1 of 7

PRIP and ELHAP

Scenario Workflows

Examining Possibilities for Future Collaboration

2 of 7

Scenario

Structure

How it Works

Governance

Data Sharing

Strengths

Limitations

1. Parallel Operations with Coordinated Hand-Offs

PRIP and ELHAP run separately but coordinate

PRIP finds lead issues → refers to ELHAP for remediation

Separate City/County departments

Shared database (e.g., Accela)

Easy to launch; aligns with current org chart

Risk of gaps or delays in handoffs

2. Integrated PRIP–ELHAP Team

Joint team conducts inspections and response

Unified inspections; both habitability and lead addressed together

Shared team or interdepartmental MOU

Fully integrated inspection data

Streamlined workflow, one-stop-shop

Requires heavy cross-training, new protocols

3. Tiered Response Model

PRIP leads, escalates serious cases to ELHAP

PRIP handles minor issues; escalates major lead cases to ELHAP

City initiates; ELHAP kicks in on trigger

Central database flags escalation points

Efficient triage; resource prioritization

Reactive rather than preventive for lead

4. Joint Governance via Lead Hazard JPA

City + County form a Joint Powers Authority

JPA oversees both programs and funding allocations

Shared JPA board with community seats

Unified oversight and reporting

Clear accountability; joint decision-making

Takes time to form legally; requires formal agreement

5. Full-Stack Healthy Housing Model

PRIP and ELHAP under a holistic housing health framework

Comprehensive inspections address all hazards (lead, mold, pests, etc.)

New “Healthy Housing Division” or City-County task force

Central public-facing housing health dashboard

Systems-level transformation; addresses root causes

Most complex to implement; cross-sector alignment needed

3 of 7

Scenario 1: Parallel Operations

Structure:

    • PRIP operates proactive inspections for all habitability issues, including lead paint.
    • ELHAP is triggered when PRIP finds lead hazards.
    • PRIP flags the unit → Refers to ELHAP Specialist → ELHAP manages lead-specific remediation and health referrals.

Workflow:

    • PRIP inspects → finds habitability issues.
    • Lead hazard → Tag in database → Notify ELHAP Specialist.
    • ELHAP coordinates:
      • County blood lead testing (if children are present).
      • Rehabilitation resources (grants/loans).
      • Relocation assistance (if necessary).
    • Case closure: Only after both habitability and lead hazard remediation are complete.

Opportunities:

    • Strengths: Easy to launch; aligns well with current org chart
    • Limitations: Risk of bottlenecks from PRIP; risk of gaps or delays in hand-offs

Yes

No

PRIP oversees inspections for all habitability issues, including lead paint

Is there a Lead Hazard?

Hazard Remediation

ELHAP Coordinates:

    • County Blood Lead Testing
    • Rehabilitation Resources
    • Relocation Assistance

Lead Hazard Remediation

Case Closure:

only after habitability and lead hazard remediation is complete

Alameda Healthy Homes Submits Referrals to PRIP

Close-Out in Accela

4 of 7

Scenario 2: Integrated Team 

Structure:

    • A joint inspection team is formed.
    • Inspectors are cross-trained on habitability and lead issues.
    • ELHAP Specialist embedded early in the inspection process.

Workflow:

    • Joint inspection happens.
    • Findings are immediately categorized:
      • Habitability → standard PRIP enforcement.
      • Lead hazards → automatic ELHAP case opening.
    • Single inspection report triggers both enforcement tracks.
    • Shared responsibilities:
      • PRIP enforces repairs.
      • ELHAP ensures blood testing, hazard clearance, and grants administration.

Opportunities:

    • Strengths: Streamlined workflow, one-stop-shop
    • Limitations: Requires heavy cross-training, new protocols

Habitability

PRIP enforces habitability repairs

Findings are Categorized

Standard PRIP Enforcement

ELHAP Coordinates:

    • County Blood Lead Testing
    • Rehabilitation Resources + Hazard Clearance
    • Relocation Assistance

Automatic ELHAP Case Opening

Joint Inspection for PRIP + ELHAP

Alameda Healthy Homes Submits Referrals

Single Inspection Report Triggers both Enforcement Tracks

Lead Hazards

5 of 7

Scenario 3: Tiered Response

Structure:

    • PRIP is frontline inspection only.
    • ELHAP is secondary intervention, activated only if serious lead risks (e.g., presence of children, deteriorated paint) are found.

Workflow:

    • PRIP inspects:
      • If minor lead issues → owner required to fix (PRIP manages).
      • If major lead risk (children, deteriorating paint) → escalation.
    • Escalated cases → ELHAP:
      • Emergency relocation assessed.
      • Full lead hazard control/remediation plan activated.
    • Annual program monitoring:
      • Disaggregated data collection (race/geography).
      • Public reporting via ELHAP.

Opportunities:

    • Strengths: Efficient triage; resource prioritization
    • Limitations: Reactive rather than preventive for lead

Yes

No

PRIP conducts frontline inspection

Is there a severe Lead Hazard?

If minor lead issues → owner required to fix (PRIP manages).

ELHAP Coordinates:

    • County Blood Lead Testing
    • Rehabilitation Resources
    • Emergency Relocation Assistance

If major lead risk (children, deteriorating paint) → escalation.

Case Closure:

only after habitability and lead hazard remediation is complete

Alameda Healthy Homes Submits Escalated Referrals to ELHAP

6 of 7

Scenario 4

Structure:

    • A Joint Powers Authority (JPA) is formed between the City of Oakland and Alameda County to oversee all lead-related inspections, interventions, funding, and evaluation.
    • Both PRIP and ELHAP operate under this centralized governance body, ensuring policy alignment, fiscal coordination, and shared accountability.

Key Features:

    • Shared leadership: City and County appoint members to a Lead Hazard Oversight Board.
    • Settlement funds are pooled and administered jointly.
    • Program design, implementation, and reporting are centralized to minimize duplication and jurisdictional conflict.
    • Community representation on the Board ensures transparency and equity oversight.

Opportunities:

    • Strengths: Clear accountability; joint decision-making
    • Limitations: Takes time to form legally; requires formal agreement

PRIP Coordinates

    • Inspections for all habitability issues, including lead paint

ELHAP Coordinates:

    • Rehabilitation and Abatement Resources
    • Relocation Assistance

JPA between the City of Oakland and Alameda County to oversee all lead-related inspections, interventions, funding, and evaluation.

Alameda County Coordinates:

    • County Blood Lead Testing
    • Case Management

City and County appoint members to a Hazard Oversight Board

7 of 7

Scenario 5

Structure:

    • PRIP and ELHAP are nested under a broader Healthy Housing Initiative that integrates:
      • Habitability enforcement (PRIP),
      • Environmental hazard remediation (ELHAP),
      • Health services (County),
      • Climate resilience upgrades (e.g., mold, asbestos, energy efficiency),
      • Tenant and landlord support services.

Key Features:

    • PRIP inspections trigger a comprehensive housing health screening, including for lead, mold, asbestos, pests, and habitability.
    • A Healthy Housing Case Manager coordinates remediation efforts, tenant protections, funding support, and public health referrals.
    • Data from all inspections feed into a unified Healthy Housing Dashboard, disaggregated by race and geography for transparency.
    • This model is closely aligned with workforce development, emphasizing small business engagement and local hiring for rehabilitation.

Opportunities:

    • Strengths: Systems-level transformation; addresses root causes
    • Limitations: Most complex to implement; cross-sector alignment needed

PRIP Inspections trigger a comprehensive housing health screening

Lead

ELHAP Coordinates:

    • Rehabilitation Resources
    • Relocation Assistance

Mold

Asbestos

Code

Health

PRIP enforces habitability repairs

Alameda HH Coordinates:

    • Case Management
    • County Blood Lead Testing