Leading for Equity
Consider:
What is the purpose of education anyway?
Do we teach and lead to simply reproduce reality, or will be teach and lead to transform?
A: For all our talk of being student centred, we have bought into a success paradigm that robs many children of their voices, marginalizes their gifts, and prioritizes measurement and incremental improvement over learning and transformation.
How do we reorient public education around another set of values and approaches?
We begin by reclaiming the village, centering the experiences of children - particularly children at the margins - and working to heal wounds of racism and oppression in our schools.
B: What if, because of what we’ve deemed valid and reliable, we have been asking the wrong set of questions? What if the achievement gap itself is a mythology?
As we reckon with these histories, we must interrogate our assumptions about knowledge, measurement, and what really matters when it comes to educating young people. What if there were a completely different way to think about all this? What would a more expansive and culturally sustaining epistemology yield?
Street Data: Leading for Equity
“Street Data” by Safir and Dugan, pg. 20
Level 1: Satellite Data
Level 2: Map Data
Level 1: Street Data
“Street Data” Safir, Dugan, pg. 55
Make a copy of the Action Plan for September (forced copy)
Deficit thinking Shaming Lagging Objectifying Static What’s wrong with you? | Asset thinking Showcasing Immediate Agentic Dynamic What’s right with you? |