1 of 16

From theory to practice – reviewing and designing interview questions through the lens of inclusion

Brandon High (he/him)

Senior Library Assistant

Kings College London

Clare Camp (she/her)

Collections Liaison Librarian

Kings College London

Lydia Harris (she/her)

Collections Manager

King’s College London

Talia Samuels (she/her)

Library Assistant

King’s College London

2 of 16

Agenda

  • Reflection activity - optional
  • Research background
  • Disability Working Group
  • Inclusive Interview Question Task & Finish Group
  • Headline findings and main outputs -

1. Guidance for hiring managers checklist

2. Anonymised interview question review

3. Interview question example bank

  • Experiences of Task & Finish Group members
  • Opportunities & challenges
  • Next steps & wrap up

3 of 16

Reflection activity - optional

What’s the worst question you’ve ever been asked at a job interview?

  • Answers in the chat or on paper
  • We’ll be checking in with the answers in the chat at the end

4 of 16

Research background

  • Library & Information Services Management MA
  • The experiences of neurodivergent Library and Information Science [LIS] professionals working in academic libraries – a case study
  • Recruitment and interview research findings
  • Taking research recommendations into practice

5 of 16

Disability Working Group

  • Disability Working Group
    • Purpose – “encourage and support a joined-up and embedded approach to disability inclusion.
  • Task & Finish Groups
    • Inclusive Interview Question Task & Finish Group

6 of 16

Inclusive Interview Question Task & Finish Group

  • Purpose – “to develop inclusive interview question guidance and tools that improve recruitment practice.”
  • Membership
  • Deliverables

1. Guidance for hiring managers checklist

2. Anonymised interview question review and feedback

3. Interview question example bank

7 of 16

Headline findings

• Clarity: reduce ambiguity; make the ask obvious�

• Plain English: avoid jargon / insider terminology�

• One thing at a time: avoid multi-part questions�

• Criteria alignment: make it explicit what is being assessed�

• Consistency: prompts used consistently; reduce hypotheticals

8 of 16

Inclusive interview question checklist

Preparation → Design → Inclusion check

• Assess only criteria listed as ‘Assessed at Interview’

• Plan a realistic number of questions and leave time for candidate questions

• Follow adjustments guidance (e.g., sharing questions in advance; offering printed copies)

• Agree which essential criterion each question assesses

• Agree marking expectations across the panel

• Agree how prompts will be used

• Avoid multi-part questions; avoid jargon; use plain English

• Avoid hypotheticals; add context/scene-setting if needed

• Avoid bias-prone subjective questions and career-break questions

• Make the assessed criterion explicit in the phrasing

9 of 16

Anonymised interview question review

How we reviewed questions (anonymised audit)

• Reviewed anonymised historic interview questions and assessment scenarios

• Applied the checklist lens; captured rationale and suggested revisions

• Used Red / Amber / Green (RAG) ratings to support consistent reflection

• Key learning: small wording choices can have big inclusion impacts

Question example (before → after)

"One of our Principles in Action is inclusion. How do you ensure excellent customer service to a broad range of customers?"

Issues: insider terminology; long/abstract; higher cognitive load

“How do you tailor your approach to meet the needs of different customers?"

Improvement: plain English; single focus; makes assessed criterion clearer

10 of 16

Interview question example bank

• Practical example bank of interview questions reviewed through the lens of inclusion�

• Includes RAG rating, feedback and improved alternatives�

• Also includes ‘green’ examples that demonstrate best practice�

• Supports consistent, criteria-aligned drafting across recruitment rounds

11 of 16

Talia’s experience

  •  Colleagues of all grades encouraged from the start
  •  My first time doing cross-team project work
  •  Initially uncertain, but with support and encouragement gained confidence
  •  Contributed by researching, sharing personal experiences and perspectives 
  •  Helped present to other groups and senior colleagues
  •  Interesting to see levels of bureaucracy for the first time: still many questions and considerations to address

12 of 16

Brandon’s experience

“My involvement in this work is from my experience as a disabled and autistic adult of non-inclusive interviews and unconscious ableism in the workplace. I have experienced interviews in which my modes of communication as an autistic adult were not accommodated and my needs as a disabled and neurodivergent person were not addressed. These were not only very difficult experiences: they were formidable obstacles to embarking on a career.

Many autistic adults are excluded from permanent employment and experience other forms of exclusion and ableism. For any employer whose objective is to be inclusive neuroinclusion is not a desirable add on, it is essential. There is so much waste of potential and so many opportunities to employ neurodivergent people which are being missed. Appropriate interventions can support, including inclusive recruitment guidance. Devising policies and procedures to do this is necessary but not sufficient. Their effectiveness needs to be monitored, and everybody needs to be aware that they are intrinsic to the organisation's success.”

13 of 16

Opportunities

• Cross-grade, non-hierarchical collaboration and shared ownership

• Integration of lived experience alongside recruitment expertise

• Values-led work translated into practical tools for hiring managers

  1. Cross-grade, non-hierarchical collaboration and shared ownership�
  2. Integration of lived experience alongside recruitment expertise�
  3. Values-led work translated into practical tools for hiring managers

14 of 16

Challenges

• Institutional constraints: capacity, workload and governance layers

• Emotional labour involved in advocating for change

• Managing expectations: embedding inclusive practice is iterative

• Institutional constraints: capacity, workload and governance layers�

• Emotional labour involved in advocating for change�

• Managing expectations: embedding inclusive practice is iterative

15 of 16

What’s next?

  • Senior management discussion and review
  • Sharing best practice and experiences
  • Recommendations to take the work further

16 of 16

Reflection activity - return

What’s the worst question you’ve ever been asked at a job interview?

  • Do you think differently about the questions?
  • How can you review them through the lens of inclusion?