1 of 42

Emittance Measurements

Randy Thurman-Keup

Fermilab

Joseph Liouville

2 of 42

Outline

  • Theory
  • Three-screen
  • Quadrupole scan
  • Aperture Based
    • Slits
    • Pepper Pot
    • Allison Scanner
  • Deflecting Mode Cavity / Spectrometer
  • Tomographic Methods
  • Other methods of interest

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

2

February 1, 2024

3 of 42

Theory

  •  

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

3

February 1, 2024

 

 

 

4 of 42

Theory

  •  

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

4

February 1, 2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 of 42

Emittance

  • Emittances have the dimensions of (length x angle)n
    • mm-mrad, cm-mrad, m-rad, etc…
    • radian is dimensionless so some people just drop it
      • m, mm, μm, nm, etc… 🡪 mm-mrad = μm
  • From M. Stockli talk

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

5

February 1, 2024

For semi-axis-products it is common to write

π⋅mm·mrad, π⋅cm·mrad, or π⋅m·rad

The π is supposed “to assure the reader that the π has been factored out of the phase space area (Sanders, 1990).” However, if the π was factored out, it was factored out in the definition. The π in the unit has no clear meaning. It is neither a real unit, nor a true multiplier. It is a one-of-a-kind object that has no precedent in the physics literature! It has created as much confusion as it intended to eliminate.

Confusion can be avoided by stating whether the quoted emittance value is a volume, an area, or a semi-axis-product!

6 of 42

Specify the Emittance Definition

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

6

February 1, 2024

I think I’ll just include�the beam core

Maybe 100% of�the particles…

We have an emittance of 0.2 𝜇m.

That’s amazing!! Ours is 100 𝜇m.

7 of 42

Phase Space

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

7

February 1, 2024

Enrico Bravin CAS

8 of 42

Courant-Snyder Parameters

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

8

February 1, 2024

Enrico Bravin CAS

?

9 of 42

Theory

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

9

February 1, 2024

Only true for trace �space emittance

Canonical emittance�(px not x’) is always

constant

10 of 42

Matrix Transport of Phase Space

  • Remember Day 1???
  • Take the x – x’ space as an example
    • A single particle can be transported as follows

    • The beam matrix can be transported as

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

10

February 1, 2024

 

 

 

11 of 42

Drift Transfer Matrix

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

11

February 1, 2024

E.Wildner NUFACT08 School

12 of 42

Quadrupole Transfer Matrix

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

12

February 1, 2024

E.Wildner NUFACT08 School

13 of 42

Outline

  • Theory
  • Three-screen
  • Quadrupole scan
  • Aperture Based
    • Slits
    • Pepper Pot
    • Allison Scanner
  • Deflecting Mode Cavity / Spectrometer
  • Tomographic Methods
  • Other methods of interest

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

13

February 1, 2024

14 of 42

Three Screen Emittance

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

14

February 1, 2024

15 of 42

Three Screen Emittance

  •  

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

15

February 1, 2024

 

 

 

 

 

16 of 42

Three Screen Emittance

  • This gives us 3 equations and 3 unknowns

  • Can solve for emittance
    • This assumes an elliptical phase space
    • It also assumes no space charge
  • Also have the option of fitting profiles with accelerator simulations

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

16

February 1, 2024

 

 

 

17 of 42

Outline

  • Theory
  • Three-screen
  • Quadrupole scan
  • Aperture Based
    • Slits
    • Pepper Pot
    • Allison Scanner
  • Deflecting Mode Cavity / Spectrometer
  • Tomographic Methods
  • Other methods of interest

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

17

February 1, 2024

18 of 42

Quadrupole Scan

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

18

February 1, 2024

19 of 42

Quadrupole Scan

  •  

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

19

February 1, 2024

 

 

20 of 42

Quadrupole Scan

  • More than 3 measurements form a redundant system of equations from which systematic errors can be extracted

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

20

February 1, 2024

21 of 42

Outline

  • Theory
  • Three-screen
  • Quadrupole scan
  • Aperture Based
    • Slits
    • Pepper Pot
    • Allison Scanner
  • Deflecting Mode Cavity / Spectrometer
  • Tomographic Methods
  • Other methods of interest

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

21

February 1, 2024

22 of 42

Slit and Profile Method

  • The principle behind slit and profile methods is to select a subset of the beam (x) and measure its angular profile (x’)

  • Scan the slit across the beam�collecting x’ profiles
  • The position of the slit is the x value for �the x’ profile
  • Space charge distortions are generally minimal

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

22

February 1, 2024

x

x’

23 of 42

Slit Devices

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

23

February 1, 2024

FNAL FAST Electron Linac

Single 50 𝜇m Slit

24 of 42

Multislit and Profile Method

  • Similar to single slit method, but no scanning of slit is required
    • Spacing of data in x is set by the slit spacing
    • No fine tuning possible

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

24

February 1, 2024

25 of 42

Multislit and Profile Method

  • FNAL A0 photoinjector, 15 MeV electrons

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

25

February 1, 2024

Correlations between horizontal and vertical

26 of 42

Multislit Devices

  • FNAL FAST Electron Linac

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

26

February 1, 2024

27 of 42

Allison Scanner

  • Another variation of a slit method is the Allison Scanner
    • The scanner has a slit at the entrance
    • An electrostatic deflector plus slit at the exit to select a particular angle
    • And a faraday cup at the end to measure intensity

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

27

February 1, 2024

28 of 42

Allison Scanner

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

28

February 1, 2024

SNS LEBT, 65 keV ions

29 of 42

Pepperpot Method

  • Like the slit and profile, but instead of one or more slits, this has many, many small holes
  • Advantage is the potential to measure correlations between the x and y dimensions and possibly the �4-D emittance

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

29

February 1, 2024

Radiabeam Website

30 of 42

Pepperpot Method

  • FETS Ion Source

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

30

February 1, 2024

Simon Jolly, Imperial College

Blue X’s are hole locations�Red is image spot location

Raw Image

Difference in positions gives the angles x’ and y’

31 of 42

Outline

  • Theory
  • Three-screen
  • Quadrupole scan
  • Aperture Based
    • Slits
    • Pepper Pot
    • Allison Scanner
  • Deflecting Mode Cavity / Spectrometer
  • Tomographic Methods
  • Other methods of interest

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

31

February 1, 2024

32 of 42

Deflecting Cavity plus Dispersion

  • This is a longitudinal emittance measurement technique
  • Combines a transverse deflecting cavity with a spectrometer
  • First the beam is deflected horizontally (x – t) and then it enters a vertical spectrometer (y – 𝛥E/E)
  • t – 𝛥E/E 🡪 x – y

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

32

February 1, 2024

Horizontal Deflection�x – t correlation

Vertical Dispersion�y – 𝛥E/E correlation

33 of 42

Deflecting Cavity plus Dispersion

  • LCLS XTCAV

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

33

February 1, 2024

34 of 42

Deflecting Cavity plus Dispersion

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

34

February 1, 2024

LCLS Data

No Microbunching

Microbunching

35 of 42

Outline

  • Theory
  • Three-screen
  • Quadrupole scan
  • Aperture Based
    • Slits
    • Pepper Pot
    • Allison Scanner
  • Deflecting Mode Cavity / Spectrometer
  • Tomographic Methods
  • Other methods of interest

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

35

February 1, 2024

36 of 42

Tomography

  • The reconstruction of an object by using projections of it
    • Radon Transform is one method for accomplishing it
    • CAT scan (Computer Aided Tomography)
      • X-ray images from different directions
  • Reconstruct phase space via projections of it onto the time axis for instance

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

36

February 1, 2024

37 of 42

Tomographic Techniques

  • Pseudo-tomography
    • For a synchrotron storage ring, the longitudinal phase space density is constant in time and along phase space trajectories
    • Uniformly populate rings in phase space such that the projection of phase space onto the time axis matches the data
    • Emittance can be calculated since�the phase space distribution has been �determined

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

37

February 1, 2024

38 of 42

Tomographic Techniques

  • Rapid-cycling synchrotron, phase space not evenly distributed
  • Collect time distributions throughout a synchrotron period (time period that particles rotate once around the longitudinal phase space)

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

38

February 1, 2024

Rotation of density variations in longitudinal phase space

39 of 42

Tomographic Reconstruction

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

39

February 1, 2024

FNAL

Main

Injector

Tomographic

reconstruction�of longitudinal�phase space

40 of 42

Outline

  • Theory
  • Three-screen
  • Quadrupole scan
  • Aperture Based
    • Slits
    • Pepper Pot
    • Allison Scanner
  • Deflecting Mode Cavity / Spectrometer
  • Tomographic Methods
  • Other methods of interest

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

40

February 1, 2024

41 of 42

6-D Phase Space

  • SNS Beam Test Facility, after RFQ (radio frequency quadrupole)

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

41

February 1, 2024

42 of 42

Extras

R. Thurman-Keup --- USPAS Hampton, VA

42

February 1, 2024