3 of 26

What is the Challenge?

Country A

Country B

Country D

Country C

Country E

People and businesses cross borders. In future, people will want to use their digital identity in their daily lives across borders, just as people expect to exchange currencies. Unfortunately, many issues pose barriers to cross-border interoperability:

Tens of digital identity ecosystems are siloed within their jurisdictions; tech stacks and policies are not interoperable by default

OECD digital identity recommendations include enabling cross-border use but there is no technical or policy roadmap on how the 38 country adherents can deliver

No country, region, standards body, non-profit, private entity, or multilateral is empowered to deliver cross-border interoperability; there is fear of one (or a few) entities having disproportionate governance.

Given a single standard is unlikely to “rule them all,” digital identity interoperability across tech stacks is technically possible but very hard to achieve and maintain

There are opportunity costs of inaction, as bad actors capitalize on weak infrastructure (AI deep fakes, cybercrime, COVID-19), people and business face high levels of friction

Business compliance costs continue to grow without mechanisms to interpret those policies and easily enforce them in products and implementations

Few people outside the identity community appreciate the profound role digital identity is likely to play, so clear & transparent communication is critical (as is averting mis-information).

We do not Interoperate…yet

4 of 26

To define what we need to achieve cross-border interoperability for digital identity.

SIDI HUB Objective:

5 of 26

Why the SIDI Hub approach?

Objective

What we are

To define what we need to achieve cross-border interoperability for digital identity

What we are not

A community of stakeholders from across the global ecosystem who are (1) responsible for digital identity infrastructure, standards, and policy (2) who see value in SIDI Hub

SIDI Hub participants in Workstreams and Workshops will help flesh out “what good looks like” for cross-border interoperability including a shared roadmap, gaps to close, and remediation options

We have a shared commitment to the challenge, respect for domestic sovereignty and domestic & international laws, respect for work of participating organizations, and a shared culture (e.g. consensus, inclusive, transparent, healthy-debate)

SIDI collaboration can also help organizations articulate their “swim lane” to deliver impact against their mission.

A legal entity
A governance body
A standards body
An open source code provider
A civil rights group
A NGO
A multilateral entity
A consulting organization
A vendor

SIDI Hub cannot tell any government or other ecosystem participant what they must do.

Benefits:

Trusted online transactions across borders improves users ease of asserting identity, lowers business costs to comply with laws and protect against fraud, while hindering cybercriminals
Trusted in person transactions, beyond passports & border crossings improves user ease of asserting identity, lowers business costs and complexity of compliance with laws

Insufficient global focus & governance mechanisms:

Highest focus is domestic digital identity strategy & deployment, some regional efforts (e.g. EU)
Global conversation is limited to a few standards bodies, non-profits, multilateral projects
Threats are global (AI deep fakes, financial crime, COVID-like health crises) but our digital identity tools are not.

Complexity of the Problem & Time to solve it:

SIDI Hub consensus was that no single standard, policy or trust framework would dominate globally
SIDI Hub consensus was that international and national policies are reasonably mature, but current mechanisms to interpret those policies and enforce them at the product, implementation, layer is immature within countries and will take years to deploy domestically.
SISI Hub consensus was that countries would prefer to pursue multi-lateral or bilateral trade agreements that will cover digital identity, but those will probably take years to develop even if the work is prioritized by all governments, and it may not work at product level with consistent conformance without private sector collaboration.
Secure, stable standards take years to develop. Interoperable ecosystems take months and years to build, test, and maintain

Hypothesis

Pursuing a global, public/private strategy & roadmap amongst stakeholders will accelerate our ability to deliver benefits to residents, businesses, and government stakeholders while mitigating risks.

Like many new technologies, digital identity credentials have emerged without a preexisting, governance structure that will ensure these credentials are interoperable. However, unlike other new technologies, digital identity credentials are unique in that they are often issued or endorsed by governments, they are accepted by governments, and governments are the regulators of them…and all other ecosystem participants rely upon these credentials.

At the moment, there many countries have domestic implementations of digital identity that are live or emerging, but globally there is no single government, company, non-profit, standards body, or multilateral has governance authority. As a result, current digital identity implementations are not on a path to convergence.

In addition, the community of stakeholders (standards bodies, non-profits/NGOs, academia, government experts, private companies) as well as the standards and policies themselves are fragmented,

It will take time to develop a suitable, global governance structure, but time itself poses opportunity costs given the benefits of globally interoperable digital identity.

SIDI Hub was conceived as a community, not an entity, to coordinate the work already underway to accelerate the path to digital identity interoperability, and help develop the governance model required for sustainability and global scale.

The community is “led” by 17 non-profits who have volunteered to help convene global stakeholders in structured conversations and workstreams to help the global community converge on a path to digital identity interoperability

Decision making is consensus based, with formal authority resting with the governance of the respective participating organizations.

6 of 26

What might SIDI Hub do…and not do?

What we will not do

Take a decision that is governed by another organization. For example, SIDI cannot tell:

A government what law or regulation they have to enact or what feature they must build
The Board of a non-profit what decision it must take
A standards body how they must improve a specification

Allow the agenda of a single entity to dictate SIDI Hub direction, this is critical to maintain trust within SIDI Hub

Presume that existing entities are incapable of delivering on function or governance requirements

Provide consulting services to individual jurisdiction deployments

SIDI Hub does not have the scope or scale to provide detailed guidance to individual jurisdictions; however, we hope SIDI hub work will help inform and future proof domestic roadmaps

Shy away from challenges.

If functional or governance gaps cannot be closed with broad consensus, SIDI Hub can offer a space to explore requirements and models that might suit
If a Cooperative Agreement or MOU is required to secure funds we will pursue it as a community
We have no plan to create a SIDI Hub legal entity unless there is an urgent imperative (e.g. to receive funds from X organization) as we want to avert any premature decisions on governance of digital identity
If two or more entities are pursuing the same scope of work, explore options to avert the duplication and encourage complementary work

What we could do

Gap analysis & mitigation

Perform analysis on questions that benefit from wide stakeholder participation outside of existing organizations (e.g. a decision process to identify “champion use cases”)
Non-profit or academic briefings that help inform gap analysis & closure
Open discussion of the range of options available to community, pros/cons

Decisions that advance SIDI Hub (without infringing on remits of others)

Use Cases: select “champion use cases”

Standards:

Highlight gaps in standards for consideration of the relevant standard(s) bodies to remediate as they see fit
Encourage convergence to specific profiles

Deployments:

Encourage interoperability testing in a shared space
Highlight any reference code or open source code that meets interoperability criteria

Policy:

Highlight promising methodologies for trust framework mapping
Encourage establishment of interoperable methods for policy communication

Operations:

Host digital and in person meetings to progress the work
Highlight organizations self-defined “swim lanes”
Track any decisions taken within SIDI hub and why
Track feedback to SIDI Hub participants
Align key roadmaps (e.g. OECD, SIDI, standards)

Benefits:

Trusted online transactions across borders improves users ease of asserting identity, lowers business costs to comply with laws and protect against fraud, while hindering cybercriminals
Trusted in person transactions, beyond passports & border crossings improves user ease of asserting identity, lowers business costs and complexity of compliance with laws

Insufficient global focus & governance mechanisms:

Highest focus is domestic digital identity strategy & deployment, some regional efforts (e.g. EU)
Global conversation is limited to a few standards bodies, non-profits, multilateral projects
Threats are global (AI deep fakes, financial crime, COVID-like health crises) but our digital identity tools are not.

Complexity of the Problem & Time to solve it:

SIDI Hub consensus was that no single standard, policy or trust framework would dominate globally
SIDI Hub consensus was that international and national policies are reasonably mature, but current mechanisms to interpret those policies and enforce them at the product, implementation, layer is immature within countries and will take years to deploy domestically.
SISI Hub consensus was that countries would prefer to pursue multi-lateral or bilateral trade agreements that will cover digital identity, but those will probably take years to develop even if the work is prioritized by all governments, and it may not work at product level with consistent conformance without private sector collaboration.
Secure, stable standards take years to develop. Interoperable ecosystems take months and years to build, test, and maintain

Hypothesis

Pursuing a global, public/private strategy & roadmap amongst stakeholders will accelerate our ability to deliver benefits to residents, businesses, and government stakeholders while mitigating risks.

Like many new technologies, digital identity credentials have emerged without a preexisting, governance structure that will ensure these credentials are interoperable. However, unlike other new technologies, digital identity credentials are unique in that they are often issued or endorsed by governments, they are accepted by governments, and governments are the regulators of them…and all other ecosystem participants rely upon these credentials.

At the moment, there many countries have domestic implementations of digital identity that are live or emerging, but globally there is no single government, company, non-profit, standards body, or multilateral has governance authority. As a result, current digital identity implementations are not on a path to convergence.

In addition, the community of stakeholders (standards bodies, non-profits/NGOs, academia, government experts, private companies) as well as the standards and policies themselves are fragmented,

It will take time to develop a suitable, global governance structure, but time itself poses opportunity costs given the benefits of globally interoperable digital identity.

SIDI Hub was conceived as a community, not an entity, to coordinate the work already underway to accelerate the path to digital identity interoperability, and help develop the governance model required for sustainability and global scale.

The community is “led” by 17 non-profits who have volunteered to help convene global stakeholders in structured conversations and workstreams to help the global community converge on a path to digital identity interoperability

Decision making is consensus based, with formal authority resting with the governance of the respective participating organizations.

7 of 26

Who is SIDI Hub?

Multilaterals

(UN, World Bank)

Governments

(countries, EU, AU)

Non Profits

(non-standards bodies)

Academia

(Universities, research bodies)

Standards Bodies

(ISO, ITU, W3C, etc)

SIDI Hub stakeholders are the organizations already involved in advancing Digital Identity from across the global community. These groups are interconnected, with some stakeholders engaged across verticals.

Private Entities

(standards development, deployment expertise, non-profit membership, policy feedback, research)

Civil Society

(privacy, security, advocacy)

Media

(education, transparency)

Use Case Experts

(As “Champion Use Cases” are identified)

8 of 26

SIDI Summit Paris Participants (11/28/23)

Sponsors:

Non-Profit Organizers:

Multilaterals, standards, development organizations and academic institutions:

Government Experts:

9 of 26

SIDI Paris Participants (11/28/23)

10 of 26

92% of Paris SIDI Summit attendees wanted to continue the work into 2024.

11 of 26

SIDI Hub Primary Workstreams

Minimum Requirements for Digital Identity Interoperability

Metrics of Success

SIDI

Governance

In the first SIDI Hub Summit in Paris on 11/28/23, we asked what we need to enable cross-border digital identity interoperability and five areas resonated as the top five key workstreams.

71%* “Consensus on champion cross-border use cases”
61% mapping of use cases to domestic, regional international policy

* % Participants in Exit poll who voted “yes” this is a high priority tactic to enable digital identity interoperability

77%* “Shared global metrics”

79%* “minimum requirements for digital identity interoperability”

69%* “Mapping of trust frameworks across jurisdictions”
68% more clarity on cross border data governance

77% opportunities for experts from global south to take part

More Technical

Less Technical

Draft objective: Develop a process for selecting and fleshing out 1-3 cross-border use cases

Draft objective: Minimum requirements for digital identity interoperability for “champion” use-cases

Draft objective: Analyze and amplify existing trust mapping efforts, identify gaps, and align on mitigation tactics.

Draft objective: Define what SIDI Hub metrics of success are, and monitor delivery.

Draft objective: SIDI Hub internal processes & grant management, SIDI decision tracking, SIDI partner issue resolution monitoring, SIDI roadmap alignment, global ecosystem governance gap analysis & options to remediate.

Trust Framework Mapping

Champion

Use Cases

12 of 26

Strategic & Operational Tactics

Multilaterals

Governments

NGOs/ Standards Bodies

Academia

Private

Entities

SIDI Paris discussions & exit poll highlighted other tactics the community should pursue to deliver results

More Technical

Less Technical

Minimum Requirements for Digital Identity Interoperability

Metrics of Success

SIDI

Governance

Trust Framework Mapping

Champion

Use Cases

SIDI Hub Co-Organizers & Support Staff

Strategy, Outreach & Coms, Events, Financing, Operations

13 of 26

Confirmed Co-Chair Volunteers to

“Kick-Off” Workstreams

Each workstream will have ~5 co-chairs, volunteers appointed by the co-organizers with diverse backgrounds.

The intention is to have “elections” later in the year for each workstream to vote in co-chairs

Co-Chairs

DIACC (Francois Bedard or Joni Brennan)
SIA/ OSIA (Olatunji Durodola)

Co-Chairs

OIDF (Mark Haine)
GlobalPlatform (JD Aussel)
SIA/OSIA (Debora Comparin)
OASIS (Alan B.)

Co-Chairs

OIX (Nick Mothershaw)
ToIP (Daniel Bachenheimer)
SIA (Debora Comparin)

Co-Chairs

IDSA (Jeff Reich)

Co-Chairs

OIDF (Gail Hodges)
ADIA (Abbie Barbir)
SIA (Stéphanie de Labriolle )
GlobalPlatform (JD Aussel)

More Technical

Less Technical

Minimum Requirements for Digital Identity Interoperability

Metrics of Success

SIDI

Governance

Trust Framework Mapping

Champion

Use Cases

14 of 26

“Champion Use Case” Paris Summit Exit Poll Results

	"Easy"	“Hard but Urgent”
	Qualifications (10) Travel (8) Financial Services (6) Government Services (6) Access to restricted resources online (3)	Financial services (11) Qualifications (11) Healthcare Services (7) Government Services (7) Travel (7) Age verification (6) e.g. adult content in Utah, face to face age Supply chain management (4) Human migration (3)
	Healthcare (2) Supply Chain (2) Address qualified (1) IoT (1) Unregulated cases (1)	Social networking (1) Parent/ child/ caregivers (1) AI delegation Securely (1) International Marriage (1) Start a company in another country (1) Foreign worker wants to report abuse(1)

More Votes

Fewer Votes

Even amongst experts, there are many use cases not just 1-3 easy choices

Range of responses by experience of experts

We need a transparent process to select “Champion Use Cases” for cross border interoperability

Conclusions

15 of 26

Draft Workstream Approach: “Champion

Use Cases”

Gather Use Case Inputs

Define

Prioritization Criteria

Apply

Criteria & Select Use Case

Engage Vertical Experts

Apply Methodology / Confirm Requirements

SIDI Brainstorm Results
EU Digital Wallet Use Cases
US/EU TTC Use Cases
Other sources eg. regional workshops

Define criteria
Feedback from SIDI hub community

Apply criteria to use cases
Select “Champion” use cases

Source experts in vertical(s)

Gather & Apply methodology to flesh out use cases
Requirements input to digital identity minimum requirements

The Champion Use Case workstream is being formed by the initial volunteer co-chairs; they will kick off the group formation, host open discussions, and facilitate workstream analysis & consensus

16 of 26

Draft Workstream Approach: “Minimum Requirements” & “Trust Framework Mapping”

Communications / Feedback / Distribution & Conformance of Comments

Metrics of Success

Role of Open Source Code, Interoperability events, Certification & Conformance

These workstreams are being formed by the initial volunteer co-chairs; they will kick off the working group formation, host open discussions, and facilitate workstream analysis & consensus… in due course co-chairs will be elected by the group

Policy requirements, gap analysis, bilateral/multi-lateral agreement requirements

17 of 26

2024 Roadmap

Progress workstreams, grant management

Workshop materials & event planning for Sep/Oct/Nov

Input to G20 due process as requested

Public briefing

2024 Strategy

Confirm 2024 summits

EU Funding, Collaboration Agreement

Kick-off workstreams

Stakeholder roles

Summit 11/28

Validate the problem

Explore minimum requirements

Prioritize tactics

Confirm interest to continue in 2024

Draft 2024 strategy

Progress workstreams, grant management

Input to G20 due process as requested

Draft 2025 Strategy

Progress workstreams, grant management

Workshop materials & event planning for May/June

Update SIDI Roadmap with partner plans (standards, OECD, World Bank, UN, EU)

Input to G20 due process as requested

Kick Off

H2 2023

Q1 2024

18 of 26

2024 Events

Kick Off

H2 2023

Q1 2024

2024 SIDI Summits

1. Africa (~ID4AFrica, Cape Town, 5/21)

2. Europe (~EIC, Berlin, 6/3)

3. North America (Identity Week, D.C, Sep)

4. Asia (TBC: Tokyo or Singapore, Oct)

5. Latin American (~G20 Rio, 11/15 -11/20)

SIDI Brief + Surveys

Tokyo 1/19 (OIDF-J)
Geneva 2/27 (ITU-T SG17)
Las Vegas 3/27 (GlobalPlatform)

Las Vegas (Identiverse, May)
Baltimore (FedID, June 26/27)
Amsterdam (Identity Week, June)

U.S. (Authenticate)
London (OIX, Sep)
U.S. (AAMVA AIC, Atlanta 9/27-30)

Singapore (Identity Week, Oct)
Paris (TrustTech, Dec 2/3)

19 of 26

SIDI Sponsorships - Multilaterals & Government Funding or Grants

Tier	Contribution	Benefits	Status
European Union NGI Sargasso	$100,000	EU recognition of the program EU advisory resources EU participation	Award confirmed Deliverables and KPIs TBD/ with review every 3-months Cooperative Agreement underway between non-profits

The first multilateral funding is received. We hope to secure other grants and awards to progress the work and ensure it can be done professionally.

20 of 26

SIDI Sponsorships - Non Profits

Tier	Contribution	Availability	Benefits	Total Tickets/ Tier	Commitments
Platinum Tier Full Year	$50,000 + time	4 @tier 3 remaining	6 invitations for all 5 events (+waitlist)	Up to 6/event 4= 24 invites / entity Up to 30/tier 5 events = 150 invites per tier	OIDF- Verbal ($50)
Gold Tier for the Year	$25,000 + time	2 @tier 1 remaining	3 invitations for all 5 events (+waitlist)	Up to 3/ event = 15 total invite Up to 6/total tier = 30 total/tier	SIA/OSIA - Verbal ($25k)
Platinum Tier for an Event	$10,000+ time	4 @event 3 remaining Asia, Latam 4 remain C.T., Berlin,D.C.	4 invitations at one event	Up to 4 entities with 4 tickets = 16 /event Up to 20 * 5 events = 100 / total year	OIDF (J)- Verbal ($10k) Central Bank Brazil/ Chicago Advisory Partners - TBC
Gold Tier for an Event	$5,000+time	2@tier 10 remain	2 invitations at one event	Up to2/event = 4 /event Up to 4/event = 20/year
Bronze Tier	Volunteer time 150 hours (10-13 hr/mo)	11@tier 11 remain	Named at event as “co-organizer” 1 invitation guaranteed per event	Up to 11 per event = 55/year	Women in identity (communications, inclusion objectives) IDSA (metrics workstream) OWF (Open Source code work)
				Non profits+ Private members 24+15+16+4+11 = 70 slots 70 slots= Governments, multilaterals, standards bodies, other guests	$95k to date 2/14/24

The first non-profits have committed $50k (OIDF), $25k (SIA) and $10k (OIDF-J). We are requesting further funding and volunteer support from other non-profits to help us scale this effort.

21 of 26

SIDI Summits 2024 - In development

	SIDI: CapeTown (Before ID4Africa)	SIDI: Berlin (Before EIC)	SIDI: D.C. (Before Identity Week)	SIDI: Tokyo (TBC)	SIDI: Rio (Before G20)
City/ Region	Cape Town/Africa	Berlin/ Europe	D.C./ North America	Tokyo/ Asia (or before Identity Week Singapore)	Rio/ Latin America
Date	May 20th	June 3rd	September 10th	TBC October	Rio 11/15-21
Capacity	100	120-140	120-140	120-140	150
Venue & A/V	Hotel ABC	Gov Hosted (by Min of Interior TBC)	Hotel ABC	Gov hosted (by Digital Agency and Cabinet Office TBC)	Gov Hosted?
Time	9 - 4pm	9-6pm	9-6pm	9-6pm	9-6pm
Catering	Breakfast, lunch, 2 coffee breaks	Breakfast, lunch, 2 coffee breaks	Breakfast, lunch, 2 coffee breaks	Breakfast, lunch, 2 coffee breaks	Breakfast, lunch, 2 coffee breaks
Evening drinks or buffet	60 people	120-140 people	120-140 people	120-140 people	120-140 people
Budget	~$15,000	~$15,000	~$15,000	~$15,000	~$25,000

Summit costs		$85,000 (estimate prior to venue selection)

EU funds are likely to go towards offsetting the costs of our 4-5 Summit/workshop events in line with the grant proposal.

22 of 26

SIDI Sponsorships - Private entities

Tier	Contribution	Avail	Sponsor
ID4Africa	Morning Coffee $1000	1
ID4Africa	Afternoon Coffee $1000	1
ID4Africa	Buffet lunch $4000	1
ID4Africa	Buffet dinner and drinks $8000	1

Private entities who attend (via a non-profit invite) may sponsor discrete events during SIDI Summits, e.g. cocktail reception, buffet dinner, coffee service. Interested organizations can contact the co-organizers for information on sponsorship, and activation for signage/ recognition for sponsorship.

Tier	Contribution	Avail	Sponsor
EIC	Morning Breakfast $2000	1
EIC	Morning Coffee $500	1
EIC	Afternoon Coffee $500	1
EIC	Buffet lunch $4000	1
EIC	Buffet dinner and drinks $8000	1

23 of 26

SIDI Operational Support 2024 (DRAFT)

Budget Line	Roles	Budget 2024	Estimated budget 2025
Website hosting/ webmastering		$5,000	$5,000
Report development/ copy writing	1 person, project	$5,000 x 4 reports + $10,000 G20 report	$5,000 x 4 reports + $10,000 G20 report
Workstream: Project coordinator	5 * 25% capacity	Cross-stream part time contractor $25,000	$25,000 each workstream, part time contractor(s) $125,000 total
Summit event coordinator	5*25% capacity	$5,000 each summit	$15,000 each summit, part time contractor(s) $75,000 total
Communications lead	1* 50% capacity	$10,000, part time contractor or agency	$50,000, part time contractor or agency
Senior Advisor / Ex Gov Official	1* 25% capacity	TBC (after OIDF initial period)	$50,000, part time
Grant writer and manager	1* 25% capacity	$25,000, part time (manage grants) $0 Grant proposals (paid % commission)	$25,000, part time
Subtotal of direct staff costs		$ 100,000	$350,000
SIDI Staff travel	5 trips	-	5 * $4,000 per trip = $20,000
Government attendee travel (select African delegates)	20 people hotel extension	20* 250 = $5,000	20* 250 = $5,000
Other Gov officials or Special guest	10 people flights/hotel	-	2 grants per summit * $5,000 = $100,000
Subtotal of direct travel costs		$5,000	$125,000

The funds raised already from the EU and co-organizers will be used to ensure the events are funded, and other key operational tasks are supported as well in 2024. As additional funds are raised, we can scale our approach.

24 of 26

SIDI Communications Strategy

Website

Social Media

Live/ in production
Recent announcements, reading lists, participants
Public repository of SIDI Hub work, e.g. links to GitHub, summit reports, participant communications

Live/ in production
Recent announcements
Goal: Transparency, opportunities to engage, avert disinformation

Live/ in production
GDPR compliance email list management

Rapporteur report from 11/28 released
Reports for Cape Town, Berlin, D.C., Tokyo, Rio

Workstream intros
Interview of participants
Post videos of summit presentations

Ad hoc briefs to stakeholders by co-organizers

PR announcements of SIDI Hub

Paris done, for other events to do

Co-organizers, transition to staff

Grant Management

Grant fit assessment
Grant proposals
Funder communications

Direct Marketing

Summit Reports

Events Organization

Video

Photography

Advocacy/ Direct Briefs

25 of 26

Confidentiality

You are welcome to share this presentation.

You may also reference it provided you give credit as per the creative commons license. Sustainable Digital & Interoperable Digital Identity © 2024 by SIDI Hub Community is licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://sidi-hub.community) Attribution 4.0 International. This license requires that reusers give credit to the creator. It allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, even for commercial purposes.

Send specification feedback to standards bodies�For IP protection, technical feedback should be directed to the standards body(s) that are responsible for the specifications on which you have contributions or clarifications.

We follow Chatham House Rules for Summit Meetings

Any summits/workshops will continue to be conducted under the Chatham House Rule as follows:

“When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.” https://www.chathamhouse.org/about-us/chatham-house-rule

1 of 26

2 of 26

3 of 26

4 of 26

5 of 26

6 of 26

7 of 26

8 of 26

9 of 26

10 of 26

11 of 26

12 of 26

13 of 26

14 of 26

15 of 26

16 of 26

17 of 26

18 of 26

19 of 26

20 of 26

21 of 26

22 of 26

23 of 26

24 of 26

25 of 26

26 of 26