1 of 10

����PRESENTATION ON �BODE PLOT, FILTER

  • BRANCH-E & TC ENGG
  • SUBJECT- CONTROL SYSTEM & COMPONENT
  • CHAPTER – 8 – FREQUENCY RESPONSE ANALYSIS & BODE PLOT
  • TOPIC- BODE PLOT, FILTER
  • SEM-6TH
  • FACULTY – Er. MANAS RANJAN MOHANTA (Sr. Lecturer E & TC ENGG DEPARTMENT)
  • AY-2021-2022, SUMMER-2022

2 of 10

First-Order System Revisited

  • Recall the transfer function�for a 1st-order system:
  • The frequency response of this�system is:

3 of 10

Bode Plot

  • Asymptotic approximation to�the actual frequency response.
  • Plotted on a log-log scale.
  • Allows approximation of the�frequency response using�straight lines:
  • Note that:

20 dB/decade

Changes by π/2

4 of 10

Second-Order System

  • The transfer function of a �2nd-order system:
  • The frequency response of this�system can be modeled as:
  • When :

40 dB/decade

Changes by π

5 of 10

Example: Comparison of Exact and Bode Plots

6 of 10

Causal Filters

  • Recall that the ideal lowpass filter �is a noncausal filter and hence�unrealizable.
  • The filter design problem then�becomes an optimization problem�in which we try to best meet the�user’s requirements with a filter that�can be implemented with the least number of components.
  • This is equivalent to trying to minimize the number of coefficients in the (Laplace transform) transfer function. It is also comparable to minimizing the order of the filter.
  • Typically the numerator order is less than or equal to the denominator order, so, building on the concept of a Bode plot, we can relate the maximum amount of attenuation desired to the order of the denominator.
  • There are often no “perfect” solutions. Users must tradeoff design constraints such as passband smoothness, stopband attenuation and linearity in phase.
  • Computer-aided design programs, including MATLAB, are able to design filters once the user adequately specifies the constraints. We will explore two interesting analytic solutions: Butterworth and Chebyshev filters.

7 of 10

Butterworth Filters

  • Butterworth filters are maximally flat in the �passband. Their distinguishing characteristic is�that the poles are arranged on a semi-circle of�radius ωc in the left-half plane.
  • The filter function is an all-pole filter that exploits�the properties of Butterworth polynomials.
  • Examples:
  • Frequency Response:
  • Design strategy: select the cutoff�frequency and the amount of �stopband attenuation, then�compute the order of the filter.

8 of 10

Chebyshev Filters

  • Chebyshev filter, based on Chebyshev polynomials, allows ripple in the passband to achieve greater attenuation. This implies a lower filter order at the expense of smoothness of the frequency response in the passband.
  • Prototype:

where:

and ε is chosen based �on the amount of passband �ripple that can be tolerated.

  • Filter design theory is based�largely on the mathematical�properties of polynomials.
  • An third type of filter, the �elliptical filter, attempts to�allow ripple in both bands.

9 of 10

Frequency Transformations

  • There are two general approaches to�filter design:
  • Direct optimization of the desired �frequency response, typically�using software like MATLAB.
  • Design a “normalized” lowpass�filter and then transform it to �another lowpass, highpass or�bandpass filter.
  • The latter approach can be achieved �by using these simple frequency �transformations:
  • This latter approach is popular�because it leverages our knowledge�of the properties of lowpass filters.

10 of 10

TNHAK YOU