LCAP Local Control Indicators�& Vital Signs Update
2022-23 School Year | Full Year
June 22nd, 2023
Executive Summary
2
Our District’s Strategic Priorities
3
Engage students with relevant, rigorous and standards-aligned instruction, supports and materials
Provide safe, joyful and productive learning environments with the proper social-emotional supports
Recruit and retain
highly effective and diverse�team members
Partner with families and the community to support
the whole child
Manage people, time and budget responsibly, equitably, and strategically in service of students
Work collaboratively
and share responsibility�for our core values
Our District’s Goals
4
Literacy
Students are powerful readers and writers who use literacy across content areas to make meaning and share their ideas
Students see themselves as mathematicians and use their skills, a deep understanding of content, and strong practices in their learning and work
Students feel safe at, connected to, and trust the school community, providing them with agency and�a sense of belonging
Math
Belonging
LCAP Local Control Indicators
5
California’s Eight State Priority Areas
These priority areas are reported to the public via indicators at the state and local levels
Discussed on the following two slides
(local district data)
Available on the
CA Dashboard (state-collected data)
Local Indicators: Conditions of Learning
We met requirements and will continue improving implementation of services and standards
State Priority | Categories | Results | Target | |
Basic Services | Appropriately Assigned Teachers | For Teachers of English Learners = 94% | 100% | |
Access to Curriculum Materials | 100% of students have access to their own copies of standards aligned instructional materials for use at school and at home | 100% (All Students) | ||
Safe, Clean and Functional School Facilities | Belle Haven = 19 Cesar Chavez RMS = 36 | Costano = 7 Los Robles-Ronald McNair = 4 | Less than 20 Total | |
Total = 66 items to repair or correct | ||||
Implementation of State Academic Standards | Providing professional learning, resources, and support that improves standards- aligned instruction | Beginning Development = English Language Development (ELD), History/Social Science | Full Implementation | |
Initial Implementation = English Language Arts (ELA), Mathematics, Science | ||||
Course Access | Equitable access to available classes | All students receive the same enrollment in courses, and access to grade-appropriate core content area instruction and enrichment / elective classes, regardless of school site or student subgroup | 100% (All Students) |
Local Indicators: Engagement & School Climate
We met requirements and will continue improving family engagement and school climate
State Priority | Categories | Results | Target | |
Parental Involvement�& Family Engagement |
| Beginning Development | Full Implementation | |
| Initial Implementation | |||
School Climate | % of students who report feeling safe at school, measured by surveys | 60% | 80% |
Visualizing District Vital Signs
A snapshot of vital signs shows positive change when compared to last year
Map Indicators
Satellite Indicators
9
16%
105%
i-Ready Reading
Status Growth
9%
86%
i-Ready Math
Status Growth
90%
+5%
Year to Date Attendance
Status Growth
-99
N/A
ELA CAASPP
DFS Growth
-131
N/A
Math CAASPP
DFS Growth
40%
-11
Chronic Absenteeism
Status Change
Growth numbers are median progress to annual growth goals
Growth compares the current attendance rate to the 2021-22 rate
CAASPP growth data will be available in Summer 2023
Change compares the 2022-23 chronic absenteeism rate to the 2021-22 rate (51%)
Note: 2021-22 average attendance rate was 85%, 2021-22 chronic absenteeism rate was 51%
Sources: i-Ready: i-Ready Diagnostics 1, 2, & 3; YTD Attendance: Infinite Campus as of June 14th; CAASPP Indicators: TOMS; Chronic Absenteeism: Infinite Campus as of June 14
Next year this dashboard will include local indicators
Academic Health
10
Strategic Priorities 1, 2
Academic Health: Diagnosis
Our multi-tiered needs are flipped
11
1-5%
5-10%
80-90%
What we should be seeing…
…vs. what we are actually seeing
1-5%
80-90%
5-20%
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Academic Health: Treatment Plan
We believe we must focus on TEAMS, TIME, and TIERED instruction…
To ensure the Academic Health of our students, we believe we must focus on:
12
For the 2023-24 School Year, we will:
Outcome Goals
…which will enable us to achieve our SY 2023-24 outcome goals
13
Literacy
Students are powerful readers�and writers who use literacy across content areas to make meaning�and share their ideas
Students are literate by 3rd grade
Students see themselves as mathematicians and use their skills,�a deep understanding of content, and strong practices in their learning and work
Students are numerate by 3rd grade
Students and staff feel safe at, connected to, and trust the school community, providing them with agency and a sense of belonging
Math
Belonging
underlined text = updates made for SY23-24
English Language Arts�i-Ready Placement and Growth
14
At/Above Grade Level
Early Grade Level
One Year Below
Three or More Years Below
Two Years Below
Source: 2022-23 i-Ready Diagnostics 1, 2, and 3
Progress to Typical Growth:
105%
The median (middle) Ravenswood student completed 105% of their expected growth in reading for the year
Action Steps
Results
Mathematics�i-Ready Placement and Growth
15
Early Grade Level
One Year Below
Three or More Years Below
Two Years Below
At/Above Grade Level
2%
28 Stu.
Source: 2022-23 i-Ready Diagnostics 1, 2, and 3
Action Steps
Results
Progress to Typical Growth:
86%
The median (middle) Ravenswood student completed 86% of their expected growth in math for the year
English Language Development�ELPAC Testing and Reclassification
16
Last year, 9% of of students who took the ELPAC scored a 4
Action Steps
Results
Belonging �Social / Emotional / Behavioral Health
17
Strategic Priorities 2, 4, and 6
Physical, Mental and Behavioral Health: Diagnosis
Our multi-tiered needs are flipped
18
1-5%
5-10%
80-90%
What we should be seeing…
…vs. what we are actually seeing
1-5%
80-90%
5-20%
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Student Survey�% of students responding positively to measures of student belonging
19
Action Steps
Tiers
Team & Time
Results
(n = 782)
Source: Spring 2023 Student Survey (Panorama)
Out of School Suspension�% suspension rate (overall, by subgroup)
20
Subgroup | Baseline 2021-22 | Target |
Overall | 4.4% | 2.4% |
English Learner | 3.0% | 2.4% |
SPED | 6.6% | 2.4% |
Pacific Islander | 0.7% | 2.4% |
Black / African American | 16.5% | 2.4% |
Hispanic / Latino | 4.0% | 2.4% |
Source: SWIS; Infinite Campus (as of June 13, 2023)
Interim Nov / Mar / Jun |
1 / 2.1 / 4% |
1 / 1 / 2% |
2.3 / 3 / 6% |
0.7 / 2 / 4% |
4.3 / 10 / 12% |
0.9 / 1.5 / 3% |
Target 2022-23 |
2.4% |
2.4% |
2.4% |
2.4% |
2.4% |
2.4% |
Action Steps
Tiers
Team & Time
Results
Goal: lower suspension rates�AND equity across subgroups
Absenteeism�% chronic absenteeism rate (overall, by subgroup)
21
Data Source: Baseline Data - Infinite Campus 2021-22 School Year; Fall Interim Data - Infinite Campus (as of Nov. 15, 2022); Winter Interim Data - Infinite Campus (as of Mar. 14th); Spring Interim Data - Infinite Campus (as of June 13th)
Subgroup | Baseline 2021-22 | Target |
Overall | 51% | 36 / 42 / 40% |
English Learner | 48% | 34 / 40 / 38% |
SPED | 60% | 45 / 47 / 44% |
Pacific Islander | 68% | 40 / 50 / 49% |
Black / African American | 64% | 42 / 46 / 45% |
Hispanic / Latino | 48% | 36 / 40 / 37% |
Interim Nov / Mar / Jun |
Target 2022-23 |
45% |
45% |
45% |
45% |
45% |
45% |
Results
Next Steps
Goal: lower absenteeism rates�AND equity across subgroups
Talent & Engagement
22
Strategic Priorities 3, 4, and 6
Talent
Staff Hiring and Retention
23
Action Steps
Results
|
Family Engagement�% of families who feel they have a good relationship with their child’s teacher
24
Source: Spring 2023 Family Survey – “On a scale of 1-5 (where 5 is the best), how would you rate your relationship with your child’s teacher?”
81% of families feel they have a good (4 or 5) relationship with their child’s teacher
Up from 76%�in Fall 2022
Action Steps
Results
Family Satisfaction�% of parents/guardians who would recommend Ravenswood to others
25
67% of families are very likely (9 or 10) to recommend Ravenswood to others
Up from 64%�in Fall 2022
Action Steps
Results
2023-24 Priorities and Practices�Our student-level goals will be supported by our teacher and leadership practices
26
Literacy
Math
Belonging
Student Goals
Teacher Practices (across content)
Leadership Practices
Create culturally responsive and antiracist classroom cultures grounded in trauma-informed restorative practices and clear expectations/routines that prioritize active, joyful, engagement
Work collaboratively with their teams to create a shared vision for student success grounded in the instructional core and align all decisions to this vision
Collaboratively develop distributed leadership structures
Give meaningful, timely feedback to teachers
Build capacity of individuals & teams to implement school systems
Work in professional learning communities focused on instruction
Internalize instructional standards & tasks
Build positive relationships with and among students
Summary
27
Based on our year of checking our Vital Signs, as a district we will: | Teams | Time | Tiers |
| X | X | |
| X | X | X |
| X | | X |
| X | X | X |
| | | X |
| | | X |
| X | X | |
Appendix
Our District Data Collection
We collected substantial data across all levels in each Vital Sign / Strategic Priority area
to last year
29
Vital Signs / Strategic Priorities | Street - Level 3 | Map - Level 2 | Satellite - Level 1 |
Academic Health, Standards Alignment,�& Teacher Practice |
|
|
|
Belonging and Safety |
|
|
|
Talent (Staff Recruitment & Retention) |
|
|
|
Family Engagement & Satisfaction |
|
|
|
Street Data: Our Plan�We are collecting data across all three levels to monitor progress towards our goals
30
| Satellite - Level 1 | Map - Level 2 | Street - Level 3 |
Frequency | Annually | 2-3x each year | Daily |
Purpose | Where has the student been academically? | Where is the student right now academically? | What do we know about the student’s story, their hopes and dreams, and their current needs? |
Specific data we will collect |
|
|
|
Description | Tells an important but incomplete story; illuminates big performance trends, �but does not tell the whole story �of the health of a student | Paints a slightly richer picture�than satellite data alone, but still �does not tell the whole story �of the health of a student | Offers information and clarity on where students are in their learning; �adds to a complete data story�of the health of a student |
“Begin with curiosity: [it] shines a light on the experience of learning and promotes a listening stance by openly inviting the presence of uncertainty, complexity, curiosity, vulnerability, and wonder” - Safir and Dugan
District Report Card & Vital Signs Overview (1 of 2)�Our new data and reporting infrastructure will inform how we can best support our students
31
District Report Card
Vital Signs
We have created a District Report Card that consists of ~30 metrics tied to our Strategic Priorities and overall goals (deep dive on next slide)
The Report Card also includes Vital Sign indicators as our way of tracking progress on a few key metrics throughout the year:
Street Data
Our site teams are also collecting Street Data on an ongoing basis as part of our Vital Sign monitoring of student educational health
We have built the infrastructure to collect and monitor our data… �Now it is time to get curious about the root causes and use this information to plan our next steps
“Complex, adaptive work demands constant attunement and responsiveness”- Safir and Dugan
District Report Card & Vital Signs Overview (2 of 2)�We have defined baselines, set targets, and developed interim Vital Signs for our key metrics
32
22-23 Target
(EOY)
For each Strategic Priority we have set multiple Outcome Measures to evaluate our performance
Outcome Measure 1
Outcome Measure 2
Outcome Measure 3
…
SP 1: Engage students with relevant, rigorous and standards-aligned instruction, supports�and materials
For each Measure we have baseline data, annual targets & interim data to track ongoing progress*
2021-22 Baseline
(BOY)
23-24 Target
24-25 Target
Interim Data and Vital Signs
(~2-3x a year)
*Note: Because several metrics are new this year, not all baseline data is available yet and some future targets will be set after gathering data this year�Furthermore, some metrics are only tracked on an annual basis so no interim data is available – this will be indicated in our reporting
…
District Report Card
Vital Signs
Overall Mission�Baseline Data, Interim Vital Signs, and EOY Targets
33
Outcome Measure | Baseline (EOY 21-22) | Interim �(Fall ‘22 / Winter ‘23 / Spring ‘23) | Target �(EOY 22-23) |
Average CAASPP distance from meeting ELA standards Interim measure (i-Ready % on target) | -99 | NA / 11% / 16% | -84 |
Average CAASPP distance from meeting math standards Interim measure (i-Ready % on target) | -131 | NA / 4% / 9% | -118 |
% of EL students increasing at least one ELPAC level | 40.2% | No interim �data available (annual only) | 54.9% |
% of EL students reclassifying as Fluent English Proficient | 5.7% | 6.0% | |
% of students who state that they feel safe, connected, AND have an adult that they trust at school | No baseline data available (new metric) | 51.5% / 50.0% / 55.2% | No targets yet (gathering data this year) |
Source: CAASPP 2021-22, ELPAC 2021-22, Reclassification Data 2021-22, Fall 2022 and Winter 2023 Student Survey
Student Growth - i-Ready Diagnostics
Explore the i-Ready diagnostic growth visualization below
34
Source: i-Ready Diagnostics 1 - 3 (Fall, Winter, and Spring) 2022-23
English Language Arts�i-Ready Placement and Growth
35
Action Steps
Results
Progress to Typical Growth (Median)
At/Above Grade Level
Early Grade Level
One Year Below
Three or More Years Below
Two Years Below
Source: 2022-23 i-Ready Diagnostics 1, 2, and 3
ELA Achievement�Spring i-Ready data shows growth from the Diagnostic baseline this fall
36
Subgroup (# with diagnostic) | Baseline Fall 2022 | Interim Spring 2023 Using Fall “on target” | Interim Spring 2023 |
Overall 1,238 Students | 28% | 43% | 16% |
English Learner 683 Students | 19% | 28% | 7% |
SPED 192 Students | 14% | 22% | 5% |
Pacific Islander 136 Students | 29% | 56% | 18% |
Black / African American 81 Students | 30% | 36% | 22% |
Hispanic / Latino 972 Students | 26% | 42% | 15% |
i-Ready Diagnostic Reading Data: Grades 1-8
(% on target)
Source: i-Ready Diagnostic 1 Fall 2022, i-Ready Diagnostic 2 Winter 2023; i-Ready Diagnostic 3 Spring 2023
As the school year progresses, we raise the bar for what it means for students to be “on target”
In the fall, students were considered “on target” if their i-Ready Diagnostic placed them On/Above Grade Level or 1 Grade Level Below
For the most recent diagnostic, students were considered “on target” only if they were placed On/Above Grade Level
Fall On Target
Spring On Target
Defining “On Target”
Mathematics�i-Ready Placement and Growth
37
Action Steps
Progress to Typical Growth (Median)
Early Grade Level
One Year Below
Three or More Years Below
Two Years Below
At/Above Grade Level
2%
28 Stu.
Source: 2022-23 i-Ready Diagnostics 1, 2, and 3
Results
Math Achievement�Spring i-Ready data shows growth from the Diagnostic baseline this fall
38
Subgroup (# with diagnostic) | Baseline Fall 2022 | Interim Spring 2023 Using Fall “on target” | Interim Spring 2023 |
Overall 1,238 Students | 20% | 42% | 9% |
English Learner 683 Students | 14% | 22% | 1% |
SPED 192 Students | 11% | 25% | 4% |
Pacific Islander 136 Students | 23% | 49% | 11% |
Black / African American 81 Students | 23% | 38% | 7% |
Hispanic / Latino 972 Students | 19% | 41% | 9% |
i-Ready Diagnostic Math Data: Grades 1-8
(% on target)
As the school year progresses, we raise the bar for what it means for students to be “on target”
In the fall, students were considered “on target” if their i-Ready Diagnostic placed them On/Above Grade Level or 1 Grade Level Below
For the most recent diagnostic, students were considered “on target” only if they were placed On/Above Grade Level
Fall On Target
Spring On Target
Defining “On Target”
Source: i-Ready Diagnostic 1 Fall 2022, i-Ready Diagnostic 2 Winter 2023; i-Ready Diagnostic 3 Spring 2023
Standards Alignment
39
We have focused on developing a shared mental model of high quality practice in the classroom by:
|
Action Steps
Strategic Priority 2�Baseline Data, Interim Vital Signs, and EOY Targets
40
Outcome Measure | Baseline (EOY 21-22) | Interim �(Fall ‘22 / Winter ‘23 / Spring ‘23) | Target �(EOY 22-23) |
% of students who report feeling safe at school | 63% | 64% / 63% / 60% | 80% |
% of students who report feeling a high level of school connectedness | 57% | 87% / 85% / 84% | 60% |
% suspension rate (= % of students with an aggregate total of one full day of suspension during the school year) | 4.4% | 1.0% / 2.0% / 4% | 2.4% |
% of teachers who believe their classrooms and schools are safe and productive learning environments | No baseline data available (new metric) | No interim data available (annual only) | No targets yet (gathering data this year) |
Source: CHKS 2021-22 (low sample size), Fall 2022 and WInter 2023 Student Survey, SWIS, Infinite Campus
Out of School Suspensions�% suspension rate (overall, by subgroup and by school)
41
Source: SWIS; Infinite Campus (as of Mar 10, 2023)
| Belle Haven | Costano | Los Robles Ronald McNair | Cesar Chavez Ravenswood MS | Districtwide |
Overall | 0.5% | 0.8% 2/367 | 3/372 | 1.1% | 3% 4/361 | 10/256 | 0% | 0% 0/256 | 0/256 | 5% | 8% 26/529 | 45/536 | 2.1% | 4% 58/1523 |
English Learner | 0% | 0% 0/212 | 0/212 | 0% | 2% 0/169 | 4/170 | 0% | 0% 0/209 | 0/209 | 3% | 7% 9/275 | 19/272 | 2% | 2% 9/865 | 19/871 |
SPED | 2% | 2% 1/45 | 1/48 | 0% | 7% 0/47 | 4/55 | 0% | 0% 0/26 | 0/26 | 6% | 9% 6/89 | 8/87 | 3% | 6% 7/206 | 13/261 |
Pacific Islander | 0% | 0% 0/30 | 0/30 | 4% | 6% 2/47 | 3/47 | 0% | 0% 0/1 | 0/1 | 2% | 5% 1/50 | 3/55 | 2% | 4% 3/128 | 5/134 |
Black/African American | 0% | 0% 0/23 | 0/23 | 3% | 3% 1/32 | 1/31 | 0% | 0% 0/1 | 0/1 | 24% | 27% 9/37 | 10/37 | 10% | 12% 10/93 | 11/91 |
Hispanic/Latino | 0.6% | 0.8% 2/296 | 3/372 | 0.4% | 2% 1/250 | 6/246 | 0% | 0% 0/238 | 0/238 | 3.8% | 7% 16/421 | 32/423 | 1.5% 3% 19/1,216 | 36/1223 |
Strategic Priority 3�Baseline Data, Interim Vital Signs, and EOY Targets
42
Outcome Measure | Baseline (EOY 21-22) | Interim �(Spring ‘23) | Target �(EOY 22-23) |
% of highly-effective* staff / teachers who are retained �(*based on evaluation results and credential status) | 90% / N/A¹ | No interim �data available (measured on annual basis only) | 96% / 87% |
% of staff members who are due to be evaluated with a completed evaluation (certificated / classified) | 95% / N/A¹ | 100% / 100% | |
% of openings filled by first day of instruction | 96% | 98.5% | |
% of new hires that are fully credentialed | 85% | 70%² | |
% of staff and teachers who are persons of color | 51% | N/A | N/A |
Source: Evaluations, Credential Status, Employee and Staffing Data
Notes: ¹Classified evaluations were previously done on paper; we are using a new system this year to improve the process and increase completion rates�²Although we exceeded our target last year, based on national trends and the teacher shortage we are keeping the 70% target for this year
Strategic Priority 4�Baseline Data, Interim Vital Signs, and EOY Targets
43
Outcome Measure | Baseline (EOY 21-22) | Interim �(Fall ‘22 / Winter ‘23 / Spring ‘23) | Target �(EOY 22-23) |
% of families who feel they have a good relationship with their child’s teacher | No baseline data available (new metric) | 76% / NA / 81% | No targets yet (gathering data this year) |
% chronic absenteeism rate overall and by subgroups | 51% | 36% / 42% / 40% | 45% |
Source: Fall 2022 Family Survey, Infinite Campus (as of Nov 11, 2022)
Absenteeism�% chronic absenteeism rate (overall, by subgroup)
44
Data Source: Baseline Data - Infinite Campus 2021-22 School Year; Fall Interim Data - Infinite Campus (as of Nov. 15, 2022); Winter Interim Data - Infinite Campus (as of Mar. 14th); Spring Interim Data - Infinite Campus (as of June 13th)
Subgroup | Baseline 2021-22 | Target |
Overall | 51% | 36 / 42 / 40% |
English Learner | 48% | 34 / 40 / 38% |
SPED | 60% | 45 / 47 / 44% |
Pacific Islander | 68% | 40 / 50 / 49% |
Black / African American | 64% | 42 / 46 / 45% |
Hispanic / Latino | 48% | 36 / 40 / 37% |
Interim Nov / Mar / Jun |
Target 2022-23 |
45% |
45% |
45% |
45% |
45% |
45% |
Context
What actions are we taking to drive this forward?
Goal: lower absenteeism rates�AND equity across subgroups
Jenn context and actions
Numbers updated
Student Survey Results - Grade Level�Across all survey categories, students in higher grades responded less positively than students in lower grades
45
Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students
District Average | 782 |
3rd Grade | 102 |
4th Grade | 132 |
5th Grade | 145 |
6th Grade | 78 |
7th Grade | 95 |
8th Grade | 87 |
Cultural Representation
Engagement
Sense of Belonging
School Climate
School Safety
Supportive Relationships
Group Size
Student Survey Results - EL Enrollment�Our “English Only” feel less represented and less belonging compared to peers
46
Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students
District Average | 782 |
English Only | 146 |
RFEP | 107 |
EL | 354 |
IFEP | 25 |
Cultural Representation
Engagement
Sense of Belonging
School Climate
School Safety
Supportive Relationships
Group Size
Note: The group sizes do not total to the district average because some students completed the non-disaggregated version of the survey for technical reasons.
Student Survey Results - Gender�There are differences between male and female students across several categories
47
District Average | 782 |
Male | 334 |
Female* | 305 |
Cultural Representation
Engagement
Sense of Belonging
School Climate
School Safety
Supportive Relationships
Group Size
Note: The female student group includes one student identifying as non-binary. To protect this student’s privacy, but also include their voice, Panorama included them in the female student group.
Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students
Student Survey Results - Students with Disabilities�Students with 504 Plans and enrolled in Special Education classes responded differently to the survey
48
Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students
District Average | 782 |
504 Plan | 15 |
Special Education | 90 |
Cultural Representation
Engagement
Sense of Belonging
School Climate
School Safety
Supportive Relationships
Group Size
CCRMS Survey Results - Race and Ethnicity�Black/African American students at CCRMS responded less positively than their peers
49
Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students
CCRMS Average | 403 |
Black/African American | 15 |
Hispanic | 207 |
Multiracial | 5 |
Pacific Islander | 28 |
Asian American and White | 5 |
Cultural Representation
Engagement
Sense of Belonging
School Climate
School Safety
Supportive Relationships
Group Size
Costano Survey Results - Race and Ethnicity�Disaggregating by Race/Ethnicity shows differences at Costano
50
Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students
Costano Average | 134 |
Black/African American | 9 |
Hispanic | 91 |
Multiracial | 6 |
Pacific Islander | 23 |
Asian American | 5 |
Cultural Representation
Engagement
Sense of Belonging
School Climate
School Safety
Supportive Relationships
Group Size
Belle Haven Survey Results - Race and Ethnicity�Disaggregating by Race/Ethnicity shows differences at Belle Haven
51
Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students
Belle Haven Average | 160 |
Hispanic | 130 |
Pacific Islander | 16 |
Black/African American, Multiracial, and White | 14 |
Cultural Representation
Engagement
Sense of Belonging
School Climate
School Safety
Supportive Relationships
Group Size
Strategic Priority 5�Baseline Data, Interim Vital Signs, and EOY Targets
52
Source: Year-End Actuals 21-22
Outcome Measure | Baseline (EOY 21-22) | Interim �(Spring ‘23) | Target �(EOY 22-23) |
% variance between adopted budget and actual spending (general fund) | 1.6% | No interim �data available (measured on annual basis only) | 10% |
% of departmental budget codes with actual spending within 5% of adopted budget | 0% | 25% | |
% of district budget owners reporting they know how to access, manage and own their budget | No baseline data available (new metric) | 90% | |
% of staff who believe we are managing people, time and budget responsibly, equitably and strategically in service of students | No targets yet (gathering data this year) | ||
% of staff who believe our facilities meet the needs of students, staff and families |
Strategic Priority 6�Baseline Data, Interim Vital Signs, and EOY Targets
53
Source: Fall 2022 Family Survey, Fall 2022 Student Survey�Notes: ¹The Fall sticker survey was done for TK-1st classes and a few 2nd grade classes; in the Winter and Spring the survey was expanded to all 2nd grade classes
Outcome Measure | Baseline (EOY 21-22) | Interim �(Fall ‘22 / Winter ‘23 / Spring ‘23) | Target �(EOY 22-23) |
% of parents who would recommend Ravenswood to others | No baseline data available (new metric) | 64% / NA / 67% | No targets yet (gathering data this year) |
% of TK-2nd grade students who are happy to be at their school1 | 75% / 70% / 73% | ||
% of 3rd-8th grade students who are happy to be at their school | 65% / 63% / 60% | ||
% of staff who would recommend Ravenswood to others | No interim �data available (annual only) |
Parent Satisfaction�% of parents/guardians who would recommend Ravenswood to others
54
Net Promoter Score Calculation
What actions are we taking to drive this forward?
Source: Spring 2023 Family Survey – “How likely are you to recommend Ravenswood to a friend/colleague?”
Net Promoter Score Calculation
67% of families are very likely (9 or 10) to recommend Ravenswood to others
Promoters (9 or 10) | = | 67% |
– Detractors (0 to 6) | = | 17% |
Overall NPS | = | 50 |
Up from 64%�in Fall 2022
Up from 47 in Fall 2022
Engagement Initiatives
55
While we work to ensure our current families are happy to be at Ravenswood, we are also working in parallel on engagement initiatives so that even more families and community partners #ChooseRavenswood
Here are some updates on our enrollment efforts:
Here are some updates on our community partnerships:
Student Satisfaction�% of TK-2nd grade students who are happy to be at their school
56
Source: Fall, Winter, and Spring 2023 Student Surveys (Posters for TK-2nd) – “How are you feeling about school today?” / “How was your day today?”�Note: Expanded sticker posters to all 2nd grade classrooms (many of which had previously used Panorama)
Key Takeaways
Spring Average: 75% happy
Spring Average: 71% happy
Teachers were asked to survey students via stickers on posters at the start and end of the day over a two-day period
Student Satisfaction�% of 3rd-8th grade students who are happy to be at their school
57
Source: Fall, Winter, and Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) – “Are you happy to be at this school?”
Key Takeaways
Winter Average: ~63% of students are happy at their school most or all of the time
(n = 782)
Theory of Action
We are developing a theory of action for district and school leaders in SY 2023-24
58
DRAFT
2023-24 Priorities and Practices
59
Student level goals | Every student fully engages critically and creatively in their education with the skills and mindset necessary to successfully fulfill their unique potential. | ||||
Students are literate by 3rd grade. Students are powerful readers and writers who use literacy across content areas to make meaning and share their ideas | Students are numerate by 3rd grade. Students see themselves as mathematicians and use their skills, a deep understanding of content, and strong practices in their learning and work | Students and staff feel safe at, connected to, and trust the school community, providing them with agency and a sense of belonging | |||
Teacher priority practices (across content) | Teachers create culturally responsive and antiracist classroom cultures grounded in trauma-informed/restorative practices and clear expectations/routines that prioritize active, joyful, engagement | ||||
Teachers work in professional learning communities to internalize the standards and curriculum and design Tier 1 Instructional experiences that are aligned with grade level standards, are engaging, are affirming, and are meaningful | Teachers internalize the purpose of standards and tasks within the lesson/unit, and prepare for frequent "student talk"opportunities that support meaning-making, critical thinking, writing, and academic language practice | Teachers build positive relationships with and among our students to create the conditions for learning | |||
Leadership Practices | Leaders work collaboratively with their teams to create a shared vision for student success grounded in the instructional core (standards-aligned, engaging, inquiry-driven and student-focused instruction with relevant high-quality materials and collaborative classroom talk), and align all decisions to this vision | ||||
School Leadership collaboratively develops distributive leadership structures that are focused on the academic, social, emotional, and physical health of students i | Leadership provides meaningful and timely feedback to teachers that support the growth and development of instructional practices | School Leadership collaborates with and builds capacity of individuals and teams to implement school systems, including PLCs that ensure strong relationships with teachers, standards/ curriculum, task, and students and between adults and students, and a sense of belonging for all students in service of the school’s vision for learning |