1 of 39

Turning Data Into

DLI Practice

Olympia Kyriakidis,Ed.D.

2 of 39

3 of 39

4 of 39

Essential Actions

  • Empathy: leaders need to learn more from and partner with those most impacted by the challenge

  • Taking Actions to Learn: at different levels of your system, take multiple small actions that will not do harm if they fail. Learn what directions are most promising in your system.

5 of 39

6 of 39

7 of 39

The liberatory design mindsets support these.

Helps designers & leaders:

  • Practice self-awareness (own identity, values, emotions, bias, power, assumptions)
  • Collectively build situational awareness (context, people, power, history, current state)

Helps designers & leaders:

  • Pause mid-stream to reflect on actions, impact, emotions, relationship
  • Adjust our intentions, presence, direction

8 of 39

Identify your equity commitment

Better understand the complexity of this challenge

Design and try potential solutions

NEP Liberatory Design for Equity Process

@equityproject #LiberatoryDesign

9 of 39

Six Circles Model

Structure

Pattern

Process

Information

Relationship

Identity

Rational/

Technical

Relational/

Experiential

Leading for Equity

Originally developed by Margaret Wheatley

10 of 39

11 of 39

“We humans use identity to organize our actions and beliefs to give meaning to our lives. We, like all living things, live in networks of relationship. And like all living beings, we need to stay alert to what’s going on in our environment, what may require us to adapt and change. “

-Margaret J. Wheatley

12 of 39

13 of 39

Why empathize?

  • To uncover the deep needs of others in order to better meet their needs

  • To engage users in developing solutions to their own problems

14 of 39

Insightful Comments from Qualitative Data

The student was on task and following directions most of the time. The tasks did not seem to excite him or engage him. During my 40 minute observation, he never verbally interacted with the teacher or participated in any requests to chorally respond. On the playground (15 minutes) he never interacted with an adult, had one short moment of verbal interaction with another student. He did sit with a small group of boys for his snack and then engaged in a game of tag on the grass.

This student never spoke for the entire 30 minute observation, even when the teachers asked the class to turn to their partner and share a response from the worksheet. (The other student did not engage in this sharing activity either)

The student was very quiet throughout the entire observation. She did not speak to the teacher or to other students. She worked on task during independent time, but when listening to the teacher she often got off-task.

.

15 of 39

Empathy Interviews

By interviewing, you get a chance to get close to the end user (students) and hear about their perspectives and challenges in their own words.

Understanding student perspective

16 of 39

Debrief Empathy Interviews

Content: What did you hear? How might this impact student learning? What did you learn?

Process: Are there questions you wish you would have asked? Are there questions that were particularly fruitful? Did you probe effectively?

17 of 39

18 of 39

“This process shadowing becomes a powerful way to shed light on the specific linguistic and cultural needs of students. Shadowing, in conjunction with follow-up professional development, allows educators to begin to create systemic instructional access and equity for Language learners .” (Ivannia Soto)

19 of 39

Talk Percentages

Teacher = 61%

Shadowee = 22%

Other Student = 15%

Audio/Visual = 2%

20 of 39

SMUSD

EL Shadowing

Elementary Wordle

21 of 39

22 of 39

Spanish Immersion Program

Increasing Language Proficiency

AP EXAM

SAT II

End of 5th Grade Spanish Immersion

End of 3 Years Mandarin Enrichment

23 of 39

24 of 39

Target Reports

25 of 39

Sample Performance Bands Gauges

26 of 39

Sample Performance Bands Gauges

27 of 39

Guiding Principles Assessment and Accountability�Strand 1 – Principle 4/5

4. A. Data are purposefully collected and subject to methodologically appropriate analysis.

B. Achievement data are disaggregated by student and program variables B (native language, grade level, student background, program, etc.).

5 - A. Progress is documented in both program languages for oral proficiency, A literacy, and academic achievement.

B. Progress can be documented for all students through indicators such as retention rates and placement in special education and gifted/talented classes

28 of 39

29 of 39

29

Facilitating a Data Conversation

1. What do you see and notice?

2. What questions does the data raise for you?

3. What hypotheses or explanations do you have about what you see?

4. What actions should I take?

Ladder of Inference

30 of 39

31 of 39

32 of 39

  • INDEPENDENTLY, write down one adjective that best describes your EL’s school experience on the shadowing day. [Pink Post-It]

  • INDEPENDENTLY, reflect on patterns, trends and insights from your site’s student shadowing data? [Yellow post-it notes]

Generating Ideas

33 of 39

STAGE

4

STAGE

3

STAGE

2

STAGE

1

Design and scaffold opportunities for sustained, productive student-to-student conversations

Intentionally plan and utilize structures and strategies for meaningful discourse

Create the environment and conditions for discourse

Know your Language

Learner students

Integrate oral discourse that develops language and deepens content and literacy learning

34 of 39

35 of 39

AIM Statements

Change Ideas

Measures

What specifically are we trying to accomplish?

What change(s) might we introduce and why?

How will we know if a change is an improvement?

A Guide for Learning

PLAN

DO

STUDY

ACT

TESTING YOUR THEORY

& BUILDING KNOWLEDGE

Charter

36 of 39

In the Chat

What are some your challenges now in trying to document and share academic growth of language learners?

37 of 39

Guiding Principles Assessment and Accountability�Strand 1 – Principle 3

A. The program systematically collects data to determine whether academic, A linguistic, and cultural goals are met.

B. The program systematically collects demographic data (ethnicity, home language, time in the United States, types of programs student has attended, mobility, etc.) from program participants.

C. Assessment is consistently conducted in the two languages of the program.

38 of 39

39 of 39