CONTINUED EXCELLENCE
ELEVATING AN ESTEEMED PROFESSION
Diana E. Fenton, Esq., Chief, Governance Unit
Richard Farrell, Investigator
“An ethics code reflects a collective decision that a profession is better off when ethical standards are not based solely on individual assessments of what is or is not acceptable.”
Fisher. C. (2013). Decoding the Ethics Code: A practical guide for psychologists (3rd edition).
Code of Conduct is Not Punishment—
It is about Process!!!
CODE OF CONDUCT—A STATEWIDE DOCUMENT
Why do we need the CoC?
Local Control Does not solve a Statewide problem.
Dealing with educator misconduct issues in the realm of employment only does not solve the entire issue.
CHILD SAFETY IS NOT A ZIP CODE ISSUE!!!
WHY IS A CODE OF CONDUCT IMPORTANT?
A BRIEF HISTORY OF CREATING �THE CODE OF ETHICS & CODE OF CONDUCT
June 2015—PSB began to look into a code of ethics;
August 2016—Commissioner Barry created Ethics Task Force;
Sept-Dec 2016—Task Force begins work on Code of Ethics;
April 2017—HB 210 signed into law;
Sept-Dec 2017—Task Force transitions focus to Code of Conduct;
Summer of 2018—State Board accepts Code of Ethics;
November 2018—State Board adopts Code of Conduct
STATUTE
RSA 21-N:9, II(CC)
RULES
THE DIFFERENCE
Code of Ethics
The Code of Ethics for New Hampshire Educators
Code of Conduct
NH’s Principles of Professional Conduct
ARE YOU TALKING TO ME?
Who is the document applicable to??
Code of Ethics—Applicable to all educators and all school personnel
Code of Conduct—Applicable to all credential holders
“Credential” is defined in Ed 501.02(g)—page 9 of the Code of Ethics & Conduct booklet!
CODE OF CONDUCT VS. CODE OF ETHICS
Code of Ethics is guidance—aspirational in nature—articulates responsibilities common to all members of the education profession.
Code of Conduct establishes the lowest standard of care—it is actionable only against credential holders
Applicable on or off duty!
CODE OF ETHICS & CONDUCT
Difference in language:
Code of ethics:
When communicating with students, utilizes social media responsibly, transparently and primarily for the purposes of teaching and learning
Code of Conduct:
An educator shall not engage in harassment, stalking, or bullying via electronic media.
EMPLOYMENT VS. LICENSURE
Emplyoment
The Analysis…..
Employment
Code of Conduct
Code of Ethics
Separate and distinct, but sometimes they affect each other.
CODE OF ETHICS & CONDUCT
Four Principles:
Principle I—Responsibility to the Education Profession and Educational Professionals;
Principle II—Responsibility to Students;
Principle III—Responsibility to the School Community;
Principle IV—Responsible and Ethical Use of Technology
**Principle V—Duty to Report
CODE OF CONDUCT—PRINCIPLE 1 (ED 510.01)
Responsibility to the Education Profession & Educational Professionals:
CODE OF CONDUCT—PRINCIPLE II (ED 510.02)
Responsibility to Students:
* “Student” is defined as being up to 10 months after graduation
CODE OF CONDUCT—PRINCIPLE III (ED 510.03)
Responsibility to the School Community:
**Gifts of small amount shall NOT be deemed conflict of interest.
SO WAIT JUST A MINUTE……
What if a parent gives me a bottle of wine as a present?
Am I going to lose my license for that??
CODE OF CONDUCT—PRINCIPLE IV (ED 510.04)
Responsible & Ethical Use of Technology:
* “Student” is defined as being up to 10 months after graduation
I NEED SOME EXAMPLES OF WHAT YOU ARE SAYING
CODE OF CONDUCT—PRINCIPLE V (ED 510.05)
Duty to Report:
INVESTIGATIONS—ED 511.01
INVESTIGATIONS—ED 511.01
This letter serves as the official notification, pursuant to New Hampshire Administrative Rule Ed. 511.01, that the New Hampshire Department of Education has initiated an investigation into a complaint against you which alleges that you engaged in an act or acts which violate the New Hampshire Code of Conduct for Educational Professional as enumerated in Ed. 510.01-510.04.
Specifically, the Department of Education has become aware of an action(s) which may have violated Ed ------- of the Code of Conduct for Educational Professionals. Specifically, the allegation is that you -------------------. At this time, no action has been taken against your teaching credential. Therefore, your teaching credential is still valid during this pending investigation. A copy of this letter will be provided to the superintendent of SAU ----- and the Union.
SANCTIONS—ED 511.02
Four options---3 forms of sanction:
Close out case—Allegation unfounded—no action taken
Suspension—rescinded for set period of time
Revocation—permanently rescinded
Reprimand—note to file of credential holder
INVESTIGATIONS—ED 511.01
Considerations of sanctions:
REPRIMAND, SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION
Ed 511.02
Ed 502.01
List of suspended and revoked educators is maintained and is on DOE website
Ed 511.05
Grounds for Reinstatement after Suspension
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In re: NAME
Credential Suspension Agreement
In Consideration For the Suspension of Educator Credential Between:
NAME (EdId: XXXX)
and
The New Hampshire Department of Education
WHEREAS NAME (EdId: XXXX) maintains an Educator Certificate in -------------.
WHEREAS NAME (EdId: XXXX)
NOW THEREFORE, NAME (EdId: XXXX) agrees to voluntarily surrender his Educator Credential in --------------, which will result in a suspension of his educator credential pursuant to the following conditions:
1. NAME shall voluntarily surrender his educator credential. This voluntary surrender will result in the SUSPENSION of his New Hampshire Educator Credential (EdId: XXXX). This suspension shall become effective on XXXX, immediately upon all required parties signing this agreement. The terms of this suspension are as follows:
OTHER ISSUES TO BE AWARE OF—ED 511.04
If arrested for RSA 189:13-a, V, DOE can do an immediate suspension of credential
CONTACTS
Richard Farrell, Investigator
271-8372 (office)
231-0521 (cell)
Diana Fenton, Esq. Chief of the Governance Unit
271-3189 (office)
325-2198 (cell)