1 of 15

The Papatūānuku Paradigm

Kathie Irwin and Associates and

The Coalition to End Women’s Homelessness

2 of 15

A Gender Analysis Tool� from a Te Ao Māori Lens

The Papatūānuku Paradigm

3 of 15

The Papatūānuku Paradigm

4 of 15

Papatūānuku frames the Tiriti Based analysis

5 of 15

Aotearoatanga: Kupe’s Law / Cooks Law, Clash of the Codes, �Sir Justice Dr Joe Williams

6 of 15

The Tool

7 of 15

Using the Tool

  • 1. Whose worldview informs the design of your solution?
  • 2. What is the whakapapa of the design of your solution? Is the design of your solution informed by Te Tiriti or The Treaty? How does it account for Māori rights and interests as guaranteed in Te Tiriti o Waitangi?
    • Article One, consultation and engagement, rangatira to rangatira;
    • Article Two, intellectual property rights;
    • Article Three, equity and equality of opportunity.
  • 3. How does your solution address inequity experienced by women, especially wāhine Māori?

​

  • 4. How does your solution honour Te Whare Tangata, women’s unique role in the creation of humanity?
  • 5. How does the design of your solution provide for women to be connected with their mokopuna, children, whānau and community?
  • 6. Is the design of your solution portable across cultures?
  • 7. How does your solution address the role of central, regional and local government in women’s homelessness?
  • 8. How does your solution address diversity and inclusion?
  • 9. How is your solution future proofed so that it contributes to Aotearoatanga, nation building, in a long-term, strategic and sustainable way?

​

8 of 15

Te Ao Māori Lens

9 of 15

Use of a Te Ao Māori Lens

10 of 15

Tiriti Based, Dual Worldview Modelling

11 of 15

Scalability

12 of 15

PESTLE Analysis Māori Women’s Homelessness, From Whare Tanagata to Kainga Kore

13 of 15

Theorising Intersectionality

14 of 15

How did we go from Whare Tangata to �Kainga Kore?

15 of 15

Design Features of the Tool