1 of 6

External Force Explicitly Included DFT Simulations: Modeling Responses of Mechanophores

​

Xiao Huang, MIT Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

05/20/2024

2 of 6

Context Statement

Goal: For computationally modeling the reactivity and response of mechanophores

MONET relevance

For a (potential) mechanophore, we would want to:

  • Quantitatively determine its reactivity--activation force or force-rate relationship
  • Understand its mechanochemical response—bond breaking/rearrangement, molecular elongation, or small molecule release

​

Those properties fundamentally affect the mechanical properties and functionalities of polymer networks

​

Reactivity and response—can be modeled with EFEI

  • Reactivity: computing force-modified TS barriers
  • Response: optimizing structures under applied forces

Y. Sun, I. Kevlishvili et al., Chem, 2024 (just accepted)

Y. Sun et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 10943–10952

3 of 6

EFEI: A Simple, Versatile Modification of Conventional DFT

EEFEI (R1, …,Rn) = EDFT (R1, …,Rn) + EForce

External Force Explicitly Included

(EFEI, Marx @ RUB)

Ri

Rj

EForce = F × |Ri − Rj|

Model energy and structure of molecules under applied force

SO2-TBO Under 1.44 nN

SO2-TBO Under 0 nN

We can do EVERYTHING we can do with force-free DFT with EFEI

  • Force-Modified Geometry Optimization: YES
  • Force-Modified Spin State Ordering: YES
  • Force-Modified Reaction Energetics and/or Transition State Calculation: YES

Ribas-Arino, et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4190-4193

Y. Sun et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 10943–10952

4 of 6

Data: Energy and Molecular Structure

Reaction/Activation Barrier under Force

Molecular Structures under Force

Original/Unfluorinated

Phenyl

Phenoxy

QAXQAJ (Fe2+): 0nN, LS

QAXQAJ (Fe2+): 3nN, HS

5 of 6

Limitations and caveats

Limitation 1: Ignoring Kinetic Effects

EFEI is an ‘static’ technique: can not account for dynamic effects caused by pulling

Limitation 2: Force Directionality

Solution: use AISMD to generate statistics

Pulling direction cannot be explicitly set in EFEI: we may want to test influences of force directions

Solution: use FMPES to test pulling variations

Y. Sun et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 10943–10952

Martinez, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6377–6379

EFMPES (R1, …,Rn) = EPES (R1, …,Rn) + EForce

Ri

Rj

EFEI:

EForce = F × |Ri − Rj|

FMPES (Martinez @ Stanford)

EForce = F × (|Ri − Rm| + |Rk − Rn| )

Rm

Rk

Rn

6 of 6

Practical considerations

Computing Resource/Orca Installation

  • Hardware: any CPU-based university/external supercomputers
  • Software: Orca (free for academics)
  • Very well-documented, easy to install following the online instructions

Common computational setups

  • Functional: B3LYP-D3BJ
  • Basis: def2-SVP
  • No solvent in most cases, use implicit solvent models if necessary

Reach out to us for help on Orca setup/input examples/data analysis!

Input Files/Execution Process

  • A bash script: containing basic execution information and the line for running Orca
  • An Orca input file: specifying molecular structure + computational setups, see Orca manual
  • A xyz file of molecule