Bone Grafting Problem
Structural cost drivers
Complex surgery, high operator skill
Long turnaround, no intraoperative adjustment
Delays, contamination, loss risk
Higher malpractice risk, expensive chair time
~10% failure / resorption
OsseoPrint3D removes entire cost layers
☆ Chairside fabrication (no lab, no shipping):� Lower malpractice potential
☆ Custom-fit graft from patient CT:� Created chairside; adjustable and reprintable
☆ Single-visit workflow:� Less chair time → direct cost savings
☆ Shorter surgery time:� Reduced overhead
☆ Better surgical outcomes:� Literature shows near ~100% success rates
OsseoPrint3D converts bone grafting into a predictable, in-office procedure
�Non-custom grafts require extra effort
to avoid critical anatomical structures�(sinus cavities, nerves, blood vessels)
Traditional bone grafting
OsseoPrint3D (Answer)
☆ Custom-fit graft simplifies surgical approach
☆ Success rates improved to near 100%
☆ Reduced complication risk
☆ Technology-driven, less operator-dependent outcomes
☆ Enables adoption by general dentists
☆ Workflow-based learning, less advanced surgical training
Traditional bone grafting (Problem)
OSSEOPRINT3D REDUCES RISK THROUGH PLANNING, PRECISION, AND PREDICTABILITY
WHY TRADITIONAL BONE GRAFTING CARRIES HIGH LEGAL RISK
Traditional bone grafting (Risk)
Inferior alveolar nerve, sinus, adjacent structures
OsseoPrint3D:
☆ CT-based, pre-planned workflow
☆ Reduced intraoperative decision-making
☆ Enables adoption by general dentists
☆ Less advanced surgical training required
Scaffold-based augmentation delivers the highest predictability
and success rates by simplifying surgical execution.
Block bone grafting
High variability, complex execution
Particulate bone + GBR
Operator-dependent, inconsistent fit
Scaffold-based augmentation
☆ Patient-specific 3D-printed scaffold
☆ Ready-to-place geometry
Vertical bone augmentation is the holy grail of implant dentistry
Traditional bone grafting outcomes vary widely
OsseoPrint3D makes outcomes predictable
OsseoPrint3D uses a proprietary, aseptic, chairside 3D printer to fabricate patient-specific bone grafts through a fast, guided clinical workflow.
☆ Guaranteed aseptic fabrication at point-of-care via single-use sterile cartridge
and print plate
☆ Single-purpose 3D printer engineered for intraoperative clinical use
☆ Fast fabrication — custom graft produced in under 1 hour
☆ Fully integrated with OsseoPrint3D planning software
☆ No external lab, shipping, or third-party manufacturing
Dental Bone Grafting Cost Overview
The entire graft design and surgical approach are planned in the software, reducing reliance on advanced surgical experience.
Guided, step-by-step planning workflow� Draft graft design created in ~15 minutes� No freehand sculpting or intraoperative decision-making� Procedure standardized across operators� Lower learning curve compared to traditional grafting� Zero-abort fail-safe: if a graft is dropped, contaminated, or damaged, the procedure does not need to be canceled — a new sterile, patient-specific graft can be printed chairside in ~15 minutes
Digital “surgical twin” creates a permanent safety record, lowering
malpractice exposure if outcomes are questioned
Sources
Polydioxanone (PDO) Implants
Porosity of 3D Biomaterial Scaffolds
Optimal Pore Size for Bone Regeneration
Interconnected Scaffold Architecture
Market Overview
☆ Bone regeneration is a large, global market driven by dental implants and aging populations.
☆ A significant portion of procedures are non-load-bearing and procedural in nature.
☆ These cases are constrained by workflow complexity, cost, and lab dependency — not demand.
Market Size Breakdown
☆ TAM: ~$7.8B — Global bone regeneration market.
☆ SAM: ~$1.6B (~20% of TAM) addressable today (non-load-bearing procedures)
☆ SOM $325M (early) limited by production scale and rollout.
Market SIze Calculations
Market Size Data
Finishing and Locking OsseoPrint System
Pre FDA
FDA submission
and approva
Pre FDA
tests/studies
Thank you!
Questions are welcome