Colorado 2020�El Paso, Arapahoe, Mesa Counties
Save Tina Peters
Layman’s Explanation of the Rig�The Trash Function and the Flip Function��Cast Vote Record Data Source: https://votedatabase.com/cvr/Colorado/
Edward Solomon, 518-530-8809, EdwardKingSolomon@gmail.com
In a fair election, where tens of thousands of ballots are coming in from random precincts by random voters of those precincts, to a Centralized Counting Location, Trump’s Cumulative Percentage of all Ballots Counted, and Trump’s Percentage of any consecutive 4% of 5% of the ballots cast, should be uniform (a flat line).��But that is not what we see in El Paso 2020. As the Total Amount of Ballots Counted Increases, Trump’s Cumulative Percentage Increases, and Trump’s Share of every consecutive batch of 4% of the ballots increases rapidly, even though the Democrat and Republican Precincts are being counted at the same speed (that is, when P% of all ballots have been counted for the county, roughly P% of all ballots for each precinct have also been counted, regardless of the political leaning of any particular precinct).
Observe that the percentage of Biden Voters (blue line) that voted NO on Proposition B remains constant at 33%. This is good, because this is what we expect in a fair election…a flat line. This means that all ballots that were voted for Biden, that were counted for Biden, were not tampered with. Thus, every Biden ballot correctly recorded as a Biden Ballot, is a legitimate ballot. Also notice that the Percentage of ALL voters (both Trump and Biden voters) that voted NO on Proposition B also remains uniform (a flat line!). This means the Proposition B voted was not tampered with in El Paso County!��However, notice that percentage of Trump Voters (red line) that voted NO on Proposition B declines from 65% to 56%. This is not what we expect in a fair election! Why would the time (time being the total percentage of ballots counted) at which a Trump ballot is counted affect the voter’s choice to vote NO on Proposition B? It can’t! Not in a fair election!��The only way to explain this is that a portion of ballots that were originally voted for Biden, were flipped to Trump (and other Republicans down the ballot), without changing how the original Biden voters voted on Proposition B. In fact, we can calculate the exact number of Biden ballots that were flipped to Trump to achieve this (40,605). This is the Flip Function. But there’s another function…the Trash Function.
Vist the below link and go to pages 13 and 14 to see how the given number of 40605 manipulated ballots was calculated��https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yCc91KwvNFcTlNUkfHuHTN_kdeBbeaMcxZNjkdbHFxI/edit?usp=sharing
In a fair election, where tens of thousands of ballots are coming in from random precincts by random voters of those precincts, to a Centralized Counting Location, Trump’s Cumulative Percentage of all Ballots Counted, and Trump’s Percentage of any consecutive 4% of 5% of the ballots cast, should be uniform (a flat line).��But that is not what we see in Arapahoe 2020. As the Total Amount of Ballots Counted Increases, Trump’s Cumulative Percentage Increases, and Trump’s Share of every consecutive batch of 4% of the ballots increases rapidly, even though the Democrat and Republican Precincts are being counted at the same speed (that is, when P% of all ballots have been counted for the county, roughly P% of all ballots for each precinct have also been counted, regardless of the political leaning of any particular precinct). This is the same pattern as seen in El Paso County; however, there’s a huge difference between these counties in the Proposition B vote.��From this we can only conclude that both Arapahoe and El Paso Counties had “Trash Function,” that told them what percentage of Trump ballots to throw in the trash (to never be counted to begin with) depending on the time (where time is the percentage of ballots counted). The Trash Function decreases as time increases. This also means the perpetrators of crime had the “true count of ballots counted” and must therefore have TWO RECORDS (as Tina Peters discovered), “The Real Election” and the “Rigged Election,” and rigged the results after the conclusion of the “Real Election.”
Why is there no partisan divide between how Republicans and Democrats voted on Proposition B in Arapahoe, which was about raising taxes via the repeal of the Gallagher Amendment, when El Paso (and all other Coloradan Counties) had the expected 20% to 30% partisan difference on the Repeal of Gallagher?��Both of these counties are highly populated and geographically close (they neighbor each other). Clearly there is something wrong.
Yet look a little closer at Arapahoe’s Data. . . the Democrat and Republican Percentage of NO on Prop B moves in unison! They have a constant difference from Democrat NO to Republican NO of 0% to 0.25%. Whenever either party’s mood fluctuates by a hair, positive or negative, the other party’s consensus also moves in perfect parallel, for ALL moments in time!��For math nerds, the derivative of the Red Line (Percentage of Trump Voters that voted NO on Prop B) is equal to the derivative of the Blue Line (Percentage of Biden Voters that voted NO on Prop B), for all moments in time. Only an algorithm could do this!
In the next series of graphs we see Mesa County’s 2020 General Election. Here we are only looking at Trump’s share of the vote over time (where time is the percentage of ballots counted, ordered as processed).��Note that this election is 90% mail-in, so there’s no reason for Trump to keep getting a larger and larger share of the vote as time goes on.��The Red line shows Trump’s cumulative percentage of the vote as it counted. The Blue line shows Trump’s immediate share of the last 5000 votes counted.��Notice how Trump goes from 45% of the last 5000 ballots counted to nearly 80% of the last 5000 ballots counted near the end of the election (Top-Left).��The other three graphs are simulations of the election, done at a precinct level according to their own data. All I did was find Trump’s percent of the vote in each precinct, and then roll a random number from 0.000 000 000 000 000 to 1.000 000 000 000 000, and if that random number was less than or equal to Trump’s Percentage in that precinct (I kept the precincts in the same order as processed in the CVR), then I simulated a Trump Vote, otherwise a Biden vote.��Observe how the actual election (top left), doesn’t even remotely resemble the simulations using their own precinct data from the very same cast vote record.
In this graph we see the percentage of Trump Voters, and Trump Voters only, which voted NO on Proposition B over time. Notice that it decreases over time, just like in El Paso County.��Yet the Democrat Vote (Blue) does exactly what we’d expect in a fair election. It just flatlines to its final state by the time 10% of the ballots are counted.��Now, as for why the green line (the percentage of all people that voted NO) increases, is because even though the Republican Vote is decreasing, Republican Votes are coming in, per the last 5000 ballots, at nearly a 4:1 proportion against Democrats (see previous slide).��With that much weight behind the Republican vote in the second half of the election, the Green Lines bends up towards the Republican choice on Prop B, rather than staying flat.
We will start with the base assumption that the Proposition B vote was Fair El Paso County.��Given the assumption that the Proposition B Vote was Fair in El Paso County (something that the Enemy will not disagree with), then we can conclude, with absolute certainty, that the Presidential Election of Trump vs Biden was rigged in El Paso County.��1. This is known as a Conditional Statement in Mathematics: If X then Y.
2. Statement X is “ The Proposition B Vote was Fair in El Paso County.”�3. Statement Y is “The Presidential Vote was Rigged in El Paso County.”��4. If the Proposition B Vote was legitimate in El Paso County, the evidence being that the percentage of NO votes remains constant over time, where time is the percentage of ballots counted, then the Presidential Vote must be rigged, since the Percentage of Trump Voters who voted “NO” on Proposition B decreased over time, while the Percentage of Biden Voters who voted “NO” on Proposition B remained constant over time and the Percentage of all “NO” votes on Proposition B remained constant over time.��5. We can only conclude that legitimate Biden ballots were converted to Trump ballots, while retaining the original Democrat’s choice on Proposition B. This explanation is simple, concise and sadly…horrific.���If someone disagrees with this conditional statement, then they must explain why Democrats did what was expected in a fair election (never wavering in their consensus on Proposition B over) while Republicans did the impossible…changed their consensus on Proposition B at a deterministic rate that maintained the observed flat trajectory of all “NO” votes on Proposition B for both Democrats and Republicans combined.
We will start again with the base assumption that the Proposition B vote was Fair El Paso County.��Given the assumption that the Proposition B Vote was Fair in El Paso County (something that the Enemy will not disagree with), then we can conclude, with absolute certainty, that the Proposition B Vote was rigged in Arapahoe County.��1. This is known as a Conditional Statement in Mathematics: If X then Y.
2. Statement X is “ The Proposition B Vote was Fair in El Paso County.”�3. Statement Y is “ The Proposition B Vote was Rigged in Arapahoe County.”��4. If the Proposition B Vote was legitimate in El Paso County, the evidence being that the percentage of NO votes remains constant over time, where time is the percentage of ballots counted, with a large Partisan Difference around 30% between Republican and Democrat consensus on Proposition B, then the Arapahoe Proposition B Vote must be rigged, because there is no partisan difference between the Republican and Democrat consensus on Proposition B, and furthermore, that the first derivative of the partisan consensus (immediate changes over time) move in perfect parallel.��5. We can only conclude that that a certain percentage of “No” votes were converted to “Yes” votes for both Trump and Biden ballots in order to achieve a false non-partisan consensus on the subject. ��If someone disagrees with this conditional statement, then they must explain why there is a 30% difference between how Democrats and Republicans voted “No” on Proposition B in El Paso County (which is expected, since it involves raising taxes), but why there is no partisan difference between how Democrats and Republicans voted on Proposition B in Arapahoe County and furthermore why the first derivative of their stance on Proposition B is equal over time!
In other words, given the assumption that the Proposition B vote is Fair in El Paso County, then we are forced to conclude that the
Presidential Race of Trump vs Biden is rigged in El Paso County and that the Proposition B vote is rigged in Arapahoe.��And since we notice the exact same pattern in the Trump vs Biden race in both Counties, we must also conclude that� the Trump vs Biden race was rigged in Arapahoe and also in Mesa County. Tina Peters is innocent.��It is clear that both Democrat and Republican officials are in on the rig statewide and county wide, and they have pooled their resources to destroy Tina Peters for the doing the right thing to save Colorado and our Nation from widespread algorithmic election fraud.