How precisely we can determine the thermal energy of weak flares based on STIX images? �
Litwicka Michalina, Mrozek Tomasz and Arun Kumar Awasthi
Space Research Center, Polish Academy of Science in Wrocław, Poland.
The Solar Physics High Energy Research (SPHERE) workshop
A „weak” flare
MARLIN imaging algorithm
Algorithm stops at 360 step
��FFLARE = FOBS - FBKG
FCAL =
FLARE
IMAGE
MTRANS *
FCAL FOBS - FBKG
(n)
Wn
FLARE
IMAGE
(n+1) =
FLARE
IMAGE
(n)
Wn*
N iteration
FOBS - vector of counts measured by each pixel stripe
FCAL – vector counts values calculated
FCAL =
MTRANS *
FLARE
IMAGE
(n)
+FBKG
FCAL FOBS
Wn
FLARE
IMAGE
(n+1) =
Wn*
FLARE
IMAGE
(n)
N iteration
1) Background subtracted
from pixel data counts
2) Background included to
image calculation
Different approaches to background in MARLIN
Background subtracting or including �
Chosen microflares (B1 – C1 classes) 20-21 Sep 2021 volume estimation
Volume estimation depend on:
50% of maximum value contour
In order to compare results volume was also estimated for mem-ge reconstructed sources.
Weak flare example �20-Sep-2021 23:04
1)Bkg Includ 50 % sig
2) Bkg subtract 50 % sig
3) Bkg includ max val
4) Bkg subtract max val
1) Iteration number: 300
Semi axis: 7.32 10.55
50% sig. = 28% max. value
2) Iteration number: 250
Semi axis: 7.29 10.45
50% sig. = 29% max. Value
3) Iteration number: 490
Semi axis: 4.77 8.02
4) Iteration number: 440
Semi axis: 4.65 7.93
Fitting all spectra with OSPEX
Temp : 11.81 mln K
Temp : 12.42 mln K
Temperatures determine for all flares are in ranges : 9.44 mln K – 14.80 mln K
Thermal energy range all�weak flares
1] 1.38 +/- 0.17
2] 1.16 +/- 0.17
3] 1.07 +/- 0.14
4] 1.54 +/- 0.17
5] 2.09 +/- 0.42
6] 1.14 +/- 0.14
7] 1.40 +/- 0.36
8] 2.85 +/- 0.36
9] 2.73 +/-0.73
10] 4.01 +/- 0.48
11] 4.55 +/- 0 .61
12] 0.86 +/- 0.10
13] 1.94 +/- 0.17
28
Different approach to volume estimation from image gives us
Errors ranges from 9% to 27%
Thank you�