1 of 20

Classical economists

2 of 20

The classics. �Interest in their analysis

  • The classics are especially interesting because they studied a purer form of capitalism (without a welfare state, with few labor laws, etc.). This simple, pure capitalism is a starting point for studying the very complex capitalisms of today.
  • Furthermore, there are trends that, if left unaddressed, are pushing current capitalist systems toward a pure form of capitalism. The theories of the classical economists help us understand what the fate of humanity would be if we fail to take action .
  • On the other hand, some of the ideas of the classics have application in our complicated current capitalisms.
    • The objectivist view of prices depending on production processes,
    • The study of the limits to growth .

3 of 20

The Classics. �Issues in Their Time

  • The world of the classics was very different from today's, and the hot topics back then were very different.
    • Opposition between industrial capitalists and agricultural landowners
      • The laws of grain; Importation Act 1815, Importation Act 1846
    • The Poor Laws, 1834,
    • The impact of machinery
      • Luddites
      • Captain Swing
    • Overpopulation
    • State monopolies

4 of 20

Optional. Background.

  • Aristotle (384 BC – 322 BC)
    • Nicomachean Ethics, book V, https://archive.org/details/aristoteles.-etica-a-nicomaco-bilingue-1999
    • Distinction between use value and exchange value.
    • Commutative justice, without gain or loss, the exchange is maintained when there is reciprocity.
  • Scholasticism.
    • Albertus Magnus (1193-1280), Thomas Aquinas (1224-1274), Duns Scotus (1265-1308).
    • The fair price that sustains the commercial association is laboris et expensis (labor and expenses).
  • William Petty (1623-1687), Richard Cantillon (1680-1743).
    • Price as labor and land.
  • John Locke (1632-1704).
    • Second Treatise, Chapter V, Of Property. Ethical-Positive Theory , “ labor is what adds the difference in value to each thing.” Two Treatises of Government , https://archive.org/details/criticaleditionw0000unse
  • François Quesnay (1694-1774), Physiocrats.
    • Price as inputs plus rents.

5 of 20

Adam Smith (1723-1790)

6 of 20

Optional. Adam Smith. �Two Theories of Value (Price)

  • Two theories of value for two different societies:
    • In the “rough and primitive state”: labor theory of value.
      • Price as labor-value, as directly necessary labor plus indirectly necessary labor to produce the other inputs. There is no land rent or capital profit; only the labor directly and indirectly necessary to produce the commodity counts.
      • In general, solving equations is necessary to calculate work values, although classical physicists were unaware of this. However, in very simple cases, work values can be calculated without solving equations.
        • If it takes 0.05 hours of work to collect 1 kg of wood in the forest, the labor value of this wood will be 0.05 hours / kg of wood;
        • If 0.1 hours of labor and 4 kg of wood are needed to produce 1 kg of charcoal, its labor value will be 0.1 + 4×0.05 = 0.3 hours / kg of charcoal;
        • If it takes 7 hours of work, 10 kg of wood and 5 kg of charcoal to produce a craft, its labor value will be 7 + 10×0.05 + 5×0.3 = 9 hours / craft.
    • In the “advanced society”: sum of wages, benefits and income.
      • Sociological theory of price, long-term price as the sum of what each class receives (workers, capitalists and landowners).
      • It does not include non-wage capital, because it assumes that it is in turn broken down into wages, profits, and rents.
    • Both are primitive theories of production cost that coincide only when there are no profits or rents.
      • The theory of the cost of production would have better exponents, such as Robert Torrens (1780-1864), An Essay on the Production of Wealth , https://archive.org/details/essayonproductio00torrrich
  • Productivity and division of labor (we will discuss this in other classes).
  • International trade, absolute advantage (in other classes).

7 of 20

Adam Smith: the invisible hand; �in capitalism, the pursuit of self-interest leads to a large pie.

“Insofar as every individual endeavors to invest his capital in national activity and to direct that activity so as to produce the maximum value, every individual necessarily works to make the annual income of society as high as possible. It is true that as a rule he neither intends to promote the general interest nor knows to what extent he is promoting it. By preferring to engage in national rather than foreign activity, he is only pursuing his own security; and by directing that activity so as to produce maximum value, he is only seeking his own gain. But in this case, as in others, an invisible hand leads him to promote an objective which was not part of his intention. That this is so is not necessarily bad for society. By pursuing his own interest, he frequently promotes that of society much more effectually than if he actually intended to promote it. I have never seen many good things done by those who pretend to act for the good of the people.”

The Wealth of Nations (selection) , Alianza, 1994, page 554, https://archive.org/details/smith-adam.-la-riqueza-de-las-naciones-ocr-1994

8 of 20

Adam Smith: the invisible hand; �in capitalism the rich consume little of the pie

“The produce of the land sustains at all times practically the number of inhabitants it is capable of supporting. The rich select from the whole only what is most precious and pleasing. They consume scarcely more than the poor, and despite their natural selfishness and avarice, although they seek only their own convenience, although the sole aim they propose is the satisfaction of their own vain and insatiable desires, they share with the poor the fruit of all their possessions. An invisible hand leads them to make almost the same distribution of the necessities of life that would have taken place if the earth had been divided equally among all its inhabitants, and thus, unintentionally, unknowingly, they promote the interests of society and provide the means for the multiplication of the species. When Providence distributed the land among a few powerful landowners, it neither forgot nor abandoned those who seemed to have been excluded from the distribution. These, too, enjoy a share of all that it produces. In what constitutes genuine happiness in human life, they are in no way inferior to those who would seem to be so superior to them. In the relief of Body and peace of mind—all the various ranks of life are found almost on the same level, and the beggar who basks in the sun by the roadside treasures the security that kings strive to attain.”

The Theory of Moral Sentiments , Alianza, 1997, page 333, https://archive.org/details/smith-adam.-la-teoria-de-los-sentimientos-morales-ocr-1759-1997

9 of 20

David Ricardo (1772-1823)

10 of 20

Optional. David Ricardo. �Theory of Value

  • Value theory.
    • Adam Smith and the theorists of production costs fall into a circularity.
      • If the aim is to calculate product prices as proportional to input prices, the prices are needed as data, which is what we want to calculate.
    • That is why he uses the labor theory of value as a long-term approximation.
      • Labor is used as the representative input. All inputs are reduced to one: labor.
        • Heterogeneous jobs are reduced to one using the observed wage scale.
        • Rent is disregarded by calculating on "marginal" land, which does not pay rent.
        • Non-wage capital is assumed to be proportional to labor (equal “rate of surplus value”).
          • Labor value is proportional to price when the wage/capital ratios and production times are common to all processes.
        • Even when these conditions are not met, work-values can be used as an approximation.

11 of 20

David Ricardo. �Evolution of the economy and distribution

  • Economic evolution
    • The most efficient lands (mines) are used first.
    • As the economy and population grow, it becomes necessary to use less efficient land, which increases the rents received by landowners.
    • The result is a decrease in profits, a lack of motivation for investment, and a halt to growth.
  • Distribution theory.
    • The interests of each class are opposed to those of the others.
    • Land rent (with Anderson and others)
      • Income is the result of the difference between profitability and the “marginal” return.
      • Extensive rent (less profitable land) and intensive rent (latest capital investment).
    • Minimum living wages (with Malthus).
    • Decreasing profits from land, mines, etc. that are becoming less and less profitable.
  • International trade, comparative advantage (in other classes).

12 of 20

Marx on Ricardo

13 of 20

Sismondi 's critique of Ricardo. �Automatic economics

Jean Charles Leonard Simonde �by Sismondi (1773-1842)

New principles of economics politics II , 1824, page 263 �https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/18582

14 of 20

Ricardo's rectification

Principles of Political Economy and Taxation , 3rd edition, https://archive.org/details/ricardo-economia-libro

15 of 20

Thomas Malthus �(1766-1834)

  • Essay on the Principle of Population , https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=8TdB7Y3XYiAC
    • Demographic mechanism; the principle of population.
  • Value theory close to Smith's, critical of Ricardo.
  • Crisis due to underconsumption.

Cambridge University, The man we love to hate: it's time to reappraise Thomas Robert Malthus , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJhGH1xYMqc

16 of 20

Malthus. �Principle of Population

"When there are no obstacles preventing it, the population doubles every twenty-five years, growing from period to period, in a geometric progression."

"Under the most favorable circumstances, the means of subsistence increase only in an arithmetic progression."

When wages exceeded the minimum living wage, the population grew; when wages fell below the minimum living wage, the population fell into poverty and declined. The result was that wages tended to settle at the minimum living wage.

17 of 20

John Stuart Mill �(1806-1873)

  • Principles of Political Economy , https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.218129
  • Collected Works , https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/robson-collected-works-of-john-stuart-mill-in-33-vols
  • Eclectic synthesis between Smithians and Ricardians
    • The price is accepted as the cost of production.
    • The use of work-values as an approximation is justified.
  • Universal laws of production, social laws of distribution (the division of the pie is a social issue).
  • Anti-slavery, feminist, pro-birth control, and a supporter of political and economic democracy.

18 of 20

John Stuart Mill. �On the Steady State.

  • A view of the final steady state that is not necessarily negative.
  • “I cannot, therefore, regard the stationary states of capital and wealth with the unaffected aversion so generally manifested by old-school political economists.”
  • “If the earth must lose the great part of its placidity which it owes to things which the unlimited increase of wealth and population would extirpate from it, for the mere purpose of enabling it to sustain a larger population, but not a better or happier one, I sincerely hope, for posterity’s sake, that they will be content to be stationary, long before necessity compels them to do so.”
  • Principles of Political Economy , Book IV, Chapter VI, The Stationary State. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.218129/page/n495/mode/2up
    • Read this chapter, pages 494 to 498.

19 of 20

Comments on the Classics �: Just because the pie is big in capitalism and the rich consume little of it doesn't mean that workers necessarily get a big slice. We shouldn't take our big slice of the pie for granted.

  • Adam Smith is not wrong when he believes that capitalism tends to cause the pie to be large and the rich to consume a relatively small piece.
  • But just because the pie is big and the rich get a relatively small slice doesn't mean that the people get the rest of it. In fact, a large part of the pie is dedicated to investment, not to people's consumption.
  • Ricardo is also correct when he believes that machines tend to make the cake bigger.
  • But Sismondi is right when he says that a fully mechanized capitalism is possible, one without human workers. Then the pie would be very large, but the workers wouldn't receive even the crumbs, because there wouldn't be any workers. The introduction of machines, like artificial intelligence, can be detrimental to workers, as Ricardo already recognized.
  • In short, the fact that the pie is big in a capitalist system does not guarantee that workers will receive a big slice of the pie.

20 of 20

Comments on the Classics �: Just because the pie is big in capitalism and the rich consume little of it doesn't mean that workers necessarily get a big slice. We shouldn't take our big slice of the pie for granted.

  • A “pure” capitalism tends to reduce the price of goods to their minimum production cost. This applies to all goods, including workers. In a “pure” capitalism, wages would be the lowest possible, as the classical economists argued. A “pure” capitalism is production driven by maximum profit, not production driven by meeting needs. In the past, capitalism demonstrated that it could behave in a “pure” form, for example, in England around 1800.
  • Today, in some countries, we don't live in pure capitalism but in one that is highly nuanced by institutions such as the welfare state, political systems, trade unions, the legal system, limited population growth, and so on. In our nuanced forms of capitalism, these institutions ensure that the distribution of wealth is partially humane, that our needs are partially met, that we are not merely another means of production, and that the share of the pie that workers consume is much larger than what they would receive under "pure" capitalism.
  • But we shouldn't assume this more humane situation is guaranteed. If those institutions that partially humanize resource allocation were to disappear, we would return to 19th-century England, to "pure" capitalism, this time with advanced technology, but with appalling living conditions. Because, if left unchecked, the logic of profit maximization spontaneously leads to that situation.