-Eliminates recognition of people that are intersex or transgender
Only two counties in Idaho have NDO’s. Ada county passed a non-discrimination ordinance in 2020 based on sexual orientation or gender identity and applies to areas like employment, housing and public accommodations. Latah county also has an anti-discrimination ordinance in place but it only covers county employees.��Currently there are no official statewide protections for people on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The ACLU of Idaho works closely with Add the Words, Planned Parenthood, Pride Foundation and other LGBTQ organizations to continue to try to pass inclusive statewide legislation.�LGBTQ Rights | ACLU of Idaho (acluidaho.org)�The rights of transgender students to use gendered facilities that match their gender identity are still being battled in the courts, but if you are a transgender student or the parent of a transgender student and are concerned about the ability to use gendered facilities, please contact the Idaho ACLU.
A federal judge has preliminarily blocked an Idaho law banning gender-affirming healthcare treatments for transgender people under 18 years old. The law was set to go into effect on Jan. 1, 2024, and would have made it a felony to provide such care.
…
Stand your ground
HOUSE BILL 384 – Idaho State Legislature��Book Ban Bill�
�Rep Gannon confirmed there are no requirements for the teacher, not even vision requirements.�Schools will no longer gun free zones.
Think of this in context of they are trying to associating being transgender or in general associated with LGBTQ with being lewd.
Death Penalty: The bill includes provisions related to the death penalty for certain cases involving lewd conduct with a minor. Debates around the death penalty often revolve around ethical, moral, and human rights concerns. Critics may argue against the death penalty, citing issues such as the possibility of wrongful convictions, the ineffectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent, and the moral implications of state-sanctioned killing.
Statutory Aggravating Circumstances: The bill introduces the concept of statutory aggravating circumstances in determining whether the death penalty should be imposed. Concerns may arise regarding the definition and application of these circumstances, as well as the potential for subjectivity or bias in their interpretation.
Fair Sentencing Procedures: Discussions may center around whether the bill ensures fair sentencing procedures, including the consideration of mitigating circumstances. Fairness and consistency in sentencing are essential aspects of a legal system, and concerns might arise if there are perceived inconsistencies or biases in how sentences are determined.
Emergency Declaration: The bill declares an emergency and provides an effective date. Some may question the justification for an emergency declaration and whether it is necessary for the immediate welfare of the state. Emergency declarations often allow laws to take effect more quickly but may also limit the usual public input and scrutiny.
This bill funds the building of the death by firing squad facility.
Death by firing squad bill
Rep. Wroten, Rep Skaud, and Rep. Ehardt all were excited about supporting firing squad bill.
Rep. Kenny Wroten, District 13, was in favor of death by firing squad. Even for inmates in hospice care.
RS30414 Methods of execution. Amends method of execution to add firing squad when lethal injection is not available. He is saying lethal injection may never come back, so deaths never may move forward without it.
-Observed by @TiffaniDeems on X/Twitter
…
We made it legal to use assault rifles in parades last year, right before the 4th of July parade
Senator Herndon confirmed “H374 passed the Idaho House and Senate last week and it is the latest refinement to the state’s anti-murder laws re:abortion.:
Changes medical terms to preborn child. Giving personhood /autonomy to embryos and fetuses.
This is where I testified I was worried my miscarriage could make me eligible for murder charges.
1
Restrictions on Gestational Agreements: The bill introduces new requirements for gestational agreements, particularly regarding the age and previous childbirth experience of the gestational carrier. Critics may argue that these restrictions could limit reproductive choices and potentially exclude individuals who may be suitable gestational carriers.
2
Changes to Abortion Definitions: The bill alters and refines various definitions related to abortion, including the definition of "abortion" itself. Critics might express concern that these changes could impact the understanding and application of abortion laws in the state, potentially leading to more restrictive interpretations.
3
Medical Emergency Definition: The bill provides a new definition for "medical emergency" in the context of abortion. Concerns may arise about the specificity of this definition and its potential impact on a woman's ability to access abortion in critical health situations.
4
Mifeprex Definition: The inclusion of a definition for "Mifeprex" (a drug used for medication abortion) could be a point of contention. It might be viewed as an attempt to regulate specific medications used in abortion procedures.
5
Changes to Informed Consent: The bill revises the definition of "informed consent." Critics might question whether the new language could affect the doctor-patient relationship and the process of obtaining informed consent for medical procedures.
Carmen Broesder, a Boise resident who testified virtually Monday, said she wanted Idaho to have a maternal mortality review board, but she opposed House Bill 399, calling the bill’s lack of protections for pregnant patients and providers “very oddly absent from this.”�“If you are there to actually protect people, that would need to be added,” Broesder said.
Sen. Melissa Wintrow (D), said the "rape exception" in Idaho code is not worth the paper it's printed on because most victims don't report to police, police reports are protected from release by lay, doctors don't want to expose themselves to litigation, most women don't know they are pregnant in the first trimester and it's difficult to get emergency contraception in the state.
Criminalization of Abortion: The bill seeks to criminalize abortion, making it a felony with imprisonment as a penalty. This could be perceived as an infringement on a woman's right to make decisions about her own body.�Removal of Exceptions: The proposed amendments remove certain exceptions that were previously allowed, potentially limiting access to abortion even in cases where it might be deemed medically necessary or in situations involving rape or incest.�Stricter Penalties for Healthcare Professionals: The bill proposes stricter penalties, including suspension and permanent revocation of the professional license for healthcare professionals involved in performing or attempting abortions in violation of the proposed laws. This may raise concerns about the impact on healthcare providers and their ability to provide necessary medical care.�Restrictions Based on Fetal Heartbeat: The bill restricts abortion once a fetal heartbeat is detected, with exceptions only for medical emergencies, rape, and incest. This limitation may be controversial as it could curtail a woman's right to choose, especially if fetal abnormalities are not detected until later in pregnancy.�Reporting Requirements: The bill imposes reporting requirements in cases of rape or incest, potentially adding bureaucratic hurdles and raising concerns about privacy for individuals seeking abortion in such circumstances.
Repeal of Section 46-802: The bill starts by repealing the existing Section 46-802 of the Idaho Code.�Addition of New Section 46-802: The bill introduces a new Section 46-802 with provisions prohibiting cities and towns from providing financial support or resources for arming, equipping, uniforming, or otherwise supporting military companies or organizations. Exceptions are outlined for the regularly organized national guard, the unorganized militia when called into service, and those regularly recognized and provided for by the laws of the state of Idaho and the United States.��Concerns: �Civil Liberties and Rights: Any legislation involving militias should be carefully scrutinized to ensure it does not infringe upon the civil liberties and rights of civilians. This includes considerations of the right to assemble, freedom of speech, and other constitutional protections.�Transparency and Accountability: There might be concerns about the transparency and accountability of militias or military organizations, especially if they operate within the state. Ensuring that these entities are subject to appropriate oversight mechanisms can be crucial in addressing potential abuses of power.�Public Safety: Concerns may arise regarding the potential impact on public safety if militias or military organizations are not adequately regulated. Ensuring that such entities adhere to established laws and safety standards is essential to maintaining public well-being.�Community Relations: Legislation related to militias can impact community relations. If civilians perceive that militias are operating without proper oversight or are not held accountable for their actions, it may lead to tensions within communities.�Potential for Vigilantism: Legislation concerning militias should consider the potential for vigilantism or unauthorized use of force by individuals or groups. Ensuring that laws are clear about when and how force can be used is important in preventing abuse.�Discrimination and Bias: There could be concerns about militias or military organizations potentially acting in a discriminatory or biased manner. Legislation should address the need for fair and equal treatment of all individuals and communities.�
Pro Militia Law