1 of 26

Evaluating Education for Social Learning and Sustainable Development in NRM Contexts

ELRC Faculty of Education | Rhodes University | Eastern Cape South Africa | Prof Eureta Rosenberg E.Rosenberg@ru.ac.za

2 of 26

Contents

  • What is evaluation?
  • Why is evaluation important?
  • Who does evaluation?
  • How to go about it!

3 of 26

Contents

  • What is evaluation?
  • Why is evaluation important?
  • Who does evaluation?
  • How to go about it!

4 of 26

What is evaluation?��Evaluation is a systematic process of determining of the meritworth, value and significance of something, using agreed-upon criteria. (Adapted from Scriven,1991 and American Evaluation Association, 2014)

  • Different from assessment (which is a form of evaluation)
  • Assessment through tests, observations of practical skills, exams
  • Looks at a narrow range of learning outcomes of individuals
  • Evaluation looks at a broader range of learning and programme outcomes for individuals, classes, organisations, systems
  • A variety of methods can be used for evaluation
  • Assessment results can be used as part of evaluation, but more is needed
  • Different from monitoring and reporting (which can be part of it)
  • Monitoring is regularly collecting information on set indicators and reporting it (e.g. quarterly reports on class attendance or graduations)
  • Evaluation makes sense of this information and what it means for future action; it asks: What? So what? Now what? and Why?

5 of 26

Contents

  • What is evaluation?
  • Why is evaluation important?
  • Who does evaluation?
  • How to go about it!

6 of 26

Roles of Evaluation

Accountability purposes (accounting for resources received)

Improving efficiency, effectiveness, outcomes and impacts

Learning and development (at project or programme level)

Learning and development (organisational level)

Learning and development (at national or system level, theory)

Decision-making (e.g. should intervention continue or not)

Communication and Promotion, Advocacy

Evaluation is a systematic process of determining of the meritworth, value and significance of something, using agreed-upon criteria

7 of 26

The special case of Evaluation in Sustainability Education

Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society. Towards a new modernity. Sage.

Global SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) as an Evaluative Agenda

8 of 26

Gender

Poverty

Hunger

Health & Wellbeing

Education

Water

Energy

Decent Work

Economy

Cities

Production &

Consumption

Inequality

Climate

Life in

Water

Life on

Land

Peace &

Justice

Global

Partnerships

SDGs as an evaluative tool in local depth inquiry

ESD and social learning processes evaluate the gap between where we want to be & where we are – with environment & sustainability issues that are complex, connected

 

Nexus matters of

concern

 Creative commons work of ELRC Rhodes University , South Africa

9 of 26

Evaluation in/as/of ESD

  • O’Donoghue, R. 1986. Environmental education evaluation: An eleventh hour reconciliation. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 3:18-21.

10 of 26

O’Donoghue, R. Rosenberg, E. Joon, D. & Krah, J. (in press) Evaluation: A ‘nested game changer’ in ESD as evaluative processes of learning-led change.

Evaluation in/as/of ESD

11 of 26

Contents

  • What is evaluation?
  • Why is evaluation important?
  • Who does evaluation?
  • How to go about it!

12 of 26

Contents

  • What is evaluation?
  • Why is evaluation important?
  • Who does evaluation?
  • How to go about it?

13 of 26

Similar? Different?

14 of 26

A Range of Evaluation Approaches

Measurement (empiricism)

Constructivism, interpretivism; narrative approaches

Developmental and process-based evaluations

(5th) Theory based approaches

Participation and action research; Strategic Adaptive Management

Quanti-tative

Quali-tative

Mixed

15 of 26

Range of Evaluation Approaches: Each of these have associated methods.

Measurement (empiricism): Look for pre-test/post-test or other (1) experimental design; (2) surveys especially large scale, to compare variables to detect shifts

Constructivism, interpretivism; narrative: (3) Most Significant Change Stories (Davis & Dart); (4) Case studies

Process-based evaluations: (5) Appreciative enquiry; (6) developmental evaluation (MQ Patton), (7) Value added methodology (Wenger & Trayner)

Theory-based approaches: (11) Designing a theory of change; (12) realist evaluation; (13) realist meta-evaluation/ synthesis

Participatory and Interventionist Approaches: (8) Participatory evaluation, (9) action research (Lewin); (10) Reflective practice (Argyris & Schon)

16 of 26

Evaluating Education & Training Common models

Kirkpatrick, D.L. 1994. Evaluating Training Programs: The four levels. San Francisco, Berret-Koehler.

Impact

Behaviour

Learning

Reaction

17 of 26

“VCF” for evaluating multiple levels of learning in longer term, non-linear process with open ended outcomes�Wenger, Trayner and De Laat (2011); Wenger-Trayner and Wenger-Trayner, 2020

Evaluating Education & Training Value Creation Framework model

18 of 26

Value Creation Framework for evaluating longer-term, non-linear and open-ended processes of social learning

Wenger, Trayner and De Laat (2011); Wenger-Trayner and Wenger-Trayner, 2020)

19 of 26

Possible Data Sources

Registers

Questionnaires

New Forum

Meeting report

New Budget

Call records

New Staff

20 of 26

Our example: Evaluating with students in an ESD course

21 of 26

Example from EI4WS (WRC, SANBI, Michelle Hiestermann)

22 of 26

# of people engaged in restoring land

# improvements in livelihood projects

Participatory monitoring:

Where is the programme working, for whom, and why? � How can we build on this?� � Where is it not working, and why? What should we try next?

Case study questions:

Across all catchments: �What are we learning about the mechanisms of livelihoods and land restoration? About transdisciplinary research?

What is the impact of social learning?

What are the principles for polycentric governance?

Meta-evaluation questions:

Tsitsa Project Combining Monitoring & Evaluation; Quantitative & Qualitative

23 of 26

Activity-based evaluation: Skills for enterprise development��

24 of 26

Layers of social reality and research

    • Observing people’s actions and outcomes of actions
    • Asking questions about their actions

Actions

    • Asking questions about meaning, decisions, making inferences or theorizing about meaning, immediate causal mechanisms
    • Introducing change processes and observing outcomes [R]

Meanings made, decisions, mechanisms

    • Hypothesizing about causes, analyzing across large data sets, historical patterns and trends
    • Identifying patterns of deeper causal mechanisms across cases (demi-regularities)

Social structures & cultural norms

25 of 26

What if reality�has layers?

Empirically experienced –the tip of the iceberg

Hidden but Actual

Potential (to also turn into ice) – also Real

Critical & social realists (Bhaskar, Archer, Sayer) argued that reality is stratified

A depth ontology allows evaluators to investigate more than what can be empirically observed, to also look at what reality must be like, for the empirical to appear

This includes looking for absences - what should be there but is not, and why? (critical realism)

26 of 26

Types of research (from Sayer, A., 2010, Problems of Explanation and the Aims of Social Science)