1 of 56

WIN Measures Update:

Measuring Equitable Transportation

Supported by Well-being and Equity (WE) in the World

�Thursday, December 16, 2021

Presenters:

Alvaro S. Sanchez, Vice President of Policy, The Greenlining InstituteMary Buchanan, Senior Research Associate, TransitCenter�Jesus M. Barajas, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Science & Policy, University of California, Davis

2 of 56

Welcome and Introductions

2

As you join the meeting, please share your name, affiliation, and one item that is on your transportation data wish list in the chat box.

3 of 56

Session Agenda

3

  • Brief Overview of WIN Measures

  • Speaker Presentations
    • Alvaro S. Sanchez, The Greenlining Institute
    • Mary Buchanan, TransitCenter
    • Jesus M. Barajas, Ph.D., University of California, Davis

  • Breakout Discussions: What additional transportation measures would you recommend?

  • Reflections and Announcements

Measuring Equitable Transportation

4 of 56

Welcome & Land Acknowledgement

Together, we acknowledge indigenous peoples, on whose ancient and sacred land we live, work, and play.  As a community, we recognize the ever-present systemic inequities that stem directly from past wrongdoings, and we commit ourselves indefinitely to respecting and reconciling this long history of injustice.

https://native-land.ca/

In the chat, please tell us where you reside!

5 of 56

Who

A strategic network of organizations, individuals, and communities united by common purpose

8

Goals

  • Advance intergenerational well-being and equity
  • Change cultures and systems that perpetuate legacies of trauma and exclusion
  • Cultivate the vital conditions that everyone needs to thrive

How

We aim to catalyze change through:

  • Building shared stewardship to support resilience and renewal
  • Transforming our relationships and our narratives
  • Transforming our system of measurement to one that is equitable, centers well-being for people and places, and shares power with communities
  • Shifting policies and investments to build an inclusive and equitable economy

What is the Well-Being in the Nation (WIN) Network?

6 of 56

WIN Measure Domains

7 of 56

By applying a racial justice frame to the WIN Measures, we aim to prioritize, develop and restore Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) communities using data that tells a complete and transparent story. In order to be effective and explicitly anti-racist, we must go beyond the identification of disparate outcomes across racial groups. We seek to include measures that:�8

  • Address equitable input in decision-making
  • Promote equitable access and opportunity
  • Highlight community-based assets and values
  • Lift-up promising interventions, remedies, and solutions
  • Expose systemic racism

8Further, we seek to disaggregate data, where possible, and apply an intersectional lens in order to highlight the unique needs and characteristics of each racial and ethnic group.

What do we mean by racial justice?

8 of 56

By applying an intergenerational wellbeing lens to the WIN measures, we intend to recognize:

  • How different age cohorts experience wellbeing within each of the domains

  • How the wellbeing of different groups is connected across generations

�In doing so, we will reflect the complex intersectional nature of the domains, that addressing disparities and inequities will require strategies which will have long term impact over generations, and of the need to develop multi-generational longitudinal measuring strategies.

What do we mean by intergenerational well-being?

9 of 56

WIN Measures Update Process

Phase 1

Information Gathering

Phase 2

Rate and Prioritize

Phase 3

Refine and Alignment

Phase 4

Report

  • Build field strength on topic
  • Conduct a landscape analysis of existing research 
  • Develop database of existing resources
  • Host domain-specific listening session webinars
  • Host community dialogues 
  • Compile results from Phase 1 into draft measures set  
  • Decision criteria will be developed to rate the draft measures 
  • Draft measures will be rated and prioritized via online survey
  • Multiple rounds to refine list of measures  ��
  • Refine and align proposed measures with major national initiatives and other organizations/groups
  • Develop and share report of process and recommendations
  • Update WIN Measures website 

10 of 56

Additional Transportation Measures

Percent of workers who commute 60 minutes or longer.

Average number of jobs reachable within 30 minutes by public transit or walking.

In the last three years, the quality and service of public transportation has: improved, worsened, or remained the same.

In the last three years, the roads leading to this community have: improved, worsened, or remained the same.

Average time of commute (minutes)

Bike score (0-100)

CORE TRANSPORTATION MEASURES

Percent of workers who commute alone by car

Rides per day per capita

(average weekday household person-miles traveled by U.S. Census Tract, per day)

Transit score

11 of 56

As you reflect on the presenters’ remarks today, we would like for you to consider

What are the opportunities the current moment offers us in terms of transportation measurement and transportation equity?

Reflection: Racial Justice and Intergenerational Well-being

12 of 56

Transportation Pre-readings

13 of 56

Alvaro S. SanchezVice President of Policy�The Greenlining Institute

13

Speaker

14 of 56

E-Mobility Equity:

Designing and Measuring for Equity

Alvaro S. Sanchez, Vice President of Policy

@alvaros_views

© Greenlining Institute. All right reserved.

15 of 56

We envision a future where communities of color can build wealth, live in healthy places filled with economic opportunity, and are ready to meet the challenges posed by climate change.

16 of 56

17 of 56

Transforming the behaviors, institutions, and systems that disproportionately harm people of color. Equity means increasing access to power, redistributing and providing additional resources, and eliminating barriers to opportunity, in order to empower low-income communities of color to thrive and reach full potential

RACIAL

EQUITY

18 of 56

May 17, 2021�Oakland COVID-19 Map

Communities in dark blue have highest case rates of COVID

* no data for white portions of the map

1937�Oakland Redlining Map

Disinvestment in redlined communities.

2021�CalEnviroScreen

Communities in red and orange suffer most from poverty and pollution

ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND HEALTH IMPACTS BASED ON RACE

19 of 56

20 of 56

21 of 56

22 of 56

Mobility Equity Framework

Enhance economic opportunities

Increase access to mobility

Reduce air pollution

© Greenlining Institute. All right reserved.

AUGUST 2021

23 of 56

The Greenlined Economy Framework

24 of 56

Community Investment Standards

  1. Emphasize anti-racist solutions.�
  2. Prioritize multi-sector approaches.�
  3. Deliver intentional benefits.�
  4. Build community capacity.�
  5. Be community-driven at every stage.�
  6. Establish paths toward wealth-building.

25 of 56

MAKING EQUITY REAL FRAMEWORK

GOALS, VALUES, MISSION

How is equity described in the context of the overall goal of the policy, program or funding approach? Is equity a core component? Is it missing?

PROCESS

How does the policy, program or funding approach propose to deliver outcomes with equity as a focus? How are decisions made or influenced by communities with less political power or voice?

IMPLEMENTATION

How does implementation lead to equity outcomes? What are the explicit equity outcomes described in the policy, program or funding approach?

ANALYSIS, MEASUREMENT

How is equity progress measured? How do we know that equity goals were achieved?

01

02

03

04

26 of 56

6 Standards for Equitable Investment

  1. Emphasis Anti-Racist Solutions
  2. Prioritize Multi-Sector Approaches
  3. Deliver Intentional Benefits
  4. Build Community Capacity
  5. Be Community-Driven at Every Stage
  6. Establish Paths Towards Wealth Building

Making Equity Real Framework

  1. In the Mission
  2. In the Process
  3. In the Outcomes
  4. In the Measurement & Analysis

+

27 of 56

2 Grant Types: 1) Planning and Capacity Building 2) Implementation

Eligible Uses: Infrastructure, zero-emission vehicles and other mobility options, land use and pricing innovations, community engagement activities, workforce development, and more.

Location: Statewide

Funding Agency: California Air Resources Board

Program Funding: $19.5 million available in Fiscal Year 2019-20

SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION EQUITY PROJECT

28 of 56

SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION EQUITY PROJECT

EQUITY IN THE MISSION

Deliver Intentional Benefits & Emphasize Anti-Racist Solutions:

  • 100% of funds targeted to communities most burdened poverty and pollution, primarily communities of color.

Prioritize Multi-Sector Approaches:

  • Requires interlocking plans for climate adaptation and resilience, workforce development and anti-displacement.

EQUITY IN THE PROCESS

Be Community-Driven at Every Stage:

  • Developed concept &

guidelines with stakeholders.

  • Accountability for meaningful community engagement, partnerships, and decision-making.

Build Community Capacity:

  • Funding for capacity building and technical assistance to give applicants the tools and resources to submit competitive applications.

EQUITY IN THE MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS

Be Community-Driven at Every Stage:

  • In an equity evaluation of STEP, a goal is to identify what “success” means to each community individually and how to co-develop metrics that can evaluate community-defined success.

  • Community partners and equity experts co-created the scope of work and will be paid advisors for the duration of the evaluation.

EQUITY IN THE OUTCOMES

Prioritize Multi-Sector Approaches

  • Zero-emission buses, electric bikes, bike lanes, community-based tree planting, and a Universal Basic Mobility Pilot.

Establish Paths Towards Wealth Building:

  • Full time jobs & training for 10-20 youth to install and maintain electric vehicle charging sites.
  • Partnerships with community colleges and trade schools.

29 of 56

© The Greenlining Institute. All right reserved.

© The Greenlining Institute. All right reserved.

AUGUST 2021

30 of 56

Mary Buchanan�Senior Research Associate�TransitCenter

30

Speaker

31 of 56

Measuring equity in public transit

Mary Buchanan

Senior Research Associate @TransitCenter

32 of 56

The goal of a transportation system is to connect people to places conveniently & affordably.

An equitable transportation system benefits the people with the greatest need for those connections by prioritizing their travel needs.

Transportation practitioners have to know who benefits from their current system and who is underserved to plan equitable service that eliminates inequities in access.

33 of 56

The Equity Dashboard measures access to opportunities on public transit outcomes for people in 7 regions

  • E.g. how many jobs can the average Black resident of D.C. get to in 45 min for less than $5?
  • How long is the transit trip to the nearest hospital from my home?

In order to...

  • Assess transit equity in the network & in service changes
  • Demonstrate how internal equity metrics can look
  • Monitor regional progress on equity

https://dashboard.transitcenter.org/

34 of 56

Resources

https://vimeo.com/575112771

  • Code to create/run the analysis & website:
  • Fares, travel times, access calculations:

https://github.com/diluisi/TransitCenter

  • General accessibility functions:

https://github.com/jamaps/tracc

  • Reliability measures:

https://github.com/wklumpen/equity-pulse-realtime

  • Website Code:

https://github.com/wklumpen/equity-pulse-web

  • Contact: email mbuchanan@transitcenter.org

Thanks to the Dashboard’s technical team!

Jeff Allen, Steven Farber, Alex Karner, Willem Klumpenhouwer, Lisa Li, Rick Liu, Mitchell Robinson, Diego Da Silva, Dana Rowangould & Amer Shalaby

Thanks to our Equity-in-Practice research

partners at Center for Neighborhood Technology

35 of 56

Jesus M. Barajas, Ph.D.Assistant Professor�Environmental Science & Policy�University of California, Davis

35

Speaker

36 of 56

Metrics and implications for equity: Regional and local applications

Jesus M. Barajas, PhD

December 16, 2021

Image: Juan Ordonez / Unsplash

37 of 56

Study 1:

How do regional agencies use equity to prioritize investments?

38 of 56

39 of 56

Transportation planning process

NCHRP Report 8-53

40 of 56

Documents reviewed from 40 largest MPOs

41 of 56

Categories of potential equity impact

42 of 56

Example metrics

Classification

Example

Location burdens-based

“Projects will score 10 points if the proposed project is not located in or adjoining environmental justice sensitive area” (HGAC)

Location benefits-based

“Project falls in, or partially in, an EJ area with high concentration of low-income persons or minorities = 4 points” (EWGCOG)

Impacts-based

“Project will directly improve safety through improvements at a high-crash location within an equity area = 2 points…” (BMPO)

Access to destinations-based

“Change in the number of jobs that low-income and minority community workers can access during peak period [on a scale of 0-100].” (ARC)

User-based

“Percent of travelers using a facility that are people of color below the poverty line, as modeled by CMAP’s travel demand model (CMAP)”

Community-engagement based

“Project implementation will include public engagement strategy. Strategy is clearly described in attachment and includes specific techniques to engage transportation disadvantaged populations = 5 points” (MARC)

43 of 56

Key takeaways

  • Transparency in prioritization is critical
  • Location-based measures are limited in their impacts
    • Assess both benefits and burdens
    • Prefer a focus on accessibility or user characteristics
  • Equity weights are generally too low to affect outcomes
    • Most MPOs give equity scores < 10% of total weight
  • Equity measures don’t help repair harm, just ensure no harm going forward

44 of 56

Study 2:

To what extent are infrastructure, safety, and policing linked?

45 of 56

46 of 56

Data gathering and processing

  • Examined number of tickets issued per street segment
  • FOIA request of CPD tickets issued for bicycle offenses
    • Time period: January 2017 to December 2019
  • Additional variables analyzed
    • Neighborhood sociodemographics
    • Street segment characteristics
      • Bike infrastructure
      • Street functional class
    • Neighborhood context
      • Police presence
      • Safety

47 of 56

Bicycle sidewalk citations issued in Chicago

48 of 56

A closer look:

Bicycle citations in Chicago

Citations per 1,000 residents

2017-2019

49 of 56

Key finding

Where there were bike facilities, the odds of getting a ticket were lower – and got much lower in neighborhoods of color

50 of 56

Key takeaways for planners and policymakers

  • Reconsider the role of enforcement in traffic safety
    • CPD quoted as acknowledging bike ticketing was for crime prevention
  • Invest in infrastructure
    • Inequities in planning and investment compound other inequities
    • But work in close collaboration with community members
  • Be attentive to the intersections of identity and mobility
  • Needs differ across groups
  • Sometimes efforts fail to count the differences

51 of 56

52 of 56

  • Disaggregate data by age, race, and ethnicity
  • Use intersectional lenses, such as place, gender, sexual orientation, veteran and migration status, and more
  • Must be actionable and accessible for communities, policymakers, and researchers
  • Include both quantitative and qualitative data that are driven by contributions from lived experience
  • Apply a systemic lens to the problem beyond individual-level outcomes
  • Do no harm (e.g., measures that shame people for lack of resources or perceived poor choices, replicate harmful narratives, or are derived from biased data sources)
  • Include both asset-based and deficit-based measures in each domain
  • Use approaches that are culturally-grounded

Guiding Principles for Measure Addition

53 of 56

Breakout Discussion

  • What additional transportation measures would you add to advance racial justice and intergenerational well-being? Consider:
    • access and safety
    • use and affordability
    • infrastructure and quality
  • What narrative frameworks need to be lifted up or need to be avoided?
  • What resources/studies/reports/articles would you suggest?

54 of 56

What key ideas and recommendations emerged during your small group discussion?

54

Report Out

55 of 56

  • Visit our WIN Measures Update page for the latest information: https://winnetwork.org/win-measures-updates
  • Continue to add your reflections and ideas to the Google doc that was shared during today’s session
  • Participate in future domain-specific listening sessions (registration is open for all sessions)
  • Help connect us with clients and community members
  • Send us your feedback. Email: kristen.rego@weintheworld.org

We invite you to remain actively involved!

56 of 56

56

Domain Listening Session

Topic: Housing

February 17th, 2022

1:00 pm - 2:30 pm ET

Stay informed about the WIN Measures update process and

register for future listening sessions:

https://winnetwork.org/win-measures-updates

Learn more about the WIN Measures: https://www.winmeasures.org/

Upcoming Meetings

Transportation