868.642 | 2,608.113 |
Compressor stations cost | 373.018 | 88.400 | 63.001 |
Compressor stations installation | 1,680.547 | 398.267 | 283.839 |
Mainline valve station | 11.137 | 11.137 | 11.137 |
Meter stations | 9 | 9 | 9 |
Subtotal | 5,085.428 | 3,122.903 | 4,018.335 |
Telecommunication systems (4%) | 254.271 | 124.916 | 160.733 |
Environmental and permitting (12%) | 610.251 | 374.748 | 482.200 |
Right of way (ROW) (8%) | 406.834 | 249.832 | 321.466 |
Engineering and construction management (12%) | 610.251 | 374.748 | 482.200 |
Contingency and other costs (10%)
| 508.543 | 312.290 | 401.834 |
Total | 7,475.578 | 4,559.437 | 5,866.768 |
the annual operating cost of Two-phase, Dense-1, and Dense-2
Description | Cost in million USD | ||
Two-phase | Dense-1 | Dense-2 | |
compressor station electrical energy | 1,422.378 | 359.557 | 256.251 |
Fuel consumption | 256.082 | 204.866 | 153.649 |
Compressor station maintenance (5%) | 18.650 | 4.420 | 3.150 |
Pipeline maintenance cost (3%) | 22.447 | 19.499 | 27.215 |
Rental and recurring ROW costs | 2.281 | 2.281 | 2.281 |
Salaries | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Payroll overhead (20%) | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Other operating and management costs (70%) | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.05 |
Total | 1,724.688 | 593.473 | 445.396 |
Net present value calculations�
Description | Cost in million USD | ||
Two-phase | Dense-1 | Dense-2 | |
Cost of service | 3,079.978 | 1,470.082 | 1,570.131 |
Net present value | -$10,926,438 | 1,522.090 | 2,455.639 |
Tariff | Cost in USD per MCF | ||
0.44 | 0.45 | 0.48 | |
CONCLUSION
RECOMMENDATION
Wall thickness