1 of 34

Sustainable community fuel breaks�for social-ecological resilience �to northern wildfires

Working group supported by

MORPHO program at NCEAS

Santa Barbara, CA

Jill Johnstone, Lead

Research Associate

University of Alaska Fairbanks

Michelle Mack, Co-Lead

Regents Professor

Northern Arizona University

 

2 of 34

3 of 34

4 of 34

5 of 34

Photo: D. Rees

Photo: D. Rees

6 of 34

Photo: M. Mack

7 of 34

Problem Statement

  1. Fire seasons are expanding
  2. We need to take proactive measures
  3. Installing fuel breaks is one option

- BUT -

Fuel breaks are expensive, with unintended side effects, and sometimes unwelcome to locals

Is there a better path forward?

8 of 34

Fuel breaks are opportunities for co-benefits

Designing Wildfire Fuelbreaks with Co-Benefits for Communities

8

Photo by Kira Wilkinson

9 of 34

Partners

Tanana Chiefs Conference

City of Eagle, AK

Government of the Yukon Territories

Alaska Fire Science Consortia

Collaborators

UAA Institute of Social and Economic Research

USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station WiRē Team

US Fish and Wildlife Service, US Park Service

BLM and AK Interagency Fire Management

 

10 of 34

Potential Scenarios of Co-Benefits

FIRE FOCUS

ECOLOGICAL CONVERSION

FOOD & SUBSISTENCE

INFRASTRUCTURE & RECREATION

11 of 34

Fire Focus

  • Education, research, and demonstration sites
  • Focus on fire protection
  • Re-treatment is part of process
  • Train new firefighters and education the public
  • Fire science and management research

12 of 34

Education and training

A place for learning about boreal forests and fire

13 of 34

Education & Training

A place for workforce development and professional training

14 of 34

Ecological Conversions

  • Aspen and birch are less flammable than spruce and pines
  • Natural vegetation can slow or reduce fire spread
  • Maintains natural ecosystems and their services

15 of 34

  • What controls post-treatment fuel composition and ecological impacts, such as forest health?

  • Which management actions nudge successional processes to promote the growth of fire-resistant deciduous trees?

  • How will these novel successional trajectories shape future fuels and forests?

NAU graduate students Nicholas Link and Jonas Noomah

Ecological research for the design of living fuel breaks

16 of 34

Photo by Betsy Black

Photo by Nick Link

17 of 34

Photo by Nick Link

Photo by Doug Younce

Photo by Nick Link

18 of 34

19 of 34

Photo by L.Bibeau

20 of 34

Enhancing Food and Subsistence Resources

  • Native forage species can be encouraged to grow in open spaces
  • Trails improve access to foraging resources
  • Agricultural use of more open spaces supports food security
  • Use maintains fuel break

21 of 34

Ka’a’gee Tu First Nation

Fuel Break Food Forest

22 of 34

Photos: C. Johnston

23 of 34

Berry Production in Vaccinium spp. in Response to Fuel Reduction Treatments in Interior Alaska

Felecia Amundsen

fa598@nau.edu

Photo by F. Amundsen

24 of 34

Treatments

Mechanical treatment

Shaded hand-thinned treatment

Photo by F. Amundsen

25 of 34

Vaccinium vitis-idaea

Vaccinium uliginosum

26 of 34

Goals

  • Drivers that influence berry production
  • Species response towards human induced disturbances
  • Aid in developing management plans to increase ecosystem services

27 of 34

Infrastructure and Recreation

  • Developing lands with open spaces
  • Support necessary infrastructure or recreation
  • Potential for public-private partnerships
  • Use maintains fuel break

28 of 34

Campbell Tract, Anchorage

Fuel break & recreational trails

Photo: N. Lojewski

Photo: S. Justin

29 of 34

Photo: https://www.alltrails.com/trail/us/alaska/campbell-airstrip-loop

30 of 34

31 of 34

Integrating multiple co-benefits

Human health & wellbeing

Wildlife habitat

Berries & forage plants

Non-motorized recreation

Soil erosion stability

Research & Education

Wood & Fibre

Gardens & agriculture

Motorized recreation

Self-sustaining natural systems

Hunting

Community engagement

32 of 34

Wildfire risk mitigation in Teslin, Yukon

Timber Harvest Plan developed to jointly manage for wood harvest and fire risk mitigation

Phase 1: FireSmart retreatments

Phase 2: Thinning, Community FireSmart

Phase 3: THP stand conversion

Fuel break?

THP Op Units

Study blocks

33 of 34

34 of 34

Ongoing research: exploring leverage points for change�

MORPHO Working Group

Case studies