1 of 59

LCAP Local Control Indicators�& Vital Signs Update

2022-23 School Year | Full Year

June 22nd, 2023

2 of 59

Executive Summary

  • We have worked hard this year to create a system for monitoring our students’ academic, social, and emotional health
  • We are now able to check our Vital Signs regularly, which allows us to begin diagnosing the root causes of our outcomes
  • It is now time to determine our Treatment Plan

2

3 of 59

Our District’s Strategic Priorities

3

Engage students with relevant, rigorous and standards-aligned instruction, supports and materials

Provide safe, joyful and productive learning environments with the proper social-emotional supports

Recruit and retain

highly effective and diverse�team members

Partner with families and the community to support

the whole child

Manage people, time and budget responsibly, equitably, and strategically in service of students

Work collaboratively

and share responsibility�for our core values

4 of 59

Our District’s Goals

4

Literacy

Students are powerful readers and writers who use literacy across content areas to make meaning and share their ideas

Students see themselves as mathematicians and use their skills, a deep understanding of content, and strong practices in their learning and work

Students feel safe at, connected to, and trust the school community, providing them with agency and�a sense of belonging

Math

Belonging

5 of 59

LCAP Local Control Indicators

  • Basic Conditions at Schools
  • Implementation of State Academic Standards
  • Parent Engagement
  • Local Climate Survey
  • Access to Broad Course of Study

5

6 of 59

California’s Eight State Priority Areas

These priority areas are reported to the public via indicators at the state and local levels

Discussed on the following two slides

(local district data)

Available on the

CA Dashboard (state-collected data)

7 of 59

Local Indicators: Conditions of Learning

We met requirements and will continue improving implementation of services and standards

State Priority

Categories

Results

Target

Basic Services

Appropriately Assigned Teachers

For Teachers of English Learners = 94%

100%

Access to Curriculum Materials

100% of students have access to their own copies of standards aligned instructional materials for use at school and at home

100%

(All Students)

Safe, Clean and Functional School Facilities

Belle Haven = 19

Cesar Chavez RMS = 36

Costano = 7

Los Robles-Ronald McNair = 4

Less than 20 Total

Total = 66 items to repair or correct

Implementation of State Academic Standards

Providing professional learning, resources, and support that improves standards- aligned instruction

Beginning Development =

English Language Development (ELD), History/Social Science

Full Implementation

Initial Implementation =

English Language Arts (ELA), Mathematics, Science

Course Access

Equitable access to available classes

All students receive the same enrollment in courses, and access to grade-appropriate core content area instruction and enrichment / elective classes, regardless of school site or student subgroup

100%

(All Students)

8 of 59

Local Indicators: Engagement & School Climate

We met requirements and will continue improving family engagement and school climate

State Priority

Categories

Results

Target

Parental Involvement�& Family Engagement

  • Providing all families with opportunities to provide input on policies and programs, and implementing strategies to reach and seek input from any underrepresented groups in the school community
  • Building the capacity of and supporting family members to effectively engage in advisory groups and decision-making
  • Supporting staff to learn about each family’s strengths, cultures, languages, and goals for their children

Beginning Development

Full Implementation

  • Building relationships between school staff and families
  • Creating welcoming environments for all families in the community
  • Providing families with information and resources to support student learning and development in the home

Initial Implementation

School Climate

% of students who report feeling safe at school, measured by surveys

60%

80%

9 of 59

Visualizing District Vital Signs

A snapshot of vital signs shows positive change when compared to last year

Map Indicators

Satellite Indicators

9

16%

105%

i-Ready Reading

Status Growth

9%

86%

i-Ready Math

Status Growth

90%

+5%

Year to Date Attendance

Status Growth

-99

N/A

ELA CAASPP

DFS Growth

-131

N/A

Math CAASPP

DFS Growth

40%

-11

Chronic Absenteeism

Status Change

Growth numbers are median progress to annual growth goals

Growth compares the current attendance rate to the 2021-22 rate

CAASPP growth data will be available in Summer 2023

Change compares the 2022-23 chronic absenteeism rate to the 2021-22 rate (51%)

Note: 2021-22 average attendance rate was 85%, 2021-22 chronic absenteeism rate was 51%

Sources: i-Ready: i-Ready Diagnostics 1, 2, & 3; YTD Attendance: Infinite Campus as of June 14th; CAASPP Indicators: TOMS; Chronic Absenteeism: Infinite Campus as of June 14

Next year this dashboard will include local indicators

10 of 59

Academic Health

  • English Language Arts
  • Mathematics
  • Language Development
  • Standards Alignment

10

Strategic Priorities 1, 2

11 of 59

Academic Health: Diagnosis

Our multi-tiered needs are flipped

11

1-5%

5-10%

80-90%

What we should be seeing…

…vs. what we are actually seeing

1-5%

80-90%

5-20%

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

12 of 59

Academic Health: Treatment Plan

We believe we must focus on TEAMS, TIME, and TIERED instruction…

To ensure the Academic Health of our students, we believe we must focus on:

  • Building strong Teams
  • Using Time intentionally and strategically, and
  • Planning for, observing, and giving feedback on standards-aligned �Tiered Instruction

12

For the 2023-24 School Year, we will:

  • Create consistent and high capacity team structures at school sites focused on Tiered Instruction (ILT, PLCs, COST, PBIS)
  • Ensure that systems, routines, procedures enable time for teams, planning, site leader observation of instruction, and site leader feedback of instruction
  • Build strong and consistent Tier 1 coherence in ELA and Math (including via a new K-5 ELA curriculum, 2nd year with 6-8 ELA Curriculum, a new K-5 Math curriculum pilot, and Early Learning Cohorts)

13 of 59

Outcome Goals

…which will enable us to achieve our SY 2023-24 outcome goals

13

Literacy

Students are powerful readers�and writers who use literacy across content areas to make meaning�and share their ideas

Students are literate by 3rd grade

Students see themselves as mathematicians and use their skills,�a deep understanding of content, and strong practices in their learning and work

Students are numerate by 3rd grade

Students and staff feel safe at, connected to, and trust the school community, providing them with agency and a sense of belonging

Math

Belonging

underlined text = updates made for SY23-24

14 of 59

English Language Arts�i-Ready Placement and Growth

14

At/Above Grade Level

Early Grade Level

One Year Below

Three or More Years Below

Two Years Below

Source: 2022-23 i-Ready Diagnostics 1, 2, and 3

Progress to Typical Growth:

105%

The median (middle) Ravenswood student completed 105% of their expected growth in reading for the year

Action Steps

  • Train all K-5 Teachers in the new Standards and Science of Reading aligned ELA/ELD Curriculum (recommended adoption CKLA)
  • Train all TK-8 teachers to use SIPPS for Tier 2 ELA foundational skills building
  • Create a clear vision and plan for Early Literacy in TK that aligns with our K-8 scopes and sequence
  • Continue to implement 6-8 ELA/ELD curriculum with fidelity

Results

  • 16% (181 students) of Ravenswood students are early on, at, or above grade level in reading
  • Over half of Ravenswood students (~52%) met or exceeded their reading growth goal

15 of 59

Mathematics�i-Ready Placement and Growth

15

Early Grade Level

One Year Below

Three or More Years Below

Two Years Below

At/Above Grade Level

2%

28 Stu.

Source: 2022-23 i-Ready Diagnostics 1, 2, and 3

Action Steps

  • Continue to build Teacher capacity in Inquiry Based Mathematics Instruction
  • Form a TK-5 Mathematics Adoption committee
  • Use ST Math across the district with fidelity to build foundational numeracy and conceptual knowledge

Results

  • 9% (114 students) of Ravenswood students are early on, at, or above grade level in math
  • Nearly half of Ravenswood students (~47%) met or exceeded their math growth goal

Progress to Typical Growth:

86%

The median (middle) Ravenswood student completed 86% of their expected growth in math for the year

16 of 59

English Language Development�ELPAC Testing and Reclassification

16

Last year, 9% of of students who took the ELPAC scored a 4

Action Steps

  • Prioritize the reclassification of students who score a 4 on the ELPAC
  • Offer multiple opportunities to meet the basic skills RFEP requirement
  • Streamline the teacher recommendation and parent consultation pieces of the RFEP process
  • This will ensure that as many students as possible reclassify before high school and have the widest possible selection of classes
  • Continue to build Teacher capacity in designated and integrated ELD

Results

  • 86 different staff members spent at least a total of 598 hours individually testing students
  • This is equivalent to one person administering 1:1 ELPAC tests for 92 school days without a break

17 of 59

Belonging �Social / Emotional / Behavioral Health

  • Student Survey
  • Suspension
  • Absenteeism

17

Strategic Priorities 2, 4, and 6

18 of 59

Physical, Mental and Behavioral Health: Diagnosis

Our multi-tiered needs are flipped

18

1-5%

5-10%

80-90%

What we should be seeing…

…vs. what we are actually seeing

1-5%

80-90%

5-20%

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

19 of 59

Student Survey�% of students responding positively to measures of student belonging

19

Action Steps

Tiers

  • 6 week Tier I Culture & Climate Plan
  • PBIS reset district wide
  • Restorative Justice conference this summer

Team & Time

  • District MTSS team bimonthly meeting with site leads
  • Assistant Principal Meetings monthly
  • Collaborative site visits

Results

  • 60% of students feel safe at school
  • 67% of students have a supportive relationship with adults at school
  • 86% of students feel connected

(n = 782)

Source: Spring 2023 Student Survey (Panorama)

20 of 59

Out of School Suspension�% suspension rate (overall, by subgroup)

20

Subgroup

Baseline

2021-22

Target

Overall

4.4%

2.4%

English Learner

3.0%

2.4%

SPED

6.6%

2.4%

Pacific Islander

0.7%

2.4%

Black / African American

16.5%

2.4%

Hispanic / Latino

4.0%

2.4%

Source: SWIS; Infinite Campus (as of June 13, 2023)

Interim

Nov / Mar / Jun

1 / 2.1 / 4%

1 / 1 / 2%

2.3 / 3 / 6%

0.7 / 2 / 4%

4.3 / 10 / 12%

0.9 / 1.5 / 3%

Target

2022-23

2.4%

2.4%

2.4%

2.4%

2.4%

2.4%

Action Steps

Tiers

  • Tier I PBIS re-set
  • COST meetings
  • Listening Campaign with students with special needs and Black/African American Students

Team & Time

  • AP bi monthly meeting
  • MTSS bi monthly meeting
  • School Visits with a MTSS and APs to observe and reflect on the culture

Results

  • Students with Special Needs 3.6% over target
  • Black/African American students: 9.6% over target

Goal: lower suspension rates�AND equity across subgroups

21 of 59

Absenteeism�% chronic absenteeism rate (overall, by subgroup)

21

Data Source: Baseline Data - Infinite Campus 2021-22 School Year; Fall Interim Data - Infinite Campus (as of Nov. 15, 2022); Winter Interim Data - Infinite Campus (as of Mar. 14th); Spring Interim Data - Infinite Campus (as of June 13th)

Subgroup

Baseline

2021-22

Target

Overall

51%

36 / 42 / 40%

English Learner

48%

34 / 40 / 38%

SPED

60%

45 / 47 / 44%

Pacific Islander

68%

40 / 50 / 49%

Black / African American

64%

42 / 46 / 45%

Hispanic / Latino

48%

36 / 40 / 37%

Interim

Nov / Mar / Jun

Target

2022-23

45%

45%

45%

45%

45%

45%

Results

  • Chronically absent = missing 10% of the school year (18 out of 180 days)
  • Most student groups, except for Pacific Islanders, met or beat their attendance targets

Next Steps

  • SARB Resource Fair
  • Targeted plans for students having Tier II and III attendance needs via the COST process
  • PBIS re-set - the more fun and engaging the more our attendance increases

Goal: lower absenteeism rates�AND equity across subgroups

22 of 59

Talent & Engagement

  • Staff Retention
  • Family Engagement

22

Strategic Priorities 3, 4, and 6

23 of 59

Talent

Staff Hiring and Retention

23

Action Steps

  • Continuing workforce development initiatives for staff recruiting
  • Conducting Culture & Climate Survey
  • Incorporating feedback from staff listening campaign in planning for next year

Results

  • 83% completion of RTA staff evaluations (vs. 95% last year)
  • 77% staff retention (vs. 90% last year)
  • Created new Principal selection process, including successful launch of principal recommendation committees, with 100% of open site admin positions filled by the end of the school year
  • Led workforce development initiatives with Early Childhood Collaborative to help identify and recruit early educators with a pipeline program through Reach University
  • Conducted district-wide Listening Campaign
  • Created an End of Year Staff Survey

24 of 59

Family Engagement�% of families who feel they have a good relationship with their child’s teacher

24

Source: Spring 2023 Family Survey – “On a scale of 1-5 (where 5 is the best), how would you rate your relationship with your child’s teacher?”

81% of families feel they have a good (4 or 5) relationship with their child’s teacher

Up from 76%�in Fall 2022

Action Steps

  • Synthesize and reflect on family survey results to inform engagement and outreach efforts for SY 2023-24

Results

  • 81% of families feel they have a good relationship with their child’s teacher (up from 76%)
  • 220 families participated (up from 157 in the Fall, driven by in-person canvassing efforts)

25 of 59

Family Satisfaction�% of parents/guardians who would recommend Ravenswood to others

25

67% of families are very likely (9 or 10) to recommend Ravenswood to others

Up from 64%�in Fall 2022

Action Steps

  • Launching a formal strategic planning process which will prioritize the inclusion of families and community members as co-creators

Results

  • 3% increase in promoters (scores of 9 or 10) vs. Fall
  • NPS increase from 47 to 50

26 of 59

2023-24 Priorities and Practices�Our student-level goals will be supported by our teacher and leadership practices

26

Literacy

Math

Belonging

Student Goals

Teacher Practices (across content)

Leadership Practices

Create culturally responsive and antiracist classroom cultures grounded in trauma-informed restorative practices and clear expectations/routines that prioritize active, joyful, engagement

Work collaboratively with their teams to create a shared vision for student success grounded in the instructional core and align all decisions to this vision

Collaboratively develop distributed leadership structures

Give meaningful, timely feedback to teachers

Build capacity of individuals & teams to implement school systems

Work in professional learning communities focused on instruction

Internalize instructional standards & tasks

Build positive relationships with and among students

27 of 59

Summary

27

Based on our year of checking our Vital Signs, as a district we will:

Teams

Time

Tiers

  • Actively listen, reflect, and root our work in the rich cultures of our students, families & community

X

X

  • Continue creating space to get curious about our data (street, map, and satellite) and use our reflections to inform our practices and decisions

X

X

X

  • Keep equity and rigorous content at the forefront of all decisions on what and how we teach

X

X

  • Create the supporting conditions (supports for learning, aligned systems and policies) in which school instructional leaders, instructional coaches, and teachers thrive and can do their best work in service of our graduate profile

X

X

X

  • Train and enable teachers to use best practices in the Science of Reading, Math and Science inquiry, and Language Development across content

X

  • Integrate social emotional and trauma-informed approaches as the foundation for learning experiences

X

  • Create space to be vulnerable, self-reflective, and create meaning

X

X

28 of 59

Appendix

29 of 59

Our District Data Collection

We collected substantial data across all levels in each Vital Sign / Strategic Priority area

to last year

29

Vital Signs /

Strategic Priorities

Street - Level 3

Map - Level 2

Satellite - Level 1

Academic Health,

Standards Alignment,�& Teacher Practice

  • Shadowing a Student
  • Exit Tickets
  • Classroom Walkthroughs
  • Empathy Interviews
  • Listening Campaign
  • Teacher Survey
  • i-Ready
  • Running Records
  • End of Unit Assessments
  • Report Cards
  • CAASPP
  • CAST
  • ELPAC
  • Reclassification Rates

Belonging and Safety

  • Teacher - Student Interactions
  • Empathy Interviews
  • Listening Campaign
  • Daily/Weekly Attendance
  • Student Surveys
  • Referrals
  • Attendance
  • Chronic Absenteeism
  • Suspensions & Expulsions

Talent (Staff Recruitment & Retention)

  • Listening Campaign
  • Exit Interviews
  • Staff Survey
  • Evaluations
  • Hiring
  • Retention

Family Engagement & Satisfaction

  • Family Survey
  • Family - Staff Interactions
  • Attendance
  • Events Hosted
  • Enrollment Data

30 of 59

Street Data: Our Plan�We are collecting data across all three levels to monitor progress towards our goals

30

Satellite - Level 1

Map - Level 2

Street - Level 3

Frequency

Annually

2-3x each year

Daily

Purpose

Where has the student

been academically?

Where is the student

right now academically?

What do we know about the student’s story, their hopes and dreams, and their current needs?

Specific data we will collect

  • CAASPP scores
  • ELPAC/Reclassification
  • Overall attendance patterns
  • Suspension rates

  • i-Ready data
  • Current daily attendance
  • Engagement data
  • Student work
  • Empathy interviews
  • Classroom observations

Description

Tells an important but incomplete story; illuminates big performance trends, �but does not tell the whole story �of the health of a student

Paints a slightly richer picture�than satellite data alone, but still �does not tell the whole story �of the health of a student

Offers information and clarity on

where students are in their learning; �adds to a complete data story�of the health of a student

“Begin with curiosity: [it] shines a light on the experience of learning and promotes a listening stance by openly inviting the presence of uncertainty, complexity, curiosity, vulnerability, and wonder” - Safir and Dugan

31 of 59

District Report Card & Vital Signs Overview (1 of 2)�Our new data and reporting infrastructure will inform how we can best support our students

31

District Report Card

Vital Signs

We have created a District Report Card that consists of ~30 metrics tied to our Strategic Priorities and overall goals (deep dive on next slide)

The Report Card also includes Vital Sign indicators as our way of tracking progress on a few key metrics throughout the year:

  • Academic Health – iReady data on ELA and Math achievement
  • Belonging – attendance, suspension, and student survey data

Street Data

Our site teams are also collecting Street Data on an ongoing basis as part of our Vital Sign monitoring of student educational health

We have built the infrastructure to collect and monitor our data… �Now it is time to get curious about the root causes and use this information to plan our next steps

“Complex, adaptive work demands constant attunement and responsiveness”- Safir and Dugan

32 of 59

District Report Card & Vital Signs Overview (2 of 2)�We have defined baselines, set targets, and developed interim Vital Signs for our key metrics

32

22-23 Target

(EOY)

For each Strategic Priority we have set multiple Outcome Measures to evaluate our performance

Outcome Measure 1

Outcome Measure 2

Outcome Measure 3

SP 1: Engage students with relevant, rigorous and standards-aligned instruction, supports�and materials

For each Measure we have baseline data, annual targets & interim data to track ongoing progress*

2021-22 Baseline

(BOY)

23-24 Target

24-25 Target

Interim Data and Vital Signs

(~2-3x a year)

*Note: Because several metrics are new this year, not all baseline data is available yet and some future targets will be set after gathering data this year�Furthermore, some metrics are only tracked on an annual basis so no interim data is available – this will be indicated in our reporting

District Report Card

Vital Signs

33 of 59

Overall Mission�Baseline Data, Interim Vital Signs, and EOY Targets

33

Outcome Measure

Baseline (EOY 21-22)

Interim �(Fall ‘22 / Winter ‘23 / Spring ‘23)

Target �(EOY 22-23)

Average CAASPP distance from meeting ELA standards

Interim measure (i-Ready % on target)

-99

NA / 11% / 16%

-84

Average CAASPP distance from meeting math standards

Interim measure (i-Ready % on target)

-131

NA / 4% /

9%

-118

% of EL students increasing at least one ELPAC level

40.2%

No interim �data available (annual only)

54.9%

% of EL students reclassifying as Fluent English Proficient

5.7%

6.0%

% of students who state that they feel safe, connected, AND have an adult that they trust at school

No baseline data available (new metric)

51.5% / 50.0% / 55.2%

No targets yet (gathering data this year)

Source: CAASPP 2021-22, ELPAC 2021-22, Reclassification Data 2021-22, Fall 2022 and Winter 2023 Student Survey

34 of 59

Student Growth - i-Ready Diagnostics

Explore the i-Ready diagnostic growth visualization below

34

Source: i-Ready Diagnostics 1 - 3 (Fall, Winter, and Spring) 2022-23

35 of 59

English Language Arts�i-Ready Placement and Growth

35

Action Steps

  • Train all K-5 Teachers in the new Standards and Science of Reading aligned ELA/ELD Curriculum (recommended adoption CKLA)
  • Train all TK-8 teachers to use SIPPS for Tier 2 ELA foundational skills building
  • Create a clear vision and plan for Early Literacy in TK that aligns with our K-8 scopes and sequence
  • Continue to implement 6-8 ELA/ELD curriculum with fidelity

Results

  • 16% (181 students) of Ravenswood students are at or above grade level in reading
  • Over half of Ravenswood students (~52%) met or exceeded their reading growth goal

Progress to Typical Growth (Median)

At/Above Grade Level

Early Grade Level

One Year Below

Three or More Years Below

Two Years Below

Source: 2022-23 i-Ready Diagnostics 1, 2, and 3

36 of 59

ELA Achievement�Spring i-Ready data shows growth from the Diagnostic baseline this fall

36

Subgroup

(# with diagnostic)

Baseline

Fall 2022

Interim

Spring 2023

Using Fall “on target”

Interim

Spring 2023

Overall

1,238 Students

28%

43%

16%

English Learner

683 Students

19%

28%

7%

SPED

192 Students

14%

22%

5%

Pacific Islander

136 Students

29%

56%

18%

Black / African American

81 Students

30%

36%

22%

Hispanic / Latino

972 Students

26%

42%

15%

i-Ready Diagnostic Reading Data: Grades 1-8

(% on target)

Source: i-Ready Diagnostic 1 Fall 2022, i-Ready Diagnostic 2 Winter 2023; i-Ready Diagnostic 3 Spring 2023

As the school year progresses, we raise the bar for what it means for students to be “on target”

In the fall, students were considered “on target” if their i-Ready Diagnostic placed them On/Above Grade Level or 1 Grade Level Below

For the most recent diagnostic, students were considered “on target” only if they were placed On/Above Grade Level

Fall On Target

Spring On Target

Defining “On Target”

37 of 59

Mathematics�i-Ready Placement and Growth

37

Action Steps

  • Continue to build Teacher capacity in Inquiry Based Mathematics Instruction
  • Form a TK-5 Mathematics Adoption committee
  • Use ST Math across the district with fidelity to build foundational numeracy and conceptual knowledge

Progress to Typical Growth (Median)

Early Grade Level

One Year Below

Three or More Years Below

Two Years Below

At/Above Grade Level

2%

28 Stu.

Source: 2022-23 i-Ready Diagnostics 1, 2, and 3

Results

  • 9% (114 students) of Ravenswood students are at or above grade level in math
  • Nearly half of Ravenswood students (~47%) met or exceeded their math growth goal

38 of 59

Math Achievement�Spring i-Ready data shows growth from the Diagnostic baseline this fall

38

Subgroup

(# with diagnostic)

Baseline

Fall 2022

Interim

Spring 2023

Using Fall “on target”

Interim

Spring 2023

Overall

1,238 Students

20%

42%

9%

English Learner

683 Students

14%

22%

1%

SPED

192 Students

11%

25%

4%

Pacific Islander

136 Students

23%

49%

11%

Black / African American

81 Students

23%

38%

7%

Hispanic / Latino

972 Students

19%

41%

9%

i-Ready Diagnostic Math Data: Grades 1-8

(% on target)

As the school year progresses, we raise the bar for what it means for students to be “on target”

In the fall, students were considered “on target” if their i-Ready Diagnostic placed them On/Above Grade Level or 1 Grade Level Below

For the most recent diagnostic, students were considered “on target” only if they were placed On/Above Grade Level

Fall On Target

Spring On Target

Defining “On Target”

Source: i-Ready Diagnostic 1 Fall 2022, i-Ready Diagnostic 2 Winter 2023; i-Ready Diagnostic 3 Spring 2023

39 of 59

Standards Alignment

39

We have focused on developing a shared mental model of high quality practice in the classroom by:

  • Conducting regular walkthroughs and discussing the instructional core to determine patterns of practice and needs
  • Sending staff, and planning to send more, to the UnboundEd Standards Institute to better understand the elements of GLEAM (Grade Level, Engaging, Affirming, and Meaningful) instruction
  • Reviewing the needs we have determined and making plans for professional learning for the 2023-24 school year

Action Steps

  • Teachers will work in Professional Learning Communities to internalize the purpose of standards and tasks within the lesson/unit, and prepare for frequent "student talk"opportunities that support meaning-making, critical thinking, writing, and academic language practice
  • Leadership will provide meaningful and timely feedback to teachers that support the growth and development of instructional practices

40 of 59

Strategic Priority 2�Baseline Data, Interim Vital Signs, and EOY Targets

40

Outcome Measure

Baseline (EOY 21-22)

Interim �(Fall ‘22 / Winter ‘23 / Spring ‘23)

Target �(EOY 22-23)

% of students who report feeling safe at school

63%

64% / 63% / 60%

80%

% of students who report feeling a high level of school connectedness

57%

87% / 85% / 84%

60%

% suspension rate (= % of students with an aggregate total of one full day of suspension during the school year)

4.4%

1.0% / 2.0% / 4%

2.4%

% of teachers who believe their classrooms and schools are safe and productive learning environments

No baseline data available (new metric)

No interim data available (annual only)

No targets yet (gathering data this year)

Source: CHKS 2021-22 (low sample size), Fall 2022 and WInter 2023 Student Survey, SWIS, Infinite Campus

41 of 59

Out of School Suspensions�% suspension rate (overall, by subgroup and by school)

41

Source: SWIS; Infinite Campus (as of Mar 10, 2023)

Belle Haven

Costano

Los Robles Ronald McNair

Cesar Chavez Ravenswood MS

Districtwide

Overall

0.5% | 0.8%

2/367 | 3/372

1.1% | 3%

4/361 | 10/256

0% | 0%

0/256 | 0/256

5% | 8%

26/529 | 45/536

2.1% | 4%

58/1523

English Learner

0% | 0%

0/212 | 0/212

0% | 2%

0/169 | 4/170

0% | 0%

0/209 | 0/209

3% | 7%

9/275 | 19/272

2% | 2%

9/865 | 19/871

SPED

2% | 2%

1/45 | 1/48

0% | 7%

0/47 | 4/55

0% | 0%

0/26 | 0/26

6% | 9%

6/89 | 8/87

3% | 6%

7/206 | 13/261

Pacific Islander

0% | 0%

0/30 | 0/30

4% | 6%

2/47 | 3/47

0% | 0%

0/1 | 0/1

2% | 5%

1/50 | 3/55

2% | 4%

3/128 | 5/134

Black/African American

0% | 0%

0/23 | 0/23

3% | 3%

1/32 | 1/31

0% | 0%

0/1 | 0/1

24% | 27%

9/37 | 10/37

10% | 12%

10/93 | 11/91

Hispanic/Latino

0.6% | 0.8%

2/296 | 3/372

0.4% | 2%

1/250 | 6/246

0% | 0%

0/238 | 0/238

3.8% | 7%

16/421 | 32/423

1.5% 3%

19/1,216 | 36/1223

42 of 59

Strategic Priority 3�Baseline Data, Interim Vital Signs, and EOY Targets

42

Outcome Measure

Baseline (EOY 21-22)

Interim �(Spring ‘23)

Target �(EOY 22-23)

% of highly-effective* staff / teachers who are retained �(*based on evaluation results and credential status)

90% / N/A¹

No interim �data available (measured on annual basis only)

96% / 87%

% of staff members who are due to be evaluated with a completed evaluation (certificated / classified)

95% / N/A¹

100% / 100%

% of openings filled by first day of instruction

96%

98.5%

% of new hires that are fully credentialed

85%

70%²

% of staff and teachers who are persons of color

51%

N/A

N/A

Source: Evaluations, Credential Status, Employee and Staffing Data

Notes: ¹Classified evaluations were previously done on paper; we are using a new system this year to improve the process and increase completion rates�²Although we exceeded our target last year, based on national trends and the teacher shortage we are keeping the 70% target for this year

43 of 59

Strategic Priority 4�Baseline Data, Interim Vital Signs, and EOY Targets

43

Outcome Measure

Baseline (EOY 21-22)

Interim �(Fall ‘22 / Winter ‘23 / Spring ‘23)

Target �(EOY 22-23)

% of families who feel they have a good relationship with their child’s teacher

No baseline data available (new metric)

76% / NA / 81%

No targets yet (gathering data this year)

% chronic absenteeism rate overall and by subgroups

51%

36% / 42% / 40%

45%

Source: Fall 2022 Family Survey, Infinite Campus (as of Nov 11, 2022)

44 of 59

Absenteeism�% chronic absenteeism rate (overall, by subgroup)

44

Data Source: Baseline Data - Infinite Campus 2021-22 School Year; Fall Interim Data - Infinite Campus (as of Nov. 15, 2022); Winter Interim Data - Infinite Campus (as of Mar. 14th); Spring Interim Data - Infinite Campus (as of June 13th)

Subgroup

Baseline

2021-22

Target

Overall

51%

36 / 42 / 40%

English Learner

48%

34 / 40 / 38%

SPED

60%

45 / 47 / 44%

Pacific Islander

68%

40 / 50 / 49%

Black / African American

64%

42 / 46 / 45%

Hispanic / Latino

48%

36 / 40 / 37%

Interim

Nov / Mar / Jun

Target

2022-23

45%

45%

45%

45%

45%

45%

Context

  • Chronically absent = missing 10% of the school year (today is day 126 so chronically absent is missing 12.6 days)
  • If students are sick, we do ask that they stay home
  • 63.6% of absences this year so far are excused absences (unexcused absences can be a parent not calling)

What actions are we taking to drive this forward?

  • Ed Services and STE will be teaming up to support families with a resource fair instead of traditional SARB
  • Exploring differentiated ways to look at the data to identify trends (e.g., sporadic absences vs. extended absences)
  • Reviewing of absences within COST teams to get to root cause analysis

Goal: lower absenteeism rates�AND equity across subgroups

Jenn context and actions

Numbers updated

45 of 59

Student Survey Results - Grade Level�Across all survey categories, students in higher grades responded less positively than students in lower grades

45

Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students

District Average

782

3rd Grade

102

4th Grade

132

5th Grade

145

6th Grade

78

7th Grade

95

8th Grade

87

Cultural Representation

Engagement

Sense of Belonging

School Climate

School Safety

Supportive Relationships

Group Size

46 of 59

Student Survey Results - EL Enrollment�Our “English Only” feel less represented and less belonging compared to peers

46

Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students

District Average

782

English Only

146

RFEP

107

EL

354

IFEP

25

Cultural Representation

Engagement

Sense of Belonging

School Climate

School Safety

Supportive Relationships

Group Size

Note: The group sizes do not total to the district average because some students completed the non-disaggregated version of the survey for technical reasons.

47 of 59

Student Survey Results - Gender�There are differences between male and female students across several categories

47

District Average

782

Male

334

Female*

305

Cultural Representation

Engagement

Sense of Belonging

School Climate

School Safety

Supportive Relationships

Group Size

Note: The female student group includes one student identifying as non-binary. To protect this student’s privacy, but also include their voice, Panorama included them in the female student group.

Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students

48 of 59

Student Survey Results - Students with Disabilities�Students with 504 Plans and enrolled in Special Education classes responded differently to the survey

48

Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students

District Average

782

504 Plan

15

Special Education

90

Cultural Representation

Engagement

Sense of Belonging

School Climate

School Safety

Supportive Relationships

Group Size

49 of 59

CCRMS Survey Results - Race and Ethnicity�Black/African American students at CCRMS responded less positively than their peers

49

Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students

CCRMS Average

403

Black/African American

15

Hispanic

207

Multiracial

5

Pacific Islander

28

Asian American and White

5

Cultural Representation

Engagement

Sense of Belonging

School Climate

School Safety

Supportive Relationships

Group Size

50 of 59

Costano Survey Results - Race and Ethnicity�Disaggregating by Race/Ethnicity shows differences at Costano

50

Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students

Costano Average

134

Black/African American

9

Hispanic

91

Multiracial

6

Pacific Islander

23

Asian American

5

Cultural Representation

Engagement

Sense of Belonging

School Climate

School Safety

Supportive Relationships

Group Size

51 of 59

Belle Haven Survey Results - Race and Ethnicity�Disaggregating by Race/Ethnicity shows differences at Belle Haven

51

Source: Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) for 3rd-8th grade students

Belle Haven Average

160

Hispanic

130

Pacific Islander

16

Black/African American, Multiracial, and White

14

Cultural Representation

Engagement

Sense of Belonging

School Climate

School Safety

Supportive Relationships

Group Size

52 of 59

Strategic Priority 5�Baseline Data, Interim Vital Signs, and EOY Targets

52

Source: Year-End Actuals 21-22

Outcome Measure

Baseline (EOY 21-22)

Interim �(Spring ‘23)

Target �(EOY 22-23)

% variance between adopted budget and actual spending (general fund)

1.6%

No interim �data available (measured on annual basis only)

10%

% of departmental budget codes with actual spending within 5% of adopted budget

0%

25%

% of district budget owners reporting they know how to access, manage and own their budget

No baseline data available (new metric)

90%

% of staff who believe we are managing people, time and budget responsibly, equitably and strategically in service of students

No targets yet (gathering data this year)

% of staff who believe our facilities meet the needs of students, staff and families

53 of 59

Strategic Priority 6�Baseline Data, Interim Vital Signs, and EOY Targets

53

Source: Fall 2022 Family Survey, Fall 2022 Student Survey�Notes: ¹The Fall sticker survey was done for TK-1st classes and a few 2nd grade classes; in the Winter and Spring the survey was expanded to all 2nd grade classes

Outcome Measure

Baseline (EOY 21-22)

Interim �(Fall ‘22 / Winter ‘23 / Spring ‘23)

Target �(EOY 22-23)

% of parents who would recommend Ravenswood to others

No baseline data available (new metric)

64% / NA / 67%

No targets yet (gathering data this year)

% of TK-2nd grade students who are happy to be at their school1

75% / 70% / 73%

% of 3rd-8th grade students who are happy to be at their school

65% / 63% / 60%

% of staff who would recommend Ravenswood to others

No interim �data available (annual only)

54 of 59

Parent Satisfaction�% of parents/guardians who would recommend Ravenswood to others

54

Net Promoter Score Calculation

What actions are we taking to drive this forward?

  • Launching a formal strategic planning process which will prioritize the inclusion of families and community members as co-creators

Source: Spring 2023 Family Survey – “How likely are you to recommend Ravenswood to a friend/colleague?”

Net Promoter Score Calculation

67% of families are very likely (9 or 10) to recommend Ravenswood to others

Promoters (9 or 10)

=

67%

Detractors (0 to 6)

=

17%

Overall NPS

=

50

Up from 64%�in Fall 2022

Up from 47 in Fall 2022

55 of 59

Engagement Initiatives

55

While we work to ensure our current families are happy to be at Ravenswood, we are also working in parallel on engagement initiatives so that even more families and community partners #ChooseRavenswood

Here are some updates on our enrollment efforts:

  • Held a district-wide enrollment event in May
  • Hosted site tours and kindergarten classroom visits across school campuses in May/June
  • Connected with local preschools to build relationships and pipelines into kindergarten
  • In the process of planning a Countdown to Kindergarten event for August 12

Here are some updates on our community partnerships:

  • Held a community partners year-end wrap up event in early June
  • Conducted a partnership survey in May/June so we can continue to improve our relationships with partner orgs

56 of 59

Student Satisfaction�% of TK-2nd grade students who are happy to be at their school

56

Source: Fall, Winter, and Spring 2023 Student Surveys (Posters for TK-2nd) – “How are you feeling about school today?” / “How was your day today?”�Note: Expanded sticker posters to all 2nd grade classrooms (many of which had previously used Panorama)

Key Takeaways

  • ~73% of TK-2nd graders reported feeling happy about school (averaged across both mornings and afternoons)
  • Some teachers noted feeling sick and missing friends as reasons for feeling sad

Spring Average: 75% happy

Spring Average: 71% happy

Teachers were asked to survey students via stickers on posters at the start and end of the day over a two-day period

57 of 59

Student Satisfaction�% of 3rd-8th grade students who are happy to be at their school

57

Source: Fall, Winter, and Spring 2022-23 Student Surveys (Panorama) – “Are you happy to be at this school?”

Key Takeaways

  • ~70%+ of elementary schoolers are happy to be at school, compared to 47% of middle schoolers
  • This survey happened after right after CAASPP and i-Ready testing, which could have affected the results
  • Student happiness at Belle Haven fell by 15 percentage points compared to the Winter survey

Winter Average: ~63% of students are happy at their school most or all of the time

(n = 782)

58 of 59

Theory of Action

We are developing a theory of action for district and school leaders in SY 2023-24

58

DRAFT

59 of 59

2023-24 Priorities and Practices

59

Student level goals

Every student fully engages critically and creatively in their education with the skills and mindset necessary to successfully fulfill their unique potential.

Students are literate by 3rd grade. Students are powerful readers and writers who use literacy across content areas to make meaning and share their ideas

Students are numerate by 3rd grade. Students see themselves as mathematicians and use their skills, a deep understanding of content, and strong practices in their learning and work

Students and staff feel safe at, connected to, and trust the school community, providing them with agency and a sense of belonging

Teacher priority practices

(across content)

Teachers create culturally responsive and antiracist classroom cultures grounded in trauma-informed/restorative practices and clear expectations/routines that prioritize active, joyful, engagement

Teachers work in professional learning communities to internalize the standards and curriculum and design Tier 1 Instructional experiences that are aligned with grade level standards, are engaging, are affirming, and are meaningful

Teachers internalize the purpose of standards and tasks within the lesson/unit, and prepare for frequent "student talk"opportunities that support meaning-making, critical thinking, writing, and academic language practice

Teachers build positive relationships with and among our students to create the conditions for learning

Leadership Practices

Leaders work collaboratively with their teams to create a shared vision for student success grounded in the instructional core (standards-aligned, engaging, inquiry-driven and student-focused instruction with relevant high-quality materials and collaborative classroom talk), and align all decisions to this vision

School Leadership collaboratively develops distributive leadership structures that are focused on the academic, social, emotional, and physical health of students i

Leadership provides meaningful and timely feedback to teachers that support the growth and development of instructional practices

School Leadership collaborates with and builds capacity of individuals and teams to implement school systems, including PLCs that ensure strong relationships with teachers, standards/ curriculum, task, and students and between adults and students, and a sense of belonging for all students in service of the school’s vision for learning