New Approaches for Quantum Dissipative Dynamics and Spectroscopy of Condense-Phase Molecular Systems
Department of Chemistry & Center for Quantum �Science and Technology, National Taiwan University
Physics Division, National Center for Theoretical Sciences
QFort Workshop, NCKU, Tainan
April 16, 2024
Yuan-Chung Cheng*��yuanchung@ntu.edu.tw
Molecular Modeling of Excitonic Dynamics
Research in the Cheng group concerns molecular simulations and quantum dynamic calculations for excitonic phenomena in molecular systems
Dynamics of light harvesting
LHCII, 42 Chls
Exciton/charge dynamics in molecular materials
Singlet fission
Donor/acceptor polymer
2D spectroscopy
Modeling EET using quantum noises
Characterization of gate errors on IBM-Q
Generic Model for Condensed-Phase Quantum Dynamics
J
Spectral density:
System
Bath
Generic Model for Condensed-Phase Quantum Dynamics
J
Spectral density:
System
Bath
Electronic Hamiltonian
Spectral density function:�coarse-grained system-bath �interactions
Strategy for Excitonic System Modeling
J
Spectral density:
System
Bath
Exciton Hamiltonian�Quantum chemistry �+ electrostatic �embedding model
Spectral fitting & MD simulations
Spectral density function
Dynamical theory
Conventional Theories for Condensed-Phase Quantum Dynamics
J
Spectral density:
System
Bath
Forster theory: weak electronic coupling, incoherent dynamics
Redfield theory: weak system-bath coupling, coherent dynamics
HEOM/QUAPI/…: non-perturbative methods, numerically exact
Conventional Methods Inadequate for Coherent EET in Photosynthesis
Conventional Förster theory or Redfield equation do not adequately describe photosynthetic EET dynamics – new theories suitable for the intermediate regime are needed.
Comparative study with exact calculations based on the reduced hierarchy equation approach on a model chlorophyll dimer (Ishizaki &Fleming, JCP 2009).
exact
full Redfield
secular Redfield
Forster
Redfield
Theories for Dissipative Quantum Dynamics
We develop perturbative methods to provide accurate descriptions of quantum dynamics in various parameter regimes:�
Simulating Quantum Dynamics & Spectra
🡪 Single consistent theory for signals and dynamics �going beyond response function formalism
http://quantum.ch.ntu.edu.tw/ycclab/QDAS.html
Quantum Dynamics
Nonlinear Optical
Spectral Signals
Model: He + Ω(ω)
Generalized
dynamical
theory
Light-matter�interactions
Theories for Dissipative Quantum Dynamics
We develop perturbative methods to provide accurate descriptions of quantum dynamics in various parameter regimes:�
Accurate quantum dynamics via 2nd-order perturbative quantum master equation
Pure Dephasing Reference System (PDRS)
11
Electronic reference basis
unitary transformation
U
Diagonal He
General basis:
Site basis
PDRS Dynamics via 2nd-order Perturbations
12
Diagonal part of Hsb included in the zero-th order Hamiltonian, treated exactly (pure dephasing)
Off-diagonal part of Hsb and Hs treated in the 2nd-order quantum master equation framework
Perturbation
PDRS Quantum Master Equation
Naturally leads to one FT-term caused by excitonic coupling, one mRT-term by electron-phonon coupling, and cross-terms
13
(Förster theory)
(modified Redfield theory)
Mix perturbation by an intermediate reference system
Variational Polaron Reference System
14
Site basis (f=0)
(Förster, Redfield)
Displaced basis �(0<f<1)
(variational polaron)
Pure Dephasing Variational Polaron Reference System (PDVPRS)
15
artifact of variational small polaronic ansatz
PDVPRS vs QUAPI Dynamics
16
PDVPRS-QME, �CMRT, FT, QUAPI
Dynamics at the Intermediate Regime
17
PDVPRS-QME, �CMRT, FT, QUAPI
Theories for Dissipative Quantum Dynamics
We develop perturbative methods to provide accurate descriptions of quantum dynamics in various parameter regimes:�
Simulate nonlinear spectra of strongly coupled electronic-vibrational systems
Two-dimensional Spectroscopy: Four-wave Mixing
Es(τ, Τ, ωt) ~
spectrometer
sample
local
oscillator (LO)
1
2
3
Es(ωτ, Τ, ωt)
Fourier
transform
along τ
1
2
3
4 (LO)
coh.
time
pop.
time
echo
time
T
t
signal
τ
12050
12550
12050
12550
ωτ (input)
ωt (output)
(cm-1)
Energy transfer
Rich Information Content in a 2D Spectrum
Theoretical Simulation of 2DES Spectra
The method with explicit treatment on vibrational relaxation dynamics is still underdeveloped
QSLE
Approach
Wong and Cheng JCP 2021
The Quantum Schrodinger-Langevin Equation Approach
An efficient, novel method for coupled vibronic dynamics and 2D spectroscopy in a dissipative environment
Dissipative dynamics + Light-matter interactions
M. T. Wong & Y.-C. Cheng, J. Chem. Phys., 154, 154107 (2021)
pulse overlap, realistic pulse shape, multiple pathways,… automatically included
The Quantum Langevin Equation Approach
An efficient, novel method for coupled vibronic dynamics and 2D spectroscopy in a dissipative environment
M. T. Wong & Y.-C. Cheng, J. Chem. Phys., 154, 154107 (2021)
Drag force
Random force
Dissipative dynamics + Light-matter interactions
Separates friction and fluctuation, unlike stochastic approaches
The Quantum Langevin Equation Approach
An efficient, novel method for coupled vibronic dynamics and 2D spectroscopy in a dissipative environment
M. T. Wong & Y.-C. Cheng, J. Chem. Phys., 154, 154107 (2021)
Dissipative dynamics + Light-matter interactions
The Quantum Langevin Equation Approach
An efficient, novel method for coupled vibronic dynamics and 2D spectroscopy in a dissipative environment
M. T. Wong & Y.-C. Cheng, J. Chem. Phys., 154, 154107 (2021)
10 auxiliary wavefunctions
2D spectra
Dissipative dynamics + Light-matter interactions
Vibrational Relaxation in 2DES Signals
Simple model simulation to demonstrate the capability of the QLE approach
Displaced-oscillator model
Vibrational Relaxation in 2DES Signals
Spectroscopy of Tagged Hydronium Ions
X=Ar or N2
SLE simulated IR Spectra
Ar-tagged:�Fermi resonance
N2-tagged:�No Fermi resonance
Collaboration with Jer-Lai Kuo & Asuka Fujii
SLE 2DIR Simulations & Fermi Resonance
Ar-tagged
N2-tagged
Strong coupling leads to square peak pattern for Fermi resonance systems
With Fermi resonance
Without Fermi resonance
Vibronic Effects in Conical-Intersection (CI) Systems
Dissipative CI dynamics with QME based methods
Solvent effects on CI geometry and mixed quantum-classical methods
Malhado et al., J. Chem. Phys., 137, 22A543 (2012)
Chen et al. Faraday Discuss., 194, 61 (2016)
Irregular intensity distribution for CI model (left)
Excited-state absorption due to CI dynamics
Duan et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 7, 382−386 (2016)
Theoretical studies of 2DES spectra for CI systems
Krčmář et al., J. Chem. Phys., 143, 074308 (2015)
Also Cederbaum/Domcke/Dassia Egorova/Fleming/Mexim Gelin/Yarkony/Artur Izmaylov/David Jonas/ …
Decisive evidence for CI dynamics for molecular systems in condensed-phase remains elusive (Berry phase effect).
Probing Vibronic Dynamics via 2DEV Spectroscopy
No vibronic coupling
Franck-Condon coupling
Herzberg–Teller coupling
Fleming and coworkers, J. Chem. Phys. 155, 054201 (2021).
2DEV beat maps
Probing Vibronic Dynamics via 2DEV Spectroscopy
No vibronic coupling
Franck-Condon coupling
Herzberg–Teller coupling
Fleming and coworkers, J. Chem. Phys. 155, 054201 (2021).
2DEV beat maps
Three-state Two-mode Model
Tuning mode 𝜔𝑡 = 1536 cm−1
Coupling mode 𝜔𝑐 = 1317 cm−1
(model pyrazine system)
Three-state Two-mode Model
Elucidate CI dynamics and 2D spectra by comparative studies
Two vibronic coupling models
Basis states:
Excited-state label (i=1,2)
Coupling mode quanta (nc=1,2,…)
Tuning mode quanta (nt=1,2,…)
Possible CI Signatures in 2DEV Spectra
2DEV 🡪 electronic excitation (first two pulses), IR probe (last two pulses)
CI
AvC
2DEV Beat Maps?
CI
AvC
Black curves: 2DEV @ T=0
Color map: beat amplitudes
We found it difficult to understand these differences!�
How do we interpret these 2DEV results?
Interpretation of 2DEV Spectra
2DEV 🡪 electronic excitation (first two pulses), IR probe (last two pulses)
Probe IR signals from the eigenstate selected by optical excitation frequency
2DEV probes nonadiabatic nuclear dynamics on the excited-state potential energy surface after optical excitation 🡪 seeking information at a giving excitation frequency to elucidate CI dynamics?
We should focus on IR signals probed at a given visible excitation frequency!
CI vs. AvC Dynamics in 2DEV Spectra
Simulated spectra show distinctive difference for the CI system
Probe IR signals from the eigenstate selected by optical excittaion frequency
CI
AvC
CI vs. AvC Dynamics in 2DEV Spectra
Ground-state IR
Additional signals sensitive to the transitions between eigenstates strongly affected by CI
Not too different from the two peaks in the ground state IR
CI
AvC
CI vs. AvC Dynamics in 2DEV Spectra
Ground-state IR
CI
AvC
FT
Fourier transform along T
2DEV Signal Beating Frequency Map
CI
AvC
signal
No signal
2DEV Signal Beating Frequency Map
CI
The signal is from a special coherence transfer pathway that should be unique to CI dynamics
Spectral Dynamics in 2DEV Signals
CI
AvC
FT
Spectral-evolution based analysis
🡪 provide a less ambiguous way to identify characteristic beating frequencies
Concluding Remarks
Acknowledgements
Funding: NCTS/NTU/CoS/CQSE
QSLE/2DEV: Man Tou Wong (黃文滔)
PDVPRS-QME: Pin-Ze Huang (黃品澤)�2DIR: Jun-Hao Yu (尤俊皓)
Thank You!!