1 of 7

���Shielding Solutions to Radiation Exposure Effects: A Preventive Step for Radiation Protection

Submitted By

Kuldeep Kumar (10PP23J32005)

Bandla Siva Rama Koteswara Rao (10PP23J32008)

Kuldeep (10PP23J32001)

Satyendra Pratap Singh(10CC22J32004)

Era Kumari (10CC23J32001)

CSIR- National Physical Laboratory (NPL), New Delhi

2 of 7

Introduction

Radiation Effects and Problems:-

Increasing the utilization of radiations including x-rays and gamma rays in hospitals and research centers for diagnostic and therapeutic applications, create adverse biological effects. Cell phones emit radiofrequency (RF) radiation from wireless internet and cellular connections, while the batteries emit extremely low-frequency radiation. Certain body parts, such as the head and torso, are much more vulnerable to EMF emissions than the arms and legs.

  • Damage to DNA
  • Negative Effects on Brain Activity
  • Increased Risk of Cancer
  • Impaired Fertility
  • Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS)
  • Oxidative Stress and Sleep Changes

3 of 7

Three principles for radiation safety:-

Time

Distance

Shielding

Choosing the Right Radiation Shielding Material: Deciding Factors

  • Type of radiation present
  • Environmental Conditions
  • Attenuation strength
  • Flexibility of a material
  • Cost of a material

4 of 7

Proposed Shielding Materials

  • Metal impregnated polymers: Polymers that have amorphous structures, like polycarbonate, PMMA, polystyrene, mixed with Bismuth, Tungsten or iron are better choices for making homogeneous nanocomposites and non-toxic alternative.
  • Spinel ferrite nanoparticles (NPs) are less costly and less toxic than lead, plays an important role in designing of new generation shielding materials.
  • Ex: Mn, Zn, Ni - ferrite NPs.
  • Doping with metallic elements may also increase the shielding efficiency.

Properties of common materials used for radiation shielding

Material

Density (g/cm3)

Linear Attenuation Coefficient for 200 KeV gamma-rays

Nature

Lead

11.34

0.992

Toxic

Bismuth Oxide

8.90

0.933

Non-toxic

Tungsten Oxide

7.16

0.647

Non-toxic

Barite

4.48

0.288

Non-toxic

5 of 7

Methodology for Synthesis

Fig. In situ and melt intercalation synthesis techniques for nano composites

Fig. Co-precipitation method for nanoparticles

6 of 7

Impact: ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) is a motive that strives to reduce the exposure time to ionizing radiation to people and the environment while considering the economics, technology and social factors.

References:

1. Mehrara, R., Malekie, S., Kotahi, S. M. S., & Kashian, S. (2021). Introducing a novel low energy gamma ray shield utilizing Polycarbonate Bismuth Oxide composite. Scientific Reports11(1), 10614.

2. Reddy, B. C., Manjunatha, H. C., Vidya, Y. S., Manjunatha, S., Sridhar, K. N., Seenappa, L., ... & Thirunavukkarasu, V. (2023). Spinel manganese nanoferrite for X-ray/gamma radiation shielding, display and antimicrobial applications. Physica B: Condensed Matter661, 414835.

3. More, C. V., Alsayed, Z., Badawi, M. S., Thabet, A. A., & Pawar, P. P. (2021). Polymeric composite materials for radiation shielding: a review. Environmental chemistry letters19, 2057-2090.

4. Lokhande, R. M., Vinayak, V., Mukhamale, S. V., & Khirade, P. P. (2021). Gamma radiation shielding characteristics of various spinel ferrite nanocrystals: a combined experimental and theoretical investigation. RSC advances11(14), 7925-7937.

7 of 7