“TITLE”
Creators: [your names]
Prompt: [Prompt used here]
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
An Illegal Photo
Photos you take can be copyright protected, but situationally some photos violate copyright. A good example of this is the Eiffel Tower light show at night.
Creators: Jackson, Tristan
Prompt: Eiffel Tower at night with lights
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“MayhemAi”
Creators: Vaughn, Ayden, Caleb, Justin V
Prompt: OpenAi scraping art from the Internet.
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
Should creators be compensated if their art is used to train an ai?
“No such thing as artificial intellectual rights”
Copy-rightable AI art is Cap
AI art is more like commissioning an art piece. The creator of the art owns the art piece and may lease it to the person that requested the commission. The AI made the art but it cannot copyright its own art as it is not a human.
Creators: [Jeremy Bellert, Nicholas Kinnas, Trevor Skeen, Zane Weirdbach
Prompt: [Should AI-generated artwork be copyrightable?]
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“Look mom, no hands!”
Art created for private usage or portfolios should not be used to train artificial intelligence without the artist’s consent. Even ‘attribution’ does not atone for the fact that a creation may be used for financial gain, and those artists would not be compensated. The only art used to train artificial intelligence creating digitally generated “art” should be explicitly public, free usage works, and, if that line is crossed, then the artists should be consulted and compensated. ��Artificially generated art is interesting, fun, and a great technological step; but it isn’t one that should come at the expense of artists and their efforts.
Creators: Garrett Isaacs, Melina Tierrablanca, Preston Harris, KJ Gast
Prompt: An AI learns from art on the internet without paying for it
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“TITLE”
Creators: [your names]
Prompt: [Prompt used here]
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“TITLE”
An individual using an AI-art generation tool shouldn’t be able to copyright the work they generate with the tool. The creator of the AI-tool also shouldn’t be able to copyright the generated artwork.
Creators: Jacob Dean, Matthew Menezes, Jake Ridenbaugh
Prompt: AI Robot copyrighting its own artwork, photorealistic
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“TITLE”
Creators: [your names]
Prompt: [Prompt used here]
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“I plunder your digital drip”
Copyright in general is fake so it doesn’t really matter.
Creators: Nathan Kleffner, Eleanor McArdle, Alex Therwhanger
Prompt: digital piracy
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“Grand Theft Art Online”
Creators: Justin Burns, Janet Jiang, Michelle Lee, Noah Wenig
Prompt: art theft online
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“Oh, the Irony”
Creators: Josh, Dohoon, Cole, Ollin
Prompt: Artists should be compensated if their art is used in AI training
“Corporate Profit”
Creators: Garrett Chollett, Paul Bland, Gabi Fulk
Prompt: Corporations profiting off of ai art
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“TITLE”
Creators: [Sean Stepanik, Grant Danner, ]
Prompt: [A collage for a job interview with people that dont exist]
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“Group #14 - Copying style”
AI’s copy images and reference style.
We copied Prof. Fogarty’s style.
Creators: Hugh Coleman, Mason Borenstein, Forrest Keller
Prompt: Male professor with thin striped blue button down shirt with glasses and a long ponytail and ear piercings no facial hair.
“TITLE”
Creators: [Ngoc Nguyen, olivia bangs, Ryan Soto]
Prompt: [Using AI generated image for a job interview]
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
Scaring your way into a job
Digital Transactions
In discussing whether or not AI Art should be copyrighted, we noted how nearly each iteration of a prompt is different. Because of this, we figured that if you pay for a specific iteration of a prompt, it should be able to be copyrighted.
Creators: Matevi Popov, Nicholas Cipolla, Larry Green,
Prompt: person paying for AI art with credits, cyberpunk
“The Greatest Form of Flattery”
Our group was discussing how close to an original artwork the AI would get and whether or not that would be considered a new artwork or just a copy of the original.
Creators: [Emery, Micah, Eric, Angela]
Prompt: [mona lisa with a toothy grin]
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“Mickey Mouse wearing a yarmulke”
Creators: Jose, David and Jacelyn
Prompt: Fair use issues (when should copyright rules apply to AI-generated art, especially if its open source?)
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“TITLE”
Creators: Jack Pittman, Daisy Nieto, Liliana Villarreal
Prompt: Who owns this art
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“Real artists get no money”
Creators: Leah, Julia, Amanda, Wen, Jimmy
Prompt: “Real artists get no money”
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)
“TITLE”
AI Art Generator Used: AI Art Generator
Should AI-generated art be copyrightable?
Debatable because
(couldnt finish on time sorry)
Creators: Arial Baker
Prompt:
Image Credit: Pexels (Burst, free to use)