EDUCATION AND CHILD PROTECTION: Supporting Integration
HOW TO USE THE GUIDANCE
AGENDA
INTRODUCTIONS
In the chat, please write your:
REMINDER: WHY INTEGRATION?
CPHA-EIE INITIATIVE
Education Specialisms
Child Protection Specialisms
There are specialisms within each sector that need to be maintained which also contribute to effective integrated programming.
CPHA-EIE INITIATIVE: TO DATE
Since 2020, INEE and the Alliance have been collaborating on efforts to draw the two sectors together and support joint and integrated programming. With support from the cross-sector multi-agency advisory group, we jointly developed and published:
We also contributed to multiple advocacy papers, technical papers, webinars and ran sessions at INEE and Alliance conferences.
MAKING THE CASE: ADVOCACY
Resources
CPHA-EIE INITIATIVE 2025
Reflecting the current funding crisis and the ongoing humanitarian reset, and after bilateral discussions with key stakeholders, it was determined that this phase of the initiative supporting joint and integrated programming should focus on:
To this end we have developed the online web-portal, making tools, guidance and resources easier to navigate and find.
Examples of Programming and Processes
CHILD PROTECTION INTEGRATION INTO EDUCATION PROGRAMS IN ETHIOPIA
Lessons Learn and Applied
1. IRC’S HEALING CLASSROOMS
02
Dimension | Pre–Healing Classrooms | Post–Healing Classrooms |
Classroom Environment | Often unpredictable, rigid, and emotionally unsafe | Safe, structured, and emotionally responsive |
Teacher Practices | Limited awareness of trauma, reliance on punitive discipline | Trauma-informed, nurturing, and protective |
Student Behavior | High levels of distress, aggression, and absenteeism | Improved attendance, reduced behavioral issues, and stronger engagement |
Emotional Support | Minimal attention to psychosocial needs | Integrated SEL, calm corners, and emotion check-ins |
Protection Linkages | Weak referral systems and low identification of CP concerns | Teachers trained to identify, refer, and respond to protection risks |
Learning Outcomes | Disrupted learning due to stress and unsafe environments | Enhanced cognitive and emotional development through play and routine |
Caregiver Involvement | Limited engagement in school-based protection | Strengthened through positive parenting sessions and community outreach |
LESSONS LEARNED FROM IRC’S HEALING CLASSROOMS (ACROSS YEARS OF IMPLEMENTATION)
Positive Discipline Frameworks
Caregiver Engagement
Monitoring and Referral Systems
STRATEGIC ADDITIONS OVER TIME
Co-Created Class Rules
2. Safe Learning and Healing Classrooms (SLHS)
02
Dimension | Before SHLS | After SHLS |
Learning Environment | Disrupted, unsafe, and emotionally unstable | Safe, structured, and emotionally supportive |
Access to Education | Limited or no access to age-appropriate learning | Regular sessions in literacy, numeracy, and SEL for children aged 6–11 |
Psychosocial Support | Minimal or absent; children left to cope alone | Integrated PSS through trauma-informed facilitators and SEL activities |
Protection Services | Weak identification and referral of at-risk children | Active monitoring, case management, and referral pathways embedded in SHLS |
Caregiver Engagement | Low involvement in child development or protection | Structured parenting sessions on emotional support and safeguarding |
Child Behavior & Well-being | High levels of distress, aggression, and withdrawal | Improved emotional regulation, peer bonding, and resilience |
Community Linkages | Fragmented coordination between schools and protection actors | Strong integration with CP committees, health services, and education systems |
LESSONS LEARNED FROM SHLS IMPLEMENTATION
Integrated Design Drives Holistic Impact
Facilitator Capacity Is Key
Community Linkages Strengthen Protection
Inclusivity Enhances Reach
Protection Monitoring and Referral Protocols
Positive Parenting Integration
Community-Based Linkages
STRATEGIC ADDITIONS OVER TIME
Structured SEL Curriculum
Facilitator Support Systems
3. Emergency Case Fund
Dimension | Before Emergency Case Fund | After Emergency Case Fund |
Education Access | Children unable to attend school due to lack of supplies, fees, or transport | Emergency funds cover school materials, transport, and re-enrollment support |
Protection Risks | High exposure to child labor, exploitation, and harmful coping strategies | Risks mitigated through timely support and school engagement |
Health Access | Unmet medical needs due to financial barriers and lack of referral pathways | Funds enable access to basic health services and referrals to clinics |
Psychosocial Well-being | Children experience distress, isolation, and trauma without support | Improved emotional stability through school re-entry and linked PSS services |
Referral Systems | Weak identification and response to protection concerns | CP actors identify and refer children through school and SHLS linkage |
Caregiver Burden | Families resort to negative coping (e.g., begging, child labor) due to financial strain | Dignity-preserving support reduces pressure and restores agency |
Community Trust | Low confidence in service systems and limited engagement | Increased trust in education and protection systems through visible, responsive support |
Flexibility | Rigid systems unable to respond to urgent, individualized child needs | Emergency fund allows rapid, tailored response to diverse and evolving protection concerns |
Flexibility Enables Timely, Contextualized Support
The fund’s adaptable design allows rapid response to diverse child protection and education needs.
School Linkages Strengthen Identification and Impact
Teachers and facilitators play a critical role in flagging cases and initiating referrals
Dignity-Preserving Support Builds Trust
Clear Criteria and Documentation Ensure Accountability
Monitoring and Feedback Loops Drive Improvement
LESSONS LEARNED FROM EMERGENCY CASE FUND
IMPLEMENTATION
School-Linked Identification Mechanisms
Integrated Protection Screening
Rapid Response Triggers
Flexibility for Local Adaptation
STRATEGIC ADDITIONS OVER TIME – EMERGENCY CASE FUND
THANK YOU
FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Goal & Objectives of the SEL Program
Long-Term Goal: To mainstream SEL into primary Education in Sri Lanka, thereby enhancing children’s academic performance, psychological well-being, and protection.
Project Objectives:
Why do Children Need SEL ?
* 200 child suicides reported in 2024 — a sharp rise from 133 in 2022 (CCPSL)
* 39% of youth aged 10–29 experience depression (Universities of Peradeniya & Kelaniya)
Mental Health
* 43.8% of teenagers (13–17) involved in physical fights (UNICEF, 2024)
* Reports of bullying, sexual violence, and cyberbullying 5.4% of students affected
Violence and Bullying
* 28.4% of students report mobile overuse (GSHS, 2024) Linked to addiction, risky content, and harmful online interactions
* According to a 2022 prison media statement, the number of O/L and A/L students (aged 16-17) incarcerated on drug charges has risen above 5,000.
.
Risky Behaviors
Critical Challenges Facing Sri Lankan Children & Youth
COMMUNITY BASED RESEARCH IN SRI LANKA
PARTICIPANTS OVERVIEW
368 Parents & caregivers
157 community Leaders
80 Education officials & Experts
603 Children
304 Teachers & School Directors
Consultative Workshops with MOE and NIE
Consultative Workshops with Experts, Development Partners, and Corporates
SEL Framework Development Workshop
SEL Framework for Primary School Children in Sri Lanka
SEL domains & key skills
SEL Domain | SEL Skills |
01. Social The Social domain includes skills that help children accurately interpret other people’s behavior, effectively navigate social situations, and interact positively with others. | 1. Collaboration and Cooperation |
2. Leadership | |
3. Responsible Decision-Making | |
4. Communication | |
5. Conflict resolution | |
02. Emotional The Emotional domain includes skills that help you recognize, express, and manage your emotions as well as understand and empathize with others. | 1. Emotional Awareness and Resilience |
2.Emotional Regulation | |
3. Seeking emotional support | |
4. Empathy and Caring | |
03. Cognitive The Cognitive domain includes the basic cognitive skills required to direct behavior toward the attainment of a goal. | 1. Focus and commitment to Learning |
2. Critical Thinking and logical reasoning | |
3. Civic Responsibility and Lifelong Learning | |
4. Creativity and Innovation |
SEL domains & key skills
SEL Domain | SEL Skills |
04. Values Values include the skills, character traits/virtues, and habits that support you to be a prosocial and a productive member of a particular community. | 1. Respect for Diversity and Spiritual awareness |
2. Time Management and Organization | |
3. Kindness and gratitude | |
4. Discipline | |
5. Honesty and Integrity | |
6. Mindful Resource Management | |
05. Identity encompasses how you understand and perceive yourself and your abilities. | 1. Self Confidence |
2. Positive Character and Responsibility | |
3. Curiosity |
Requirements for Effective SEL Implementation in Schools�
Role of Homes & Communities in Supporting SEL�
Thank you!
CPHA-EiE WEB - PORTAL
CPHA-EIE WEB-PORTAL
Let’s Jump On!
CPHA-EiE WEB - PORTAL
Q&A
THANK YOU
To share additional resources to upload or to learn more, please contact:
Mark Chapple Mark.Chapple@alliancecpha.org
Rachel McKinney rachel.mckinney@inee.org