1 of 29

T32 PreDoctoral: Program-Specific Breakout

Catherine Leimkuhler Grimes

University of Delaware

cgrimes@udel.edu

NIH NIGMS

Biomedical Training Program Directors Conference

Workforce Development, and Diversity (TWD)

Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)

July 8, 2024

No conflicts of interest to declare

Ivo D. Dinov

University of Michigan

statistics@umich.edu

2 of 29

T32 Overall Goals

A central theme of our Subgroup is to develop a diverse pool of well-trained scientists with technical, operational, and professional skills necessary to conduct rigorous and reproducible research, and transition into careers in the biomedical research workforce.

The T32 training programs should be well integrated within one or more graduate department(s)/program(s) and is expected to exert a strong, positive influence on the development and execution of the graduate curriculum, training opportunities and mentoring.

Dr. Mercedes Rubio

NIH Leadership

Dr. Alison Gammie

3 of 29

14 T32 PreDoctoral “Flavors”

Behavioral-Biomedical Science Interface

Medical Scientist Training Program

Bio-

technology

Cellular, Biochemical and Molecular

Computational Biology, Bioinformatics and Biomedical Data

Training in Genetics

Biostatistics

Chemistry-

Biology-

Interface

Training in Joint Neuroscience

Molecular Biophysics

Pharmacological Sciences

Molecular Medicine

Systems and Integrative Biology

New Programs?

Trans-

departmental

Basic Biomedical Sciences

4 of 29

5 of 29

Outline

1:30 – 1:35: Welcome to the T32 Predoctoral TP PI Session

1:35 - 2:00:Panel Discussion with NIGMS Leadership

2:00 – 2:10: Pre-meeting PI Survey and Qualitative/Quantitative Results (PDF)

2:10 – 2:40: Breakout Discussion (10 per table)

2:40 – 3:00: Summary Reports and Moving Forward

6 of 29

FASEB Meeting 2024��

Alison Gammie, PhD

Mercedes Rubio, PhD

Sydella Blatch Alexander, PhD

Michelle Bond, PhD

Marie Harton, PhD

Sailaja Koduri, PhD

Miljan Simonovic, PhD

Dimitrios Vatakis, PhD

Nie Zhongzhen, PhD

NIGMS

TWD

Predoctoral Basic Biomedical and Medical Science Training Programs Branch

T32 Predoc Program Specific Breakout

7 of 29

Panel Discussion

Questions for the leadership from the survey

1. Could you please highlight what is new in the latest FOA? Do you anticipate changes? How often do you think it is reasonable to change the FOA? Can you describe any new supplement opportunities?

2. As Graduate students unionize across the country, stipends continue to increase. How do you see NIH responding to these stipend increases? How would you suggest training grants supplement them? What is the best mechanism for supplementing (aside from University Match).

3. The PIs gathered in the room, spend a significant amount of time directing these programs, are there mechanisms in place to increase support for T32 PS and other training-related topics?

8 of 29

FASEB Meeting 2024��

Alison Gammie, PhD

Mercedes Rubio, PhD

Sydella Blatch Alexander, PhD

Michelle Bond, PhD

Marie Harton, PhD

Sailaja Koduri, PhD

Miljan Simonovic, PhD

Dimitrios Vatakis, PhD

Nie Zhongzhen, PhD

NIGMS

TWD

Predoctoral Basic Biomedical and Medical Science Training Programs Branch

T32 Predoc Program Specific Breakout

9 of 29

Submitted Questions

  • Could you please highlight what is new in the latest NOFO?  Do you anticipate changes? How often do you think it is reasonable to change the NOFO? Can you describe any new supplement opportunities? 

  • As graduate students unionize across the country, stipends continue to increase. How do you see NIH responding to these stipend increases? How would you suggest training grants supplement them? What is the best mechanism for supplementing (aside from University Match). 

  • The PIs gathered in the room, spend a significant amount of time directing these programs, are there mechanisms in place to increase support for T32 PS and other training-related topics? 

9

10 of 29

Submitted Questions

  • Could you please highlight what is new in the latest NOFO?  Do you anticipate changes? How often do you think it is reasonable to change the NOFO? Can you describe any new supplement opportunities? 

  • As graduate students unionize across the country, stipends continue to increase. How do you see NIH responding to these stipend increases? How would you suggest training grants supplement them? What is the best mechanism for supplementing (aside from University Match). 

  • The PIs gathered in the room, spend a significant amount of time directing these programs, are there mechanisms in place to increase support for T32 PS and other training-related topics? 

10

11 of 29

Predoctoral Basic Biomedical (BBM) �NOFO Updates�PAR-23-228

11

12 of 29

BBM NOFO Changes: �Other Attachments

Old (PAR-20-213) 

New (PAR-23-228) 

Required 

Recruitment plan to enhance diversity 

Recruitment plan to enhance diversity 

Application and admissions data (table A) 

Baseline data on the trainee pool (new Suggested Formats A and Suggested Formats B) 

Outcomes data collection and storage plan

(MOVED: now part of the 25-page Program Plan)

Dissemination plan

(MOVED: now part of the 25-page Program Plan)

 

Optional 

Advisory Committee 

Advisory Committee 

 

Training activities (NEW: 10-pg limit)

Before: 2 pages each in the Appendix

12

13 of 29

BBM NOFO Changes: �Other Attachments

Recruitment plan to enhance diversity 

  • Old Language: The overall plan will be rated as ACCEPTABLE only if the recruitment strategies for all of the relevant groups identified in the Notice of NIH's Interest in Diversity are viewed by the review panel as acceptable, otherwise the plan will be rated as UNACCEPTABLE.   
  • New Language: Is the recruitment process responsive to the Baseline Data on the Trainee Pool? Does the training program’s recruitment plan describe effective strategies to reach a broad range of potential trainees that are program-specific and go beyond organizational recruitment efforts? 

13

14 of 29

BBM NOFO Changes: Appendix

Old (PAR-20-213) 

New (PAR-23-228) 

Required 

Required Training activities syllabi/outlines 

moved to “other attachments”

Trainee Selection and Appointment

in Program Plan

RCR Syllabi (part of program plan)

in Program Plan

Optional 

Syllabi/summaries of elective courses and/or elective activities - up to 4 in TOTAL 

moved to “other attachments”

Evaluation and assessment instruments 

Still allowed per SF424 

Conflict Resolution Protocols (part of program plan)

in Program Plan

14

15 of 29

Data Table Updates�General and Program-Specific Updates

15

Changes are intended to reduce burden and promote consistency in the requested information

  • For all data tables
    • Updated table instructions to clarify terms and lettering for training stage
    • Remove redundancies by not asking for structured data available elsewhere in the application
  • Multiple changes specific to predoctoral, postdoctoral, undergraduate, and international training tables, including:
    • Update Table 1 - applicants will only be required to provide information relevant to the training stage(s) in the proposed program.
    • Realign Table 5 - focus on the outcomes only on trainees supported by the grant.
    • Table 6 - remove some trainee characteristics.
    • Table 8 - remove “Part II. Those Clearly Associated with the Training Grant” & encourage reporting this information in the Program Plan Section or RPPR narrative
  • Implementation: Applications with due dates on/after January 25, 2025.
  • .

16 of 29

Resources

16

17 of 29

Submitted Questions

  • Could you please highlight what is new in the latest NOFO?  

  • Do you anticipate changes?

  • How often do you think it is reasonable to change the NOFO?

  • Can you describe any new supplement opportunities? 

17

18 of 29

Submitted Questions

  • Could you please highlight what is new in the latest NOFO?  Do you anticipate changes? How often do you think it is reasonable to change the NOFO? Can you describe any new supplement opportunities? 

  • As graduate students unionize across the country, stipends continue to increase. How do you see NIH responding to these stipend increases? How would you suggest training grants supplement them? What is the best mechanism for supplementing (aside from University Match). 

  • The PIs gathered in the room, spend a significant amount of time directing these programs, are there mechanisms in place to increase support for T32 PS and other training-related topics? 

18

19 of 29

Submitted Questions

  • Could you please highlight what is new in the latest NOFO?  Do you anticipate changes? How often do you think it is reasonable to change the NOFO? Can you describe any new supplement opportunities? 

  • As graduate students unionize across the country, stipends continue to increase. How do you see NIH responding to these stipend increases? How would you suggest training grants supplement them? What is the best mechanism for supplementing (aside from University Match). 

  • The PIs gathered in the room, spend a significant amount of time directing these programs, are there mechanisms in place to increase support for T32 PS and other training-related topics? 

19

20 of 29

Outline

1:30 – 1:35: Welcome to the T32 Predoctoral TP PI Session

1:35 - 2:00:Panel Discussion with NIGMS Leadership

2:00 – 2:10: Pre-meeting PI Survey and Qualitative/Quantitative Results (PDF)

2:10 – 2:40: Breakout Discussion (10 per table)

2:40 – 3:00: Summary Reports and Moving Forward

21 of 29

Breakout Discussions

  • Fiscal limitations and caps on funded slots.

  • Institutional support for proposal preparation.

  • Challenges in tracking students and their training activities.

  • Funding to match salary increases and coordination across multiple departments.

  • Mentor Training

  • Administrative Support

22 of 29

Panel Discussion Wrap-Up

23 of 29

Monthly Meetings/Office Hours Facilitated by NIGMS?

24 of 29

Summary and Moving Forward

  • What can we do to keep discussions going?

  • How can we best work together to help each other?

25 of 29

T32 PreDoctoral: Program-Specific Breakout

Catherine Leimkuhler Grimes

University of Delaware

cgrimes@udel.edu

Thank you!

Please look for post-meeting

survey to keep in touch with us

Ivo D. Dinov

University of Michigan

statistics@umich.edu

Post-meeting survey

26 of 29

Some Notes

Tracking students after T32 program completion.

  • Linkedin pages, polls, surveys,
  • National Trainee Network, e.g., NCI Fellows Networks, NPA,
  • Non-TGE student participation in T32 curriculum Programs (without funding)

NIHMS T32 Predoc Fellow marketplace exchange, all Trainees can register/profiles, share projects, recruit predicts, and offer jobs for T32 grads.

Mentor-training (train-the-trainer)...

PI salary (20-10% in-kind, stipend, perks)?

Indirects…. Differences between institutional support levels…

Student Unionization/salaries/funding gap….

26

27 of 29

Some Notes

Table 8 - mandate from the NIH that trainees graduate to Bench science and/or academia. How much flexibility is there – especially for training specific internships (biotech). NIH challenged us to broaden our mentoring skills – identifying different career paths – NIH should be amenable to these career outcomes. Redefine how they define success.

List of Institutional Supports: building foundations, defining communities – we should be able to write the application around our strengths – ask NIH to priotize the low-cost mechanisms; reward us for being successful; modulate the funding mechanisms to where programs are doing well. Funding faculty effort;

Unionization – challenges to the NIH – are students appointed to training grants allowed to be in a union?

COVID - how to justify on our proposals come renewal time

27

28 of 29

Some Notes

Supplement for students needing help with childcare. An depth discussion is needed to assure that childcare support is available to those students who need it; funding window is too specific.

Evaluation of mentors; report card system – how do we remove a trainer from the program; program bi-laws — does the NIH have bi-laws that we could use to remove a trainer.

There is tension between Administration and T32: like the prestigious nature but hate the low overhead rate; could this be negotiated with the NIH.

Mentor Training – CIMER training, 1:1 mentor/mentee training (like pre-Cana when getting married). Frequency/Duration

External Evaluation of the T32 – done anonymously by the University

Burden of Tracking – centralize if possible; this could be a University support

28

29 of 29

Some Notes

To keep the band together:

Need tri-annual meet ups (first one in early December)

SLACK channel – way to facilitate discussion and quick answers to questions from the broader community.

To provide feedback, contribute, or provide corrections,

please contact: Ms. Julia Eussen, jneussen@med.umich.edu

29