Urgent Start Peritoneal Dialysis
Bharat Sachdeva M.D.
Associate Professor Medicine
Fellowship Program Director
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension
LSUHSC, Shreveport LA
bsachd@lsuhsc.edu
Disclaimer
Case 1
Case 1 : LABS
Uremic? Yes
Need RRT? Yes
What Modality?..
Case 2
What are the Options for our patients
What are the Options for our patients
Adjusted first-year hospital admission rates & days (from day 90) in matched incident hemodialysis & peritoneal dialysis patients�Figure 3.7 (Volume 2)
Incident hemodialysis & peritoneal dialysis patients age 20 & older.
Adj: age/gender/race/primary diagnosis; ref: USRDS 2005 incident hemodialysis & peritoneal dialysis patients.
Cumulative incidence of Bacteremia or septicemia over time in the Wave 2 population
Kidney Int. 2005; 68: 311-318.
What are the Options for my patients
YES
What are the Options for my patients
United States Renal Data Report 2013
Total Medicare ESRD expenditures �per person per year, by modality
$ 87,945
$ 71,630
$ 32,922
Figure 11.7 (Volume 2) USRDS 2013 ADR
Comprehensive education is vital
Hemodialysis
Peritoneal dialysis
Golper T. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16(suppl):20-24.
Benefits of Urgent-Start PD
Urgent Start PD
CKD patient who will need RRT within TWO WEEKS of placement of the PD catheter
Therapy is initiated with SUPINE/LOW VOLUME for a period of two weeks until the Cuff is well healed
Dialysis centers are not equipped to deal with unstable Uremic patients (Volume, Hyperkalemia, Uremic…..)
Selecting the right patients is imperative to the overall success of the program
CHOICES��Open Surgical�Laparoscopic �Fluoroscopic/Peritoneoscopic
STEPS-FLUOROSCOPIC PLACEMENT
https://www.youtube.com/user/LSUNEPHROLOGY
USE THE LINK BELOW TO VIEW A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF FLUROSCOPIC INSERTION
Catheter Placement
Abdominal Incision
Blunt dissection to anterior rectus sheath
Local lidocaine anesthesia into skin and subcutaneous tissues
Abdominal WALL
Aponeurosis of abdominal
muscles
Anterior rectus sheath
Posterior rectus sheath
Linea alba
Rectus muscle
Subcutaneous fat (fascia)
Facliform ligament
Transversalis fascia
Peritoneum
Blunt Dissection
Anterior Rectus Sheath
Rectus Sheath
Anterior rectus sheath
Posterior rectus sheath
Rectus muscle
Peritoneum
Inferior epigastric artery
Inferior epigastric artery
Ultrasound guided entry into peritoneum
Fluoroscopic and Sonographic Guidance to Place Peritoneal Catheters: How We Do It. AJR 2009; 192:1085-1089
Radio contrast Injection
The radio contrast outlines the bowel and puddles in the pelvis
Introduce 0.035 glide wire into the abdomen; easy entry and looping of the wire in the pelvis is seen
Radio contrast Injection
The radio contrast outlines the bowel and puddles in the pelvis
Introduce 0.035 glide wire into the abdomen; easy entry and looping of the wire in the pelvis is seen
Radio contrast Injection
The radio contrast outlines the bowel and puddles in the pelvis
Introduce 0.035 glide wire into the abdomen; easy entry and looping of the wire in the pelvis is seen
Radio contrast Injection
The radio contrast outlines the bowel and puddles in the pelvis
Introduce 0.035 glide wire into the abdomen; easy entry and looping of the wire in the pelvis is seen
Radio contrast Injection
The radio contrast outlines the bowel and puddles in the pelvis
Introduce 0.035 glide wire into the abdomen; easy entry and looping of the wire in the pelvis is seen
Graded Dilation over Glide Wire
Sequential dilation over wire from 12F to 18F
Finally introduce the 18F dilator with the peel-away sheath
Insertion of catheter
The PD catheter is introduced over the glide wire
Insertion of Catheter
Catheter loop is confirmed to fall in the pelvis
Purse String Suture
Purse String Suture
Retrospective review of medical charts of 89 patients with fluoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters from 2000 to 2012 to review intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications. All patients with Fluoroscopic PDC placement were included in the study. Patients with prior extensive abdominal surgery, bowel resection and morbid obesity were excluded from the study. Intra-operative complications were defined as bowel/bladder perforation, bleeding/ hematoma, acute abdomen, procedure abandonment, any complication requiring higher level of care or surgical intervention, and death. Immediate postoperative complications were defined as those occurring within 24 hours after PDC placement.
Timely placement of Peritoneal Dialysis catheter (PDC) remains a major hurdle for patients starting Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) and has spurred the growth of non-surgical PD catheter placement. Techniques of catheter placement differ in required resources, selection criteria, procedure anesthesia, procedure complications, postoperative recovery time, and cost amongst others. Fluoroscopic PDC placement have equivalent outcomes and has been increasingly used. A single center review of immediate complications of Fluoroscopic PDC placement is presented here.
Intra-operative complications: bowel/bladder perforation, intra-peritoneal/abdominal hematoma, acute abdomen, procedure failure from any cause, any complication requiring higher level of care, and death.
Immediate post-op complications: those occurring within 24 hours after PDC placement and included catheter flow dysfunction, fluid leak, acute abdomen, or any complication necessitating open laparotomy or surgical laparoscopic intervention, and death.
FLUOROSCOPIC PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT
AN OUTPATIENT PROCEDURE
Ishwinder Sidhu, M.D., Mukesh Sharma, M.D., Kenneth Abreo, M.D., Bharat Sachdeva, M.D.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
Background
Definitions
Purpose of the Study
Conclusions
Results
To assess the risk of immediate complications associated with fluoroscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters with an aim to evaluate if this procedure can be safely performed in an out patient setting.
Patients and Methods
Procedure
COMPLICATION | INTRA-OP n (%) | IMMEDIATE POST OP (%) |
Bowel Puncture | 2 (2.2) | 0 |
Bladder Perforation | 0 (0.0) | 0 |
Bleeding/Hematoma | 1 (1.1) | 0 |
Failure of placement of PDC under fluro | 4 (4.5) | |
Fluoroscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter placement is a safe procedure and has a high technical success rate. Intra-Op complications are minimal; bowel puncture can be prevented using a blunt tip needle for peritoneal entry. Patients can be discharged once recovered from procedure sedation analgesia.
Number of patients | 89 |
Mean Age, years | 46.5 |
Gender, N (%) | M-52, F-46 |
Race, N (%) African American | AA-54,C-46 |
Mean eGFR, ml/min | 10.16 ± 4.7 |
Mean Se. Creatinine, mg/dL | 7.55 |
Total PD Catheter Attempted | 89 |
Succesfully Placement | 85 |
Success Rate (%) | 95.5 |
Table 1 : Demographics
Table 2 : Complications
Table 3 : Procedure Success Rate
LSU-Shreveport Experience Fluoroscopy (NKF 2012)
| Insertion | Number: time | LEAKS | Complications |
Song JH PDI 2000 | Neph Blind Trocar PS | 21: Low vol 13 days 38: 2000 cc | 9.5% 10.5% | 66% (1m) 55% |
Banli O PDI 2005 | Percutaneous | 41: Low vol, 6 days | 4.8% | 17% (1m) |
Povlsen J NDT 2006 | Open Surgical | 52: Low vol 88: start >14 days | 7.7% 0 | 29% (3m) 7.7% |
Jo YI PDI 2007 | Percutaneous; PS | 51: Low vol, Day 0 | 1.9% | 23% (1m) |
Yang Et al. 2011 | Surgical PS | 226: <14 d 84: >14 d | 2.2% 2.4% | 14.6% (6m) 13.1% |
Ghaffari A AJKD 2012 | Percutaneous | 1: Low vol for 14 d 2: start>14d | 33% 11% | |
Casaretto A APD 2012 | Laparoscopic PS (2) | 11: Low vol for 14 d | 0 | 9% (1m) |
R: Randomized; P Prospective; PS: Purse string suture
Five patients who were declared ESRD were selected for this study. Patients were educated on the merits of different dialysis modalities by their Nephrologist and selected PD over HD. Of these Three patients underwent EPD and Two patients underwent UPD. Indications for EPD and UPD are listed in Table 2.
Two EPD and one UPD patients received 1-3 HD treatments through a temporary CVC prior to PDC placement for indications listed in Table 1. Interventional Nephrologists placed Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters within 48 hours of patients choice of PD. All catheters were placed using the modified Seldinger’s technique under fluoroscopy and Procedure Sedation Analgesia(Conscious Sedation). A purse string suture was placed in the anterior rectus sheath encircling the catheter to prevent PD fluid leak in some patients. Patients resumed renal diet within 2 hours post procedure. Low volume (1 liter) exchanges were used with the patient in supine position within 24 hrs in EPD patients and within 2 weeks in UPD patients. Patients were followed in the outpatient PD clinic after discharge for continuation of low volume exchanges and PD training. Regular volume exchanges were started within a month of Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in all patients.
In the US, 60-80% incident ESRD patients start hemodialysis (HD) with a central venous catheter (CVC), resulting in an unacceptably high morbidity and mortality associated with catheter related infections/inflammation. Selecting Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) as the initial dialysis modality may be an excellent CVC avoidance strategy in selected patients and may help decrease both morbidity and mortality.
We describe a case series of newly declared ESRD patients without established Arterio-Venous dialysis access, who were initiated on peritoneal dialysis as their initial modality for chronic dialysis.
Emergent Peritoneal Dialysis (EPD): Starting Peritoneal Dialysis immediately (24-48 h) after PD catheter (PDC) placement
Urgent Peritoneal Dialysis (UPD): Starting Peritoneal Dialysis after 48 hours but within 2 weeks of PDC placement.
Emergent and Urgent Peritoneal Dialysis
instead of Hemodialysis with a Central Venous Catheter
Background
Definitions
Purpose of the Study
Conclusions
Table 2: Demographics
Emergent or Urgent PD should be considered in all incident ESRD patients and chronic PD catheter can be placed using minimally invasive technique in an interventional suite. Low volume exchanges in supine position, within 24 hours of PD catheter placement are well tolerated without early leak. Tunneled dialysis catheters can this way be avoided in incident ESRD patients without established Arterio-Venous Access. PDC insertion at short notice is a sine qua non for EPD and UPD.
To demonstrate that Peritoneal Dialysis can be safely used as a choice of dialysis modality in emergent and urgent settings in carefully selected and appropriate patients. This approach avoids placement of Tunneled central venous catheters in ESRD patients without a working vascular access at the time of initiation of dialysis.
Patients and Methods
*One HD treatment for Hyperkalemia each, †HD for 3 days for volume overload,
AA=African American, W=White
Table 1: Laboratory Data
Pre-PD= before start of PD/HD; Discharge=hospital day of discharge, * One HD treatment for Hyperkalemia each, †HD for 3 days for volume overload
# | PD Type | Age (years) | Race | Gender | Baseline eGFR (ml/min) | Indication |
1 | EPD | 30 | AA | Male | 4 | Uremia |
2* | EPD | 62 | AA | Male | 11 | Hyperkalemia |
3* | EPD | 57 | AA | Female | 8 | Hyperkalemia |
4 | UPD | 21 | AA | Female | 10 | Uremia |
5† | UPD | 62 | W | Female | 11 | Volume |
Patient # | Pre-PD Creatinine (mg/dL) | Discharge Creatinine (mg/dL) | Pre-PD BUN (mg/dL) | Discharge BUN (mg/dL) | Pre-PD Potassium (mmol/L) | Discharge Potassium (mmol/L) | Pre-PD Bicarbonate (mmol/L) | Discharge Bicarbonate (mmol/L) |
1 | 19.5 | 16.5 | 139 | 92 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 18 | 27 |
2* | 6.4 | 6.8 | 53 | 51 | 6.3 | 4.9 | 25 | 25 |
3* | 4.7 | 5.2 | 63 | 60 | 5.5 | 4.8 | 17 | 23 |
4 | 6.7 | 5.7 | 123 | 64 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 25 | 25 |
5† | 3.5 | 3.2 | 58 | 44 | 5.8 | 5.4 | 33 | 24 |
Mukesh Sharma, M.D., M.S., Kenneth Abreo, M.D., Bharat Sachdeva, M.D.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
What the Options for my patients
Outpatient training/exchanges
Urgent Start: PD Prescription
Conclusions