1 of 34

Project 180: Smart Clothing for Kinematic and Dynamic Movements

Advisor: Professor Bunch

Client: Professor Tron

Gabrielle Bartolomei

Andrew Chen

Izabell Garcia

Wes Yan

Ilyoung Yang

May 2nd, 2025

2 of 34

Project 180

2

¼ Elderly individuals fall each year

3 million Emergency room visits

1 million hospitalizations

3 of 34

Project 180

The Problem

3

Previous Solutions: Computer Vision and EM systems → intrusive and require complex set up

The need: accurate, monitoring of mobility decline in elderly patients outside of a controlled environment

The Process:

Embed sensors

Data collection and storage

Evaluate accuracy of system

Integration of data to create postural pose

4 of 34

Project 180

Customer Requirements and Specifications

4

Professor Tron’s Research:

Elderly stroke patients would have trouble moving their limbs. This trouble could lead to further injury and health complications in the future. Solved by using a deep learning camera and electrostimulation suits equided with accelerometers to help reduce muscle atrophy

Focuses to make system more user friendly and accessible:

Battery Life

Charging Time

Calibration

Durability

System Storage Capacity

Set up Time

Accuracy of Joint Angle Measurement Accuracy of Movement Speed

Pitfalls

  • Privacy/Invasive
  • Improper use of equipment
  • Accessibility
  • Environment Diversity

Benefits

  • Accurate Data
  • Instantaneous Response
  • Retain Muscle Memory
  • Personalization

5 of 34

Project 180

5

Conceptual Design Summary

Bendlab

IMU

ESP-32

BendLab:

  • 4, outside of both knees and hips
  • Returns an angle

IMU BN055:

  • 1, center of lower back
  • Returns angular velocity, acceleration, and orientation

ESP 32:

  • 1, located in pocket on left upper thigh
  • Programmable light user interface

Battery Compartment

Esp32 and SD Card Compartment

Hole for User interface Light System

Housing:

6 of 34

Project 180

6

Conceptual Design Summary

Concept 1: Harness Concept 2: Leggings Concept 3: Compression Socks

7 of 34

Project 180

7

Prototype Generation:

Components:

  • 4 BendLab
  • 1 IMU
  • 1 Control Housing

Fabrication:

  • Flat-felled seeming
  • Zigzag stitch
  • Removable backing

Alterations:

  • Velcro straps and pockets
  • Belt loops
  • Fabric Flap secured via velcro and snap buttons

8 of 34

Project 180

8

Prototype Generation

9 of 34

Project 180

9

Prototype Generation: Sensor Array

Final Sensor Implementation

Housing and User Interface

Final Prototype Assembly

10 of 34

Project 180

10

Prototype Evaluation: Ground Truth Testing

Testing Setup:

ACL Brace placed over Bendlab Sensor to compare joint angle measurements

11 of 34

Project 180

11

Prototype Evaluation: Functionality Tests

Sit to Stand Test

  • Sit Position
    • Knee Angle

~ 70°- 100°

    • Hip Angle

~ 35°

  • Stand Position
    • Knee Angle

~ 20°

    • Hip Angle

~ 20°

12 of 34

Project 180

12

Prototype Evaluation: Functionality Tests

Walking Test

  • Dynamic motion easily visualized

  • Knee and Hip angles coincide

  • Consistent angle readings in motion

13 of 34

Project 180

13

Prototype Evaluation: Prolonged Activity

IMU Orientation Angle Over Time

Flexion/Extension Angles

14 of 34

Project 180

14

Deliverables and Achievements

Long Battery Life

12 hours ~ 40%

Quick Calibration

~2 seconds

Easy to remove and charge battery

~5 seconds

Robust Data Storage

16 Gigabytes

Accurate Bend Angle Measurement

+/- 5 degrees

Minimal System Drift

BendLab: <1 degree

IMU: ~10 degrees

15 of 34

Project 180

15

Takeaways and Recommendations

01

Improve mechanical protection of BendLab sensors and connection robustness

02

Strengthen waterproofing through sealed housing, embedded electronics, or coatings to allow for pre-positioned sensors

03

Pre-positioned sensors would decrease user error, increase ease of use, and increase accuracy of measurements

BendLab sensors are highly sensitive

Long setup time and specific sensor placement

Modular design allows for greater precision than accuracy

16 of 34

Questions?

Thank You

Professor Bunch

Professor Tron

Nick Rudh

BU Soft Robotics Control Lab

Project 180

16

17 of 34

Citations

[1] McArdle, W.D.; Katch, F.I.; Katch, V.L. “Essentials of Exercise Physiology;” Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2006.

[2] Edriss, S.; Romagnoli, C.; Caprioli, L.; Zanela, A.; Panichi, E.; Campoli, F.; Padua, E.; Annino, G.; Bonaiuto, V. “The Role of Emergent Technologies in the Dynamic and Kinematic Assessment of Human Movement in Sport and Clinical Applications.” Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14031012

[3] Tan, Emily. “Roberto Tron: Redefining Health Care for Aging America.” College of Engineering Roberto Tron Redefining Health Care for Aging America Comments, Sept. 2024.

[4] Jones CH, Dolsten M. Healthcare on the brink: navigating the challenges of an aging society in the United States. NPJ Aging. 2024 Apr 6;10(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41514-024-00148-2. Erratum in: NPJ Aging. 2024 May 10;10(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41514-024-00153-5. PMID: 38582901; PMCID: PMC10998868.

[5] Tron, Roberto. Customer Interview. Interview by G. Bartolomei, A. Chen, I. Garcia, W. Yan, I. Yang, 24 Sept. 2024. Personal interview.

[6] Mesquita, Inês Albuquerque, Pedro Filipe Pereira da Fonseca, Ana Rita Vieira Pinheiro, Miguel Fernando Paiva Velhote Correia, and Cláudia Isabel Costa da Silva. 2019. “Methodological Considerations for Kinematic Analysis of Upper Limbs in Healthy and Poststroke Adults Part II: A Systematic Review of Motion Capture Systems and Kinematic Metrics.” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 26 (6): 464–72. doi:10.1080/10749357.2019.1611221.

[7] Samatas, G.G.; Pachidis, T.P. “Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) in Mobile Robots over the Last Five Years: A Review”. Designs 2022, 6, 17. doi.org/10.3390/designs6010017

[8] A. M. Franz, T. Haidegger, W. Birkfellner, K. Cleary, T. M. Peters and L. Maier-Hein, "Electromagnetic Tracking in Medicine—A Review of Technology, Validation, and Applications," in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1702-1725, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2321777.

[9] Robert A. Conner, (2019). Smart clothing for ambulatory motion capture (US10321873B2)

[10] Robert A. Conner, (2020). Smart clothing with converging/diverging bend or stretch sensors for measuring body motion or configuration (US10716510B2)

[11] Geof Auchinlek, Paul Sharman (2017). Method for calibrating apparatus or monitoring rehabilitation from joint surgery. (US10456075B2)

[12] Bendlabs, “Soft Angular Displacement Sensor Theory Manual,” ad Theory Guide, June 2022

[13] Bendlabs, “2-Axis Datasheet,” Bend Labs Flexible Soft Sensor (2-axis), June 2022

[14] Jing, Ran. BendLab Sensor Interview. Interviewed by Ilyoung Yang. 12 Oct. 2024. Personal Interview

18 of 34

Citations

[1] McArdle, W.D.; Katch, F.I.; Katch, V.L. “Essentials of Exercise Physiology;” Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2006.

[2] Edriss, S.; Romagnoli, C.; Caprioli, L.; Zanela, A.; Panichi, E.; Campoli, F.; Padua, E.; Annino, G.; Bonaiuto, V. “The Role of Emergent Technologies in the Dynamic and Kinematic Assessment of Human Movement in Sport and Clinical Applications.” Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14031012

[3] Tan, Emily. “Roberto Tron: Redefining Health Care for Aging America.” College of Engineering Roberto Tron Redefining Health Care for Aging America Comments, Sept. 2024.

[4] Jones CH, Dolsten M. Healthcare on the brink: navigating the challenges of an aging society in the United States. NPJ Aging. 2024 Apr 6;10(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41514-024-00148-2. Erratum in: NPJ Aging. 2024 May 10;10(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41514-024-00153-5. PMID: 38582901; PMCID: PMC10998868.

[5] Tron, Roberto. Customer Interview. Interview by G. Bartolomei, A. Chen, I. Garcia, W. Yan, I. Yang, 24 Sept. 2024. Personal interview.

[6] Mesquita, Inês Albuquerque, Pedro Filipe Pereira da Fonseca, Ana Rita Vieira Pinheiro, Miguel Fernando Paiva Velhote Correia, and Cláudia Isabel Costa da Silva. 2019. “Methodological Considerations for Kinematic Analysis of Upper Limbs in Healthy and Poststroke Adults Part II: A Systematic Review of Motion Capture Systems and Kinematic Metrics.” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 26 (6): 464–72. doi:10.1080/10749357.2019.1611221.

[7] Samatas, G.G.; Pachidis, T.P. “Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) in Mobile Robots over the Last Five Years: A Review”. Designs 2022, 6, 17. doi.org/10.3390/designs6010017

[8] A. M. Franz, T. Haidegger, W. Birkfellner, K. Cleary, T. M. Peters and L. Maier-Hein, "Electromagnetic Tracking in Medicine—A Review of Technology, Validation, and Applications," in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1702-1725, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2321777.

[9] Robert A. Conner, (2019). Smart clothing for ambulatory motion capture (US10321873B2)

[10] Robert A. Conner, (2020). Smart clothing with converging/diverging bend or stretch sensors for measuring body motion or configuration (US10716510B2)

[11] Geof Auchinlek, Paul Sharman (2017). Method for calibrating apparatus or monitoring rehabilitation from joint surgery. (US10456075B2)

[12] Bendlabs, “Soft Angular Displacement Sensor Theory Manual,” ad Theory Guide, June 2022

[13] Bendlabs, “2-Axis Datasheet,” Bend Labs Flexible Soft Sensor (2-axis), June 2022

[14] Jing, Ran. BendLab Sensor Interview. Interviewed by Ilyoung Yang. 12 Oct. 2024. Personal Interview

19 of 34

Citations

[15] Hyeokhyen Kwon, Gregory D. Abowd, Harish Kashyap Haresamudram, Thomas Ploetz, Eu Gen Catherine Tong, Yan Gao, Nicholas Lane (2022). Method and system for automatic extraction of virtual on-body inertial measurement units. (US20220066544A1)

[16] Biosensics. “LEGSys.” Biosensics, Oct. 21 2024. Accessed:

[17] Biosensics. “PAMSys.” Biosensics, Oct. 21 2024. Accessed:

[18] Wearable X. “How It Works.” Wearable X, Oct. 21 2024. Accessed:

[19] Movella. “Rehabilitation Applications in Health and Sports.” Movella, Oct. 21 2024.

[20] K. Zhou, Z.Y. Wu, “Strain gauge placement optimization for structural performance assessment”, Engineering Structures Volume 141, 2017, Pages 184-197, ISSN 0141-0296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.031.

[21] 2-axis soft flex sensor. 2-Axis Soft Flexible Sensor - Nitto Bend Technologies. (n.d.). https://www.nitto.com/us/en/nbt/products/2-axis-soft-flex-sensor/

[22] Industries, A. (n.d.-c). Round high force sensitive resistor (FSR) - 1 ~ 100 Newton force. adafruit industries blog RSS. https://www.adafruit.com/product/5475

[23] Industries, A. (n.d.-a). Adafruit 9-DOF absolute orientation IMU Fusion Breakout - BNO055. adafruit industries blog RSS. https://www.adafruit.com/product/2472

[24] Industries, A. (n.d.). Adafruit HUZZAH32 – esp32 feather board. adafruit industries blog RSS. https://www.adafruit.com/product/3405

[25] International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), "Degrees of protection provided by enclosures (IP Code)," IEC 60529:1989+A1:1999+A2:2013, 2013.

20 of 34

Appendix

  1. Problem Statement
  2. Research Overview
  3. Functional Analysis and Benchmarking
  4. Competitive Assessment
  5. Customer Requirements
  6. Concept Down Selection
  7. Prototype Definition
  8. Ground Truth Testing
  9. Functionality Testing
  10. Deliverables and Achievements

21 of 34

Project 180

4

Problem Statement

Monitoring mobility decline in elderly patients outside of controlled environments presents significant challenges regarding usability. Existing motion capture technologies such as computer vision, IMUs, and EM systems are intrusive and require complex setup in order to achieve accurate results, making them impractical for independent everyday use. These limitations create a gap between the need for accurate, non-invasive motion tracking in unstructured environments and the previously implemented solutions. This affects the ability to monitor human motion over extended periods, essential for diagnosing mobility decline in aging populations.

22 of 34

Project 180

5

Research Overview

Traditional Systems:

  • Optical [6]
    • Require significant processing power
    • Struggle in cluttered environments
    • Markerless systems remain underdeveloped and less validated.�
  • Inertial [7]
    • Compact, but prone to drift and require recalibration
    • Widely used for long-term health monitoring�
  • Electromagnetic [8]
    • Accurate in real-time tracking
    • limited by interference and the need for unobstructed space.

Project Approach:

  • BendLab Capacitance Sensor [9] [12]
    • Medical-grade silicone elastomer
    • Differential capacitance measurement
    • Path Independence ���������
  • Hybrid System
    • Inertial Measurement Units
      • Gait measurement
    • Force-Pressure Sensor
      • Postural state

23 of 34

Functional Analysis and Benchmarking

Project 180

Primary Function:

Monitor and track human motion in unstructured environments

Data Collection

Data Transmission and Storage

User Interaction

Power Management

Durability

Measure joint angles

Transmit data to a doctor or caregiver

Enable easy setup and correct positioning of sensors

Recharge the battery daily

Ensure clothing meets IPX4 standards for water resistance

Gait Measurements

Store data for later use or analysis

Design an intuitive user interface

Ensure a battery life of at least 8 hours

Allow the clothing to endure washing cycles without damaging the embedded sensors

Postural States

Auto-calibrate sensor settings

Auto-calibrate at the start of the day

Enable fast and simple charging

Form Factor

6

24 of 34

Project 180

7

Competitive Assessment

IMU: Inertial Measurement Unit

Product

Overview (location worn and system)

Main Performance Metrics

Advantages

Limitations

LEGSys [16]

(medical)

Shin and leg

2-5 IMUs

Gait: stride time and length, thigh and knee range of motion, center of mass sway, steps to reach steady state

Comprehensive measurement system: quick gait and walking assessments

Easy set up and use

Short term use

$2,750

PAMSys [17]

(medical)

Neck/chest area

9 axis IMU, accelerometer, altimeter, 2 microphones

Postural transitions: walk, run, sit. stand

Gait parameters

Sleep quality and falls

Comprehensive measurement system: long term health monitoring

6 week battery life

$2500

Smart Yoga Pants [18] (sports performance)

Legs and lower abdomen

Sensors embedded in pants

Stride length and walking speed

Sitting vs. standing

Knee bending angle

Easy to wear/use

Real time feedback

$299

Purpose: guidance during yoga practice

Limited measurement

25 of 34

Project 180

Customer Requirements

3

Customer Requirement

Specifications

Be able to record data for at least a full day

Battery Life

≥ 8 hours

Be easy to charge

Charging (time to plug in)

<15s

A short sensor calibration period is acceptable when the device is turned on

Calibration Time

< 2 min

Be able to withstand everyday wear and tear as well as washing

Durability

Meet IPX4 Standard

Be able to log sensor data for 3 weeks of use

Storage Capacity

(estimate)

5Gb

Easy to correctly put on and align sensors with minimal adjustment (for an elderly patient with slightly limited mobility

Setup Time

< 2 min

The product should measure:

sitting time, standing time, movement time, joint angle, movement speed

Joint Angle Measurement

0° to 180°, ±5° accuracy

Movement Speed

0-5 km/h, ±0.5 km/h accuracy

26 of 34

Project 180

13

Concept Down Selection

Technical Challenge

Key Criteria

Candidate Concepts

Sensing

Accuracy, Durability, Power Consumption, Size

Capacitance Sensor, Strain Gauge, IMU, Ultrasonic

Processing

Performance, Compatibility, Tools/ Support, Size

Arduino, ESP-32, Raspberry Pi

User Interface

Accessibility, Power Consumption, User Feedback

Custom App, LED array, Voice Guidance, Web Dashboard

Form Factor

Comfort, Weight, Fit, Lifestyle Compatibility

Harness, Knee Brace, Leggings

Durability

Washability, Reliability, Style, Cost

Waterproof Coating, Removable Strip, Sealed Housings

Down Selection Methodology:

Used Pugh Matrices to evaluate technical challenges in sensing, data processing, durability, user interface, and form factor. For each technical challenge key criteria were weighted and used to assess each candidate concept.

27 of 34

Project 180

16

Prototype Definition

Item

Unit Price ($)

Quantity

Component Cost ($)

Bendlab Capacitance Sensor

50

4

200

BNO055 IMU

34.95

1

34.95

FSR Pressure Sensor

4.95

2

9.9

ESP 32

19.95

1

19.95

5000 mAh Li-ion Battery

21

1

21

SanDisk SD Card

9.82

1

9.82

UMLife micro SDHC

8.89

1

8.89

DFPlayer Mini MP3 Module

9.9

1

9.9

Visaton FR 8 Speaker

22.28

1

22.28

Leggings

29.99

1

29.99

Elastic Fabric

9.92

1

9.92

Velcro Straps

0.33

20

6.6

Snap Buttons

0.44

20

8.8

Prototype Cost:

$ 392.00

28 of 34

Project 180

11

Prototype Evaluation: Ground Truth Testing

Testing Setup:

ACL Brace placed over Bendlab Sensor to compare joint angle measurements

29 of 34

Project 180

11

Prototype Evaluation:

30 of 34

Project 180

11

Prototype Evaluation:

31 of 34

Project 180

11

Prototype Evaluation:

32 of 34

Project 180

11

Prototype Evaluation:

33 of 34

Project 180

11

Prototype Evaluation: Functionality Tests

Pose-estimation layover real-time video**

Walking Test

  • Begin standing and stationary

  • Walk forward 10 steps

  • Walk backward 10 steps

  • Repeat twice

34 of 34

Project 180

11

Deliverables and Achievements

Specifications

Battery Life

≥ 8 hours

Charging (time to plug in)

<15s

Calibration Time

< 2 min

Durability

Meet IPX4 Standard

Storage Capacity

16Gb

Setup Time

< 2 min

Joint Angle Measurement

0° to 180°, ±5° accuracy

Movement Speed

0-5 km/h, ±0.5 km/h accuracy