1 of 21

Private Wells: A Patchwork of Protections

Tannie Eshenaur, MPH | Water Policy Center

Minnesota Department of Health

2 of 21

Drinking Water Protection: State Agency Collaboration

4/29/2025

BWSR

DNR

MDA

MPCA

MDH

  • Water Quantity
  • Ecosystem Interactions
  • Water Monitoring
  • Standards
  • Permits
  • Clean-up
  • Pesticides
  • Fertilizers
  • Private Land Owners
  • Soil Health
  • Water Quality
  • Groundwater Guidance
  • Public Drinking Water
  • Wells

3 of 21

Disparities in safeguards over the lifespan of a well

3

4/29/2025

Well users don’t choose their geology or how land is used around them

4 of 21

What are we concerned about in private wells?

5 of 21

Few private well users are testing and taking necessary action

2016 survey of 798 well owners who had arsenic above 10 µg/L in their new well sample

<20% tested at recommended frequency

34% did not take action to reduce exposure to arsenic above the level allowed in community water systems

6 of 21

Arsenic exposure reductions from MCL change

2001: MCL reduced from 50 µg/L to 10 µg/L

6

4/29/2025

Nigra

Welsh

Community water system customers

17% decrease

10.6% decrease

Private well users

No change

No change

Nigra, et.al., 2017, Welch, et. al., 2018

How many preventable cancer cases?

7 of 21

EPA directive to state agencies

Develop a coordinated and comprehensive work plan to reduce nitrate contamination of drinking water aquifers in eight southeastern Minnesota counties.

Letter, Minnesota’s response, reports: Response to Nitrate in Southeast Minnesota

8 of 21

Plan components: Private well focus

  1. Develop coordinated communication plan
  2. Identify all private wells
  3. Provide education and outreach:
    • Private wells owners/users 
    • Community water system customers
  4. Offer testing for all private wells
  5. Offer remediation for wells that exceed drinking water guidance
  6. Establish public access to data and records
  7. Report quarterly to US EPA

Township Testing results for 8 county area

9 of 21

Workplan has three phases 

health.state.mn.us

9

4/29/2025

Phase I: Immediate Response – MDH & MDA�Jan-Jun 2024 

    • Conduct education and outreach encouraging well testing
    • Provide limited alternate water for vulnerable populations

Phase II: Public Health Intervention – MDH & MDA�Jul 2024 forward 

    • Identify impacted residences
    • Conduct education and outreach
    • Test private well drinking water
    • Provide mitigation
    • Provide public record of work

Phase III: Long-Term Nitrate Strategies – MDA & MPCA�Long-term 

    • Taskforce to address nitrate
    • Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan and Groundwater Protection Rule
    • Feedlot permits and rules
    • Revising MN Nutrient Reduction Strategy
    • Fish kill prevention
    • Wastewater nitrogen reduction and karst protection strategies

10 of 21

CWF helps fund public health intervention

10

4/29/2025

CWF$2.79M to MDH

    • Well inventory
    • Testing
    • Education, outreach, community engagement
    • Staff capacity (local and state)

General Fund�$2.8M to MDA

    • Home water treatment
    • Option to transfer to MDH for a mitigation program

Fund Year 1 �of a 10-year public health intervention

11 of 21

The Power of Partnerships

health.state.mn.us

11

4/29/2025

Private well users have safe drinking water

Well Contractors (MWWA)

Laboratories

Local Health Departments & Environmental Services

SWCDs

Real Estate Professionals

Rental Property Owners

Medical Professionals

UMN Extension/ Water Resources Center

Nongovernmental Organizations (MNWOO, MGWA)

State Agencies

12 of 21

Phase II: Public Health Intervention

  • Free water tests for private well households in 8-county area, prioritizing households with babies or a pregnant person ~1400+ requests
  • Mitigation (RO systems) provided by MDA for households with nitrate above 10 mg/L ~160 RO systems installed
  • Well inventory to locate private wells
  • Outreach: support local outreach and education about well testing and mitigation; media contract
  • Use a scalable approach: Design the approach so it can be used throughout MN

Leverage and elevate Tap-In �and existing efforts

13 of 21

Test kits requested by week

14 of 21

How did you hear about the free well test kit?

15 of 21

Early Private Well Testing Results

Out of 236 Test Kits:

    • 11% nitrate >10 mg/L
    • 12% bacteria present
    • 1% E.coli present
    • 12% arsenic present
    • 45% lead present
    • 5% manganese present

Data from June 3, 2024 – February 20, 2025

15

4/29/2025

Number of Test Kits Returned by County

16 of 21

Water Treatment System Installations

* As of 3/31/2025

12% of homes had an infant under the age of 1 or

a pregnant woman in the household

31% of applicants have income below 300%

of the federal poverty level

Example reverse osmosis system installation

County

Water Treatment System Installs

Dodge

9

Fillmore

28

Goodhue

29

Houston

15

Mower

10

Olmsted

10

Wabasha

21

Winona

42

TOTAL

164

17 of 21

Outreach and Education

  • Social Media, TV, Radio, Newspaper
  • Community meetings, webinars
  • Private Well Steward Network, UMN Extension
  • Groundwater Awareness Week, Drinking Water Week
  • MDH Website
  • Realtor CEUs, Buying and Selling a Home brochures
  • Well mitigation navigator with county laboratory
  • Social science research with UMN

17

18 of 21

Well Inventory

  • Process aligns with MN Geologic Survey/UMN
  • Identify all private wells supplying drinking water for a home (county by county)
  • Provide information to update the County Well Index (which updates Minnesota Well Index)

18

4/29/2025

19 of 21

Where do we go from here?

  • Improve test kit return rate and bacteria hold time compliance
  • Expand mitigation options to maximize cost/benefit and sustainability
  • Additional local champions like community health workers
  • Address nitrate and other "top five" contaminants in other parts of the state

19

20 of 21

Approaches to carry forward

health.mn.gov

20

4/29/2025

Sustainable statewide system for well testing & mitigation

Locally led

Be adaptable

Prioritize vulnerable populations

Rely on social science

Multi-pronged outreach

Test for the top 5

Multiple mitigation strategies

Make it simple for well users

21 of 21

Questions?

Tannie Eshenaur

tannie.eshenaur@state.mn.us

651-201-4074