Grammarly Career Path Introduction
Career Paths have a specific purpose
To define and standardize the aspects of performance that are prioritized by Grammarly and your function, and how those expectations change throughout career progression.
Career Paths and Inclusion
One of the benefits of having structured and shared expectations across our teams is that we create a more inclusive and fair environment.
Inclusion is building an environment with practices and culture that affirms everyone is valued, able to succeed, and treated fairly and with respect.
Career Paths are not *new* to Grammarly
Historically we have used a simple version from a company called Radford. It is widely used by Tech/IT companies and understood as standard.
Previously it was not customized to Grammarly and our functions, so it was not an effective tool for coaching our team members.
Grammarly supports two career tracks
Individual Contributor (IC) | Management |
| |
Career Paths,
Learning & Development
Learning & Development is a large category of activities
Career Paths and Learning & Development
In terms of performance, we care most about the impact of team members -- what they get done and implement; goals they achieve and exceed; tools and efficiencies they build, etc.
Grammarly’s Career Paths describe the main aspects of performance necessary to build this impact and contribute to our mission.
Career Paths don’t describe every detail for your individual learning and development. They’re a roadmap and you will fill in the details.
Career Paths and career progression
Level
Time
How will we use Career Paths going forward?
Career development conversations
The Career Path will be a tool you and your manager use in learning and development conversations as you define and create plans for your development (every 3-6 months).
Grammarly people processes
We are integrating Career Paths into hiring, performance evaluations, and compensation reviews.
Promotions, or a change in level
A promotion is a change to a new Career Path level. Team members will be eligible for promotions in each review cycle (2x per year). We will not support promotions outside this review process to maintain consistency and rigor in the process. In each performance review cycle, managers will review the level and potential promotion of each direct report. Ahead of the performance review timeframe, any team member can also have a confidential conversation with their manager about if they should be considered for a promotion.
Promotion criteria:
Promotions are reviewed in a calibration meeting by a group of managers, and depending on the seniority of the role, the Exec team to ensure a consistent expectations bar.
Career Path calibration process
In calibration meetings, managers review leveling decision to ensure they are consistently interpreting the expectations and aspects of performance in the Career Path.
In preparation for this Career Path rollout, we did multiple calibration meetings with the managers in each function as well as with the Exec team. This was a rigorous and deliberate process. In Engineering alone, we did over 14 hours of calibration.
We will use calibration meetings in the future in review cycles to ensure we continue to apply a uniform standard.
Titles
In many organizations, team members’ titles reflect their level. At Grammarly, levels will be kept confidential (i.e. team members will not know each other’s levels) and titles will not have a corresponding 1:1 relationship to level.
Why? There are many pros and cons to public titles and we believe that the potential for negative side effects on culture is high. We’re optimizing for an organization with individual autonomy and team collaboration.
Career Path Structure
Career Path Structure
Level | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Impact | | | | | | |
Autonomy | | | | | | |
Skills & Knowledge | | | | | | |
Ownership | | | | | | |
Career Path Structure
Level | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Impact | | | | | | |
Autonomy | | | | | | |
Skills & Knowledge | | | | | | |
Ownership | | | | | | |
Career Path Structure
Level | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Impact | | | | | | |
Autonomy | | | | | | |
Skills & Knowledge | | | | | | |
Ownership | | | | | | |
Career Path Structure
Level | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Impact | | | | | | |
Autonomy | | | | | | |
Skills & Knowledge | | | | | | |
Ownership | | | | | | |
Career Path Structure
Level | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Impact | | | | | | |
Autonomy | | | | | | |
Skills & Knowledge | | | | | | |
Ownership | | | | | | |
The 4 shared categories for all Grammarly Career Paths
Impact | Autonomy |
Skills & Knowledge | Ownership |
Ownership is on all Grammarly Career Paths
Level | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Impact | | | | | | |
Autonomy | | | | | | |
Skills & Knowledge | | | | | | |
Ownership | | | | | | |
How individual matrix looks in practice
Level | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Impact | | | | | | |
Autonomy | | | | | | |
Skills & Knowledge | | | | | | |
Ownership | | | | | | |
Relationship of levels and compensation
Level | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| $A-B | $B-C | $C-D | $D-E | $E-F | $F-G |
Each Career Path level has a corresponding salary range. All team members in the level have compensation that is within the range, i.e. all team members in Level 3 have compensation between $C and $D.
We complete a compensation review two times each year. We update the compensation ranges based on market data from over 400 Tech/IT companies in the US and over 55 Tech/IT companies in Ukraine.
Growth/Marketing/Comms Career Paths - the process
Growth/Marketing/Comms Career Path Dimensions
Impact | Autonomy |
Skills & Knowledge | Ownership |
Growth/Marketing/Comms Career Path Dimensions - Impact
Growth/Marketing/Comms Career Path Dimensions - Autonomy
Growth/Marketing/Comms Career Path Dimensions - Skills & Knowledge
Title Mapping
Titles
Promotions & Recognition
Recognition cont...
Grammarly IC Career Paths
To be added: