Early Literacy Leadership 2020-2021
Learning Series for the School-Wide and Center-Wide Essential Practices in Early and Elementary Literacy
Session 1
1
2
Meet our Team!
Jessica Hackworth
K-12 Literacy Consultant
Lindsey Hughes
Early Literacy Coach
Anne Hosking
Early Literacy Coach
Shannon L. Sweet
Early Literacy Coach
Vee Murugan
Early Literacy Coach
Electronic Resources
Zoom Expectations
Safe |
|
Respectful |
|
Responsible |
|
Online Working Agreements
Norms of Collaboration
6
Check In...On a scale of Baby Yoda, how are you today?
B. Optimistic
C. Sleepy
D. Overwhelmed
E. Curious
Images taken from https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1702984-baby-yoda
Session Outcomes
It is our sincere hope that you are able to:
8
Checking In and Introduction
0 – Never heard of the Schoolwide Essentials
1 – Heard of the ELTF (Early Literacy Task Force) and the work
around the SW Essentials
2 – Have a copy and am familiar with the SW Essentials
3 – Staff are utilizing the SW Essentials
4 – Have a dog-eared copy of the SW Essentials and refer to it
regularly
5 – The SW Essentials have a prominent role in our PL plan,
Ed Eval Process, and SIP
9
9
Introduction to the School-Wide Essentials
10
10
Introduction to the School-Wide Essentials
11
11
What it is… | What it is not… |
Resource | Checklist |
Research (Endnotes) | To-do List |
Systems Work | Fast & Furious |
Connected | List of Programs |
Swift Scan
�
12
12
School-Wide Essential #1 – The Leadership Team
The leadership team is composed of instructional leaders committed to continuous improvements in literacy and ongoing attention to data.
13
School-Wide Essential #2 – Organizational Climate
The organizational climate reflects a collective sense of responsibility for all children and a focus on developing child independence and competence in a safe space.
14
14
School-Wide Essential #3 – Learning Environment
The learning environment reflects a strong commitment to literacy.
15
15
Text Rendering
16
16
Text Rendering
17
17
18
Connections
19
19
Connections
20
20
��
21
21
��
Leadership Team
Mission
Vision
Values
Problem-Solving
Environment
The visible things
Climate
The way it feels
CULTURE
How we do our thing
Understanding & Connecting �School-Wide Essentials 1, 2, and 3
22
So that we can “go deep” today, we will focus on a couple of bullets within each Essential.
Do not interpret this to mean those bullets are any more important than the others!
They are all important and can intersect in various ways across an organization.
School-Wide Essential #1 – The Leadership Team
The leadership team is composed of instructional leaders committed to continuous improvements in literacy and ongoing attention to data.
23
School-Wide Essential #1 – The Leadership Team
The leadership team is composed of instructional leaders committed to continuous improvements in literacy and ongoing attention to data.
24
Under the guidance of the lead administrator, the school or program leadership team:
… that guide school climate…
… and children’s learning…
… and that are shared schoolwide…
… and aligned across all ages and grade levels, including Pre-K,…
… and across all professional roles…
… for the purpose of continuous improvement.
Bullet 3
School Vision – The Research
25
Vision is a key facet of transformational leadership, which is leadership that inspires and motivates people to work and perform at high levels.
LEADERSHIP VISION:
Endnote #3: Kurland, Peretz, & Hertz-Lazarowitz. (2010). Leadership style and organizational learning: The mediate effect of school vision. Journal of Educational Administration.
School Vision – The Research
26
LEADERSHIP VISION:
Endnote #3: Kurland, Peretz, & Hertz-Lazarowitz. (2010). Leadership style and organizational learning: The mediate effect of school vision. Journal of Educational Administration.
School-Wide Essential #1 – The Leadership Team
The leadership team is composed of instructional leaders committed to continuous improvements in literacy and ongoing attention to data.
27
Under the guidance of the lead administrator, the school or program leadership team:
Bullet 7
Distributed Leadership – The Research
28
Distributed Leadership is a way of understanding school leadership as a distributed practice that is stretched across the school. It considers who and what in the school leads and where in the school leadership happens.
DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP:
Endnote #7: Spillane, Diamond, & Jita. (2003). Leading instruction: The distribution of leadership for instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies.
Distributed Leadership – The Research
29
DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP:
“Educational leaders who cannot engage others in leading will not be very successful. They will not be able to spread and mobilize the expertise necessary for instructional improvement in their organizations, and, thus, are unlikely to be very effective. It is highly unlikely that a principal practicing solo can improve instruction in his or her school….
…. If expertise is distributed, then the school rather than the individual leader may be the most appropriate unit for developing leadership expertise.” (p. 542)
Endnote #7: Spillane, Diamond, & Jita. (2003). Leading instruction: The distribution of leadership for instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies.
Break out Groups:
30
School-Wide Essential #2 – Organizational Climate
The organizational climate reflects a collective sense of responsibility for all children and a focus on developing child independence and competence in a safe space.
31
31
School-Wide Essential #2 – Organizational Climate
The organizational climate reflects a collective sense of responsibility for all children and a focus on developing child independence and competence in a safe space.
32
All adults – administrators, teachers, specialists, aides, and support staff – throughout the organization:
…that is grounded in the shared belief that every child can and will be successful, regardless of location, demographic, or program funding
Bullet 1
Shared Responsibility for Children – The Research
33
Murphy (2004) uses a distributed leadership lens to review research on the links between school leadership and student learning in literacy.
He determines that one of the key functions of leadership for literacy is “developing an appropriate platform of beliefs.”
In schools that help all children meet rigorous literacy standards, he observes:
“To begin with, there is a bedrock belief in the educability of all youngsters in schools that promote mastery of literacy skills. This trust in the capacity of children underpins relations between adults and youngsters. It directs the activities and behaviors of teachers and school and district administrators.
Accompanying this educability tenet is a sense of efficacy and commitment among staff. It is not only that youngsters can learn, but that the staff (a) believe that they have the skills and organizational capacity to succeed in reaching all pupils and (b) are dedicated to making universal achievement at high levels a reality. Not surprisingly, effective literacy schools are awash in energy and hard work.”
Shared Responsibility for Children – The Research
34
In schools that help all children meet rigorous literacy standards, Murphy (2004) observes:
“A third pillar in the value infrastructure of schools that promote high levels of literacy skills is a sense of responsibility among adults for student performance…. These institutions take responsibility for what happens to their students. The result is that when things do not work well – as is the case at times in all schools – the response is not a diffusion of responsibility but a concerted effort to overcome problems. Structures are overhauled, policies are reformulated, and activities are reshaped in the service of ensuring high levels of literacy achievement for all youngsters.
Equally important,… these highly effective schools are characterized by a collective or shared sense of responsibility. Everyone is accountable for all children, not just the 20 to 30 youngsters in one’s class. It is this tenet that undergirds collective work in the area of reading that often marks these effective schools.”
Endnote #8: Murphy. (2004). Leadership for Literacy: A Framework for Policy and Practice. School Effectiveness and School Improvement.
School-Wide Essential #2 – Organizational Climate
The organizational climate reflects a collective sense of responsibility for all children and a focus on developing child independence and competence in a safe space.
35
All adults – administrators, teachers, specialists, aides, and support staff – throughout the organization:
Bullet 4
Competence and Self-Efficacy – The Research
Competence:
Self-Efficacy:
36
Bandura (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman; Ryan & Deci (2009). Promoting Self-Determined School Engagement: Motivation, Learning, and Well-Being. Handbook of Motivation at School.
Break out Groups:
37
38
School-Wide Essential #3 – Learning Environment
The learning environment reflects a strong commitment to literacy.
39
39
School-Wide Essential #3 – Learning Environment
The learning environment reflects a strong commitment to literacy.
40
Throughout the learning environment, there is evidence that:
… and their written work is made prominently visible
Bullet 5
Visible Written Work from Students – The Research
41
Local Texts are texts available in the classroom that were created by the teacher or the students.
Measures of the quality of a print-rich environment include examination of the local text within classrooms. The highest rating on one such measure is “Extremely rich.”
Endnote #16: Hoffman, Sailors, Duffy, & Beretvas (2004). The effective elementary classroom literacy environment: Examining the validity of the TEX-IN3 observation system. Journal of Literacy Research.
Measures of local texts significantly predict student growth in reading comprehension.
They are also relatively cheap to produce.
School-Wide Essential #3 – Learning Environment
The learning environment reflects a strong commitment to literacy.
42
Throughout the learning environment, there is evidence that:
Bullet 9
Intrinsic Motivation – The Research
43
Intrinsic Motivation:
Motivation & Rewards:
3 groups of students:
Endnote #19: Marinak & Gambrell (2008). Intrinsic Motivation and Rewards: What Sustains Young Children’s Engagement with Text? Literacy Research and Instruction.
Intrinsic Motivation – The Research
44
Findings – Outcome: First Activity Selected After Reading &
Number of Seconds Spent Reading
Ryan & Deci (2009). Promoting Self-Determined School Engagement: Motivation, Learning, and Well-Being. Handbook of Motivation at School. Endnote #19: Marinak & Gambrell (2008). Intrinsic Motivation and Rewards: What Sustains Young Children’s Engagement with Text? Literacy Research and Instruction.
Intrinsic Motivation – The Research
45
Ryan & Deci (2009). Promoting Self-Determined School Engagement: Motivation, Learning, and Well-Being. Handbook of Motivation at School. Endnote #19: Marinak & Gambrell (2008). Intrinsic Motivation and Rewards: What Sustains Young Children’s Engagement with Text? Literacy Research and Instruction.
Bottom Line:
Kids who spent time reading without being rewarded with a token were more motivated to continue reading.
The non-reading-related reward undermined intrinsic motivation in reading for interest and enjoyment.
Break Out Groups:
Processing: What surprised you? Whole group share out
46
Using the School-Wide Screening Tool
47
Overview
48
Complete the Screening Tool Fish Bowl
49
49
Individual Scoring
Individually, stakeholders select the extent to which they believe that statement is currently true of the school.
Consensus Building
Beginning with the first essential, group members will speak one at a time to report their individual score and provide a brief rationale for their score.
The group will then move into a conversation to come to agreement on a group score for that essential. Record the “Group Score”.
Continue this process for each of the other 9 essentials.
Prioritizing
Using the group scores - along with other data and knowledge relevant to your school - discuss and identify three “high priority” areas that you collectively agree are critically important as focal areas for the next phase of your work. Your priority areas may or may not be those with the lowest group scores.
Processing the Screening Tool
In the chat….
What is one thing that you noticed about the protocol?
In your breakout rooms….
What are your plans to administer the screening tool between now and December 7th?
50
Questions?
51
51
52
Next Steps