The Assumptions of Perfect Competition
1
Profit Maximization
Short-Run Profit Maximization �
3
The Firm’s Supply Decision
MC(y)
ATC(y)
y
p
The firm’s�supply curve
$
Qf
ATC
AVC
MC
Pe = MR
Qf*
ATC
Pe
Profit = (Pe - ATC) × Qf*
Should this Firm Sustain Short Run Losses or Shut Down?
$
Qf
ATC
AVC
MC
Pe = MR
Qf*
ATC
Pe
Profit = (Pe - ATC) × Qf* < 0
Loss
Operating at a Loss in the Short-Run
7
Shutdown Decision Rule
Decision rule:
Firm’s Short-Run Supply Curve: MC Above Min AVC
$
Qf
ATC
AVC
MC
Qf*
P min AVC
8-9
A Competitive Firm’s Short-Run Supply Curve
10
Short-Run Market Supply Curve
Firm 1
Firm 2
5
10
20
30
Market
Q
Q
Q
P
P
P
15
18
25
43
S1
S2
SM
8-11
Short-Run Industry Equilibrium
Market demand
Short-run industry�supply
pse
Yse
Y
Short-run equilibrium price clears the�market and is taken as given by each firm.
y1
y2
y3
ATC
ATC
ATC
MC
MC
MC
y1*
y2*
y3*
pse
Firm 1
Firm 2
Firm 3
y1
y2
y3
ATC
ATC
ATC
MC
MC
MC
y1*
y2*
y3*
pse
Firm 1
Firm 2
Firm 3
Firm 1 wishes�to remain in�the industry.
Firm 2 wishes�to exit from�the industry.
Firm 3 is�indifferent.
Π1 > 0
Π2 < 0
Π3 = 0
Long-Run Industry Supply
S2(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
Suppose the industry initially contains�only two firms.
Mkt.�Supply
S2(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p2
p2
Then the market-clearing price is p2.
S2(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p2
p2
y2*
Then the market-clearing price is p2.�Each firm produces y2* units of output.
S2(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p2
p2
y2*
Π > 0
Each firm makes a positive economic�profit, inducing entry by another firm.
S2(p)
S3(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p2
p2
Market supply shifts outwards.
y2*
S2(p)
S3(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p2
p2
Market supply shifts outwards.�Market price falls.
y2*
S2(p)
S3(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p3
Each firm produces less.
y3*
p3
S2(p)
S3(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p3
Each firm produces less.�Each firm’s economic profit is reduced.
y3*
p3
Π > 0
S3(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p3
Each firm’s economic profit is positive.�Will another firm enter?
y3*
p3
Π > 0
S4(p)
S3(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p3
Market supply would shift outwards again.
y3*
p3
S4(p)
S3(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p3
Market supply would shift outwards again.�Market price would fall again.
y3*
p3
S4(p)
S3(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p4
Each firm would produce less again.
y4*
p4
S4(p)
S3(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p4
Each firm would produce less again. Each�firm’s economic profit would be negative.
y4*
Π < 0
p4
S4(p)
S3(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p4
Each firm would produce less again. Each�firm’s economic profit would be negative.�So the fourth firm would not enter.
y4*
Π < 0
p4
Long-Run Industry Supply
S(p)
Mkt. Demand
ATC(y)
MC(y)
y
A “Typical” Firm
The Market
p
p
Y
p’
y*
p’
A long-run competitive equilibrium occurs when three conditions hold:
The Long-Run Industry Supply Curve
33
The Long-Run Industry Supply Curve
34
CONSTANT-, INCREASING-, AND DECREASING-COST INDUSTRIES: COFFEE, OIL, AND AUTOMOBILES
You have been introduced to industries that have constant, increasing, and decreasing long-run costs.
The supply of coffee is extremely elastic in the long run. The reason is that land for growing coffee is widely available and the costs of planting and caring for trees remains constant as the volume grows. Thus, coffee is a constant-cost industry.
The oil industry is an increasing cost industry because there is a limited availability of easily accessible, large-volume oil fields.
Finally, a decreasing-cost industry. In the automobile industry, certain cost advantages arise because inputs can be acquired more cheaply as the volume of production increases.
The Industry’s Long-Run Supply Curve
Constant-Cost Industry
constant-cost industry Industry whose long-run supply curve is horizontal.
LONG-RUN SUPPLY IN A CONSTANT COST INDUSTRY
In (b), the long-run supply curve in a constant-cost industry is a horizontal line SL. When demand increases, initially causing a price rise, the firm initially increases its output from q1 to q2, as shown in (a). But the entry of new firms causes a shift to the right in industry supply. Because input prices are unaffected by the increased output of the industry, entry occurs until the original price is obtained (at point B in (b)).
The long-run supply curve for a constant-cost industry is, therefore, a horizontal line at a price that is equal to the long-run minimum average cost of production.
The Industry’s Long-Run Supply Curve
Increasing-Cost Industry
increasing-cost industry Industry whose long-run supply curve is upward sloping.
LONG-RUN SUPPLY IN A CONSTANT COST INDUSTRY
In (b), the long-run supply curve in an increasing-cost industry is an upward-sloping curve SL. When demand increases, initially causing a price rise, the firms increase their output from q1 to q2 in (a). In that case, the entry of new firms causes a shift to the right in supply from S1 to S2.
Because input prices increase as a result, the new long-run equilibrium occurs at a higher price than the initial equilibrium.
In an increasing-cost industry, the long-run industry supply curve is upward sloping.
38
The Monopolist’s Demand and Marginal Revenue Curves
39
The Monopolist’s AR Curve
40
Monopoly
AVERAGE AND MARGINAL REVENUE
Average and marginal revenue are shown for the demand curve �P = 6 − Q.
Average Revenue and Marginal Revenue
marginal revenue Change in revenue resulting from a one-unit increase in output.
Consider a firm facing the following demand curve: P = 6 − Q; MR is the derivative of TR with respect to Q
TOTAL, MARGINAL, AND AVERAGE REVENUE
PRICE (P) | QUANTITY (Q) | TOTAL REVENUE (R) | MARGINAL REVENUE (MR) | AVERAGE REVENUE (AR) |
$6 | 0 | $0 | — | — |
5 | 1 | 5 | $5 | $5 |
4 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 4 |
3 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 3 |
2 | 4 | 8 | −1 | 2 |
1 | 5 | 5 | −3 | 1 |
Profit Maximizing in Monopoly
We can also see algebraically that Q* maximizes profit. Profit π is the difference between revenue and cost, both of which depend on Q:
As Q is increased from zero, profit will increase until it reaches a maximum and then begin to decrease. Thus the profit-maximizing Q is such that the incremental profit resulting from a small increase in Q is just zero (i.e., Δπ /ΔQ = 0). Then
44
Profit-Maximization: Total and Per-Unit Curves
45
Profit Maximization
46
Profit-Maximizing Output of a Monopoly
47
Monopoly
An Example
EXAMPLE OF PROFIT MAXIMIZATION
Part (a) shows total revenue R, total cost C, and profit, the difference between the two.
Part (b) shows average and marginal revenue and average and marginal cost.
Marginal revenue is the slope of the total revenue curve, and marginal cost is the slope of the total cost curve.
The profit-maximizing output is Q* = 10, the point where marginal revenue equals marginal cost.
At this output level, the slope of the profit curve is zero, and the slopes of the total revenue and total cost curves are equal.
The profit per unit is $15, the difference between average revenue and average cost. Because 10 units are produced, total profit is $150.
Monopoly
With limited knowledge of average and marginal revenue, we can derive a rule of thumb that can be more easily applied in practice. First, write the expression for marginal revenue:
Note that the extra revenue from an incremental unit of quantity, Δ(PQ)/ΔQ, has two components:
Thus
Monopoly
(Q/P)(ΔP/ΔQ) is the reciprocal of the elasticity of demand, 1/Ed, measured at the profit-maximizing output, and
Now, because the firm’s objective is to maximize profit, we can set marginal revenue equal to marginal cost:
which can be rearranged to give us
(10.1)
Equivalently, we can rearrange this equation to express price directly as a markup over marginal cost:
(10.2)
Monopoly Demand, Marginal Revenue, and Total Revenue
51
Monopoly Power
Measuring Monopoly Power
Remember the important distinction between a perfectly competitive firm and a firm with monopoly power: For the competitive firm, price equals marginal cost; for the firm with monopoly power, price exceeds marginal cost.
Lerner Index of Monopoly Power Measure of monopoly power calculated as excess of price over marginal cost as a fraction of price.
Mathematically:
This index of monopoly power can also be expressed in terms of the elasticity of demand facing the firm.
(10.4)
Monopoly Power
The Rule of Thumb for Pricing
FIGURE 10.8
ELASTICITY OF DEMAND AND PRICE MARKUP
The markup (P − MC)/P is equal to minus the inverse of the elasticity of demand.
If the firm’s demand is elastic, as in (a), the markup is small and the firm has little monopoly power.
The opposite is true if demand is relatively inelastic, as in (b).
The Social Costs of Monopoly Power
DEADWEIGHT LOSS FROM MONOPOLY POWER
The shaded rectangle and triangles show changes in consumer and producer surplus when moving from competitive price and quantity, Pc and Qc, to a monopolist’s price and quantity, Pm and Qm.
Because of the higher price, consumers lose A + B and producer gains A − C. The deadweight loss is B + C.
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Monopolistic Competition Market in which firms can enter freely, each producing its own brand or version of a differentiated product.
Oligopoly Market in which only a few firms compete with one another, and entry by new firms is impeded.
Price and Output Under Monopolistic Competition
56
Determination of Market Equilibrium
57
Perfect Competition – Monopoly - Monopolistic Competition
Short-Run Monopolistic Competition
$
ATC
MC
D
MR
QM
PM
Profit
ATC
Quantity of Brand X
Long-Run Monopolistic Competition
$
AC
MC
D
MR
Q*
P*
Quantity of Brand X
MR1
D1
Entry
P1
Q1
Long Run Equilibrium
(P = AC, so zero profits)
8-60
Monopolistic Competition and Economic Efficiency
COMPARISON OF MONOPOLISTICALLY COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUM AND PERFECTLY COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUM
Under perfect competition, price equals marginal cost.
The demand curve facing the firm is horizontal, so the zero-profit point occurs at the point of minimum average cost.
Monopolistic Competition and Economic Efficiency
COMPARISON OF MONOPOLISTICALLY COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUM AND PERFECTLY COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUM
Under monopolistic competition, price exceeds marginal cost.
Thus there is a deadweight loss, as shown by the yellow-shaded area.
The demand curve is downward-sloping, so the zero profit point is to the left of the point of minimum average cost.
In both types of markets, entry occurs until profits are driven to zero.
Monopolistic Competition
Is monopolistic competition then a socially undesirable market structure that should be regulated? The answer—for two reasons—is probably no:
Oligopoly
In oligopolistic markets, the products may or may not be differentiated.
What matters is that only a few firms account for most or all of total production.
In some oligopolistic markets, some or all firms earn substantial profits over the long run because barriers to entry make it difficult or impossible for new firms to enter.
Examples of oligopolistic industries include automobiles (in some countries), steel, aluminum, petrochemicals, electrical equipment, and computers.
Welfare Economics
Consumer Surplus
Producer Surplus
Social Welfare
Competitive Equilibrium is Efficient
Excise Tax
Tax imposed on Buyers
Tax imposed on Sellers
Excise Tax
How the Tax Burden is Divided
Tax Revenue
Welfare Effects of Excise Tax
Welfare Effects of Excise Tax
International Trade
Exporting Small Open Economy
Welfare Effects of Exports
Importing Small Open Economy
Welfare Effects of Imports
Other Benefits of International Trade
Arguments for Restricting Trade
Tariff
Import Quota