UNDERTAKING THE LARGEST-EVER ASSESSMENT OF THE UK’S WILDLIFE
Tom August, Nick Isaac, Gary Powney & Charlie Outhwaite
Wild bird populations in the UK, 1970-2015 . 2017. DEFRA
UK Biodiversity Indicators 2015. JNCC
WWF. 2016. Living Planet Report 2016. Risk and resilience in a new era. WWF International, Gland, Switzerland
How do we know these things?
Project Sapelli, ZSL & ExCiteS
Bird ringing by Hans Olofsson
Countryside survey:
Surveys from 2007, 1998, 1990, 1984 and 1978.
How do we know these things?
Professional surveys
Carey, P.D.; Wallis, S.; Chamberlain, P.M.; Cooper, A.; Emmett, B.A.; Maskell, L.C.; McCann, T.; Murphy, J.; Norton, L.R.; Reynolds, B.; Scott, W.A.; Simpson, I.C.; Smart, S.M.; Ullyett, J.M.. 2008 Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007. NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
UK Ladybird survey receives 20,000 records a year from unpaid members of the public
How do we know these things?
Volunteer surveys
Who is the BRC?�Biological Records Centre
The national focus for terrestrial and freshwater recording
Biases in ad-hoc data
Photo: Richard Comont
Time
Space
Detectability
Effort
Accounting for bias
Isaac et al (2014) Meth Ecol Evol 5: 1052-1060
Occupancy models
What is the computational issue
Analyses were previously run on our in-house cluster for ~4,000 species.
We parallelised across species
1 CPU
20,000 iterations
3 chains
Input
Output
X 4000
What is the computational issue
Analyses were expanded to 12,000 species some with ~2 week runtimes
1 CPU
20,000 iterations
3 chains
Input
Output
X 12,000
What is the computational issue
Analyses were expanded to 12,000 species some with ~2 week runtimes
1 CPU
20,000 iterations
1 chains
Input
Output
X 36,000
1 CPU
20,000 iterations
1 chains
Input
Output
1 CPU
20,000 iterations
1 chains
Input
Output
What is the computational issue
Analyses were expanded to 12,000 species some with ~2 week runtimes
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
X 720,000
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
x20
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
x20
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
x20
Jasmin solution
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
X 720,000
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
x20
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
x20
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
1 CPU
1,000 its
1 chain
x20
20,000 iterations
3 chains
Input
Output
X 12,000
Challenges?
Rewards
Results redacted, sorry!
Next steps
Conclusions
With thanks to…
Charlie Outhwaite
@CharlieLouO
PhD Student
Gary Powney
@GaryPowney
Quantitative Ecologist
Nick Isaac
@drNickIsaac
Macroecologist
Thousands of volunteer records who contribute there time for free
Recording schemes and societies who support recorders and generously give their data and expertise
The JASMIN team, especially Fatima Chami
Biases in ad-hoc data
Biases in ad-hoc data
Top Grasshopper recorders
Isaac & Pocock (2015) Biol J Linn Soc 115: 522-531
Contribution to citizen science projects often follows the 80:20 rule where approximately 80% of the data comes from only 20% of the recorders