1
Syllabus
0777837368
Introduction to Control Systems . Laplace transforms. Modeling of mechanical, liquid-level and electrical control systems. Block diagram Reduction and obtaining transfer function. Calculation of time response of first-order and second-order .Applying different types of controllers (P, I, D, PI.PD and PID).Analyzing system stability using Routh’s and Nyquist criteria. Drawing Bode Plot and Nyquist plot for a given transfer function. Applying root-locus technique for control system analysis
Introduction to Control Systems��Text book: K. Ogata Modern control Engineering. 5th edition
2
applications
3
Liquid-level system
4
5
plant
Controlled variable
Manipulated variable
Reference input
Feedback Element
Feedback Signal
Definitions.
6
7
8
9
10
Closed-Loop control Versus Open-Loop control
11
Closed-loop control systems
12
open-loop control systems
13
14
possible to use relatively inaccurate and inexpensive components to obtain the accurate control of a given plant, whereas doing so is impossible in the open-loop case.
�From the point of view of stability, the open-loop control system is easier to build because system stability is not a major problem. On the other hand, stability is a major problem in the closed-loop control system,
15
16
17
Robot control system
18
19
Temperature control system
20
21
UNIT 2
Laplace Transform
22
23
Why Laplace Transform�
24
Definition of Laplace Transform
25
EXAMPLES
26
27
Damped exponential function
28
29
30
Laplace Transform Pairs
31
32
33
INVERSE LAPLACE TRANSFORMATION
34
The inverse Laplace Transform can be calculated in a few ways. If the function whose inverse Laplace Transform you are trying to calculate is in the table, you are done. Otherwise we will use
partial fraction expansion (PFE); it is also called partial fraction decomposition. If you have never used partial fraction
expansions you may wish to read a background article, but you can probably continue without it.
35
Inverse Laplace Transform by Partial Fraction Expansion
This technique uses Partial Fraction Expansion to split up a complicated fraction into forms that are in the Laplace Transform table. As you read through this section, you may find it helpful to refer to the review section on partial fraction expansion techniques. The text below assumes you are familiar with that material.
36
If F(s) is broken up into components,
and if the inverse Laplace transforms of F1(s),F2(s), . . . , Fn(s) are read available, then
-z1,-z2,…-zm are the zeros of F(s)
-p1,-p2,…-pn are the poles of F(s)
Case #1 Partial-fraction expansion when F(s) involves distinct poles only
37
Partial Fraction Expansion
There are three cases to consider in doing the partial fraction expansion of F(s).
Case 1: F(s) has all non repeated simple roots.(distinct poles)
Case 2: F(s) has complex poles:
Case 3: F(s) has repeated poles. (multiple poles)
38
Cancelling common terms and set s= -P1
39
40
Multiplying both sides by s
Canceling the common terms and replacing s by zero
S=0
We have
S=0
And A1=1
41
S=-2
A2=-2
A3=+1
S=-1
If all poles of the function F(s) are distinct except zero pole. The time function f(t) will be an exponential
Partial-Fraction Expansion
42
42
Check.
Case #2 Partial-fraction expansion when F(s) involves complex poles
43
44
Method of completing the square
45
46
: Complex Conjugate Poles (Method 2)
Taking common denominators
Equating both numerators
Given:
Partial Fraction
Equating the coefficients of same power
Solving we obtain A=2 ; B=-2; C=-8
47
And
Finally the inverse Laplace transform is
48
If all poles of the function F(s) are complex conjugate, t except zero pole. The time function f(t) will be an damped sinusoidal
49
Special Case :Imaginary Conjugate Poles (Method 2)
If all poles of the function F(s) are imaginary
conjugate except zero pole. The time function
f(t) will be sinusoidal
Case #3 Partial-fraction expansion when F(s) involves multiple poles
50
Taking common denominators and equating numerators
A=1 ; B=-1; C=-1
Equating like powers of "s" gives us:
51
The inverse Laplace
If all poles of the function F(s) are multiple except zero pole. The time function f(t) will be damped ramp
��
�1. By taking the Laplace transform of each term in the given differential equation, convert the differential equation into an algebraic equation in s and obtain the expression for the Laplace transform of the dependent variable by rearranging the algebraic equation.
�
52
SOLVING LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
53
Find the solution of the differential equation ��
54
55
UNIT#3A
Mathematical Modeling �of Dynamic Systems
.Mathematical Models
56
57
The dynamics of many systems, whether they are mechanical, electrical, thermal, economic, biological, and so on, may be described in terms of differential equations.
Such differential equations may be obtained by using physical laws governing a particular system, for example, Newton's laws for mechanical systems and Kirchhoff's laws for electrical systems.
deriving reasonable mathematical models is the most important part of the entire analysis of control systems.
A mathematical model of a dynamic system is defined as a set of equations that represents the dynamics of the system accurately or, at least, fairly well
Steps in Modeling
58
What will the model be used for
59
Simplicity versus accuracy
60
Linear systems
61
Linear time-invariant systems
62
linear time-varying systems
63
Nonlinear systems
64
Examples of nonlinear differential equations
65
Examples of nonlinearities
66
TRANSFER FUNCTION
67
�Consider a system defined : ��
68
where y is the output of the system and x is the input
The transfer function of this system is obtained by taking the Laplace transforms of both sides of Equation under the assumption that all initial conditions are zero, or ��
69
Comments on transfer function
70
71
IMPULSE- �RESPONSE FUNCTION
72
To derive the transfer function
�1. Write the differential equation for the system.
�2. Take the Laplace transform of the differential equation, assuming all initial conditions are zero.
�3. Take the ratio of the output C(s) to the input R(s). This ratio is the transfer function. ��
73
� BLOCK DIAGRAMS �
74
75
�Element of a block diagram. �
76
The arrowhead pointing toward the block indicates the input.
the arrowhead leading away from the block represents the output.
Such arrows are referred to as signals. ��
77
Summing Point
The summing point is represented with a circle having cross (X) inside it. It has two or more inputs and single output. It produces the algebraic sum of the inputs. It also performs the summation or subtraction or combination of summation and subtraction of the inputs based on the polarity of the inputs.
Branch Point
78
Block diagram of a closed-loop system.
79
B(s) the feedback signal
E(s) actuating error signal
G(S) Feed forward transfer function
G(s)H(s) Open-loop transfer function
C(S)/R(s) Closed-loop transfer function
Transfer function only used for linear time invariant systems mainly single input single output(SISO)
80
Modern control theory versus conventional control theory.
81
definitions
82
83
84
85
STATE-SPACE REPRESENTATION �OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS ��
86
Case #1 The input does not involve derivative terms
87
88
89
90
91
92
And the linearized equations
93
94
EXAMPLE Mechanical system
95
u(t) is the input to the system,
the displacement y(t) of the mass is the output.
. This system is a single-input—single-output system.
�From the diagram, the system equation is
Let us define state variables x1 (t) and x2(t) as
x1(t)=y(t)
96
Then we obtain
97
block diagram for the system
98
99
6 0 0
C=
0 0 9
0 4
D=
0 2
From the given state space model , obtain the matrices A,B,C and D
2 0
B=0 5
0 0
100
Solving Differential equation by Simulation
101
Correlation between transfer functions and state-space equations
102
103
assume that x(0) is zero. Then we have
Or
104
By substituting this Equation into the output equation, we get �
EXAMPLES�ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
105
RC Circuit
106
Parameters: R,C
Independent variables (inputs): ei
dependent variables (outputs): eo, i
107
Laplace Transformed equations
108
RL Series Circuit
LRC circuit
109
110
111
Transfer functions of cascaded elements
Taking forward Laplace transform
Rearrange results in
First loop equation
Transfer function
In block diagram form
G1(s)
I1(s)
112
Taking forward Laplace transform and rearrange we obtain the
transfer function of the second loop
And the block diagram
113
Taking forward Laplace transform and rearrange we obtain the transfer function
The block diagram
Finally ,connection all blocks together results in block diagram of the system
The transfer function of the system
Liquid-level system
114
115
116
117
118
Modeling Mechanical Systems
Translational System
Block Diagram
Rotational Mechanical System
119
120
121
Taking the Laplace transform of both sides of this last equation and assuming all initial conditions to be zero yields ��
122
Electrical and Mechanical Systems Analogs
123
RLC series circuit equation
Translational mechanical system equation
Replacing displace met x(t) by velocity v(t) = dx(t)/dt the equation of mechanical system is
124
Series Analog(Force -Voltage Analog)
Equation of motion of the above translational mechanical system is;
Kirchhoff’s mesh equation for the above simple series RLC network is;
For a direct analogy b/w Eq (1) & (2), convert displacement to velocity by divide and multiply the left-hand side of Eq (1) by s, yielding;
(1)
(2)
Comparing Eqs. (2) & (3), we recognize the sum of impedances & draw the circuit shown in Figure (c). The conversions are summarized in Figure (d).
Replacing the position by the speed
125
Parallel Analog(Force-Current Analog)
(1)
(2)
Block Diagram reduction (Manipulation)�
126
127
For example, we would want to transform the following diagram
128
To the next form
Block Diagram Transformations Rules
129
130
2.Parallel Connection:
131
3.Feedback Connection :
Solving We obtain ,the equivalent or closed-loop
transfer function is
Negative feedback
Positive feedback
C(s)=G(s)E(s)
B(s)=H(s)C(s)
E(s)=R(s)+B(s)
Solving We obtain ,the equivalent or closed-loop
transfer function is
4. Moving summing�A.point behind a block
132
4. Moving a summing point �B.ahead of a block
133
5. Moving a pickoff point �A.ahead of a block
134
5. Moving a pickoff point �B.behind a block
135
8. replacing summing points
136
C=R-A-B
C=R-A-B
10. Combining summing points
137
Attention Don't use
thisMoving branch point through
summing point
Example�reduce the following block diagram
138
139
Example
140
Signal-flow graph�
141
142
Definitions
143
144
Signal-flow graph of two algebraic equations
Signal-flow graph of interconnected system
Corresponding block diagram
145
Mason’s gain formula
The linear dependence Tij between the independent variable xi (also called the input variable) and a dependent variable xj is
146
Systematic approach:
Write the gain formula in a simplified form:
147
1.Calculate forward path transfer function Pk for each forward path k.
2.Calculate all loop TF’s.
3.Consider nontouching loops 2 at a time.
Loops L1 and L2 do not touch Loops L3 and L4
148
None.
The TF of the system is
149
الى هنا مادة امتحان منتصف الفصل
UNIT FOUR �Time response of Control Systems
150
Transient response and steady-state response
151
152
typical input signals
153
154
FIRST-ORDER SYSTEMS
155
156
In the following, we shall analyze the system responses to such inputs as the unit-step, unit-ramp, and unit-impulse functions. The initial conditions are assumed to be zero. �
Unit-step response of first-order systems
157
158
t(SEC) | 0 | T | 2T | 3T | 4T | inf |
c(T) | 0 | 63.2% | 86.5% | 95% | 98.2% | 1 |
COMMENTS
159
160
161
Unit-ramp time response of first-order systems
�
162
163
Unit-impulse response of first-order systems
164
165
166
SECOND-ORDER SYSTEMS �
167
Example: servo system
168
The closed-loop transfer function of a second order system
and the block diagram are
169
Underdamped case (0 < ζ < I):
170
un-damped natural frequency of the second order system, which is the frequency of oscillation of the system without damping.
damping ratio of the second order system, which is a measure of the degree of resistance to change in the system output.
For unit step input
-
171
Φ
Φ
If (0 < ζ < I) the poles of the system are
complex conjugate and the time response
is underdamped
3.Critically damped case (ζ = 1):
172
2.undamped case ζ=0
the response becomes undamped and oscillations continue indefinitely. The response c(t) for the zero damping case can be obtained by substituting zeta = 0 in forgoing Equation
If (ζ =0) the poles of the system are imagenary conjugate and the time
response is undamped
If (ζ = I) the poles of the system are multiple and the time
response is criticaly damped
4.overdamped case (ζ> 1):
173
174
unit-step time response
3
175
176
Given the transfer function below, find natural frequency ωn and damping ratio ζ.
Solution
The general form of the second-order transfer function is
Comparing the equations we will get :ωn2 = 36, or natural frequency ωn = 6
2ζωn= 4.2, substituting the value of ωn we will get, damping ratio ζ = 0.35.
Time domain specifications of control systems
177
178
179
Time domain specifications
180
181
and the cosine terms in this last equation cancel each other, dc/dt, evaluated
at t = tp, can be simplified to
This last equation yields the following equation:
182
Since the peak time corresponds to the first peak overshoot,
.Maximum overshoot
The maximum overshoot occurs at the peak time or at t = tp . Thus, Mp is obtained as
���
183
Example: Servo system with velocity feedback
184
185
For the system, determine the values of gain K and velocity feedback constant Kh so that the maximum overshoot in the unit-step response is 0.2 and the peak time is 1 sec. With these values of K and Kh, obtain the rise time and settling time. Assume that J 1 kg-m2 and B = 1 N-m/rad/sec. �
186
187
Higher order systems & Stability
188
189
190
Where
Unit step response of higher
order system
191
191
-σ
If
2.
3. There are no zeros nearby the complex conjugate poles
1, There are two complex conjugate poles
The transfer function is
Reduction The Order Of Higher Order System
The order of higher system can be reduced to a second order system if it has dominant closed-loop poles
192
1 critically stable
2.Stable
3.unstable
Routh’s Stability Criterion
193
A necessary (but not sufficient) condition for stability
is that all the coefficients of the polynomial
characteristic equation be positive.
A necessary and sufficient condition �for Stability
194
A system is stable if and only if all the elements of
the first column of the Routh array are positive
Characteristic Equation
195
Method for determining the Routh array
196
Routh array: method (cont’d)
197
?!
Routh array: method (cont’d)
198
Routh array: method (cont’d)
199
Example 1:
Given the characteristic equation,
is the system described by this characteristic equation stable?
Answer:
200
Example 2:
Given the characteristic equation,
is the system described by this characteristic equation stable?
Answer:
201
Example 2 (cont’d): Routh array
202
Example 2 (cont’d): Routh array
203
Example 2 (cont’d): Routh array
204
Example 2 (cont’d): Routh array
205
The elements of
the 1st column
are not all positive:
the system is unstable
Example 3: Stability versus Parameter Range
Consider a feedback system such as:
The stability properties of this system are a function of the proportional feedback gain K. Determine the range of K over which the system is stable.
206
Example 3 (cont’d)
207
Example 3 (cont’d)
208
Example 3 (cont’d)
209
Example 4: Stability versus Two Parameter Range
Consider a Proportional-Integral (PI) control such as:
Find the range of the controller gains so that the PI feedback system is stable.
210
Example 4 (cont’d)
211
Example 4 (cont’d)
212
Example 4 (cont’d)
213
214
215
215
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
⇒ 2 roots in RHP
216
Basic control actions
217
output with the reference input, determines the deviation, and produces a control signal that will reduce the deviation to zero or to a small value.
218
219
Open loop system
Closed loop uncontrolled system
Closed loop controlled system
block diagram of an industrial control system
220
Classifications of Industrial Controllers. �
221
First order systems: Proportional control�
222
For open loop system
For uncontrolled closed loop system
For closed loop system
Proportional control of first order system reduces the steady state error and the time constant both advantages
The proportional controller is defined as : m(t)=K e(t)
Or M(s)/E(s)=K
first Order System Integral Control
223
Integral control of the system eliminates the steady-state error in the response to the step input and rise the order of the system by one . This
Oscillates the output
224
Time response of first order system:1. open loop system, 2.uncontrolled
Closed loop system, 3. proportional control, 4.integral control
*Proportional controller reduce the steady state error and the time constant
*Integral controller eliminates the steady state error , rise the order of
The system by one and increase the oscillations
Second Order System�Proportional Control
225
For open loop
For uncontrolled
For controlled
Second Order System�Integral Control
226
For controlled system
The controlled system is stable if
227
Time response of second order system
*Proportional controller reduces the steady state error and the damping ratio
*Integral controller eliminates the steady state error , rise the order of
The system by one and the system may be unstable
Response to Torque Disturbances (Proportional Control)
228
Assume that R=0, then
And
The proportional controller reduces the steady state error caused By disturbance
T(s)/E(s)= Kp+Ki/s=Kp(1+1/Tis), Ti =Ki/Kp
229
Proportional plus Integral control
Differential Control Action
230
Proportional-Plus-Derivative Control
231
. Thus derivative control introduces a damping effect. A typical response curve c ( t ) to a unit step
232
Change in gain in P controller
→ Upgrade both steady-
state and transient
responses
→ Reduce steady-state
error
→ Reduce stability! Of second orser system and the higer order system may be unstable
Integral Controller
a unit step input
233
Change in gain for PI controller
234
→ Do not upgrade steady-
state responses
→ Increase oscillations
and overshoot! But less than I controller
Effect of change for gain PD controller
235
The PD controller is mainly used to improve the transient response of a control system. Reduce the max. peak and settling time
236
Changes in gains for PID Controller
237
238
Tuning PID controller Using trial error method
1.Set Ti to infinity and Td to zero
2.Increase Kp to reduce initial steady state error to half it's value
3. Add small Ti and tune for min. overshoot
4.Add a Td so that max. peak than 20%
239
240
241
Second Method
242
243
�Root Locus Design Method
244
Goal
Learn a specific technique which shows hochanges in one ofa system’s parameter (usually the controller gain, K)
will modify the location of the closed-loop poles in the s-domain.
245
246
247
248
Definition
249
The root locus is the locus of the closed-loop poles
when a specific parameter (usually gain, K)
is varied from 0 to infinity.
Root Locus Method Foundations
(i.e. )
250
Angle and Magnitude Conditions
251
Independent of K
252
Magnitude and phase of distinct zero assume
G(s) =s+3 and s=i4 then
G(i4)=3+i4
Magnitude and phase of distinct pole assume
G)s)=1/(s+1) and s=i1
Then G(i1)=1/(1+i1) =0.5 –i0.5
253
Magnitude and Phase
254
angle and phase conditions
255
256
Rules for Construction of Root Locus�
Follow these rules for constructing a root locus.
Rule 1 −
Starting points G(s)H(s)=1/K
0,-10
Terminating points -4, or infinity
Rule 2 − Locate the open loop poles and zeros in the ‘s’ plane.
Find the number of root locus branches.
We know that the root locus branches start at the open loop poles and end at open loop zeros. So, the number of root locus branches N is equal to the number of finite open loop poles P or the number of finite open loop zeros Z, whichever is greater.
Mathematically, we can write the number of root locus branches N as
257
258
259
Example: Plot a root locus of a system given as
Rule 4 − Find the centroid and the angle of asymptotes.
If P=Z , then all the root locus branches start at finite open loop poles and end at finite open loop zeros.
If P>Z , then Z number of root locus branches start at finite open loop poles and end at finite open loop zeros and P−Z number of root locus branches start at finite open loop poles and end at infinite open loop zeros.
If P<Z, then P number of root locus branches start at finite open loop poles and end at finite open loop zeros and Z−P number of root locus branches start at infinite open loop poles and end at finite open loop zeros.
So, some of the root locus branches approach infinity, when P≠Z .
260
Asymptotes give the direction of these root locus branches. The intersection point of asymptotes on the real axis is known as centroid.
We can calculate the centroid α by using this formula,
261
The formula for the angle of asymptotes θ is
Where
Determine the n - m asymptotes:
262
Rule 5 − Find the intersection points of root locus branches with an imaginary axis.
We can calculate the point at which the root locus branch intersects the imaginary axis and the value of K at that point by using the Routh array method and special case (ii).
If all elements of any row of the Routh array are zero, then the root locus branch intersects the imaginary axis and vice-versa.
Identify the row in such a way that if we make the first element as zero, then the elements of the entire row are zero. Find the value of K for this combination.
Substitute this K value in the auxiliary equation. You will get the intersection point of the root locus branch with an imaginary axis.
263
264
Routh table
(6-K)/3 0
K 0
Critical gain K cr=6
Auxiliary equation
265
Find the breakpoints.
266
267
Rule 7 :Angles of departure and arrival
*If there are starting points at complex conjugate
poles there will be departure angels
conjugate zeros there will be arrival angels
268
269
Frequency Response Analysis
270
What is frequency response
So far we have described the response and performance of a system in terms of complex frequency variable s=σ+jω and the location of poles and zeros in the s-plane. An important alternative approach to system analysis and design is the frequency response method.
The frequency response of a system is defined as the steady-state response of the system to a sinusoidal input signal with constant amplitude and varying frequency . We will investigate the steady-state response of the system to the sinusoidal input as the frequency varies.
271
272
When the input signal is a sinusoid, the resulting output signal for LTI systems is sinusoidal in the steady state, it differs from the input only in amplitude and phase.
where p1, p2,…,pn are distinctive poles,
then in partial fraction expansion form, we have
Taking the inverse Laplace transform yields
Suppose the system is stable, then all the poles are located in the left half plane and thus the exponential terms decay to zero as t→∞. Hence, the steady-state response of the system is
273
the steady-state output is
That is, the steady-state response depends only on the magnitude and phase of T(jω).
274
Plot the frequency response of the following system
ω | 0 | R/L | inf | |
Magnitude | 1 | | 0 | |
Phase | 0 | -45 | -90 | |
275
276
The Bode plot consists of two graphs:
i. A logarithmic plot of the magnitude of a transfer function.
ii. A plot of the phase angle.
277
278
Classes of Factors of Transfer Functions
279
Class-I: The Constant Gain Factor (K)
280
K = 20
K = 10
K = 4
K = 4, 10, and 20
281
282
The slope intersects with 0 dB line at frequency ω =1
| .01 | 0,1 | 1 | 10 | 100 | |
Log M[dB] | 40 | 20 | 0 | -20 | -40 | |
283
284
The frequency response of the function G(s) = s, is shown in the Figure.
G(s) = s has only a high-frequency asymptote, where s = jω.
The Bode magnitude plot is a straight line with a +20 dB/decade slope passing through 0 dB at ω = 1.
The Bode phase plot is equal to a constant +90o.
285
286
Low-Frequency Asymptote (letting frequency S 0
High-Frequency Asymptote (letting frequency s INF
287
288
Low-Frequency
High-Frequency Asy
Corner-Frequency
289
Magnitude of a real pole: The piecewise linear asymptotic Bode plot for magnitude is at 0 dB until the break frequency and then drops at 20 dB per decade as frequency increases (i.e., the slope is -20 dB/decade).
Phase of a real pole: The piecewise linear asymptotic Bode plot for phase follows the low frequency asymptote at 0° until one tenth the break frequency (0.1·ωc) then decrease linearly to meet the high frequency asymptote at ten times the break frequency (10·ωc). This line is shown above. Note that there is no error at the break frequency and about 5.7° of error at 0.1·ωc and 10·ωc the break frequency.
290
Again, as with the case of the real pole, there are three cases:
291
The phase of a single real zero also has three cases (which can be derived similarly to those for the real pole, given above):
292
Key Concept: Bode Plot of Real Zero:
�
293
Example :The first example is a simple pole at 5 radians per second. .G(s)=1/(1+s/5)
�
294
295
Key Concept: Bode Plot for Real Pole
�
296
Example-5: Obtain the Bode plot of the system given by the transfer function;
297
298
If u=1,
The magnitude asymptotes intersect at the 0dB line when u=ω/ωn=1.
The difference between the actual magnitude curve and the asymptotic approximation is a function of ζ. The max value of the frequency response occurs at the resonant frequency, ωr.
When ζ→0, ωr→ ωn.
299
When u<<1, the log magnitude is -10log1=0 dB, and the phase angle approaches 00. When u>>1, the log magnitude approaches -10log(u4)=-40logu, which results in a curve with a slope of -40dB/decade. The phase angle, when u>>1, approaches -1800. The magnitude asymptotes meet at the 0dB line when
300
asymptotes for
301
The peak will have an amplitude of 1/(2·ζ)=5.00 or 14 dB.
302
303
Draw a Bode diagram for
304
305
Sum of all plots except the gain
306
Add the gain to obtained the total plot
307
308
Nyquist Plot or Polar Plot
309
Sketch the Polar plot of Frequency Response
To sketch the polar plot of G(jω) for the entire range of frequency ω, i.e., from 0 to infinity, there are four key points that usually need to be known:
310
Problem-1: Polar Plot of Integrator
Representing G(s) in the frequency response form G( jω ) by replacing s = jω:
The magnitude of G( jω ), i.e., | G( jω) |, is obtained as;
The phase of G( jω ), denoted by, φ , is obtained as;
311
Problem-2: Polar Plot of First Order System
Consider a first order system
Representing G(s) in the frequency response form G( jω ) by replacing s = jω:
The magnitude of G( jω ), i.e., | G( jω) |, is obtained as;
The phase of G( jω ), denoted by, φ , is obtained as;
The start of plot where ω = 0
The end of plot where ω = ∞
The mid part of plot where ω = 1/T
312
Problem-3: Polar Plot of Second Order System
Consider a second order system
313
Representing G(s) in the frequency response form G( jω ) by replacing s = jω:
The magnitude of G( jω ), i.e., | G( jω) |, is obtained as;
The phase of G( jω ), denoted by, φ , is obtained as;
314
Example :Plot the Nyquist plot for the open loop system
315
Four Important Points for Derivation the Nyquist Stability Criterion
3. The relationship between the poles of 1 + G(s)H(s) and the poles of G(s)H(s);
4. The relationship between the zeros of 1 + G(s)H(s) and the poles of the closed-loop transfer function, T(s);
316
The Concept of Mapping Points
OR
317
The Concept of Mapping Contours
The collection of points, called a contour.
318
Examples of Contour Mapping
The contour B maps in a counter clockwise direction if F(s) has just poles that are encircled by the contour, Also, you should verify that, if the pole or zero of F(s) is enclosed by contour A, the mapping encircles the origin .
319
Examples of Contour Mapping
In this last case, the pole and zero rotation cancel, and the mapping does not encircle the origin.
The number of encirclements of the origin of F(s) contour is N=Z-P;
Where Z number of zeros and P number of poles of F(s) inside s contour
320
F(s) combine the characteristic equations of the open loop and closed loop systems
The Function F(s) for Stability
321
THE NYQUIST STABILITY CRITERION
322
We use the Nyquist plot of the open loop system and the number of
encirclement of (-1,j0) point
Nyquist Path
323
Nyquist Stability Criterion
324
325
326
327
Nyquist or Polar Plot
Nyquist Diagram
B-The open loop system is critically stable
328
329
The Nyquist Stability Plot for GH(s) = 1/s(s-1) is given in the figure below.
330
Relative Stability
Phase margin (γ) is that amount of additional phase lag at the gain crossover frequency required to bring the system to the verge of instability.
331
332
Figure 14.10 Gain and phase margins on a Nyquist plot.
333