1 of 73

​

El Paso County

Commissioner Redistricting

​

July 6, 2023 @ 5:30pm

Mesa Ridge High School

6070 Mesa Ridge Parkway

Colorado Springs, CO 80911

​

​

Presented By: Steve Schleiker, El Paso County Clerk & Recorder

2 of 73

Redistricting (July 6th) Presentation QR Code:

3 of 73

Redistricting Commission

Assigned Tasks from June 21st Meeting:

  • Per Commissioner Holly Williams
    • Based on June 21st Map 1
    • Add Precinct 301 to Commissioner District 1
  • Per Commissioner Longinos Gonzalez 6/21 Redistricting Meeting
    • Based on June 21st Map 3
    • Air Force Academy to Commissioner District 1
    • Modified Precincts around Commissioner District 5 to add more to Southern Boundary
  • Per Commissioner Carrie Geitner
    • Based on June 21st Map 1 to have Palmer Lake and Monument Proper in Commissioner District 3
    • Air Force Academy to Commissioner District 1
    • Black Forest Precincts (219) and (441) to Commissioner District 1
    • Slight modifications to Commissioner District 5 boundary to adjust for population
  • Per Commissioner Stan VanderWerf
  • Per Commissioner Cami Bremer

​

​

4 of 73

Map Option (4)

Commissioner Williams Summary:

5 of 73

Map Option (4) Summary

HOUSE BILL 21-1047:

​

Map Option 4 Summary:

  • Overall Range in Deviation = 2.49%
  • Total Precinct Moves = 46
    • Total Affected Population = 101,846 (14%)
    • Total Affected Active Voters = 64,314 (13%)

​

​

​

6 of 73

Map Option (4) Summary

1ST Criteria: Population Equality & VRA

Total Population Racial Ethnicity:

    • District 1 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 2 (+3.25% White)
    • District 3 (No Variance +/- 2%)
    • District 4 (+3.26% White)
    • District 5 (+5.56% Hispanic or Latino / -7.88% White)

​

​

This variance is the change from current.

7 of 73

Total Voting Age Racial Ethnicity:

    • District 1 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 2 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 3 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 4 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 5 (+3.27% Hispanic or Latino / -7.34% White)

​

​

Map Option (4) Summary

1ST Criteria: Population Equality & VRA

This variance is the change from current.

8 of 73

Map Option (4) Summary

2nd Criteria: Communities of

Interest & Compactness:

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

  • The proposed map keeps most municipalities whole within one Commissioner District, except City of Colorado Springs.
  • Communities of Interest are the 5 Military Installations, Falcon, Southeast Colorado Springs, Monument, Palmer Lake, and the Wildland Urban Interface.
  • The Districts are sufficiently compact.
    • Precincts: 602, 603, 604, 606, and 613 District 4 questions.
    • Precincts: 414, 418, 415, 195, and 139 District 4 questions.
  • Districts 1,2, and 4 are under population target deviation to allow for future growth.

​

9 of 73

District:

Total Population:

Target Deviation:

1

145,848

-1,053

2

144,848

-1,707

3

148,366

1,811

4

145,554

-1,001

5

148,503

1,948

Map Option (4) Summary

2nd Criteria: Communities of

Interest & Compactness:

10 of 73

Map Option (4) Summary

3rd Criteria: Political Competitiveness:

US PRESIDENT

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.16% DEMOCRAT

2

+2.13% REPUBLICAN

3

+1.82% DEMOCRAT

4

+3.15% REPUBLICAN

5

+2.54% DEMOCRAT

US SENATE

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.33% DEMOCRAT

2

+1.91% REPUBLICAN

3

+1.32% DEMOCRAT

4

+2.96% REPUBLICAN

5

+2.51% DEMOCRAT

GOVERNOR

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.36% DEMOCRAT

2

+1.80% REPUBLICAN

3

+1.28% DEMOCRAT

4

+2.90% REPUBLICAN

5

+2.14% DEMOCRAT

SECRETARY OF STATE

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.31% DEMOCRAT

2

+1.80% REPUBLICAN

3

+1.31% DEMOCRAT

4

+2.93 REPUBLICAN

5

+2.23% DEMOCRAT

CLERK & RECORDER

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.26% DEMOCRAT

2

+2.25% REPUBLICAN

3

+1.18% DEMOCRAT

4

+3.26% REPUBLICAN

5

+3.65% DEMOCRAT

SHERIFF

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.15% DEMOCRAT

2

+1.78% REPUBLICAN

3

+1.51% DEMOCRAT

4

+2.93% REPUBLICAN

5

+2.15% DEMOCRAT

11 of 73

Map Option (5)

Commissioner Gonzalez Summary:

12 of 73

Map Option (5) Summary

HOUSE BILL 21-1047:

​

Map Option 5 Summary:

  • Overall Range in Deviation = 4.63%
  • Total Precinct Moves = 45
    • Total Affected Population = 101,527 (14%)
    • Total Affected Active Voters = 61,896 (13%)

​

​

​

13 of 73

Map Option (5) Summary

1ST Criteria: Population Equality & VRA

Total Population Racial Ethnicity:

    • District 1 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 2 (+3.15% White)
    • District 3 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 4 (+3.3% White)
    • District 5 (+5.57% Hispanic or Latino / -7.9% White)

​

​

This variance is the change from current.

14 of 73

Total Voting Age Racial Ethnicity:

    • District 1 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 2 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 3 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 4 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 5 (+3.23% Hispanic or Latino / -7.43% White)

​

​

Map Option (5) Summary

1ST Criteria: Population Equality & VRA

This variance is the change from current.

15 of 73

Map Option (5) Summary

2nd Criteria: Communities of

Interest & Compactness:

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

  • The proposed map keeps most municipalities whole within one Commissioner District, except City of Colorado Springs.
  • Communities of Interest are the 5 Military Installations, Falcon, Southeast Colorado Springs, Monument, Palmer Lake, and the Wildland Urban Interface.
  • The Districts are sufficiently compact.
    • Precincts 605, and 601 District 5 questions.
    • Precincts 191, 192, 195, and 139 District 4 questions.
  • Districts 1,2, and 4 are under population target deviation to allow for future growth.

16 of 73

District:

Total Population:

Target Deviation:

1

145,922

-633

2

143,278

-3,277

3

149,502

2,947

4

144,006

-2,549

5

150,065

3,510

Map Option (5) Summary

2nd Criteria: Communities of

Interest & Compactness:

17 of 73

Map Option (5) Summary

3rd Criteria: Political Competitiveness:

US PRESIDENT

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.20% DEMOCRAT

2

+2.04% REPUBLICAN

3

+4.56% REPUBLICAN

4

+2.99% REPUBLICAN

5

+2.67% DEMOCRAT

US SENATE

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.07% DEMOCRAT

2

+1.68% REPUBLICAN

3

+1.01% DEMOCRAT

4

+2.93% REPUBLICAN

5

+2.64% DEMOCRAT

GOVERNOR

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.12% DEMOCRAT

2

+1.60% REPUBLICAN

3

+0.96% DEMOCRAT

4

+2.88% REPUBLICAN

5

+2.30% DEMOCRAT

SECRETARY OF STATE

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.12% DEMOCRAT

2

+1.67% REPUBLICAN

3

+0.98% DEMOCRAT

4

+2.85% REPUBLICAN

5

+2.39% DEMOCRAT

CLERK & RECORDER

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.05% DEMOCRAT

2

+2.04% REPUBLICAN

3

+0.87% DEMOCRAT

4

+3.17% REPUBLICAN

5

+3.74% DEMOCRAT

SHERIFF

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.02% DEMOCRAT

2

+1.64% REPUBLICAN

3

+1.17% DEMOCRAT

4

+2.86% REPUBLICAN

5

+2.21% DEMOCRAT

18 of 73

Map Option (6)

Commissioner Geitner Summary:

19 of 73

Map Option (6) Summary

HOUSE BILL 21-1047:

​

Map Option 6 Summary:

  • Overall Range in Deviation = 4.41%
  • Total Precinct Moves = 34
    • Total Affected Population = 81,070 (11.06%)
    • Total Affected Active Voters = 53,625 (11.09%)

​

​

​

20 of 73

Map Option (6) Summary

1ST Criteria: Population Equality & VRA:

Total Population Racial Ethnicity:

    • District 1 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 2 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 3 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 4 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 5 (+3.24% Hispanic or Latino / -4.85% White)

​

​

This variance is the change from current.

21 of 73

Total Voting Age Racial Ethnicity:

    • District 1 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 2 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 3 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 4 (No Variance +/- 3%)
    • District 5 (-4.6% White)

​

​

Map Option (6) Summary

1ST Criteria: Population Equality & VRA:

This variance is the change from current.

22 of 73

Map Option (6) Summary

2nd Criteria: Communities of

Interest & Compactness:

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

  • The proposed map keeps most municipalities whole within one Commissioner District, except City of Colorado Springs.
  • Communities of Interest are the 5 Military Installations, Falcon, Southeast Colorado Springs, Monument, Palmer Lake, and the Wildland Urban Interface.
  • The Districts are sufficiently compact.
    • Precincts 193, 194, 620, and 627 District 4 questions.
  • Districts 1,2, and 4 are under population target deviation to allow for future growth.

23 of 73

District:

Total Population:

Target Deviation:

1

146,079

-476

2

143,409

-3,146

3

149,865

3,310

4

145,405

-1,150

5

148,015

1,460

Map Option (6) Summary

2nd Criteria: Communities of

Interest & Compactness:

24 of 73

Map Option (6) Summary

3rd Criteria: Political Competitiveness:

US PRESIDENT

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.57% DEMOCRAT

2

+0.48% REPUBLICAN

3

+2.21% REPUBLICAN

4

+1.47% REPUBLICAN

5

+0.59% DEMOCRAT

US SENATE

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.66% DEMOCRAT

2

+0.06% DEMOCRAT

3

+2.04% REPUBLICAN

4

+1.17% REPUBLICAN

5

+0.16% REPUBLICAN

GOVERNOR

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.55% DEMOCRAT

2

+0.17% DEMOCRAT

3

+2.02% REPUBLICAN

4

+1.33% REPUBLICAN

5

+0.12% REPUBLICAN

SECRETARY OF STATE

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.58% DEMOCRAT

2

+0.04% REPUBLICAN

3

+1.92% REPUBLICAN

4

+0.98% REPUBLICAN

5

+0.21% REPUBLICAN

CLERK & RECORDER

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.57% DEMOCRAT

2

+0.04% REPUBLICAN

3

+1.97% REPUBLICAN

4

+1.34% REPUBLICAN

5

+0.41% DEMOCRAT

SHERIFF

District:

Deviation from Current:

1

+0.58% DEMOCRAT

2

+0.09% REPUBLICAN

3

+1.89% REPUBLICAN

4

+1.16% REPUBLICAN

5

+0.31% REPUBLICAN

25 of 73

Working Map

Commissioner VanderWerf

Map Review:

26 of 73

Commissioner VanderWerf Map Review:

  • This map does not meet minimum required criteria and is a working map that still requires precinct moves in order to be within 5% population deviation, per HB 21-1047

District:

Total Population:

Target Deviation:

Target Deviation %:

1

137,017

-9,538

-6.51%

2

145,518

-1,337

-0.91%

3

148,357

1,802

1.23%

4

150,420

3,865

2.64%

5

151,761

5,206

3.55%

27 of 73

Working Map

Commissioner Bremer

Map (District 5 North & South) Review:

28 of 73

Commissioner Bremer (District 5 North) Map Review:

  • This map does not meet minimum required criteria and is a working map that still requires precinct moves in order to be within 5% population deviation, per HB 21-1047

District:

Total Population:

Target Deviation:

Target Deviation %:

1

146,580

25

0.02%

2

141,482

-5,073

-3.46%

3

118,262

-28,293

-19.31%

4

177,771

31,216

21.30%

5

148,678

2,123

1.45%

29 of 73

Commissioner Bremer (District 5 South) Map Review:

  • This map does not meet minimum required criteria and is a working map that still requires precinct moves in order to be within 5% population deviation, per HB 21-1047

District:

Total Population:

Target Deviation:

Target Deviation %:

1

178,007

31,452

21.46%

2

135,161

-11,395

-7.77%

3

124,925

-21,630

-14.76%

4

144,099

-2,456

-1.68%

5

150,581

4,026

2.75%

30 of 73

​

​

​

Questions?

​

​

31 of 73

Map Option (4)

Supporting Documentation:

32 of 73

District:

Total Population:

Target Deviation:

Target Deviation %:

County

732,773

​

​

District 1

145,848

-1,053

-0.72%

District 2

144,848

-1,707

-1.16%

District 3

148,366

1,811

1.24%

District 4

145,554

-1,001

-0.68%

District 5

148,503

1,948

1.33%

Map Option (4) –

Commissioner Holly Williams:

Metric:

Data:

TOTAL Population

732,773

Mean Target Population

146,555

Mean Deviation

1,504

Mean % Deviation

1.03%

Largest (+) Deviation

1,948

Largest (–) Deviation

-1,707

Overall Range in Deviation

3,655

Overall Range in Deviation %:

2.49%

33 of 73

Map Option (4) –

Commissioner Holly Williams:

Map Option 4 Precinct Moves = 46

​

​

​

Districts:

Precincts Added:

Precincts Removed:

Total Impact:

District 1

(304)(302)(301)

(440)(457)(253)(134)(145)(135)

-3

District 2

(440)(457)(253)(134)(164)

(151)(153)(155)(156)

(192)(193)(194)(620)(627)(414)

(418)(415)(139)

0

District 3

(120)(97)(138)(121)(136)

(123)(124)(99)(127)(95)(173)

(93)(92)(179)(178)

(304)(302)(301)(602)(605)(601)

+9

District 4

(414)(418)(415)(139)(602)

(623)(621)(622)(624)(625)

0

District 5

(145)(135)(192)(193)(194)

(620)(627)(623)(621)(622)

(624)(625)(605)(601)

(164)(151)(153)(155)(156)(120)

(97)(138)(121)(136)(123)(124)

(99)(127)(95)(173)(93)(92)(179)

(178)

-6

TOTAL AFFECTED POPULATION = 101,846 (14%)

TOTAL AFFECTED ACTIVE VOTERS = 64,314 (13%)

34 of 73

Map Option (4) Total Population Racial Ethnicity –

Commissioner Holly Williams:

​

35 of 73

Map Option (4) Total Population Racial Ethnicity - Commissioner Holly Williams:

​

Districts

Total % / Variance:

Hispanic or Latino:

Black:

White:

Asian:

1

Total %:

10.39%

2.78%

75.67%

4.25%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.19%

-0.15%

0.39%

-0.02%

2

Total %:

15.81%

4.73%

67.98%

3.14%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-2.53%

-0.61%

3.25%

-0.01%

3

Total %:

12.42%

2.76%

75.94%

2.33%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.24%

-0.09%

0.41%

0.03%

4

Total %:

22.56%

8.86%

56.49%

2.67%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-2.45%

-0.76%

3.26%

-0.09%

5

Total %:

27.75%

9.03%

52.67%

2.42%

​

Total Variance from Original:

5.56%

1.73%

-7.88%

0.21%

36 of 73

Map Option (4) Voting Age Racial Ethnicity – Commissioner Holly Williams:

​

37 of 73

Map Option (4) Voting Age Racial Ethnicity – Commissioner Holly Williams:

​

Districts

Total % / Variance:

Hispanic or Latino:

Black:

White:

Asian:

1

Total %:

6.83%

2.16%

58.86%

3.28%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.11%

-0.13%

0.32%

-0.03%

2

Total %:

9.97%

3.59%

52.72%

2.55%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-1.65%

-0.46%

2.5%

-0.03%

3

Total %:

8.99%

2.3%

65.26%

2%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.11%

-0.02%

0.75%

0.02%

4

Total %:

14.64%

6.75%

44.03%

2.23%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-1.4%

-0.52%

2.75%

-0.08%

5

Total %:

18.42%

6.95%

44.03%

2.23%

​

Total Variance from Original:

3.27%

1.21%

-7.34%

0.18%

38 of 73

Map Option (4) Communities of

Interest & Compactness:

District:

Total Population:

Target Deviation:

1

145,502

1,053

2

144,848

1,707

3

148,366

1,811

4

145,554

1,001

5

148,503

1,948

39 of 73

Map Option (4) Communities of

Interest & Compactness:

  • The proposed map keeps most municipalities whole within one Commissioner District, except City of Colorado Springs.
  • Communities of Interest are the 5 Military Installations, Falcon, Southeast Colorado Springs, Monument, Palmer Lake, and the Wildland Urban Interface.
  • The Districts are sufficiently compact.
    • Precincts: 602, 603, 604, 606, and 613 District 4 questions.
    • Precincts: 414, 418, 415, 195, and 139 District 4 questions.
  • Districts 1,2, and 4 are under population target deviation to allow for future growth.

40 of 73

Map Option (4) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

US PRESIDENT:

1

32,751

36.14%

55,040

60.74%

90,617

+24.60%

+0.16%

2

28,489

35.54%

48,695

60.74%

80,169

+25.20%

+2.13%

3

45,715

51.57%

40,053

45.18%

88,655

+6.39%

+1.82%

4

23,036

41.40%

30,058

54.02%

55,642

+12.62%

+3.15%

5

31,950

50.10%

28,982

45.45%

63,768

+4.65%

+2.54%

41 of 73

Map Option (4) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

US SENATE:

1

26,056

35.80%

44,452

61.07%

72,790

+25.27%

+0.33%

2

22,861

36.80%

36,831

59.29%

62,122

+22.49%

+1.91%

3

36,731

52.29%

31,447

44.77%

70,239

+7.52%

+1.32%

4

15,900

44.08%

18,561

51.46%

36,067

+7.38%

+2.96%

5

22,476

52.15%

18,704

43.40%

43,101

+8.75%

+2.51%

42 of 73

Map Option (4) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

GOVERNOR:

1

28,952

39.67%

42,600

58.37%

72,978

+18.70%

+0.36%

2

24,850

39.90%

35,647

57.24%

62,279

+17.34%

+1.80%

3

39,063

55.48%

29,925

42.50%

70,413

+12.98%

+1.28%

4

17,014

47.07%

17,866

49.43%

36,144

+2.36%

+2.90%

5

23,568

54.54%

18,346

42.45%

43,213

+12.08%

+2.14%

43 of 73

Map Option (4) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

SECRETARY OF STATE:

1

26,004

35.95%

44,468

61.48%

72,325

+25.53%

+0.31%

2

22,674

36.73%

36,890

59.76%

61,726

+23.03%

+1.80%

3

35,998

51.63%

31,800

45.61%

69,720

+6.02%

+1.31%

4

15,573

43.41%

18,841

52.52%

35,874

+9.11%

+2.93%

5

21,742

50.81%

19,346

45.21%

42,790

+5.60%

+2.23%

44 of 73

Map Option (4) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

EL PASO COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER:

1

22,245

31.86%

47,581

68.14%

69,826

+36.28%

+0.26%

2

20,140

33.50%

39,974

66.50%

60,114

+32.99%

+2.25%

3

31,958

47.37%

35,503

52.63%

67,461

+5.25%

+1.18%

4

14,316

40.78%

20,792

59.22%

35,108

+18.45%

+3.26%

5

20,327

49.05%

21,113

50.95%

41,440

+1.90%

+3.65%

45 of 73

Map Option (4) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

EL PASO COUNTY SHERIFF:

1

22,868

32.56%

47,374

67.44%

70,242

+34.89%

+0.15%

2

20,198

33.47%

40,140

66.53%

60,338

+33.05%

+1.78%

3

32,713

48.40%

34,881

51.60%

67,594

+3.21%

+1.51%

4

14,031

40.00%

21,046

60.00%

35,077

+20.00%

+2.93%

5

19,990

47.98%

21,675

52.02%

41,665

+4.04%

+2.15%

46 of 73

Map Option (5)

Supporting Documentation:

47 of 73

District:

Total Population:

Target Deviation:

Target Deviation %:

County

732,773

​

​

District 1

145,922

-633

-0.43%

District 2

143,278

-3,277

-2.24%

District 3

149,502

2,947

2.01%

District 4

144,006

-2,549

-1.74%

District 5

150,065

3,510

2.4%

Map Option (5) –

Commissioner Longinos Gonzalez:

Metric:

Data:

TOTAL Population

732,773

Mean Target Population

146,555

Mean Deviation

2,583

Mean % Deviation

1.76%

Largest (+) Deviation

3,510

Largest (–) Deviation

-3,277

Overall Range in Deviation

6,787

Overall Range in Deviation %:

4.63%

48 of 73

Map Option (5) –

Commissioner Longinos Gonzalez:

Map Option 5 Precinct Moves = 45

​

​

​

Districts:

Precincts Added:

Precincts Removed:

Total Impact:

District 1

(302)(304)(219)

(440)(457)(253)(143)(134)(145)

-3

District 2

(440)(457)(253)(143)(134)

(151)(153)(156)(155)

(219)(190)(191)(192)(195)(139)

(193)(194)(620)(627)

-1

District 3

(120)(138)(97)(121)(136)

(123)(124)(99)(127)(95)(173)(93)(179)(92)(178)

(302)(304)(605)(601)(602)

+10

District 4

(191)(192)(195)(139)(602)

(623)(621)(622)(624)(625)

0

District 5

(190)(193)(194)(620)(627)

(623)(621)(622)(624)(625)

(605)(601)(145)

(151)(153)(156)(155)(120)(138)

(97)(121)(136)(123)(124)(99)

(127)(95)(173)(93)(179)(92)(178)

-6

TOTAL AFFECTED POPULATION = 101,527 (14%)

TOTAL AFFECTED ACTIVE VOTERS = 61,896 (13%)

49 of 73

Map Option (5) Total Population Racial Ethnicity –

Commissioner Longinos Gonzalez:

​

50 of 73

Map Option (5) Total Population Racial Ethnicity - Commissioner Longinos Gonzalez:

​

Districts

Total % / Variance:

Hispanic or Latino:

Black:

White:

Asian:

1

Total %:

10.39%

2.8%

75.66%

4.24%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.19%

-0.13%

0.38%

-0.03%

2

Total %:

15.72%

4.8%

67.87%

3.24%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-2.62%

-0.54%

3.15%

0.09%

3

Total %:

12.4%

2.75%

75.99%

2.31%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.26%

-0.1%

0.46%

0.01%

4

Total %:

22.66%

8.78%

56.53%

2.65%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-2.35%

-0.84%

3.3%

-0.11%

5

Total %:

27.76%

9.06%

52.65%

2.38%

​

Total Variance from Original:

5.57%

1.76%

-7.9%

0.17%

51 of 73

Map Option (5) Voting Age Racial Ethnicity – Commissioner Longinos Gonzalez:

​

52 of 73

Map Option (5) Voting Age Racial Ethnicity – Commissioner Longinos Gonzalez:

​

Districts

Total % / Variance:

Hispanic or Latino:

Black:

White:

Asian:

1

Total %:

6.83%

2.17%

58.88%

3.28%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.11%

-0.12%

0.34%

-0.03%

2

Total %:

9.9%

3.65%

52.49%

2.63%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-1.72%

-0.4%

2.27%

0.05%

3

Total %:

8.97%

2.28%

65.28%

1.99%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.13%

-0.04%

0.78%

0.01%

4

Total %:

14.73%

6.69%

44.18%

2.21%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-1.31%

-0.58%

2.9%

-0.1%

5

Total %:

18.38%

6.97%

43.9%

2.07%

​

Total Variance from Original:

3.23%

1.23%

-7.43%

0.14%

53 of 73

Map Option (5) Communities of

Interest & Compactness:

  • The proposed map keeps most municipalities whole within one Commissioner District, except City of Colorado Springs.
  • Communities of Interest are the 5 Military Installations, Falcon, Southeast Colorado Springs, Monument, Palmer Lake, and the Wildland Urban Interface.
  • The Districts are sufficiently compact.
    • Precincts 605, and 601 District 5 questions.
    • Precincts 191, 192, 195, and 139 District 4 questions.
  • Districts 1,2, and 4 are under population target deviation to allow for future growth.

​

54 of 73

Map Option (5) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

US PRESIDENT:

1

32,065

35.95%

54,321

60.90%

59,194

+24.95%

+0.20%

2

28,241

35.57%

48,184

60.70%

79,386

+25.12%

+2.04%

3

46,718

45.58%

41,588

45.58%

91,249

+0.00%

+4.56%

4

22,891

41.52%

29,762

53.98%

55,138

+12.46%

+2.99%

5

32,026

50.13%

28,973

45.35%

63,884

+4.78%

+2.67%

55 of 73

Map Option (5) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

US SENATE:

1

26,032

35.67%

44,665

61.20%

72,977

+25.53%

+0.07%

2

22,633

36.89%

36,292

59.15%

61,359

+22.26%

+1.68%

3

37,038

52.13%

31,917

44.93%

71,043

+7.21%

+1.01%

4

15,822

44.15%

18,453

51.49%

35,840

+7.34%

+2.93%

5

22,499

52.20%

18,668

43.31%

43,100

+8.89%

+2.64%

56 of 73

Map Option (5) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

GOVERNOR:

1

28,941

39.55%

42,801

58.49%

73,172

+18.94%

+0.12%

2

24,605

39.99%

35,149

57.13%

61,523

+17.14%

+1.60%

3

39,395

55.32%

30,383

42.66%

71,217

+12.65%

+0.96%

4

16,911

47.10%

17,748

49.43%

35,908

+2.33%

+2.88%

5

23,595

54.61%

18,303

42.36%

43,207

+12.25%

+2.30%

57 of 73

Map Option (5) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

SECRETARY OF STATE:

1

26,007

35.86%

44,657

61.57%

72,527

+25.71%

+0.12%

2

22,436

36.81%

36,399

59.71%

60,958

+22.91%

+1.67%

3

36,293

51.47%

32,280

45.78%

70,515

+5.69%

+0.98%

4

15,490

43.46%

18,710

52.49%

35,643

+9.03%

+2.85%

5

21,765

50.86%

19,299

45.10%

42,792

+5.76%

+2.39%

58 of 73

Map Option (5) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

EL PASO COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER:

1

22,232

31.75%

47,784

68.25%

70,016

+36.49%

+0.05%

2

19,961

33.61%

39,432

66.39%

59,393

+32.78%

+2.04%

3

32,217

47.21%

36,019

52.79%

68,236

+5.57%

+0.87%

4

14,235

40.82%

20,636

59.18%

34,871

+18.36%

+3.17%

5

20,341

49.09%

21,092

50.91%

41,433

+1.81%

+3.74%

59 of 73

Map Option (5) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

EL PASO COUNTY SHERIFF:

1

22,884

32.49%

47,553

67.51%

70,437

+35.02%

+0.02%

2

19,990

33.54%

39,604

66.46%

59,594

+32.91%

+1.64%

3

32,972

48.22%

35,401

51.78%

68,373

+3.55%

+1.17%

4

13,950

40.04%

20,894

59.96%

34,844

+19.93%

+2.86%

5

20,004

48.01%

21,664

51.99%

41,668

+3.98%

+2.21%

60 of 73

Map Option (6)

Supporting Documentation:

61 of 73

District:

Total Population:

Target Deviation:

Target Deviation %:

County

732,773

​

​

District 1

146,079

-476

-0.32%

District 2

143,409

-3,146

-2.15%

District 3

149,865

3,310

2.26%

District 4

145,405

-1,150

-0.78%

District 5

148,015

1,460

1%

Map Option (6) –

Commissioner Carrie Geitner:

Metric:

Data:

TOTAL Population

732,773

Mean Target Population

146,555

Mean Deviation

1,908

Mean % Deviation

1.3%

Largest (+) Deviation

3,310

Largest (–) Deviation

-3,146

Overall Range in Deviation

6,456

Overall Range in Deviation %:

4.41%

62 of 73

Map Option (6) –

Commissioner Carrie Geitner:

Map Option 6 Precinct Moves = 34

​

​

​

Districts:

Precincts Added:

Precincts Removed:

Total Impact:

District 1

(441)(219)(201)(202)(204)

(144)(164)

(310)(313)(319)(315)(318)(210)

(303)(253)

-1

District 2

(253)(901)

(441)(219)(193)(194)(620)(627)

-4

District 3

(310)(313)(319)(315)(318)

(210)(303)(95)(93)(92)(173)

(179)(178)

(201)(202)(204)(605)(601)(602)

+7

District 4

(605)(601)(602)(193)(194)

(620)(627)

(621)(622)(623)(624)(625)

-2

District 5

(621)(622)(623)(624)(625)

(144)(164)(95)(93)(92)(173)(179)

(178)(901)

-4

TOTAL AFFECTED POPULATION = 81,070 (11.06%)

TOTAL AFFECTED ACTIVE VOTERS = 53,625 (11.09%)

63 of 73

Map Option (6) Total Population Racial Ethnicity –

Commissioner Carrie Geitner:

​

64 of 73

Map Option (6) Total Population Racial Ethnicity - Commissioner Carrie Geitner:

​

Districts

Total % / Variance:

Hispanic or Latino:

Black:

White:

Asian:

1

Total %:

10.86%

2.95%

74.95%

4.24%

​

Total Variance from Original:

0.28%

0.02%

-0.33%

-0.03%

2

Total %:

17.59%

5.21%

65.52%

3.22%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.75%

-0.13%

0.79%

0.07%

3

Total %:

11.76%

2.57%

76.81%

2.24%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.9%

-0.28%

1.28%

-0.06%

4

Total %:

23.48%

9.06%

55.48%

2.65%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-1.53%

-0.56%

2.25%

-0.11%

5

Total %:

25.43%

8.46%

55.7%

2.46%

​

Total Variance from Original:

3.24%

1.16%

-4.85%

0.25%

65 of 73

Map Option (6) Voting Age Racial Ethnicity – Commissioner Carrie Geitner:

​

66 of 73

Map Option (6) Voting Age Racial Ethnicity – Commissioner Carrie Geitner:

​

Districts

Total % / Variance:

Hispanic or Latino:

Black:

White:

Asian:

1

Total %:

7.12%

2.33%

58.72%

3.29%

​

Total Variance from Original:

0.18%

0.04%

0.18%

-0.02%

2

Total %:

11.07%

3.95%

50.68%

2.63%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.55%

-0.1%

0.46%

0.05%

3

Total %:

8.45%

2.1%

64.89%

1.9%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.65%

-0.22%

0.38%

-0.08%

4

Total %:

15.32%

6.89%

43.34%

2.22%

​

Total Variance from Original:

-0.72%

-0.38%

2.06%

-0.09%

5

Total %:

16.99%

6.54%

46.97%

2.14%

​

Total Variance from Original:

1.84%

0.8%

-4.36%

0.21%

67 of 73

Map Option (6) Communities of

Interest & Compactness:

  • The proposed map keeps most municipalities whole within one Commissioner District, except City of Colorado Springs.
  • Communities of Interest are the 5 Military Installations, Falcon, Southeast Colorado Springs, Monument, Palmer Lake, and the Wildland Urban Interface.
  • The Districts are sufficiently compact.
    • Precincts 193, 194, 620, and 627 District 4 questions.
  • Districts 1,2, and 4 are under population target deviation to allow for future growth.

68 of 73

Map Option (6) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

US PRESIDENT:

1

31,740

36.30%

52,890

60.48%

87,447

+24.19%

+0.57%

2

27,504

36.33%

45,335

59.88%

75,706

+23.55%

+0.48%

3

46,243

49.59%

44,047

47.24%

93,247

+2.36%

+2.21%

4

22,939

42.24%

28,881

53.19%

54,300

+10.94%

+1.47%

5

33,515

49.18%

31,675

46.48%

68,151

+2.70%

+0.59%

69 of 73

Map Option (6) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

US SENATE:

1

25,942

35.96%

43,937

60.90%

72,142

+24.94%

+0.66%

2

21,747

37.72%

33,581

58.25%

57,652

+20.53%

+0.06%

3

36,991

50.61%

33,948

46.44%

73,094

+4.16%

+2.04%

4

15,971

45.03%

17,953

50.62%

35,465

+5.59%

+1.17%

5

23,373

50.85%

20,576

44.76%

45,966

+6.08%

+0.16%

70 of 73

Map Option (6) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

GOVERNOR:

1

28,758

39.76%

42,153

58.27%

72,336

+18.52%

+0.55%

2

23,615

40.85%

32,499

56.22%

57,805

+15.37%

+0.17%

3

39,443

53.83%

32,349

44.14%

73,280

+9.68%

+2.02%

4

17,008

47.87%

17,286

48.65%

35,531

+0.78%

+1.33%

5

24,623

53.44%

20,097

43.62%

46,075

+9.82%

+0.12%

71 of 73

Map Option (6) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

SECRETARY OF STATE:

1

25,876

36.08%

43,985

61.33%

71,714

+25.25%

+0.58%

2

21,532

37.58%

33,718

58.85%

57,291

+21.27%

+0.04%

3

36,288

50.03%

34,260

47.23%

72,531

+2.80%

+1.92%

4

15,656

44.38%

18,182

51.54%

35,279

+7.16%

+0.98%

5

22,639

49.63%

21,200

46.47%

45,620

+3.15%

+0.21%

72 of 73

Map Option (6) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

EL PASO COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER:

1

22,163

32.01%

47,069

67.99%

69,232

+35.97%

+0.57%

2

19,324

34.61%

36,513

65.39%

55,837

+30.78%

+0.04%

3

32,142

45.79%

38,045

54.21%

70,187

+8.41%

+1.97%

4

14,417

41.74%

20,127

58.26%

34,544

+16.53%

+1.34%

5

20,940

47.43%

23,209

52.57%

44,149

+5.14%

+0.41%

73 of 73

Map Option (6) Political Competitiveness:

​

District:

DEM:

DEM %:

REP:

REP %:

Total:

Deviation:

Deviation from Current:

EL PASO COUNTY SHERIFF:

1

22,873

32.70%

46,792

67.17%

69,665

+34.46%

+0.58%

2

19,226

34.32%

36,801

65.68%

56,027

+31.37%

+0.09%

3

32,842

46.70%

37,491

53.30%

70,333

+6.61%

+1.89%

4

14,103

40.89%

20,388

59.11%

34,491

+18.22%

+1.16%

5

20,756

46.75%

23,644

53.25%

44,400

+6.50%

+0.31%