1 of 29

Coventry�School Building Committee�

INITIAL/POTENTIAL CAPITAL PLANNING OPTIONS

FOR

DISCUSSION

2 of 29

Please Note: ��- Estimates and costs provided in this document are preliminary rough estimates only and will be further refined as the scope of work narrows and more information becomes available.��- Current construction market conditions do not align with RIDE funding formulas (cost/SF) - such that the funding provided may not be sufficient to build the size of building desired and/or level of improvements.��- “Renovations” in this discussion include both deferred maintenance and educational adequacy components. It is important to understand that there is flexibility in the cost of renovations – renovation costs can be increased or reduced from the costs and cost ranges presented here. ��

3 of 29

COVENTRY PUBLIC SCHOOLS MAP

4 of 29

SUMMARY DATA

5 of 29

SUMMARY DATA

6 of 29

COVENTRY HS FLOOR PLAN

7 of 29

COVENTRY HS SITE

8 of 29

ALAN SHAWN FEINSTEIN MS FLOOR PLAN

9 of 29

ALAN SHAWN FEINSTEIN MS SITE

10 of 29

BLACKROCK ES FLOOR PLAN

11 of 29

BLACKROCK ES SITE

12 of 29

HOPKINS HILL ES FLOOR PLAN

13 of 29

HOPKINS HILL ES SITE

14 of 29

TIOGUE ES FLOOR PLAN

15 of 29

TIOGUE ES SITE

16 of 29

WASHINGTON OAK ES FLOOR PLAN

17 of 29

WASHINGTON OAK ES SITE

18 of 29

WESTERN COVENTRY ES FLOOR PLAN

19 of 29

WESTERN COVENTRY ES SITE

20 of 29

OPTION 1 - $120 M (Maximizes Incentive Potential)

Components:

  1. Close Tiogue ES and Hopkins Hill ES and build new ($60M)
    • New 650 student ES @ ASF MS site

  • Close Blackrock ES and construct addition to Washington Oak ES ($35 M)
    • Becoming Upper and Lower ES for 1,000 students

  • Construct new ASF MS cafeteria and kitchen ($10 M)
    • Use current interior cafeteria space for other uses, e.g. music, fine arts, collaborative space, maker space; use existing kitchen for additional classroom space

  • Renovations at Western Coventry ES ($5M)

  • Coventry High School improvements ($10M)
    • May be funded outside of Stage II through RIDE grant

21 of 29

OPTION 1 - $120 M

ADVANTAGES

  • Maximizes incentive potential
  • Fewer school plants to operate and maintain
  • Energy savings
  • Little funding needed initially for maintenance
  • Staff consolidation possibilities
  • Equitable

DISADVANTAGES

  • Total cost
  • Possible increased transportation costs and student bus time
  • Loss of “neighborhood” school feel

22 of 29

OPTION 2 - $100 M (Maximizes Incentive Potential)

Components:

  1. Close Hopkins Hill ES and construct addition to Tiogue ES ($40M)
    • Becoming an ES for 650 students

  • Close Blackrock ES and construct addition to Washington Oak ES ($35 M)
    • Becoming Upper and Lower ES for 1,000 students

  • Construct new ASF MS cafeteria and kitchen ($10 M)
    • Use current interior cafeteria space for other uses, e.g. music, fine arts, collaborative space, maker space; use existing kitchen for additional classroom space

  • Renovations at Western Coventry ES ($5M)

  • Coventry High School improvements ($10M)
    • May be funded outside of Stage II through RIDE grant

23 of 29

OPTION 2 - $100 M

ADVANTAGES

  • Maximizes incentive potential
  • Fewer school plants to operate and maintain
  • Energy savings
  • Little funding needed initially for maintenance
  • Staff consolidation possibilities
  • Equitable

DISADVANTAGES

  • Total cost
  • Possible increased transportation costs and student bus time
  • Loss of “neighborhood” school feel

24 of 29

OPTION 3 - $65 M - $90 M (Less Incentive Potential)

Components:

  1. Renovate Hopkins ES ($10M - $15M)
  2. Renovate Tiogue ES ($10 M - $15 M)
  3. Renovate Blackrock ES ($10 M - $15 M)
  4. Renovate Washington Oak ES ($5 M - $10 M)
  5. Renovate Western Coventry ES ($10 M - $15 M)
  6. Construct ASF MS cafeteria and kitchen ($10 M)
  7. Coventry High School improvements ($10 M)
    • May be funded outside of Stage II through RIDE grant

25 of 29

OPTION 3 - $65 M - $90 M (Less Incentive Potential)

ADVANTAGES

  • Energy savings
  • Keeping all schools in current neighborhoods
  • Equitable

DISADVANTAGES

  • Not as comprehensive a solution as other options
  • Less incentive potential

26 of 29

OPTION 4 - $81 M - $90 M (Maximizes Incentive Potential)

Components:

  1. Construct Cafeteria Addition & Renovate Hopkins ES ($7M - $10M)

  • Construct Cafeteria Addition & Renovate Tiogue ES ($7 M - $10 M)

  • Construct Cafeteria Addition & Renovate Blackrock ES ($7 M - $10 M)

  • Close Western Coventry ES & Construct Addition to Washington Oak with minimal Renovation to Washington Oak ($35 M)

  • Construct ASF MS swing space classrooms, cafeteria and kitchen ($15 M)
    1. Possible relocation of Grade 8 and possible demolition of parts of Guam

  • Coventry High School improvements ($10 M)
    • May be funded outside of Stage II through RIDE grant

27 of 29

OPTION 4 - $81 M - $90 M (Maximizes Incentive Potential)

ADVANTAGES

  • Energy savings
  • Keeping all schools in current neighborhoods
  • Equitable

DISADVANTAGES

  • Not as comprehensive a solution as other options

28 of 29

29 of 29

NEXT STEPS

  • Understanding that there is flexibility in the “renovation” numbers….
    • Narrow down options to those that appear to present reasonable and do-able facility and educational solutions, and….
    • Narrow down options to those that may likely be supported by the majority of the community, and….
    • Narrow down options to those that will likely be financially feasible, both in terms of bonding and in terms of overall individual home owner tax burden.

  • StudioJAED will then further define and refine the options chosen, including costs, for further discussion and vetting with the School Building Committee and Community.